1
|
Bailey NR, Mitchell KA, Miller TM. Opioid Misuse Harm Reduction. J Addict Nurs 2024; 35:3-14. [PMID: 38373177 DOI: 10.1097/jan.0000000000000561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS The misuse of opioids by the public is a major health issue. Prescription opioids and nonprescription opioids, such as heroin and opium, are misused in epidemic proportions. When opioids are used incorrectly or illegally, they can lead to drug dependence, addiction, morbidity, and mortality. This program is in collaboration with the Jolt Foundation that provides resources to prevent opioid overdose deaths. DESIGN/METHODS This program involves community education on the dangers of opioid use and training on the use of naloxone rescue procedures to prevent overdose deaths. A pretest-posttest design was employed to determine if participants gained knowledge regarding the naloxone administration procedures. PARTICIPANTS The researcher presented 10 community naloxone trainings that included staff from 20 different social service agencies, two schools, and three local churches. Each agency received at least one naloxone kit. FINDINGS The outcomes were met and included educating 137 participants on the risk factors and signs and symptoms of opioid overdose and the proper procedure to administer naloxone. One hundred twenty-eight posttests were returned and showed that the objectives for the project were met. The overall mean score for the pretests was 65.00 ( n = 126) with a standard deviation of 19.01, and the overall mean for the posttests was 86.64 ( n = 128) with a standard deviation of 14.60. CONCLUSIONS Community social service agency staff were successfully educated to respond appropriately to overdose situations in a group training setting as evidenced by significant posttest scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy R Bailey
- Nancy R. Bailey, RN, DNP, Kimberly A. Mitchell, RN, PhD, CNE, and Theresa M. Miller, RN, PhD, Saint Francis Medical Center College of Nursing, Peoria, Illinois
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jones JD, Avila JR, Smith MK, Martinez S. Opioid overdose knowledge among college students compared to experienced opioid users. Drug Alcohol Rev 2024; 43:343-346. [PMID: 37920901 DOI: 10.1111/dar.13770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jermaine D Jones
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, USA
| | - Jesus R Avila
- Summer Public Health Scholars Program, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA
- Department of Biological Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA
| | - Mitchell K Smith
- Summer Public Health Scholars Program, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA
- School of Public Health, Furman University, Greenville, USA
| | - Suky Martinez
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Adams N, Kong N, Tian R, Altidor C, Chang S. Untrained Bystanders Administering Drone-Delivered Naloxone: An Exploratory Study. Subst Abuse 2023; 17:11782218231211830. [PMID: 38033431 PMCID: PMC10687938 DOI: 10.1177/11782218231211830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Opioid overdose deaths continue to climb in the United States. Administering naloxone to an overdose victim can save their life, but rapid access to naloxone remains a barrier. Delivering naloxone to a bystander using a drone has potential to increase naloxone availability but there are still many uncertainties about this mode of delivery. Can an untrained bystander to an opioid overdose successfully administer drone delivered naloxone after viewing video instructions on the drone and how long does it take? Methods This mixed-methods observational study, conducted in a controlled outdoor environment, simulated an opioid overdose using a mannequin (overdose victim) and panicked bystander. Untrained and medically naïve participants were instructed to call for help, move the drone from the landing spot to the mannequin, and follow the instructions provided by the drone to administer naloxone. Data was collected using video recordings, interviews, and an online survey. Time stamp data was extracted from the video for 2 time points: time for removing the naloxone from the drone and time to administer the naloxone. Interviews were audio recorded and analyzed using an inductive concept analysis approach. One interview question was coded as a binary response of anxiety/no anxiety and added to the demographic data. Results The average time to remove and administer naloxone was 62 seconds. Anxiety during the activity was reported by 59% of the participants but there was no correlation between anxiety and time. The design of our drone and instructional video can be improved. Conclusions We have established baseline times for completing steps in administering naloxone delivered by drone. We were able to successfully induce anxiety and have a baseline measure for what percentage of untrained bystanders may experience anxiety when involved with an emergency situation. Design of instructional materials and drone construction can contribute to anxiety and successful administration of naloxone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Adams
- Purdue University School of Nursing, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Nan Kong
- Purdue University Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Renran Tian
- Purdue University Indianapolis (PUI), Purdue School of Engineering & Technology, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Shen Chang
- Purdue University Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Freestone J, Ezard N, Bourne A, Brett J, Roberts DM, Hammoud M, Nedanoski A, Prestage G, Siefried KJ. Understandings, attitudes, practices and responses to GHB overdose among GHB consumers. Harm Reduct J 2023; 20:121. [PMID: 37660058 PMCID: PMC10475182 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-023-00857-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) is used at disproportionately high rates within sexuality and gender diverse communities and carries a high risk of overdose. GHB overdose can result in death. Internationally, recent increases in GHB overdoses have been observed. Coronial reviews of GHB-related death highlight the pivotal roles that bystanders to GHB overdose play in preventing fatality. No research has examined, in detail, how bystanders respond to GHB overdose. This qualitative study was conducted among people who use GHB and explored how they responded upon witnessing a GHB overdose experienced by someone else. METHODS Interviews were conducted with 31 sexuality and gender diverse Australian residents reporting three or more occasions of GHB use in the previous 12 months. Participants were asked questions about witnessed GHB overdose, their actions and decision-making processes throughout overdose. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS Participants described witnessing GHB overdose, commonly in private settings involving sexualized GHB use. Variable definitions of GHB overdose were reported, ranging from GHB-induced symptoms of distress to comatose intoxication. Drastic actions to keep someone alert and responsive post-GHB ingestion were reported; these included the administration of stimulant substances and citrus. Decisions to call or not call for emergency medical services (EMS) were influenced by many circumstantial variables. In most instances, an EMS call was resisted and response practices deviated from established first aid protocols. CONCLUSIONS GHB overdose prevention and response training programs targeting people who use GHB are urgently required. These education interventions ought to address inaccuracies that inform street remedies for GHB overdose, teach people how to safely check breathing and response, promote basic first aid principles and address barriers to contacting EMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Freestone
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, High St, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
- ACON, 414 Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills, NSW, 2010, Australia.
