Twenty-year analysis of implant treatment in an Australian public dental clinic

Fixed prosthodontics clinical unit completions in an undergraduate curriculum: A 10-year retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Providing undergraduate dental students with a range of clinical experiences in fixed prosthodontics procedures is an important component of dental education. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the types of laboratory-fabricated fixed prosthodontics clinical units completed by undergraduate students over 10 consecutive years and determine any significant trends.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The fixed prosthodontics treatment registers from 2012 to 2021 were reviewed and the different types of completed fixed prosthodontics units and total number of fixed prosthodontics units were recorded for each year. Completed units were categorised according to the type of restoration and expressed in whole numbers and as a percentage of the total number of units completed in each year. The data were presented in table and graph form. Mann-Kendall tests were performed to statistically analyse for trends in the different restoration types.

RESULTS

Throughout all study years, porcelain bonded to metal (PBM) crowns (48.25%, range 35.70%-59.91%) were the most frequently completed fixed prosthodontics unit followed by full gold crowns (FGC) (20.84%, range 14.89%-27.30%) and all-ceramic crowns (ACC) (12.70%, range 3.67%-24.41%). Collectively, PBM, FGC and ACC comprised 81.80% of all completed fixed prosthodontics units. There were observed trends of increased use of all types of all-ceramic containing restorations, all types of all-gold containing restorations, all types of partial coverage restorations and specifically ceramic onlays and gold onlays. There were observed trends of reduced use of cast gold post-cores and all types of bridges.

CONCLUSION

PBM crowns were the mainstay laboratory-fabricated fixed prosthodontic unit completed over 10 years of undergraduate student fixed prosthodontics clinical practice.

Retrospective Study of Biohorizons® Implants Placed by Postgraduate Students at the University of Barcelona

The study aimed to evaluate the survival and failure rate, in the short- and medium-term, in addition to its relationship with risk factors, in implants placed by postgraduate students of the Master of Medicine, Surgery, and Oral Implantology course from the University of Barcelona. The study was designed including 192 patients with 422 implants placed between 2015 and 2018. Variables of implant failure were evaluated and related. Failure was split into early failure and late failure. Qualitative data were compared using the chi-squared test, taking p ≤ 0.05 as a significant value. The comparison of quantitative variables was carried out using the Student’s t-test for independent samples. The survival rate in a period of 6 months to 3 years was 97.87%. The mean age of the patients was (54.5 ± 13), and the largest number of implants were placed in the 51–60 age range. The failure rate was 2.13% (N = 9), 6 failed early and 3 failed after definitive prosthetic loading, with a p value < 0.0001. When comparing the failures according to their location in the anterior/posterior sector of the arch, the anterior sector showed statistically significant results (p = 0.027). Failed implants had a statistically significant relationship when they were placed in the anterior sector and were performed in the early stage.

Restoration of converging implants: Restorative complexity to facilitate retrievability

Implant treatment should be restoratively driven, however at times, ideal implant positioning may be sacrificed for surgical convenience at the expense of restorative complexity. A prosthesis incorporating a novel design was constructed to restore two converging implants placed in close proximity utilizing standard implant impression componentry and simple clinical stages. As the use of angulated screw channel technology was not possible, a customized cast “rest” abutment and overlying telescopic crown was fabricated that facilitated access for oral hygiene and retrievability as required. The complexity of the case design was transferred to the laboratory phases of construction. The case presented a satisfactory clinical outcome for an initially challenging implant presentation and reinforced the need to work closely with the laboratory technician.

Biofunctionalization of Microgroove Surfaces with Antibacterial Nanocoatings

Objectives

To investigate the physical properties of the modified microgroove (MG) and antibacterial nanocoated surfaces. In addition, the biological interactions of the modified surfaces with human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) and the antibacterial activity of the surfaces against Porphyromonas gingivalis were studied.

Methods

The titanium nitride (TiN) and silver (Ag) coatings were deposited onto the smooth and MG surfaces using magnetron sputtering. A smooth titanium surface (Ti-S) was used as the control. The physicochemical properties including surface morphology, roughness, and hydrophilicity were characterized using scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and an optical contact angle analyzer. The "contact guidance" morphology was assessed using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Cell proliferation was analyzed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay. The expression level of the main focal adhesion-related structural protein vinculin was compared using quantitative reverse transcription PCR and Western blotting. The antibacterial activity against P. gingivalis was evaluated using the LIVE/DEAD BacLight™ Bacterial Viability Kit.

Results

The Ag and TiN antibacterial nanocoatings were successfully deposited onto the smooth and MG surfaces using magnetron sputtering technology. TiN coating on a grooved surface (TiN-MG) resulted in less nanoroughness and greater surface hydrophilicity than Ag coating on a smooth surface (Ag-S), which was more hydrophobic. Cell proliferation and expression of vinculin were higher on the TiN-MG surface than on the Ag-coated surfaces. Ag-coated surfaces showed the strongest antibacterial activity, followed by TiN-coated surfaces.

Conclusion

Nano-Ag coating resulted in good antimicrobial activity; however, the biocompatibility was questionable. TiN nanocoating on an MG surface showed antibacterial properties with an optimal biocompatibility and maintained the "contact guidance" effects for HGFs.