A Smart Water Bottle and Companion App (HidrateSpark 3) to Improve Bladder-Filling Compliance in Patients With Prostate Cancer Receiving Radiotherapy: Nonrandomized Trial of Feasibility and Acceptability

BACKGROUND

Patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiation therapy (RT) need comfortably full bladders to reduce toxicities during treatment. Poor compliance is common with standard of care written or verbal instructions, leading to wasted patient value (PV) and clinic resources via poor throughput efficiency (TE).

OBJECTIVE

Herein, we assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a smartphone-based behavioral intervention (SBI) to improve bladder-filling compliance and methods for quantifying PV and TE.

METHODS

In total, 36 patients with prostate cancer were enrolled in a single-institution, closed-access, nonrandomized feasibility trial. The SBI consists of a fully automated smart water bottle and smartphone app. Both pieces alert the patient to empty his bladder and drink a personalized volume goal, based on simulation bladder volume, 1.25 hours before his scheduled RT. Patients were trained to adjust their volume goal and notification times to achieve comfortably full bladders. The primary end point was met if qualitative (QLC) and quantitative compliance (QNC) were >80%. For QLC, patients were asked if they prepared their bladders before daily RT. QNC was met if bladder volumes on daily cone-beam tomography were >75% of the simulation's volume. The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire (SUTAQ) was given in person pre- and post-SBI. Additional acceptability and engagement end points were met if >3 out of 5 across 4 domains on the SUTAQ and >80% (15/18) of patients used the device >50% of the time, respectively. Finally, the impact of SBI on PV and TE was measured by time spent in a clinic and on the linear accelerator (linac), respectively, and contrasted with matched controls.

RESULTS

QLC was 100% in 375 out of 398 (94.2%) total treatments, while QNC was 88.9% in 341 out of 398 (85.7%) total treatments. Of a total score of 5, patients scored 4.33 on privacy concerns, 4 on belief in benefits, 4.56 on satisfaction, and 4.24 on usability via SUTAQ. Further, 83% (15/18) of patients used the SBI on >50% of treatments. Patients in the intervention arm spent less time in a clinic (53.24, SEM 1.71 minutes) compared to the control (75.01, SEM 2.26 minutes) group (P<.001). Similarly, the intervention arm spent less time on the linac (10.67, SEM 0.40 minutes) compared to the control (14.19, SEM 0.32 minutes) group (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This digital intervention trial showed high rates of bladder-filling compliance and engagement. High patient value and TE were feasibly quantified by shortened clinic times and linac usage, respectively. Future studies are needed to evaluate clinical outcomes, patient experience, and cost-benefit.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04946214; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04946214.

Study on the recovery of bladder function in patients with cervical cancer after operation by portable ultrasound combined

BACKGROUND

Postoperative urination dysfunction is a common complication after surgery in patients with cervical cancer. Portable bladder ultrasound are commonly utilized in clinical practice for measuring residual urine volume. This study aimed to the effect of bladder function training combined with portable ultrasound monitoring on bladder function recovery in patients with cervical cancer after training.

METHODS

A total of 40 postoperative patients with cervical cancer were randomly divided into a control group (A) and an experimental group (B) of 20 cases each. Group A was given routine postoperative care, while group B was given bladder function training. Urgent urine bladder volume were taken twice daily after removal of the urinary catheter and monitored for five consecutive days. The difference of urgent urine bladder volume and bladder filling rate were compared by t-test and chi-square test respectively. The 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to evaluate the quality of life of patients before and after intervention, and compared by Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in preoperative urgent urine volume between the two groups. After catheter removal, the bladder volume of patients in the B increased, while the bladder volume of patients in the A increased less and fluctuated greatly. The bladder filling rate in the A was significantly lower than that in the B (5/15 vs 17/18, p < 0.05). After intervention, the quality of life of the experimental group was better than that of the control group, including scores of general health, mental health, vitality, and physical role (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative cervical cancer patients trained to hold urine by portable ultrasound monitoring are able to recover bladder function.

Does a patient-specific bladder-filling protocol affect bladder volume and dose in postprostatectomy radiotherapy?

PURPOSE

Our aim is to develop a patient-specific bladder-filling protocol (PSP) using an ultrasound-based bladder scanner (BS) and compare the volumetric and dosimetric parameters with those of the standard filling protocol (SP) in postprostatectomy patients.

METHODS

Twenty postprostatectomy patients who received salvage radiotherapy (72 Gy/36 fx) were included. For PSP, the patient was asked to drink 500 mL of water after emptying his bladder. Bladder volume was measured using BS every 10 min. Each patient's unique time to reach a 150-200 cc volume was used for simulation and treatment. For the SP, the patient was asked about the feeling of having a full bladder. Organs at risk (OAR) were contoured on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans that were transferred to the treatment planning system (TPS). Treatment plans were applied to CBCTs. Changes in bladder volume and doses for planning computed tomography (PCT) and CBCT were determined.