| | - Nadine Ezard
- National Centre for Clinical Research on Emerging Drugs, c/o the University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia
- Alcohol and Drug Service, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, 2010, Australia
- The National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), The University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia
| | - Adam Bourne
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, High St, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
- Australian Research Centre for Sex Health and Society, La Trobe University, Building NR6., Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia
| | - Jonathan Brett
- Alcohol and Drug Service, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, 2010, Australia
| | - Darren M Roberts
- Edith Collins Centre, Drug Health Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Mohamed Hammoud
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, High St, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | | | - Garrett Prestage
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Wallace Wurth Building, High St, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Krista J Siefried
- National Centre for Clinical Research on Emerging Drugs, c/o the University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia
- Alcohol and Drug Service, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, 2010, Australia
- The National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), The University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Urmanche AA, Harocopos A. Experiences Administering Naloxone Among People in Different Social Roles: People Who Use Opioids and Family Members and Friends. JOURNAL OF DRUG ISSUES 2023; 53:475-489. [PMID: 37829614 PMCID: PMC10569559 DOI: 10.1177/00220426221133024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
Unintentional drug overdose deaths continue to be a critical public health issue. Naloxone, a nonscheduled, safe, and effective drug that reverses opioid-involved overdoses is available to non-medically trained individuals ("lay people"), but there is scant information about how people in different social roles experience naloxone administration. We conducted 24 in-depth interviews with people who use opioids (PWUO; n = 15) and family members and friends of people who use opioids (FF; n = 9) who had administered naloxone in response to an opioid overdose. Compared with PWUO, members of the FF group were less reticent to administer naloxone in response to an overdose. PWUO and FF had different perspectives of law enforcement and demonstrated varied knowledge of the Good Samaritan Law. While PWUO found that having and administering naloxone was empowering, FF took a more pragmatic approach, reporting the need for naloxone as an unfortunate reality of their loved one's drug use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adelya A Urmanche
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Bureau of Alcohol and Drug Use Prevention, Care and Treatment, NY, USA
| | - Alex Harocopos
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Bureau of Alcohol and Drug Use Prevention, Care and Treatment, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Olding M, Boyd J, Kerr T, Fowler A, McNeil R. (Re)situating expertise in community-based overdose response: Insights from an ethnographic study of overdose prevention sites (OPS) in Vancouver, Canada. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2023; 111:103929. [PMID: 36529032 PMCID: PMC10184134 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Overdose Prevention Sites (OPS) are low-barrier services where people may use illicit drugs under the monitoring of staff trained to provide life-saving care in the event of an overdose. In British Columbia (BC), Canada, OPS have been rapidly scaled-up as a community-based response to the overdose crisis and are staffed primarily by community members who are also people who use drugs (PWUD). While it is known that PWUD perform vital roles in OPS and other community-based overdose interventions, the expertise and expert knowledge of PWUD in this work remains under-theorised. This study draws on 20 months of ethnographic fieldwork in Vancouver, BC (July 2018 to March 2020), to explore how OPS responders who are PWUD developed and enacted expertise in overdose response. Ethnographic fieldwork focused on four OPS located in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside (DTES) and Downtown South neighbourhoods. Methods included 100 hours of observation in the sites and surrounding areas, three site-specific focus groups with OPS responders (n=20), and semi-structured interviews with OPS responders (n=14) and service users (n=23). Data was analysed with the aim of characterizing the knowledge underpinning responders' expertise, and the arrangements which allow for the formation and enactment of expertise. We found that OPS responders' expertise was grounded in experiential knowledge acquired through their positionality as PWUD and members of a broader community of activists engaged in mutual aid. Responders became skilled in overdose response through frequent practice and drew on their experiential and embodied knowledge of overdose to provide care that was both technically proficient and responsive to the broader needs of PWUD (e.g. protection from criminalization and stigmatizing treatment). Responders emphasized that the spatial arrangements of OPS supported the development of expertise by facilitating more specialized and comprehensive overdose care. OPS became sites of collective expertise around overdose management as responder teams developed shared understandings of overdose management, including processes for managing uncertainty, delegating team responsibilities, and sharing decision-making. This research re-situates theoretical understandings of expertise in community-based overdose response with implications for overdose prevention interventions. Findings underscore the experiential and embodied expertise of PWUD as community-based responders; the importance of supportive environments and team-based approaches for overdose response; and the benefits of community-driven training that extends beyond technical skills of overdose identification and naloxone administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Olding
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jade Boyd
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Thomas Kerr
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Al Fowler
- East Vancouver Activist, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ryan McNeil
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Intention to seek emergency medical services during community overdose events in British Columbia, Canada: a cross-sectional survey. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2022; 17:56. [PMID: 35883186 PMCID: PMC9315848 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-022-00484-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Canada and the United States continue to experience increasing overdose deaths attributed to highly toxic illicit substances, driven by fentanyl and its analogues. Many bystanders report being hesitant to call 9-1-1 at an overdose due to fears around police presence and arrests. In Canada, a federal law was enacted in 2017, the Good Samaritan Drug Overdose Act (GSDOA), to provide protection from simple drug possession and related charges when 9-1-1 is called to an overdose. There is limited evidence, however, that the GSDOA has improved rates of intention to call 9-1-1 at overdose events. We therefore sought to examine intent to call 9-1-1 among persons who received GSDOA education and were at risk of witnessing an overdose. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted with people at risk of witnessing an overdose recruited at 19 Take Home Naloxone (THN) program sites across British Columbia as well as online through Foundry from October 2020 to April 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to examine intention to call 9-1-1 at future overdoses. Multivariable logistic regression models were built in hierarchical fashion to examine factors associated with intention to call 9-1-1. Results Overall, 89.6% (n = 404) of the eligible sample reported intention to call 9-1-1. In the multivariable model, factors positively associated with intention to call 9-1-1 included identifying as a cisgender woman (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 3.37; 95% CI: 1.19–9.50) and having previous GSDOA awareness ([AOR]: 4.16; 95% CI: 1.62–10.70). Having experienced a stimulant overdose in the past 6 months was negatively associated with intention to call 9-1-1 ([AOR]: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.09–0.65). Conclusion A small proportion of the respondents reported that, despite the enactment of GSDOA, they did not intend to call 9-1-1 and those who were aware of the act were more likely to report an intention to call at future overdose events. Increasing GSDOA awareness and/or additional interventions to support the aims of the GSDOA could address ongoing reluctance to seek emergency medical care by people who use drugs. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13011-022-00484-0.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ericson ØB, Eide D, Lobmaier P, Clausen T. Risks and overdose responses: Participant characteristics from the first seven years of a national take-home naloxone program. Drug Alcohol Depend 2022; 240:109645. [PMID: 36191532 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2014, the Norwegian government funded a large-scale take-home naloxone (THN) program to address high overdose mortality rates. The aims of this study are to describe characteristics among persons trained to receive THN, describe actions taken following THN use at an overdose event and to explore factors associated with naloxone use. METHODS This was a prospective cohort study of individuals who received THN from 2014 to 2021. Descriptive characteristics were collected at initial training. When returning for refill, participants reported on their previous naloxone use. In a multivariable logistic regression model exploring associations with naloxone use: gender, age, opioid use history, concomitant drug use, injecting, history of experienced or witnessed overdose were included. RESULTS In total, 3527 individuals were included in this study. There were 958 individuals who returned for refills 2303 times. Most participants were male (63.6%), with a history of opioid use (77.5%). Those who reported naloxone use were more likely to have a history of opioid use (aOR= 4.1; 95% CI=2.77,6.1), were younger (aOR=0.98; 95% CI=0.97,0.99) and had witnessed overdoses (aOR=3.3; 95% CI=1.98,5.34). Among current opioid users, the odds were higher for injectors (aOR=1.57; 95% CI=1.18,2.1). Naloxone use was reported 1282 times. Additional actions such as waking the person and calling the ambulance were frequently reported. Survival was reported in almost all cases (94%). CONCLUSION People who use drugs are a suitable target group for THN-programs, as they seem to be willing and capable to reverse overdoses effectively. Given their personal risk factors for overdosing, recipients will likely also benefit from overdose prevention education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Øystein Bruun Ericson
- The Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Building 45, Ullevål Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, 0450 Oslo, Norway.
