Expression of NO Synthase Under Medication with Cyclosporine A, Mycophenolate Mofetil, and Tacrolimus during Development of Transplant Vasculopathy on Rat Cardiac Allograft

Urinary nitrate concentration as a marker for kidney transplant rejection

BACKGROUND

Early identification and treatment of kidney transplant rejection episodes is vital to limit loss of function and prolong the life of the transplanted kidney and recipient. Current practice depends on detecting a creatinine rise. A biomarker to diagnose transplant rejection at an earlier time point than current practice, or to inform earlier decision making to biopsy, could be transformative. It has previously been shown that urinary nitrate concentration is elevated in renal transplant rejection. Nitrate is a nitric oxide (NO) oxidation product. Transplant rejection upregulates NO synthesis via inducible nitric oxide synthase leading to elevations in urinary nitrate concentration. We have recently validated a urinary nitrate concentration assay which could provide results in a clinically relevant timeframe. Our aim was to determine whether urinary nitrate concentration is a useful tool to predict renal transplant rejection in the context of contemporary clinical practice.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study, recruiting renal transplant participants over an 18-month period. We made no alterations to the patients' clinical care including medications, immunosuppression, diet and frequency of visits. We collected urine samples from every clinical attendance. We assessed the urinary nitrate to creatinine ratio (uNCR) between patient groups: routine attendances, biopsy proven rejection, biopsy proven no rejection and other call backs. uNCR was examined over time for those with biopsy proven transplant rejection. These four groups were compared using an ANOVA test.

RESULTS

A total of 2656 samples were collected. uNCR during biopsy proven rejection, n = 15 (median 49 μmol/mmol, IQR 23-61) was not significantly different from that of routine samples, n = 164 (median 55 μmol/mmol, IQR 37-82) (p = 0.55), or biopsy proven no rejection, n = 12 (median 39 μmol/mmol, IQR 21-89) (P = 0.77). Overall uNCR was highly variable with no diagnostic threshold for kidney transplant rejection. Furthermore, within-patient uNCR was highly variable over time, and thus it was not possible to produce individualised patient thresholds to identify rejection. The total taking Tacrolimus was 204 patients, with no statistical difference between the uNCR of all those on Tacrolimus, against those not, p = 0.18.

CONCLUSION

The urinary nitrate to creatinine ratio is not a useful biomarker for renal transplant rejection.

Low Nasal NO in Congenital Heart Disease With Systemic Right Ventricle and Postcardiac Transplantation

Background

NO bioavailability has not been systematically examined in congenital heart disease (CHD). To assess NO in patients with CHD, we measured nasal NO (nNO) generated by the nasal epithelia, given blood NO is difficult to measure (half‐life, <2 ms). Given NO's role in hemodynamic regulation and the association of NO bioavailability with heart failure risk, we hypothesized NO levels may differ with varying severity of CHD physiologic characteristics.

Methods and Results

Six‐hundred eighteen subjects, 483 with CHD and 135 controls, had nNO measured noninvasively via the nares using American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines. Subjects were dichotomized as having low or normal nNO based on age‐specific cutoff values. Prevalence of low nNO was examined by various CHD physiologic feature types. Low nNO was more prevalent with CHD than controls (odds ratio, 2.28; P=0.001). A logistic regression model showed overall significance (P=0.035) for single ventricle, systemic right ventricle, ventricular dysfunction, oxygen desaturation, and heterotaxy predicting low nNO, with systemic right ventricle independently having twice the odds of low nNO (odds ratio, 2.04; P=0.014). Patients with low nNO had a higher risk of experiencing heart transplant or death (hazard ratio, 2.75; P=0.048), and heart transplant recipients (N=16) exhibited 5 times the odds of low nNO (69% versus 30%; odds ratio, 5.1; P=0.001).

Conclusions

Patients with CHD have increased prevalence of low nNO, with highest odds seen with systemic right ventricle and heart transplant. Further studies are needed to investigate heart failure risks in patients with CHD with left versus right systemic ventricle physiologic characteristics and utility of low nNO for predicting heart failure risk.