RESULTS

In the SP, there was no significant difference in mean bladder volume for PCT and CBCT (p = 0.139); however, there was a trend for significance in the mean bladder dose (p = 0.074). In PSP, there was no significant difference in the mean bladder volume or dose for PCT and CBCT (p = 0.139 and p = 0.799, respectively). There was a significant difference in terms of mean CBCT bladder volume between the two protocols (p = 0.007), whereas no significant difference was detected in terms of bladder dose (p = 0.130).

CONCLUSION

With PSP, optimal bladder filling was obtained and maintained throughout the whole treatment course, and it was reproducible in every fraction.

[Benefits and limitations of using a portable ultrasound scanner (bladderscan) in pelvic radiotherapy. Narrative review of the literature]

PURPOSE

The reproducibility of bladder filling influences the target volume position for pelvis radiotherapy. The objective of this study was to summarize the current knowledge on the use of portable echograph systems named Bladderscan (BS) in this context.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Review of the PubMed and Google Scholar publication databases was performed between September 2020 and April 2021. Results of this research were filtered in accordance to a set of eligibility criterias and are presented in this article.

RESULTS

Keyword search yielded a total of 2407 publications, which filtered down to 10 relevant articles in accordance to the eligibility criterias. These publications described the viability of the BS measures as well as their clinical and organizational repercussions.

CONCLUSION

According to multiple studies, BS allows to measure the bladder volume before each radiotherapy session. The use of BS decreases the amount of Cone Beam Computer Tomography potentially rejected due to non-conformed bladder filling, and improve the throughput of patients.

[Usefulness of an Ultrasound System with Automatic Bladder Urine Volume Measurement Using Artificial Intelligence Technology in Radiotherapy]

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the usefulness of iViz air ver.4 Convex (FUJIFILM, Tokyo) as a tool to determine the bladder capacity before prostate radiotherapy by comparing it with the existing BladderScan BVI 6100 (Verathon Inc., Bothell, Washington).

METHODS

We investigated the usefulness of iViz air as a tool to determine the bladder capacity before prostate radiotherapy by comparing it with the current BladderScan.

RESULTS

The absolute value of each error rate was approximately 30.9%±27.2% and 26.4%±18.9% for the BladderScan and iViz air, respectively, with no significant differences between the instruments (p=0.16). Evaluated by urine volume, the mean error rates for bladder volumes >50 ml were 26.9%±19.0% and 26.1%±18.5% for the Bladder Scan and iViz air, respectively, with no significant differences (p=0.56). However, the BladderScan and iViz air had significantly higher error rates of 89.5%±52.5% and 31.5%±25.1%, respectively, if the bladder volume was <50 ml (p=0.005).

CONCLUSION

The iViz air has limited measurement error to confirm images, especially in limited volumes, suggesting that it is a useful bladder capacity measurement device in performing prostate radiotherapy.

Bladder filling volume variation between the first and second day of planning computed tomography for prostate cancer radiation therapy and correlation with renal function

AIM

During radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer, bladder filling helps exclude the organ from irradiation and reduces adverse effects. For RT planning, we performed computed tomography (CT) for 2 consecutive days to evaluate inter-day variations in organs such as the bladder. However, the patient factors that are associated with large intra-patient variations in bladder filling volume prior to RT are not known.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 97 prostate cancer patients who underwent CT for 2 consecutive days for RT planning between March 2015 and March 2020 and with confirmed water intake volume before the scans. Patients consumed 500 ml of water immediately after urination and underwent CT 30 min after the start of water intake; CT was performed under similar conditions over 2 consecutive days. Patient information was collected from the medical records taken before CT.

RESULTS

The median bladder filling volume was 102.8 cm³ (range: 31.7-774.0), and the median intra-patient bladder filling volume variation was 23.4 cm³ (range: 0.4-277.7). Univariate analysis revealed that the intra-patient variation was significantly larger in patients with an eGFR higher than the median (p = 0.003). No other factor showed correlations with the variation. As the larger bladder filling volume of the 2 consecutive days in patients increased (median 121.5 cm³ , range: 47.8-774.0), the intra-patient variation also increased.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a higher eGFR show greater variation in bladder filling volume, and caution should be exercised when applying RT in these patients.

Abnormal deviation in the measurement of residual urine volume using a portable ultrasound bladder scanner: a case report

In addition to being suitable for the assessment of residual urine volume, the use of a portable bladder scanner can also assist medical staff in developing a reasonable urination plan. Portable scanners can help medical personnel to estimate the height and/or relaxation of the bladder neck for pelvic floor muscle training, assist in the efficacy evaluation of muscarinic antagonists in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity, and even determine whether the urine in the bladder of pediatric patients meets the criteria for catheterization to obtain urine samples. However, in the case described herein, we encountered abnormal deviation between the data measured by a portal bladder scanner and actual catheterization. The patient was a 65-year-old male suffering spinal nerve dysfunction due to tuberculous meningitis. He had functional dysuria and a history of liver cirrhosis, accompanied by a large amount of ascites. We therefore deduced that the deviation in the scanning data was attributable to the ascites. After the patient’s ascites had resolved, the residual urine volume obtained via scanning evaluation was comparable to that obtained through catheterization. Our case shows that in the event of abnormal deviation in portable bladder scanner measurements, clinical judgements should be made based on the patient’s condition rather than the scanning results alone.