| | - Desiree Eide
- The Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Building 45, Ullevål Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, 0450 Oslo, Norway
| | - Philipp Lobmaier
- The Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Building 45, Ullevål Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, 0450 Oslo, Norway; Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, PB 23 Vinderen, 0319 Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas Clausen
- The Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Building 45, Ullevål Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, 0450 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sajwani HS, Williams AV. A systematic review of the distribution of take-home naloxone in low- and middle-income countries and barriers to the implementation of take-home naloxone programs. Harm Reduct J 2022; 19:117. [PMID: 36266701 PMCID: PMC9585764 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-022-00700-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid overdose epidemic is hitting record highs worldwide, accounting for 76% of mortality related to substance use. Take-home naloxone (THN) strategies are being implemented in many developed countries that suffer from high opioid overdose death rates. They aim to provide overdose identification and naloxone administration training, along with THN delivery to opioid users and others likely to witness an overdose incident such as family members and peers. However, little is known about such measures in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), where opioid use and opioid-related deaths are reportedly high. This systematic literature review aims to examine the distribution of THN in LMIC, review studies identifying barriers to the implementation of THN programs worldwide, and assess their applicability to LMIC. METHODS The literature was searched and analyzed for eligible studies with quality assessment. RESULTS Two studies were found from LMIC on THN programs with promising results, and 13 studies were found on the barriers identified in implementing THN programs worldwide. The main barriers to THN strategies were the lack of training of healthcare providers, lack of privileges, time constraints, cost, legislative/policy restrictions, stigma, fear of litigation, and some misperceptions around THN. CONCLUSIONS The barriers outlined in this paper are probably applicable to LMIC, but more difficult to overcome considering the differences in their response to opioid overdose, their cultural attitudes and norms, the high cost, the waivers required, the legislative differences and the severe penalties for drug-related offenses in some of these countries. The solutions suggested to counter-act these obstacles can also be more difficult to achieve in LMIC. Further research is required in this area with larger sample sizes to provide a better understanding of the obstacles to the implementation, feasibility, accessibility, and utilization of THN programs in LMIC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hawraa Sameer Sajwani
- Department of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA US
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA US
- Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Anna V Williams
- Department of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Filteau MR, Green B, Kim F, McBride KA. 'It's the same thing as giving them CPR training': rural first responders' perspectives on naloxone. Harm Reduct J 2022; 19:111. [PMID: 36192736 PMCID: PMC9531424 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-022-00688-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's (SAMHSA) Harm Reduction grant program expanded access to several harm reduction strategies to mitigate opioid overdose fatalities, including expanding access to naloxone. Interviews with first responders in a frontier and remote (FAR) state were conducted to understand their job responsibilities in relation to overdose response and prevention and their perceptions of training laypersons to administer naloxone. This study includes 22 interviews with law enforcement, EMS and/or fire personnel, and members of harm reduction-focused community organizations. The study finds widespread support for increasing access to naloxone and training laypersons in naloxone administration throughout Montana, due to rural first responders' inability to meet the needs of residents and an overall lack of resources to address addiction and the effects of fentanyl. Participants from harm reduction-focused community organizations convey support for training lay persons, but also illuminate that real and perceived cultural opposition to harm reduction strategies could reduce the likelihood that laypeople enroll in naloxone training. This study adds to the literature because it focuses on first responders in a FAR area that would benefit from layperson naloxone education and administration training due to its geographic expansiveness and the area's overall lack of access to medications for opioid use disorder or other treatment services. Expanding harm reduction approaches, like increasing access and training laypersons to administer naloxone, might be FAR residents' best chance for surviving an opioid overdose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Frances Kim
- JG Research and Evaluation, Bozeman, MT, USA
| | - Ki-Ai McBride
- Montana Department of Health and Human Services, Behavioral Health and Disabilities Disorders Division, Helena, MT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Core competencies of peer workers who use pulse oximeters to supplement their overdose response in British Columbia. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0273744. [PMID: 36054132 PMCID: PMC9439192 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction
Peer workers (those with lived/living experience of substance use) are at the forefront of overdose response initiatives in British Columbia, Canada. The onset of the coronavirus disease pandemic has significantly compounded the impact of the overdose crisis. Peer workers are integral in supporting people who use substances. However, despite the important work they do, peer workers often lack formalized credibility and do not have the same resources available to them as service providers without lived experience. The peer-led project titled the Peer2Peer Project implemented several support programs for peer workers, including providing pulse oximeters to peer workers to supplement their overdose response procedures.
Materials and methods
This study was a component of a larger evaluation of the pulse oximeter program at two organizations in BC. The study aims to highlight the competencies of peer workers who use pulse oximeters. Telephone interviews were conducted with seven peer workers who were given pulse oximeters. The transcripts were thematically coded using Covert et al.’s framework of core competencies of community health workers to compare our sample with other widely recognized professions.
Findings
We found that peer workers who used pulse oximeters described several core competencies in their work and these were aligned with Covert et al.’s core competencies for community health workers, including assessment, community health practice, communication, diversity and inclusion, professional practice, and disease prevention and management.
Conclusion
By aligning peer workers’ skills to those of community health workers, we create awareness on the competencies of peer workers in using oximeters to supplement overdose response and advocate for them to receive more recognition and respect within the workplace. Further, our findings act as groundwork for future research in identifying the professional proficiencies of peer workers.
Collapse
|
12
|
Strang J. Take-Home Naloxone and the Prevention of Deaths from Heroin Overdose: Pursuing Strong Science, Fuller Understanding, Greater Impact. Eur Addict Res 2022; 28:161-175. [PMID: 34963112 DOI: 10.1159/000519939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT Realization of the life-saving potential of "take-home naloxone" has been a personal journey, but it has also been a collective journey. It has been a story of individual exploration and growth, and also a story of changes at a societal level. "Take-home naloxone" has matured since its first conceptualization a quarter of a century ago. It required recognition of the enormous burden of deaths from drug overdose (particularly heroin and other opioids), and also realization of critical clusterings (such as post-release from prison). It also required realization that, since many overdose deaths are witnessed, we can potentially prevent many deaths by mobilizing drug users themselves, their families, and the wider caring community to act as intervention workforce to give life-saving interim emergency care. Summary of Scope: This article explores 5 areas (many illustrations UK-based where the author works): firstly, the need for strong science; secondly, our improved understanding of opioid overdose and deaths; thirdly, the search for greater impact from our policies and interventions; fourthly, developing better forms of naloxone; and fifthly, examining the challenges still to be addressed. KEY MESSAGES "Take-home naloxone" is an exemplar of harm reduction with potential global impact - drug policy and practice for the public good. However, "having the potential" is not good enough - there needs to be actual implementation. This will be easier once the component parts of "take-home naloxone" are improved (better naloxone products, better training aids, revised legislation, and explicit funding support). Many improvements are already possible, but we hesitate about implementation. It is our responsibility to drive progress faster. With "take-home naloxone," we can be proud of what we have achieved, but we must also be humble about how much more we still need to do.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Strang
- National Addiction Centre, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Neale J, Farrugia A, Campbell AN, Dietze P, Dwyer R, Fomiatti R, Jones JD, Comer SD, Fraser S, Strang J. UNDERSTANDING PREFERENCES FOR TYPE OF TAKE-HOME NALOXONE DEVICE: INTERNATIONAL QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE VIEWS OF PEOPLE WHO USE OPIOIDS. DRUGS (ABINGDON, ENGLAND) 2022; 29:109-120. [PMID: 35813841 PMCID: PMC9268211 DOI: 10.1080/09687637.2021.1872499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Background Take-home naloxone (THN) is provided to non-medically trained people to reverse potential opioid overdoses. There is an increasing range of effective intramuscular (IM) and intranasal (IN) naloxone devices and this paper explores the types preferred by people who use opioids, using consumer behaviour literature to interpret the findings. Methods Data derive from two unconnected qualitative studies involving audio-recorded semi-structured interviews. Study 1 was conducted in the United States (n=21 users of non-medical/illicit opioids). Study 2 was conducted in Australia (n=42 users of non-medical/illicit or prescribed opioids). Findings Most participants preferred IN naloxone. Preferences were based on the ease, speed, safety and comfort of each device and underpinned by accounts of overdose revivals as being very rushed and frightening situations. Preferences related to complex interactions between the naloxone device ('product'); the knowledge, skills, experience and attitudes of the lay responder ('consumer'), and when, where and how naloxone was to be used ('usage situation'). Conclusions THN programs should offer choice of device when possible and nasal naloxone if resources permit. Asking people which devices they prefer and why and treating them as valued consumers of naloxone products can generate insights that improve future naloxone technology and increase THN uptake and usage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Neale
- National Addiction Centre, King’s College London, London, UK.,Centre for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Aimee N. Campbell
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Paul Dietze
- Program on Behaviours and Health Risks, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Robyn Dwyer
- Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Renae Fomiatti
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jermaine D. Jones
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lipira L, Leichtling G, Cook RR, Leahy JM, Orellana ER, Korthuis PT, Menza TW. Predictors of having naloxone in urban and rural Oregon findings from NHBS and the OR-HOPE study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021; 227:108912. [PMID: 34315014 PMCID: PMC8464511 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Naloxone is an opioid antagonist that can be effectively administered by bystanders to prevent overdose. We determined the proportion of people who had naloxone and identified predictors of naloxone ownership among two samples of people who inject drugs (PWID) who use opioids in Portland and rural Western Oregon. BASIC PROCEDURES We used data from participants in Portland's National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS, N = 477) and the Oregon HIV/Hepatitis and Opioid Prevention and Engagement Study (OR-HOPE, N = 133). For each sample, we determined the proportion of participants who had naloxone and estimated unadjusted and adjusted relative risk of having naloxone associated with participant characteristics. MAIN FINDINGS Sixty one percent of NHBS and 30 % of OR-HOPE participants had naloxone. In adjusted analysis, having naloxone was associated with female gender, injecting goofballs (compared to heroin alone), housing stability, and overdose training in the urban NHBS sample, and having naloxone was associated with drug of choice, frequency of injection, and race in the rural OR-HOPE sample. In both samples, having naloxone was crudely associated with SSP use, but this was attenuated after adjustment. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS Naloxone ownership was insufficient and highly variable among two samples of PWID who use opioids in Oregon. People who use methamphetamine, males, and people experiencing homelessness may be at increased risk for not having naloxone and SSP may play a key role in improving access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Lipira
- Regional Research Institute, Portland State University, 1600 SW 4(th)Avenue, Suite 900, Portland, OR, 97201, USA; Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority, 800 NE Oregon Street, Portland, OR, 97232, USA.
