Racism Is Not a Factor in Door-to-electrocardiogram Times of Patients With Symptoms of Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Prospective, Observational Study

Race, racism, and antiracism in emergency medicine: A scoping review of the literature and research agenda for the future

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to conduct a scoping review of the literature and develop consensus-derived research priorities for future research inquiry in an effort to (1) identify and summarize existing research related to race, racism, and antiracism in emergency medicine (EM) and adjacent fields and (2) set the agenda for EM research in these topic areas.

METHODS

A scoping review of the literature using PubMed and EMBASE databases, as well as review of citations from included articles, formed the basis for discussions with community stakeholders, who in turn helped to inform and shape the discussion and recommendations of participants in the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) consensus conference. Through electronic surveys and two virtual meetings held in April 2021, consensus was reached on terminology, language, and priority research questions, which were rated on importance or impact (highest, medium, lower) and feasibility or ease of answering (easiest, moderate, difficult).

RESULTS

A total of 344 articles were identified through the literature search, of which 187 met inclusion criteria; an additional 34 were identified through citation review. Findings of racial inequities in EM and related fields were grouped in 28 topic areas, from which emerged 44 key research questions. A dearth of evidence for interventions to address manifestations of racism in EM was noted throughout.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence of racism in EM emerged in nearly every facet of our literature. Key research priorities identified through consensus processes provide a roadmap for addressing and eliminating racism and other systems of oppression in EM.

Racism Is Not a Factor in Door-to-electrocardiogram Times of Patients With Symptoms of Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Prospective, Observational Study

Background

Investigators have identified important racial identity/ethnicity‐based differences in some aspects of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care and outcomes (time to presentation, symptoms, receipt of coronary angiography/revascularization, repeat revascularization, mortality). Patient‐based differences such as pathophysiology and treatment‐seeking behavior account only partly for these outcome differences. We sought to investigate whether there are racial identity/ethnicity‐based variations in the initial emergency department (ED) triage and care of patients with suspected ACS in Canadian hospitals.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled ED patients with suspected ACS from one university‐affiliated and two community hospitals. Trained research assistants administered a standardized interview to gather data on symptoms, treatment‐seeking patterns, and self‐reported racial/ethnic identity: “white,” South Asian” (SA), “Asian,” or “Other.” Clinical parameters were obtained through chart review. The primary outcome was door‐to‐electrocardiogram (D2ECG) time. ECG times were log‐transformed and two linear regression models, controlling for important demographic, system, and clinical factors, were fit.

Results

Of 448 participants, 214 (48%) reported white identity, 115 (26%) SA, 83 (19%) Asian, and 36 (8%) “Other.” Asian respondents were younger and more likely to report initial discomfort as “low” and be accompanied by family; respondents identifying as “Other” were more likely to report initial discomfort as “high.” There was no difference in D2ECG time between white participants and all other groups, but there were statistically significant differences by sex: women had longer D2ECG times than men. Exploring more specific racial identities revealed similar findings: no significant differences between the white, SA, Asian, and other groups, while sex (women had 13.4% [95% confidence interval, 0.81%–27.57%] longer D2ECG times) remained statistically significantly different in the adjusted models.

Conclusion

Although racial/ethnicity‐based differences in aspects of ACS care have been previously identified, we found no differences in the current study of early ED care in a Canadian urban setting. However, female patients experience longer D2ECG times, and this may be a target for process improvements.