1
|
Suleiman NN, Luedi MM, Joshi G, Dewinter G, Wu CL, Sauter AR. Perioperative pain management for cleft palate surgery: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) recommendations. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024; 49:635-641. [PMID: 38124208 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-105024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/IMPORTANCE Cleft palate surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain. Effective pain control can decrease stress and agitation in children undergoing cleft palate surgery and improve surgical outcomes. However, limited evidence often results in inadequate pain control after cleft palate surgery. OBJECTIVES The aim of this review was to evaluate the available evidence and to develop recommendations for optimal pain management after cleft palate surgery using procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology. EVIDENCE REVIEW MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews assessing pain in children undergoing cleft palate repair published in English language from July 2002, through August 2023. FINDINGS Of 1048 identified studies, 19 randomized controlled trials and 4 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. Interventions that improved postoperative pain, and are recommended, include suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block or palatal nerve block (if maxillary nerve block cannot be performed). Addition of dexmedetomidine to local anesthetic for suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block or, alternatively, as intravenous administration perioperatively is recommended. These interventions should be combined with a basic analgesic regimen including acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Of note, pre-incisional local anesthetic infiltration and dexamethasone were administered as a routine in several studies, however, because of limited procedure-specific evidence their contribution to pain relief after cleft palate surgery remains unknown. CONCLUSION The present review identified an evidence-based analgesic regimen for cleft palate surgery in pediatric patients. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022364788.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nergis Nina Suleiman
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Markus M Luedi
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Bern Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Cantonal Hospital of St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Girish Joshi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Geertrui Dewinter
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Section Anesthesiology, KU Leuven and University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christopher L Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Axel R Sauter
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kummer I, Lüthi A, Klingler G, Andereggen L, Urman RD, Luedi MM, Stieger A. Adjuvant Analgesics in Acute Pain - Evaluation of Efficacy. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2024; 28:843-852. [PMID: 38865074 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01276-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW Acute postoperative pain impacts a significant number of patients and is associated with various complications, such as a higher occurrence of chronic postsurgical pain as well as increased morbidity and mortality. RECENT FINDINGS Opioids are often used to manage severe pain, but they come with serious adverse effects, such as sedation, respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and impaired bowel function. Therefore, most enhanced recovery after surgery protocols promote multimodal analgesia, which includes adjuvant analgesics, to provide optimal pain control. In this article, we aim to offer a comprehensive review of the contemporary literature on adjuvant analgesics in the management of acute pain, especially in the perioperative setting. Adjuvant analgesics have proven efficacy in treating postoperative pain and reducing need for opioids. While ketamine is an established option for opioid-dependent patients, magnesium and α2-agonists have, in addition to their analgetic effect, the potential to attenuate hemodynamic responses, which make them especially useful in painful laparoscopic procedures. Furthermore, α2-agonists and dexamethasone can extend the analgesic effect of regional anesthesia techniques. However, findings for lidocaine remain inconclusive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Kummer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rescue- and Pain Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
| | - Andreas Lüthi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rescue- and Pain Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Gabriela Klingler
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rescue- and Pain Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Andereggen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital of Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Richard D Urman
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Markus M Luedi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rescue- and Pain Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Stieger
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rescue- and Pain Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Flyger SSB, Sorenson S, Pingel L, Karlsen APH, Nørskov AK, Mathiesen O, Maagaard M. Primary outcomes and anticipated effect sizes in randomised clinical trials assessing adjuncts to peripheral nerve blocks: A scoping review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2024. [PMID: 38978187 DOI: 10.1111/aas.14489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prolonging effects of adjuncts to local anaesthetics in peripheral nerve blocks have been demonstrated in randomised clinical trials. The chosen primary outcome and anticipated effect size have major impact on the clinical relevance of results in these trials. This scoping review aims to provide an overview of frequently used outcomes and anticipated effect sizes in randomised trials on peripheral nerve block adjuncts. METHODS For our scoping review, we searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL for trials assessing effects of adjuncts for peripheral nerve