Phenotypic characteristics contributing to the enhanced growth of Escherichia coli bloom strains

The efficacy of current treatment processes to remove, inactivate, or reduce environmental bloom-forming Escherichia coli

Escherichia coli is excreted in high numbers from the intestinal tract of humans, other mammals, and birds. Traditionally, it had been thought that E. coli could grow only within human or animal hosts and would perish in the environment. Therefore, the presence of E. coli in water has become universally accepted as a key water quality indicator of fecal pollution. However, recent research challenges the assumption that the presence of E. coli in water is always an indicator of fecal contamination, with some types of E. coli having evolved to survive and grow in aquatic environments. These strains can form blooms in water storages, resulting in high E. coli counts even without fecal contamination. Although these bloom-forming strains lack virulence genes and pose little threat to public health, their presence in treated water triggers the same response as fecal-derived E. coli. Yet, little is known about the effectiveness of treatment processes in removing or inactivating them. This study evaluated the effectiveness of current treatment processes to remove bloom-forming strains, in comparison to fecal-derived strains, with conventional coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation and filtration investigated. Second, the effectiveness of current disinfection processes-chlorination, chloramination, and ultraviolet (UV) light to disinfect bloom-forming strains in comparison to fecal-derived strains-was assessed. These experiments showed that the responses of bloom isolates were not significantly different from those of fecal E. coli strains. Therefore, commonly used water treatment and disinfection processes are effective to remove bloom-forming E. coli strains from water.IMPORTANCEThe presence of Escherichia coli in water has long been used globally as a key indicator of fecal pollution and for quantifying water safety. Traditionally, it was believed that E. coli could only thrive within hosts and would perish outside, making its presence in water indicative of fecal contamination. However, recent research has unveiled strains of E. coli capable of surviving and proliferating in aquatic environments, forming blooms even in the absence of fecal contamination. While these bloom-forming strains lack the genes to be pathogenic, their detection in source or drinking water triggers the same response as fecal-derived E. coli. Yet, little is known about the efficacy of treatment processes in removing them. This study evaluated the effectiveness of conventional treatment and disinfection processes in removing bloom-forming strains compared to fecal-derived strains. Results indicate that these commonly used processes are equally effective against both types of E. coli, reassuring that bloom-forming E. coli strains can be eliminated from water.

Factors influencing the persistence of enteropathogenic bacteria in wetland habitats and implications for water quality

AIMS

To better understand the persistence dynamics of enteropathogenic bacteria in freshwater wetland habitats, we constructed lab-scale mesocosms planted with two different wetland plant species using a subsurface flow wetland design. Mesocosms were treated with either a high-quality or a poor-quality water source to examine the effects of water quality exposure and plant species on Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp. and Enterococcus spp. in the rhizoplane, rhizosphere and water of wetland habitats.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Quantities of study micro-organisms were detected using real-time PCR in wetland mesocosms. A combination of molecular and culture-based methods was also used to enumerate these organisms from surface water and plant material at high, medium and poor water quality sites in the field. We found that all three enteropathogenic micro-organisms were influenced by microhabitat type and plant species. Organisms differed with respect to their predominant microhabitat and the extent of persistence associated with wetland plant species in the mesocosm study. Of the monitored pathogens, only E. coli was influenced by both water quality treatment and plant species. Salmonella spp. quantities in the rhizoplane consistently increased in all treatments over the course of the mesocosm experiment.

CONCLUSIONS

Plant species selection appears to be an overlooked aspect of constructed wetland design with respect to the removal of enteropathogenic micro-organisms. Escherichia coli and Enterococcus concentrations in wetland outflow were significantly different between the two plant species tested, with Enterococcus concentrations being significantly higher in mesocosms planted with Phalaris arundinaceae and E. coli concentrations being higher in mesocosms planted with Veronica anagallis-aquatica. Furthermore, there is evidence that the rhizoplane is a significant reservoir for Salmonella spp. within wetland habitats.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

This is the first time that Salmonella spp. has been shown to proliferate under natural conditions within the rhizoplane. This will contribute to our understanding of wetland removal mechanisms for enteropathogenic bacteria. This study identifies the rhizoplane as a potentially important reservoir for human pathogenic micro-organisms and warrants additional study to establish whether this finding is applicable in non-wetland habitats.