Overview of patient preparation strategies to manage internal organ motion during radiotherapy in the pelvis

Introduction:

Pelvic internal organs change in volume and position during radiotherapy. This may compromise the efficacy of treatment or worsen its toxicity. There may be limitations to fully correcting these changes using online image guidance; therefore, effective and consistent patient preparation and positioning remain important. This review aims to provide an overview of the extent of pelvic organ motion and strategies to manage this motion.

Methods and Materials:

Given the breadth of this topic, a systematic review was not undertaken. Instead, existing systematic reviews and individual high-quality studies addressing strategies to manage pelvic organ motion have been discussed. Suggested levels of evidence and grades of recommendation for each strategy have been applied.

Results:

Various strategies to manage rectal changes have been investigated including diet and laxatives, enemas and rectal emptying tubes and rectal displacement with endorectal balloons (ERBs) and rectal spacers. Bladder-filling protocols and bladder ultrasound have been used to try to standardise bladder volume. Positioning the patient supine, using a full bladder and positioning prone with or without a belly board, has been examined in an attempt to reduce the volume of irradiated small bowel. Some randomised trials have been performed, with evidence to support the use of ERBs, rectal spacers, bladder-filling protocols and the supine over prone position in prostate radiotherapy. However, there was a lack of consistent high-quality evidence that would be applicable to different disease sites within the pelvis. Many studies included small numbers of patients were non-randomised, used less conformal radiotherapy techniques or did not report clinical outcomes such as toxicity.

Conclusions:

There is uncertainty as to the clinical benefit of many of the commonly adopted interventions to minimise pelvic organ motion. Given this and the limitations in online image guidance compensation, further investigation of adaptive radiotherapy strategies is required.

Positional uncertainty of vaginal cuff and feasibility of implementing portable bladder scanner in postoperative cervical cancer patients

PURPOSE

To propose a geometrical margin for definition of the vaginal cuff PTV using only CT images of the full bladder (CT_full) in postoperative cervical cancer patients.

METHODS

Twenty-nine operated cervical cancer patients underwent volumetric arc therapy with a bladder filling protocol. This study assessed bladder filling using a portable bladder scanner and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) during the entire treatment period. The measured bladder volumes with a BladderScan® were compared with the delineated volume on CBCT. Titanium clips in the vaginal cuff were analysed to assess geometrical uncertainty and the influence of rectal and bladder volume changes.

RESULTS

BladderScan® showed good agreement with the delineated volume (R = 0.80). The volume changes in the bladder have a greater influence on the clip displacements than in the rectum. The 95th percentile of uncertainty of the clips in reference to CT_full in the right-left (RL), the superoinferior (SI), and the anteroposterior (AP) was 0.32, 0.65, and 1.15 cm, respectively. From this result and intra-fractional movements of the vaginal cuff reported by Haripotepornkul, a new geometrical margin was proposed for definition of the vaginal cuff planning target volume (PTV): 0.5, 0.9, and 1.4 cm in the RL, SI, and AP directions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A new geometrical margin was proposed for definition of the vaginal cuff PTV based on CT_full, which will be needless of empty bladder at the planning CT scan. This method allows patients to reduce the burden and efficient routine CT scans can be improved.

Implementation of ultrasound bladder volume scanning for patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy to the cervix or endometrium: clinical experiences from a United Kingdom radiotherapy department

Background and purpose

Achieving daily consistent bladder volume is acknowledged as challenging for patients undergoing radiotherapy to the cervix or endometrium. We investigated if use of an ultrasound bladder volume scanner (BioCon-700) improves bladder reproducibility when used during an active volume correction protocol.

Materials and methods

During our method-comparison study, prospectively recruited patients (n=20) followed a fluid-loading protocol to achieve acceptable bladder volume. Bladder ultrasound was performed daily to verify planned volume, with patients actively correcting volumes outside a planned range up to a maximum of three times. Using the Bland–Altman method, we compared mean ultrasound readings (USMean) with mean cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) volumes (CBCTMean). We also conducted staff focus groups exploring issues encountered during implementation of bladder scanning.

Results

Comparing USMean with CBCTMean produced a mean of the differences −10±49·92 mL (1 SD), demonstrating that bladder volume scanning is equivalent to our standard measure for the stated confidence levels. The cohort mean bladder volume decrease from week 1 to 5 was only 8·4%. Mean USMean was 323 mL, mean CBCTMean was 313 mL. Staff experience with the scanner overall was positive.

Conclusions

The BioCon-700 is suitable for the purpose of daily pre-treatment volume verification, facilitating daily assessment and modification of bladder volume, resulting in reproducible treatment volumes.