blocks published in 10 major anaesthesia journals. We included randomised clinical trials assessing adjuncts for single-shot ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks, regardless of the type of interventional adjunct and control group, local anaesthetic used and anatomical localization. Our primary outcome was the choice of primary outcomes and corresponding anticipated effect size used for sample size estimation. Secondary outcomes were assessor of primary outcomes, the reporting of sample size calculations and statistically significant and non-significant results related to the anticipated effect sizes. RESULTS Of 11,854 screened trials, we included 59. The most frequent primary outcome was duration of analgesia (35/59 trials, 59%) with absolute and relative median (interquartile range) anticipated effect sizes for adjunct versus placebo/no adjunct: 240 min (180-318) and 30% (25-40) and for adjunct versus active comparator: 210 min (180-308) and 17% (15-28). Adequate sample size calculations were reported in 78% of trials. Statistically significant results were reported for primary outcomes in 45/59 trials (76%), of which 22% did not reach the anticipated effect size. CONCLUSION The reported outcomes and associated anticipated effect sizes can be used in future trials on adjuncts for peripheral nerve blocks to increase methodological homogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Sofie Bitsch Flyger
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Sandra Sorenson
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Lasse Pingel
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Anders Peder Højer Karlsen
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anders Kehlet Nørskov
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Ole Mathiesen
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mathias Maagaard
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maagaard M, Funder KS, Schou NK, Penny JØ, Toquer P, Laigaard J, Stormholt ER, Nørskov AK, Jæger P, Andersen JH, Mathiesen O. Combined Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine as Adjuncts to Popliteal and Saphenous Nerve Blocks in Patients Undergoing Surgery of the Foot or Ankle: A Randomized, Blinded, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial. Anesthesiology 2024; 140:1165-1175. [PMID: 38489226 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000004977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine increase the duration of analgesia of peripheral nerve blocks. The authors hypothesized that combined intravenous dexamethasone and intravenous dexmedetomidine would result in a greater duration of analgesia when compared with intravenous dexamethasone alone and placebo. METHODS The authors randomly allocated participants undergoing surgery of the foot or ankle under general anesthesia and with a combined popliteal (sciatic) and saphenous nerve block to a combination of 12 mg dexamethasone and 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine, 12 mg dexamethasone, or placebo (saline). The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia measured as the time from block performance until the first sensation of pain in the surgical area as reported by the participant. The authors predefined a 33% difference in the duration of analgesia as clinically relevant. RESULTS A total of 120 participants from two centers were randomized and 119 analyzed for the primary outcome. The median [interquartile range] duration of analgesia was 1,572 min [1,259 to 1,715] with combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine, 1,400 min [1,133 to 1,750] with dexamethasone alone, and 870 min [748 to 1,138] with placebo. Compared with placebo, the duration was greater with combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine (difference, 564 min; 98.33% CI, 301 to 794; P < 0.001) and with dexamethasone (difference, 489 min; 98.33% CI, 265 to 706; P < 0.001). The prolongations exceeded the authors' predefined clinically relevant difference. The duration was similar when combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine was compared with dexamethasone alone (difference, 61 min; 98.33% CI, -222 to 331; P = 0.614). CONCLUSIONS Dexamethasone with or without dexmedetomidine increased the duration of analgesia in patients undergoing surgery of the foot or ankle with a popliteal (sciatic) and saphenous nerve block. Combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine did not increase the duration of analgesia when compared with dexamethasone. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Maagaard
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Kamilia S Funder
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nikolaj K Schou
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Jeannette Ø Penny
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Peter Toquer
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Jens Laigaard
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Emma R Stormholt
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Anders K Nørskov
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark; Department of Anesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-North-Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Pia Jæger
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jakob H Andersen
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ole Mathiesen
- Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maagaard M, Andersen JH, Jaeger P, Mathiesen O. Effects of combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuncts to peripheral nerve blocks: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024:rapm-2023-105098. [PMID: 38253609 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-105098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/IMPORTANCE The effects of combining dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine on block duration are unclear. OBJECTIVE To investigate the effects of combining dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine on block duration. EVIDENCE REVIEW Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, the Web of Science, and BIOSIS until June 8, 2023. RCTs with adults undergoing surgery with a peripheral nerve block randomized to combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine versus placebo or other adjuncts were eligible. Primary outcome