| | | | - Ryan R Cook
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | - Judith M Leahy
- Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority, 800 NE Oregon Street, Portland, OR, 97232, USA.
| | - E Roberto Orellana
- Regional Research Institute, Portland State University, 1600 SW 4(th)Avenue, Suite 900, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
| | - P Todd Korthuis
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | - Timothy W Menza
- Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority, 800 NE Oregon Street, Portland, OR, 97232, USA; Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brandt L, Yanagida T, Campbell ANC, Jones JD, Schultes MT, Martinez S, Comer SD. Multi-informant Implementation and Intervention Outcomes of Opioid Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution in New York City. GLOBAL IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS 2021; 1:209-222. [PMID: 34622215 PMCID: PMC8450721 DOI: 10.1007/s43477-021-00021-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution (OEND) is an effective public health intervention to reduce opioid overdose fatalities (McDonald and Strang, Addiction 111:1177-1187, 2016). However, we know little about OEND implementation outcomes (i.e., indicators of implementation success), specifically the fidelity of training delivery, and how these may relate to intervention outcomes (i.e., indicators of the success or effectiveness of an intervention), such as overdose knowledge and attitudes. This study evaluated 16 OEND trainings conducted at different Opioid Overdose Prevention Programs in New York City. Trainees (N = 75) completed the Opioid Overdose Knowledge and Attitude Scales before and after training (intervention outcomes). Implementation outcomes were fidelity (competence and adherence of the trainer, N = 10; modified Fidelity Checklist) and acceptability of OEND (Acceptability of Intervention Measure), assessed from multiple perspectives (trainees, trainers, and an independent observer). Trainees' overdose knowledge, t(71) = - 8.12, p < 0.001, 95% CI [- 6.54, - 3.96], and attitudes, t(65) = - 6.85, p < 0.001, 95% CI [- 0.59, - 0.33], improved significantly from pre- to post-training. Stepwise multiple regression models indicated that adherence of the trainer rated from the observer perspective added significantly to the prediction of changes in overdose knowledge, F(1, 67) = 9.81, p = 0.003, and explained 13% of the variance in outcome. However, fidelity measures from the perspective of trainees or trainers and acceptability of OEND were not associated with changes in trainees' overdose knowledge or attitudes. OEND implementation outcomes and their relationship with intervention outcomes differed depending on the role of the fidelity rater in relation to the intervention. Specifically, our findings indicate that fidelity should be measured from an independent perspective (i.e., an individual who is experienced with fidelity rating but not directly involved in the intervention). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-021-00021-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Brandt
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry & New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit #120, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - Takuya Yanagida
- Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Vienna, Universitaetsstrasse 7 (NIG), 1010 Vienna, Austria
| | - Aimee N. C. Campbell
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry & New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit #120, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - Jermaine D. Jones
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry & New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit #120, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - Marie-Therese Schultes
- Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Vienna, Universitaetsstrasse 7 (NIG), 1010 Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Implementation Science in Healthcare, University of Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 84, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Suky Martinez
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry & New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit #120, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - Sandra D. Comer
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry & New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit #120, New York, NY 10032 USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Brandt L, Campbell ANC, Jones JD, Martinez S, Neale J, Parkin S, Brown C, Strang J, Comer SD. Emotional reactions of trained overdose responders who use opioids following intervention in an overdose event. Subst Abus 2021; 43:581-591. [PMID: 34520679 PMCID: PMC8810579 DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1975870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Background: Our aim was to explore emotional reactions to intervening in an overdose event from the perspective of individuals who use opioids (peer responders). In addition, we were interested in the impact this experience may have on peer responders' feelings about helping in an overdose situation in the future. Methods: For this qualitative sub-study of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), data from 61 interviews were analyzed thematically using an inductive approach. Results: Peer responders had diverse emotional reactions to the overdose event. These ranged from a sense of pride and other positive feelings associated with their ability to help to ambivalence about being involved in situations perceived as challenging and burdensome. There were few reports of the overdose event as an exclusively negative experience. Many peer responders perceived it as their duty to use naloxone again if required. However, some had ambivalent feelings toward this responsibility, which may be related to negative experiences with previous intervention efforts. Conclusions: The capacity of people who use opioids to help reduce the harms associated with opioid overdose is experienced as empowering by some. Nonetheless, engaging peer responders in strategies to reduce opioid-related mortality should be coupled with appropriate resources to process their experiences and emotional responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Brandt
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute & Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Aimee N. C. Campbell
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute & Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jermaine D. Jones
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute & Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Suky Martinez
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute & Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joanne Neale
- National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- Centre for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Camberwell, London, UK
| | - Stephen Parkin
- National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Caral Brown
- National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - John Strang
- National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Camberwell, London, UK
| | - Sandra D. Comer
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute & Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ataiants J, Reed MK, Schwartz DG, Roth A, Marcu G, Lankenau SE. Decision-making by laypersons equipped with an emergency response smartphone app for opioid overdose. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2021; 95:103250. [PMID: 33887699 PMCID: PMC8523579 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted naloxone distribution to potential lay responders increases the timeliness of overdose response and reduces mortality. Little is known, however, about the patterns of decision-making among overdose lay responders. This study explored heuristic decision-making among laypersons equipped with an emergency response smartphone app. METHODS UnityPhilly, a smartphone app that connects lay responders equipped with naloxone to overdose victims, was piloted in Philadelphia from March 2019 to February 2020. Participants used the app to signal overdose alerts to peer app users and emergency medical services, or respond to alerts by arriving at overdose emergency sites. This study utilised in-depth interviews, background information, and app use data from a sample of 18 participants with varying histories of opioid use and levels of app use activity. RESULTS The sample included 8 people who used opioids non-medically in the past 30 days and 10 people reporting no opioid misuse. Three prevailing, not mutually exclusive, heuristics were identified. The heuristic of unconditional signalling ("Always signal for help or backup") was used by 7 people who valued external assistance and used the app as a replacement for a 911 call; this group had the highest number of signalled alerts and on-scene appearances. Nine people, who expressed confidence in their ability to address an overdose themselves, followed a heuristic of conditional signalling ("Rescue, but only signal if necessary"); these participants had the highest frequency of prior naloxone administrations. Eleven participants used the heuristic of conditional responding ("Assess if I can make a difference"), addressing an alert if they carried naloxone, were nearby, or received a signal before dark hours. CONCLUSION The deployment of specific heuristics was influenced by prior naloxone use and situational factors. Success of overdose prevention interventions assisted by digital technologies may depend on the involvement of people with diverse overdose rescue backgrounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janna Ataiants
- Department of Community Health and Prevention, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, 3215 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Megan K Reed
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut St, College Bldg, Suite 706, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - David G Schwartz
- Information Systems Division, Graduate School of Business, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, 5290002, Israel
| | - Alexis Roth
- Department of Community Health and Prevention, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, 3215 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Gabriela Marcu
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 105 S. State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Stephen E Lankenau
