P40 expression in small cell lung cancer: The presence of p40-positive cells does not always indicate squamous differentiation

Personalizing non-small cell lung cancer treatment through patient-derived xenograft models: preclinical and clinical factors for consideration

PURPOSE

In the pursuit of creating personalized and more effective treatment strategies for lung cancer patients, Patient-Derived Xenografts (PDXs) have been introduced as preclinical platforms that can recapitulate the specific patient's tumor in an in vivo model. We investigated how well PDX models can preserve the tumor's clinical and molecular characteristics across different generations.

METHODS

A Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) PDX model was established in NSG-SGM3 mice and clinical and preclinical factors were assessed throughout subsequent passages. Our cohort consisted of 40 NSCLC patients, which were used to create 20 patient-specific PDX models in NSG-SGM3 mice. Histopathological staining and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) analysis were preformed to understand tumor heterogeneity throughout serial passages.

RESULTS

The main factors that contributed to the growth of the engrafted PDX in mice were a higher grade or stage of disease, in contrast to the long duration of chemotherapy treatment, which was negatively correlated with PDX propagation. Successful PDX growth was also linked to poorer prognosis and overall survival, while growth pattern variability was affected by the tumor aggressiveness, primarily affecting the first passage. Pathology analysis showed preservation of the histological type and grade; however, WES analysis revealed genomic instability in advanced passages, leading to the inconsistencies in clinically relevant alterations between the PDXs and biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the impact of multiple clinical and preclinical factors on the engraftment success, growth kinetics, and tumor stability of patient-specific NSCLC PDXs, and underscores the importance of considering these factors when guiding and evaluating prolonged personalized treatment studies for NSCLC patients in these models, as well as signaling the imperative for additional investigations to determine the full clinical potential of this technique.

Diagnostic criteria and evolving molecular characterization of pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas

Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung are currently classified into two categories: small cell lung carcinoma and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Diagnostic criteria for small cell- and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma are based solely on tumor morphology; however, overlap in histologic and immunophenotypic features between the two types of carcinoma can potentially make their classification challenging. Accurate diagnosis of pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas is paramount for patient management, as clinical course and treatment differ between small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Molecular-genetic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data published over the past decade suggest that small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas are not homogeneous categories but rather comprise multiple groups of distinctive malignancies. Nuances in the susceptibility of small cell lung carcinoma subtypes to different chemotherapeutic regimens and the discovery of targetable mutations in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma suggest that classification and treatment of neuroendocrine carcinomas may be informed by ancillary molecular and protein expression testing going forward. This review summarizes current diagnostic criteria, prognostic and predictive correlates of classification, and evidence of previously unrecognized subtypes of small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Small-Cell Carcinoma of the Lung: What We Learned about It?

Small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is a high-grade aggressive disease that belongs to the neuroendocrine (NE) group of lung tumors that also includes typical carcinoid, atypical carcinoid, and large-cell NE carcinoma. SCLC has specific histological diagnostic criteria that are sometimes troublesome to be assessed in cytological samples that indeed represent the most frequent source of diagnostic material due to the typical advanced presentation at the onset of SCLC. However, cytological preparations could be in some instances more reliable than histology due to the better preservation of nuclear details. Cytological criteria for diagnosis of SCLC include high cellularity, small cell size, scant cytoplasm, coarsely granulated chromatin with "salt-and-pepper" appearance, inconspicuous or absent nucleoli, Azzopardi crush effect, and necrotic debris in the background. Despite being distinctive, these features could be incomplete to differentiate SCLC with other small-cell neoplasia. Therefore, immunocytochemical determination of diagnostic biomarkers is crucial to achieve a confident diagnosis. Furthermore, recent findings on molecular and transcriptomic studies of SCLC revealed the potential rise of new predictive and prognostic biomarkers that, whenever validated by immunocytochemistry, may potentially assist to tailor the best therapy, including immune checkpoint inhibition.

Oral sarcomatoid squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study based on 14 cases

The treatment outcomes for oral sarcomatoid squamous cell carcinoma (OSSCC) are far from satisfactory in our hospital. The aim of this study was to retrospectively summarize the OSSCC cases admitted to our department. From 2003 to 2017, 14 patients were hospitalized and diagnosed with OSSCC. We summarized and analysed the medical histories, diagnostic examinations, treatment strategies, and clinical outcomes of the involved cases. Of the 14 cases, 8 were located in the gingiva. The imageological diagnosis identified the existence of a mass with an infiltrative morphology pre-operatively. The cytopathologic features revealed a malignant neoplasm with a mixture of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) components and spindle cell neoplastic components. To confirm the diagnosis of OSSCC, the use of the immunohistochemical markers AE1/AE3 and Vimentin were more indicative. Complete follow-up data were available for 12 patients, and at the last follow-up, all 12 of the patients had died. The median overall survival for these patients was 11.67 months (range: 3-24 months). OSSCC patients respond poorly to the strategies solely referring to experiences from oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) treatment. The effective diagnosis and treatment of OSSCC at an early stage is necessary. The treatment for OSSCC still poses a great challenge for clinical oncologists.