was duration of analgesia. We performed meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, risk of bias-2, and Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation assessment. FINDINGS We included 9 RCTs with 14 eligible comparisons. The combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine was compared with placebo in three RCTs (173 participants), dexamethasone in seven (569 participants), and dexmedetomidine in four (281 participants). The duration of analgesia was likely increased with the combination versus placebo (mean difference 460 min, 95% CI 249 to 671) and versus dexmedetomidine (mean difference 388 min, 95% CI 211 to 565). The duration was likely similar with the combination versus dexamethasone (mean difference 50 min, 95% CI -140 to 239). The certainty of the evidence was moderate because most trials were at high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS Combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine likely increased the duration of analgesia when compared with placebo and dexmedetomidine. The combination likely provided a similar duration of analgesia as dexamethasone. Based on this systematic review, it seems reasonable to use dexamethasone as the sole adjunct if the goal is to increase the duration of analgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Pia Jaeger
- Department of Anaesthesia, the Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - Ole Mathiesen
- Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Koge, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rostamipoor Z, Nazemi-Rafi M, Mirafzal A, Ilka S, Hosseininasab M. Effect of oral clonidine on pain reduction in patients with opioid use disorder in the emergency department: A randomized clinical trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2023. [PMID: 37908055 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Pain can create physical and psychosocial discomfort. Pain management of patients with opioid misuse history can be challenging, in part due to their tolerance to opioids. Clonidine is an alpha-2 agonist that has been used for the reduction of anxiety and pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of oral clonidine on pain outcomes in patients with a history of opioid use disorder presenting with orthopaedic fractures in the emergency room. METHODS In this blinded clinical trial in the emergency department, 70 opioid-dependent patients with orthopaedic fractures were divided into a control group of 35 and an intervention group of 35 subjects. Initially, 0.2 mg of oral clonidine was given to the intervention group and the control group received placebo tablets. Pain levels were recorded based on the Numerical Rating Scale rating before intervention, at 30 min, 1 h after intervention and at disposition from the emergency room (3-6 h after intervention). The total morphine requirement was also recorded. RESULTS The pain score of the clonidine group was significantly lower than that of the control group at 1 h and at disposition time. The amount of morphine required was significantly reduced in the clonidine group (P < 0.05). Oral clonidine had no significant effect on pulse rate. Oral clonidine was more effective for pain reduction in lower limb injuries. CONCLUSION Oral clonidine significantly reduced pain and the need for morphine in opioid-dependent patients with orthopaedic fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Rostamipoor
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Masoomeh Nazemi-Rafi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Amirhossein Mirafzal
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Shahab Ilka
- Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Masumeh Hosseininasab
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen Z, Liu Z, Feng C, Jin Y, Zhao X. Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant in Peripheral Nerve Block. Drug Des Devel Ther 2023; 17:1463-1484. [PMID: 37220544 PMCID: PMC10200118 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s405294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Peripheral nerve block technology is important to balanced anesthesia technology. It can effectively reduce opioid usage. It is the key to enhance clinical rehabilitation as an important part of the multimodal analgesia scheme. The emergence of ultrasound technology has accelerated peripheral nerve block technology development. It can directly observe the nerve shape, surrounding tissue, and diffusion path of drugs. It can also reduce the dosage of local anesthetics by improving positioning accuracy while enhancing the block's efficacy. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective drug α2-adrenergic receptor agonist. Dexmedetomidine has the characteristics of sedation, analgesia, anti-anxiety, inhibition of sympathetic activity, mild respiratory inhibition, and stable hemodynamics. Numerous studies have revealed that dexmedetomidine in peripheral nerve blocks can shorten the onset time of anesthesia and prolong the time of sensory and motor nerve blocks. Although dexmedetomidine was approved by the European Drug Administration for sedation and analgesia in 2017, it has not yet been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It is used as a non-label drug as an adjuvant. Therefore, the risk-benefit ratio must be evaluated when using these drugs as adjuvants. This review explains the pharmacology and mechanism of dexmedetomidine, the effect of dexmedetomidine on various peripheral nerve block as an adjuvant, and compare it with other types of adjuvants. We summarized and reviewed the application progress of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant in nerve block and look forward to its future research direction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheping Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhenzhen Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, People’s Republic of China
| | - Chang Feng
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yanwu Jin
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xin Zhao
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pérez BR, Martínez CP, Jiménez CP. Thoracic transversus plane block as part of a multimodal analgesia plan in a cat undergoing sternotomy. VETERINARY RECORD CASE REPORTS 2023. [DOI: 10.1002/vrc2.586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
|