- Department of Community Health and Prevention, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, 3215 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Conway A, Valerio H, Peacock A, Degenhardt L, Hayllar J, Harrod ME, Henderson C, Read P, Gilliver R, Christmass M, Dunlop A, Montebello M, Whitton G, Reid D, Lam T, Alavi M, Silk D, Marshall AD, Treloar C, Dore GJ, Grebely J. Non-fatal opioid overdose, naloxone access, and naloxone training among people who recently used opioids or received opioid agonist treatment in Australia: The ETHOS Engage study. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2021; 96:103421. [PMID: 34452808 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overdose is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among people who use opioids. Naloxone can reverse opioid overdoses and can be distributed and administered with minimal training. People with experience of overdose are a key population to target for overdose prevention strategies. This study aims to understand if factors associated with recent non-fatal opioid overdose are the same as factors associated with naloxone access and naloxone training in people who recently used opioids or received opioid agonist treatment (OAT). METHODS ETHOS Engage is an observational study of people who inject drugs in Australia. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios for non-fatal opioid overdose, naloxone access and naloxone training. RESULTS Between May 2018-September 2019, 1280 participants who recently used opioids or received OAT were enrolled (62% aged >40 years; 35% female, 80% receiving OAT, 62% injected drugs in the preceding month). Recent opioid overdose (preceding 12 months) was reported by 7% of participants, lifetime naloxone access by 17%, and lifetime naloxone training by 14%. Compared to people receiving OAT with no additional opioid use, recent opioid, benzodiazepine (preceding six months), and hazardous alcohol use was associated with recent opioid overdose (aOR 3.91; 95%CI: 1.68-9.10) and lifetime naloxone access (aOR 2.12; 95%CI 1.29-3.48). Among 91 people who reported recent overdose, 65% had never received take-home naloxone or naloxone training. CONCLUSIONS Among people recently using opioids or receiving OAT, benzodiazepine and hazardous alcohol use is associated with non-fatal opioid overdose. Not all factors associated with non-fatal overdose correspond to factors associated with naloxone access. Naloxone access and training is low across all groups. Additional interventions are needed to scale up naloxone provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Conway
- The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - H Valerio
- The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - A Peacock
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Psychology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - L Degenhardt
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - J Hayllar
- Alcohol and Drug Service, Metro North Mental Health, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - M E Harrod
- NSW Users and AIDS Association, NSW, Australia
| | - C Henderson
- NSW Users and AIDS Association, NSW, Australia
| | - P Read
- The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Kirketon Road Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - R Gilliver
- Kirketon Road Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - M Christmass
- Next Step Drug and Alcohol Services, Mental Health Commission, WA, Australia; National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, WA, Australia
| | - A Dunlop
- Centre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health, Hunter Medical Research Institute & University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; Drug and Alcohol Clinical Services, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - M Montebello
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Drug and Alcohol Services, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia; University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - G Whitton
- Drug Health Service, South West Sydney LHD, NSW, Australia
| | - D Reid
- Drug and Alcohol Service, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - T Lam
- Drug Health, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - M Alavi
- The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - D Silk
- The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - A D Marshall
- The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - C Treloar
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - G J Dore
- The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - J Grebely
- The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Macleod ER, Tajbakhsh I, Hamilton-Wright S, Laliberte N, Wiese JL, Matheson FI. "They're not doing enough.": women's experiences with opioids and naloxone in Toronto. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PREVENTION AND POLICY 2021; 16:26. [PMID: 33743756 PMCID: PMC7980746 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-021-00360-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Amid increasing opioid overdose deaths in Canada since 2010 and a changing naloxone access landscape, there is a need for up-to-date research on Canadian women's experiences with opioids. Studies on Canadian take-home naloxone programs are promising, but research beyond these programs is limited. Our study is the first to focus on women's experiences and perspectives on the opioid crisis in Ontario, Canada's most populous province, since the opioid crisis began in 2010. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to address research knowledge gaps involving Canadian women with criminal justice involvement who use opioids, and identify flaws in current policies, responses, and practices. While the opioid overdose crisis persists, this lack of research inhibits our ability to determine whether overdose prevention efforts, especially involving naloxone, are meeting their needs. METHODS We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews from January to April 2018 with 10 women with experience of opioid use. They were recruited through the study's community partner in Toronto. Participants provided demographic information, experiences with opioids and naloxone, and their perceptions of the Canadian government's responses to the opioid crisis. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and inductive thematic analysis was conducted to determine major themes within the data. RESULTS Thematic analysis identified seven major concerns despite significant differences in participant life and opioid use experiences. Participants who had used illicit opioids since naloxone became available over-the-counter in 2016 were much more knowledgeable about naloxone than participants who had only used opioids prior to 2016. The portability, dosage form, and effects of naloxone are important considerations for women who use opioids. Social alienation, violence, and isolation affect the wellbeing of women who use opioids. The Canadian government's response to the opioid crisis was perceived as inadequate. Participants demonstrated differing needs and views on ideal harm reduction approaches, despite facing similar structural issues surrounding stigma, addiction management, and housing. CONCLUSIONS Participants experienced with naloxone use found it to be useful in preventing fatal overdose, however many of their needs with regards to physical, mental, and social health, housing, harm reduction, and access to opioid treatment remained unmet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie R Macleod
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B1W8, Canada
| | - Iren Tajbakhsh
- Elizabeth Fry Society Toronto, 215 Wellesley Street East, Toronto, ON, M4X 1G1, Canada
| | - Sarah Hamilton-Wright
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B1W8, Canada
| | - Nancy Laliberte
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Jessica L Wiese
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B1W8, Canada
| | - Flora I Matheson
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B1W8, Canada. .,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 55 College St Room 500, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Parkin S, Neale J, Brown C, Jones JD, Brandt L, Castillo F, Campbell ANC, Strang J, Comer SD. A qualitative study of repeat naloxone administrations during opioid overdose intervention by people who use opioids in New York City. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2021; 87:102968. [PMID: 33096365 PMCID: PMC7940548 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Take-home naloxone (THN) kits have been designed to provide community members (including people who use drugs, their families and/or significant others) with the necessary resources to address out-of-hospital opioid overdose events. Kits typically include two doses of naloxone. This 'twin-pack' format means that lay responders need information on how to use each dose. Advice given tends to be based on dosage algorithms used by medical personnel. However, little is currently known about how and why people who use drugs, acting as lay responders, decide to administer the second dose contained within single THN kits. The aim of this article is to explore this issue. METHODS Data were generated from a qualitative semi-structured interview study that was embedded within a randomised controlled trial examining the risks and benefits of Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution (OEND) training in New York City (NYC). Analysis for this article focuses upon the experiences of 22 people who use(d) opioids and who provided repeat naloxone administrations (RNA) during 24 separate overdose events. The framework method of analysis was used to compare the time participants believed had passed between each naloxone dose administered ('subjective response interval') with the 'recommended response interval' (2-4 minutes) given during OEND training. Framework analysis also charted the various reasons and rationale for providing RNA during overdose interventions. RESULTS When participants' subjective response intervals were compared with the recommended response interval for naloxone dosing, three different time periods were reported for the 24 overdose events: i. 'two doses administered in under 2 minutes' (n = 10); ii. 'two doses administered within 2-4 minutes' (n = 7), and iii. 'two doses administered more than 4 minutes apart' (n = 7). A variety of reasons were identified for providing RNA within each of the three categories of response interval. Collectively, reasons for RNA included panic, recognition of urgency, delays in retrieving naloxone kit, perceptions of recipients' responsiveness/non-responsiveness to naloxone, and avoidance of Emergency Response Teams (ERT). CONCLUSION Findings suggest that decision-making processes by people who use opioids regarding how and when to provide RNA are influenced by factors that relate to the emergency event. In addition, the majority of RNA (17/24) occurred outside of the recommended response interval taught during OEND training. These findings are discussed in terms of evidence-based intervention and 'evidence-making intervention' with suggestions for how RNA guidance may be developed and included within future/existing models of OEND training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Parkin
- National Addiction Centre, King's College London, 4 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill, SE5 8BB, United Kingdom.
| | - Joanne Neale
- National Addiction Centre, King's College London, 4 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill, SE5 8BB, United Kingdom; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London; Centre for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Caral Brown
- National Addiction Centre, King's College London, 4 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill, SE5 8BB, United Kingdom
| | - Jermaine D Jones
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 120, New York, NY 10032, United States
| | - Laura Brandt
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 120, New York, NY 10032, United States
| | - Felipe Castillo
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 120, New York, NY 10032, United States
| | - Aimee N C Campbell
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 120, New York, NY 10032, United States
| | - John Strang
- National Addiction Centre, King's College London, 4 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill, SE5 8BB, United Kingdom; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London
| | - Sandra D Comer
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 120, New York, NY 10032, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Franklin Edwards G, Mierisch C, Mutcheson B, Horn K, Henrickson Parker S. A review of performance assessment tools for rescuer response in opioid overdose simulations and training programs. Prev Med Rep 2020; 20:101232. [PMID: 33163333 PMCID: PMC7610043 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the 1990s, more than 600 overdose response training and education programs have been implemented to train participants to respond to an opioid overdose in the United States. Given this substantial investment in overdose response training, valid assessment of a potential rescuers' proficiency in responding to an opioid overdose is important. The aim of this article is to review the current state of the literature on outcome measures utilized in opioid overdose response training. Thirty-one articles published between 2014 and 2020 met inclusion criteria. The reviewed articles targeted laypersons, healthcare providers, and first responders. The assessment tools included five validated questionnaires, fifteen non-validated questionnaires, and nine non-validated simulation-based checklists (e.g., completion of critical tasks and time to completion). Validated multiple choice knowledge assessment tools were commonly used to assess the outcomes of training programs. It is unknown how scores on these assessment tools may correlate with actual rescuer performance responding to an overdose. Seven studies reported ceiling effects most likely attributed to participants' background medical knowledge or experience. The inclusion of simulation-based outcome measures of performance, including the commission of critical errors and the time to naloxone administration, provides better insight into rescuer skill proficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G. Franklin Edwards
- Translational Biology, Medicine and Health, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
- Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, VA, USA
- Carilion Clinic Center for Simulation, Research and Patient Safety, Roanoke, VA, USA
| | - Cassandra Mierisch
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA
- Carilion Clinic, Department of Orthopedics and Opioid Task Force, Roanoke, VA, USA
| | | | - Kimberly Horn
- Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, VA, USA
- Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Sarah Henrickson Parker
- Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, VA, USA
- Carilion Clinic Center for Simulation, Research and Patient Safety, Roanoke, VA, USA
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Stevens A. Critical realism and the ‘ontological politics of drug policy’. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2020; 84:102723. [DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
23
|
Neale J, Kalk NJ, Parkin S, Brown C, Brandt L, Campbell ANC, Castillo F, Jones JD, Strang J, Comer SD. Factors associated with withdrawal symptoms and anger among people resuscitated from an opioid overdose by take-home naloxone: Exploratory mixed methods analysis. J Subst Abuse Treat 2020; 117:108099. [PMID: 32811629 PMCID: PMC7491601 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Take-home naloxone (THN) is a clinically effective and cost-effective means of reducing opioid overdose fatality. Nonetheless, naloxone administration that successfully saves a person's life can still produce undesirable and harmful effects. AIM To better understand factors associated with two widely reported adverse outcomes following naloxone administration; namely the person resuscitated displays: i. withdrawal symptoms and ii. anger. METHODS A mixed methods study combining a randomized controlled trial of overdose education and naloxone prescribing to people with opioid use disorder and semi-structured qualitative interviews with trial participants who had responded to an overdose whilst in the trial. All data were collected in New York City (2014-2019). A dataset (comprising demographic, pharmacological, situational, interpersonal, and overdose training related variables) was generated by transforming qualitative interview data from 47 overdose events into dichotomous variables and then combining these with quantitative demographic and overdose training related data from the main trial. Associations between variables within the dataset and reports of: i. withdrawal symptoms and ii. anger were explored using chi-squared tests, t-tests, and logistic regressions. RESULTS A multivariate logistic regression found that people who had overdosed were significantly more likely to display anger if the person resuscitating them criticized, berated or chastised them during resuscitation (adjusted OR = 27 [95% CI = 4.0-295]). In contrast, they were significantly less likely to display anger if the person resuscitating them communicated positively with them (OR = 0.10 [95% CI = 0.01-0.78]). Both positive and negative communication styles were independently associated with anger, and communication was associated with 59% of the variance in anger. There was no evidence that people who displayed withdrawal symptoms were more likely to display anger than those not displaying withdrawal symptoms, and neither displaying withdrawal symptoms nor displaying anger were associated with using more drugs after resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS Contrary to common assumptions, withdrawal symptoms and anger following naloxone administration may be unrelated phenomena. Findings are consistent with previous research that has suggested that a lay responder's positive or reassuring communication style may lessen anger post overdose. Implications for improving THN programmes and naloxone administration are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Neale
- National Addiction Centre, King's College London, 4 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8BB, United Kingdom; Centre for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Camberwell, London, SE5 8AZ, United Kingdom.
| | - Nicola J Kalk
- National Addiction Centre, King's College London, 4 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8BB, United Kingdom; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Camberwell, London, SE5 8AZ, United Kingdom.
| | - Stephen Parkin
- National Addiction Centre, King's College London, 4 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8BB, United Kingdom.
| | - Caral Brown
- National Addiction Centre, King's College London, 4 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8BB, United Kingdom.
| | - Laura Brandt
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 120, New York, NY 10032, United States.
| | - Aimee N C Campbell
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 120, New York, NY 10032, United States.
| | - Felipe Castillo
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 120, New York, NY 10032, United States.
| | - Jermaine D Jones
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 120, New York, NY 10032, United States.
| | - John Strang
- National Addiction Centre, King's College London, 4 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8BB, United Kingdom; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Camberwell, London, SE5 8AZ, United Kingdom.
| | - Sandra D Comer
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 120, New York, NY 10032, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Jones JD, Campbell AN, Brandt L, Castillo F, Abbott R, Comer SD. Intervention in an opioid overdose event increases interest in treatment among individuals with opioid use disorder. Subst Abus 2020; 42:407-411. [PMID: 32814002 DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2020.1809607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study sought to explore whether intervening in suspected cases of opioid overdose alters interest in treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Data were collected as a part of a trial comparing the effects of different overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) training curricula on overdose outcomes. Methods: Following OEND training, participants completed four in-person follow-up visits at 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-months. Participants were also regularly contacted to inquire about overdose events they responded to, witnessed, or experienced themselves. Other assessments included the Addiction Severity Index that queries participants' perceived importance of drug treatment on a scale of: 0 (Not at All) to 4 (Extremely). For the current secondary data analysis, treatment importance was assessed at the time points most immediately preceding and following participant intervention in an overdose event using naloxone. Results: The sample reported a mean duration of opioid use of 14.9 (± 11.5) years, with 67% having witnessed an overdose event prior to the study. Of the 321 enrolled, 92 participants used naloxone in response to 166 suspected cases of an opioid overdose. For the entire sample, mean treatment importance did not significantly change throughout the study. Among participants who utilized naloxone, treatment importance increased following the event (Before: 3.03, After: 3.39, p = 0.02). Due to the amount of time between the overdose event and assessment of post-event treatment importance (40.5 days, ±40.2), the current study most likely underestimates this effect. Conclusions: The current study suggests that responding to an overdose event increases interest in OUD treatment. Currently only considered an acute intervention to reduce overdose morbidity and mortality, OEND may have the potential to increase enrollment in medications to treat OUD. However, a prospective investigation needs to determine if the impact of an overdose event could be utilized to increase treatment engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jermaine D Jones
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Aimee N Campbell
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Laura Brandt
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Felipe Castillo
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Rebecca Abbott
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sandra D Comer
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Perrone E, De Bei F, Cristofari G. Law and mental health: A bridge between individual neurobiology and the collective organization of behaviors. Med Hypotheses 2020; 144:110004. [PMID: 32758868 DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Mental disorders (MD) or mental symptoms (MS) have multifactorial causes. Today we know much more about the variables that cause individual MD\MS, but in our opinion these characterizations, although essential, are not sufficient to account for the complexity in which we live. For example, they do not explain in a coherent and empirically verifiable way how the biological individual relates to the social architecture in which he lives. This article presents a hypothesis that connects social and organizational structures to the emergence of symptoms and mental disorders in the population. It is our belief that some of these structures fundamentally impact the distribution of MD/MS in a population and the medical and psychological communities must consider this impact seriously. Laws aim at directing the behavior of groups of people, whose behavior is strictly interdependent with their neurobiology. Given the ability of laws to direct the behaviors that regulate social interactions, traumatic factors may be considered capable of linking a non-material object (e.g., a law) to a real effect (e.g., MS/MD). We discuss, as a paradigmatic example, the laws that regulate the use of psychotropic substances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Perrone
- Faculty of Medicine and surgery, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
| | - Francesco De Bei
- Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianmarco Cristofari
- Department of Political Sciences, Communication and International Relations, University of Macerata, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Over the last 3 years and for the first time in 60 years, life expectancy in the United States has declined across all racial groups primarily because of drug overdoses, alcohol abuse, and suicide. A public health response to the opioid crisis must expand its focus to more broadly include children, adolescents, and young adults while increasing efforts toward preventing new cases of opioid addiction, early identification of individuals with opioid-abuse disorder, and ensuring access to effective opioid addiction treatment, while simultaneously continuing to safely meet the needs of patients experiencing pain. RECENT FINDINGS Although a multimodal approach to pain management is fundamental in current practice, opioids remain an essential building block in the management of acute and chronic pain and have been for over 5000 years as they work. Left over, unconsumed opioids that were appropriately prescribed for pain have become the gateway for the development of opioid use disorder, particularly in the vulnerable adolescents and young adult patient populations. How to reduce the amount of opioids dispensed, improve methods of disposal in an environmentally safe way, and proactively make naloxone, particularly nasal spray, readily available to patients (and their families) receiving prescription opioids or who are at risk of opioid use disorder are highlighted in this review. SUMMARY We describe the historical use of opioids and the scope of the current opioid crisis, review the differences between dependence and addiction, and the private and public sectors response to pain management and highlight the issue of adolescent vulnerability. We conclude with a proposal for future directions that address both public and patient health needs.
Collapse
|
27
|
Fomiatti R, Farrugia A, Fraser S, Dwyer R, Neale J, Strang J. Addiction stigma and the production of impediments to take-home naloxone uptake. Health (London) 2020; 26:139-161. [PMID: 32529843 DOI: 10.1177/1363459320925863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Opioid overdose deaths are a major health issue in Australia and around the world. Programmes to provide opioid consumers with 'take-home' naloxone to reverse overdose exist internationally, but uptake by mainstream health services and consumers remains inconsistent. Researchers have identified a range of important educational, training and logistical impediments to take-home naloxone uptake and distribution, yet they have focused less on the social dynamics that can enhance or limit access, such as stigma. In this article, we also explore impediments to uptake, drawing on qualitative interview data gathered for an Australian research project on take-home naloxone. Mobilising a performative approach to stigma, we argue that overdose and prevention are shaped by the social dynamics of stigma and, as such, responsibility for dealing with overdose, as with take-home naloxone, should also be considered social (i.e. shared among peers, the public, communities and governments). Our interview data illuminate the various ways in which addiction stigma limits the possibilities and capacities of take-home naloxone and overdose prevention. First, we focus on how stigma may impede professional information provision about take-home naloxone by limiting the extent to which it is presented as a matter of interest for all opioid consumers, not just those who consume opioids illicitly. Second, we explore how stigma may limit the scale-up and expansion of programmes and access points. From here, we focus on how stigma co-constitutes the politics of overdose and prevention, rendering take-home naloxone ill-suited to many social settings of overdose. In closing, we point out that stigma is not just a post hoc impediment to access to and use of take-home naloxone but is central to opioid overdose production itself, and to effective prevention. While take-home naloxone is an excellent life-saving initiative, uncritically valorising it may divert attention from broader goals, such as the de-stigmatisation of drug consumption through decriminalisation, and other ambitious attempts to reduce overdose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renae Fomiatti
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Australia
| | - Adrian Farrugia
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Australia; National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Australia
| | - Suzanne Fraser
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Australia; Centre for Social Research in Health, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robyn Dwyer
- Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Australia; National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Parkin S, Neale J, Brown C, Campbell ANC, Castillo F, Jones JD, Strang J, Comer SD. Opioid overdose reversals using naloxone in New York City by people who use opioids: Implications for public health and overdose harm reduction approaches from a qualitative study. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2020; 79:102751. [PMID: 32304981 PMCID: PMC7572435 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adverse reactions to naloxone, such as withdrawal symptoms and aggression, are widely recognised in the literature by pharmaceutical manufacturers and clinical practitioners as standard reactions of individuals who are physically dependent upon opioid drugs following the reversal of potentially fatal opioid overdose. This paper seeks to provide a differentiated view on reactions to naloxone that may have important implications for public health and harm reduction approaches. METHODS Analyses from a qualitative investigation embedded within a 5-year Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) examined the risks and benefits of Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution (OEND) training models (brief or extended training) in various populations of people who use opioids in New York City. The qualitative experiences (obtained through semi-structured interviews) of 46 people who use opioids and who were each involved in the delivery of naloxone, during 56 separate overdose events that occurred throughout 2016-2018, were studied. Situational analysis and inductive content analysis of interview data focused upon overdose reversals in an attempt to provide understandings of the various adverse effects associated with naloxone from their perspective. These analyses were supplemented by data sessions within the research team during which the findings obtained from situational analysis and inductive content analysis were reviewed and complemented by deductive (clinical) appraisals of the various physical and psychological effects associated with the overdose reversals. RESULTS People who use opioids recognise three distinct and interconnected outcomes that may follow a successful opioid overdose reversal after intramuscular or intranasal administration of naloxone. These outcomes are here termed, (i) 'rage' (describing a wide range of angry, hostile and/or aggressive outbursts), (ii) 'withdrawal symptoms,' and (iii) 'not rage, not withdrawal' (i.e., a wide range of short-lived, 'harmless' conditions (such as temporary amnesia, mild emotional outbursts, or physical discomfort) that do not include rage or withdrawal symptoms). CONCLUSION Physical and psychological reactions to naloxone should not be understood exclusively as a consequence of acute, opioid-related, withdrawal symptoms. The three distinct and interconnected reversal outcomes identified in this study are considered from a harm reduction policy perspective and are further framed by concepts associated with 'mediated toxicity' (i.e., harm triggered by medicine). The overall conclusion is that harm reduction training programmes that are aligned to the policy and practice of take home naloxone may be strengthened by including awareness and training in how to best respond to 'rage' associated with overdose reversal following naloxone administration by people who use opioids and other laypersons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Parkin
- National Addiction Centre, King's College London, 4 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill SE5 8BB, United Kingdom.
| | - Joanne Neale
- National Addiction Centre, King's College London, 4 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill SE5 8BB, United Kingdom; Centre for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Caral Brown
- National Addiction Centre, King's College London, 4 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill SE5 8BB, United Kingdom
| | - Aimee N C Campbell
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Columbia University Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 20, New York, NY 10032, United States
| | - Felipe Castillo
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Columbia University Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 20, New York, NY 10032, United States
| | - Jermaine D Jones
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Columbia University Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 20, New York, NY 10032, United States
| | - John Strang
- National Addiction Centre, King's College London, 4 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill SE5 8BB, United Kingdom; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, London SE5 8AZ, United Kingdom
| | - Sandra D Comer
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Columbia University Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 20, New York, NY 10032, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Fatal overdose prevention and experience with naloxone: A cross-sectional study from a community-based cohort of people who inject drugs in Baltimore, Maryland. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0230127. [PMID: 32160244 PMCID: PMC7065783 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Overdose is a leading cause of death in the United States, especially among people who inject drugs (PWID). Improving naloxone access and carrying among PWID may offset recent increases in overdose mortality associated with the influx of synthetic opioids in the drug market. This study characterized prevalence and correlates of several naloxone outcomes among PWID. Methods During 2018, a survey to assess experience with naloxone was administered to 915 participants in the AIDS Linked to the IntraVenous Experience (ALIVE) study, an ongoing community-based observational cohort of people who currently inject or formerly injected drugs in Baltimore, Maryland. We examined the associations of naloxone outcomes (training, supply, use, and regular possession) with socio-demographic, substance use and healthcare utilization factors among PWID in order to characterize gaps in naloxone implementation among this high-risk population. Results Median age was 56 years, 34% were female, 85% were African American, and 31% recently injected. In the past six months, 46% (n = 421) reported receiving training in overdose prevention, 38% (n = 346) had received a supply of naloxone, 9% (n = 85) had administered naloxone, and 9% (n = 82) reported usually carrying a supply of naloxone. Recent non-fatal overdose was not associated with any naloxone outcomes in adjusted analysis. Active opioid use (aOR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.03, 4.28) and recent treatment of alcohol or substance use disorder (aOR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.13, 3.56) were associated with regularly carrying naloxone. Conclusion Further work is needed to encourage PWID to carry and effectively use naloxone to decrease rates of fatal opioid overdose. While accessing treatment for substance use disorder was positively associated with carrying naloxone, EMS response to 911 calls for overdose, the emergency department, and syringe services programs may be settings in which naloxone access and carrying could be encouraged among PWID.
Collapse
|
30
|
Troberg K, Isendahl P, Blomé MA, Dahlman D, Håkansson A. Protocol for a multi-site study of the effects of overdose prevention education with naloxone distribution program in Skåne County, Sweden. BMC Psychiatry 2020; 20:49. [PMID: 32028921 PMCID: PMC7006080 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-2470-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuously high rates of overdose deaths in Sweden led to the decision by the Skåne County to initiate the first regional take-home naloxone program in Sweden. The project aims to study the effect of overdose prevention education and naloxone distribution on overdose mortality in Skåne County. Secondary outcome measures include non-fatal overdoses and overdose-related harm in the general population, as well as cohort-specific effects in study participants regarding overdoses, mortality and retention in naloxone program. METHODS Implementation of a multi-site train-the-trainer cascade model was launched in June 2018. Twenty four facilities, including opioid substitution treatment units, needle exchange programs and in-patient addiction units were included for the first line of start-up, aspiring to reach a majority of individuals at-risk within the first 6 months. Serving as self-sufficient naloxone hubs, these units provide training, naloxone distribution and study recruitment. During 3 years, questionnaires are obtained from initial training, follow up, every sixth month, and upon refill. Estimated sample size is 2000 subjects. Naloxone distribution rates are reported, by each unit, every 6 months. Medical diagnoses, toxicological raw data and data on mortality and cause of death will be collected from national and regional registers, both for included naloxone recipients and for the general population. Data on vital status and treatment needs will be collected from registers of emergency and prehospital care. DISCUSSION Despite a growing body of literature on naloxone distribution, studies on population effect on mortality are scarce. Most previous studies and reports have been uncontrolled, thus not being able to link naloxone distribution to survival, in relation to a comparison period. As Swedish registers present the opportunity to monitor individuals and entire populations over time, conditions for conducting systematic follow-ups in the Swedish population are good, serving the opportunity to study the impact of large scale overdose prevention education and naloxone distribution and thus fill the knowledge gap. TRIAL REGISTRATION Naloxone Treatment in Skåne County - Effect on Drug-related Mortality and Overdose-related Complications, NCT03570099, registered on 26 June 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Troberg
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. .,Division of Psychiatry, Addiction Center Malmö, Region Skåne, Malmö, Sweden. .,Malmö Addiction Centre, Clinical Research Unit, Södra Förstadsg. 35, Plan 4, S-205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
| | - Pernilla Isendahl
- grid.411843.b0000 0004 0623 9987Department of Infectious Disease, University Hospital Skåne, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Marianne Alanko Blomé
- grid.411843.b0000 0004 0623 9987Department of Infectious Disease, University Hospital Skåne, Malmö, Sweden ,Regional Office for Communicable Disease Control, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Disa Dahlman
- grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Department of Clinical Sciences, Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden ,grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Department of Clinical Sciences, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University/Region Skåne, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Anders Håkansson
- grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Department of Clinical Sciences, Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden ,grid.426217.40000 0004 0624 3273Division of Psychiatry, Addiction Center Malmö, Region Skåne, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hanson BL, Porter RR, Zöld AL, Terhorst-Miller H. Preventing opioid overdose with peer-administered naloxone: findings from a rural state. Harm Reduct J 2020; 17:4. [PMID: 31918740 PMCID: PMC6953279 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-019-0352-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In response to the opioid epidemic, naloxone distribution programs aim to prevent overdose death by making naloxone available and training people to use it. Peers of individuals at risk of opioid overdose are well-positioned to administer naloxone and prevent overdose death. METHODS We conducted key informant interviews with 18 individuals with past or current opioid and heroin drug use who had administered naloxone to a peer during an overdose emergency. Interviews explored individuals' experiences with administration and their recommendations for program and policy improvement. Data were systematically coded and analyzed for themes. RESULTS Participants sought naloxone rescue kits because they perceived high risk of overdose. They described high satisfaction with training and felt prepared to administer naloxone during overdose incidents. Overwhelmingly, participants perceived naloxone to be effective and emphasized the need to make it widely available. Findings suggest that engagement in overdose prevention strategies other than naloxone differs by gender, with females more likely than males to use multiple different strategies. Participants described that overdose experiences do not have a lasting impact on drug use behaviors. CONCLUSIONS Findings support the feasibility of naloxone distribution to peer opioid and heroin users and provide recommendations for policy improvement, including effective and well-advertised Good Samaritan laws and links to treatment for opioid use disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget L Hanson
- University of Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Dr, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA.
| | - Rebecca R Porter
- University of Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Dr, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA
| | - Amanda L Zöld
- University of Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Dr, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Maher L, Neale J. Adding quality to quantity in randomized controlled trials of addiction prevention and treatment: a new framework to facilitate the integration of qualitative research. Addiction 2019; 114:2257-2266. [PMID: 31400177 DOI: 10.1111/add.14777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are important for evaluating interventions, and qualitative research is increasingly recognized as being crucial to the success of this enterprise. We aimed to describe and demonstrate a temporal parallel purpose framework to help researchers understand how to make optimum use of qualitative research before, during and after RCTs. This framework sets out specific rationales for conducting qualitative research at each stage of a trial, where the rationales presented relate to both the intervention and evaluation methodology. METHOD AND RESULTS We conducted a scoping review of published qualitative studies undertaken alongside RCTs focusing on illicit drug use. We then used the temporal parallel purpose framework to present key findings to demonstrate how qualitative studies can add value to addiction RCTs by enhancing understanding of the intervention being trialled and/or the RCT itself. In so doing, we highlight the missed opportunities for addiction science when qualitative research is overlooked. We also explain why barriers to combining qualitative research and RCTs are neither inevitable nor insurmountable. CONCLUSIONS The temporal parallel purpose framework provides a tool for assessing when and why to combine qualitative research with addiction treatment and prevention RCTs. Our paper and framework can help researchers formulate key questions that qualitative research can address. This can potentially save resources by reducing the number of poorly designed interventions and trials and prevent morbidity, mortality, and other addiction-related harms by facilitating the identification and implementation of interventions that are most likely to be effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Maher
- Faculty of Medicine, Kirby Institute for Infection and Immunity, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Australia and Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joanne Neale
- National Addiction Centre, Kings College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Davis CS. Commentary on Neale et al. (2019): Foregrounding the competency, expertise and rights of people who use drugs. Addiction 2019; 114:719-720. [PMID: 30854746 DOI: 10.1111/add.14572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Corey S Davis
- Network for Public Health Law, Edina, MN, USA.,Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Donaghy J. Opioid users reflect on their experiences responding to suspected opioid overdoses using take-home naloxone. Evid Based Nurs 2019; 22:77. [PMID: 30898764 DOI: 10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet Donaghy
- Brantham Assessment Unit, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trus, Ipswich, Suffolk, UK
| |
Collapse
|