Mandibular division trigeminal nerve injuries following primary endodontic treatment. A case series

Clinical and medico-legal considerations in endodontics

Endodontic treatment can be challenging for a number of reasons, including the microscopic nature of the clinical environment, reliance on tactile sensation and lack of direct visualization of the work being performed. Commonly, endodontic patients present with pain and distress, which can exacerbate an already difficult clinical situation. Complications may might arise prior to, or during treatment, despite practising with the utmost care and skill. Preventing and managing these complications can take considerable time and energy, and oftentimes assistance from or referral to more experienced colleagues is required. The aim of this review is to discuss medico-legal considerations in endodontics, with clinical correlations and a focus on the Australian legal landscape. [Correction added on 18 October 2023, after first online publication: The abstract was amended from a structured to an unstructured abstract.].

Resolution of apical periodontitis-induced mental nerve paresthesia through non-surgical endodontic retreatment: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Paresthesia is a potential consequence of unsuccessful root canal treatment. Persistent infection resulting in apical periodontitis may enlarge sufficiently to involve the mental neurovascular bundle.

METHODS

The case presented in this report was referred for endodontic evaluation with a chief complaint of discomfort on mastication and persistent numbness of the lower left lip. Clinical and radiographic evaluation revealed incomplete primary endodontic treatment of the left mandibular second premolar with complex internal anatomy. The untreated root canal system resulted in the progression of apical periodontitis involving the left mental neurovascular bundle as confirmed by CBCT imaging.

RESULTS

Non-surgical root canal retreatment was performed over two visits. At the 3-year follow-up visit, the paresthesia had resolved with return of normal sensation.

CONCLUSION

Non-surgical endodontic retreatment may be sufficient to allow healing of large periapical lesions and resolve complications including paresthesia without the need for surgical intervention.

Prognostic factors, symptom evolution, and quality of life of posttraumatic trigeminal neuropathy

ABSTRACT

Neurosensory disturbances (NSDs) caused by injury to the trigeminal nerve can affect many aspects of daily life. However, factors affecting the persistence of NSDs in patients with posttraumatic trigeminal neuropathies (PTTNs) remain largely unknown. The identification of such risk factors will allow for the phenotyping of patients with PTTNs, which is crucial for improving treatment strategies. We therefore aimed to identify the prognostic factors of NSD persistence, pain intensity, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with PTTNs and to use these factors to create a prognostic prediction model. We first performed a bivariate analysis using retrospective longitudinal data from 384 patients with NSDs related to posttraumatic injury of the trigeminal nerve (mean follow-up time: 322 ± 302 weeks). Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed. The multivariable prediction model to predict persistent NSDs was able to identify 76.9% of patients with persistent NSDs, with an excellent level of discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.84; sensitivity: 81.8%; specificity: 70.0%). Furthermore, neurosensory recovery was significantly associated with sex; injury caused by local anesthesia, extraction, third molar surgery, or endodontic treatment; and the presence of thermal hyperesthesia. Pain intensity and QoL analysis revealed several factors associated with higher pain levels and poorer QoL. Together, our findings may aid in predicting patient prognosis after dental, oral, and maxillofacial surgery and might lead to personalized treatment options and improved patient outcomes.

Outcomes of referrals from endodontic to orofacial pain specialists: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Diagnosis and treatment of non-odontogenic pain is challenging for endodontists. The purpose of the study was to investigate the outcomes of referrals to orofacial pain specialists made for patients with suspected non-odontogenic pain, after evaluation and/or treatment by an endodontist.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of dental records was conducted for 60 patients referred from a postgraduate endodontic clinic to an orofacial pain clinic. Patient demographics, pain history, endodontic, and orofacial pain diagnoses were collected. Number of visits, length of treatment, and treatments prescribed were recorded. For analysis of outcomes, data pertinent to resolution/persistence of symptoms and patient compliance were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were included in the study. The most frequent pulpal and periapical diagnoses were previously treated (62%) and symptomatic apical periodontitis (72%), respectively. The most common orofacial pain diagnosis was temporomandibular disorder. The average time spent to diagnose and treat the pain was 17 months. Pain reduction varied and was documented for 51% of patients. Indications of non-compliance with orofacial pain appointments and treatments were documented for 66% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-odontogenic pain diagnosis and treatment are challenging. Patients may have an increased predilection for developing persistent pain after endodontic treatment and/or have an undiagnosed, chronic orofacial pain condition as a true source of their chief complaint. It may be helpful for endodontists to set expectations of typical treatment times/plans when referring patients for evaluation and treatment of non-odontogenic pain.

Microsurgical Repair of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injuries Associated With Endodontic Treatment: Results on Sensory Function and Relief of Pain

PURPOSE

An uncommon, but serious complication of endodontic treatment is inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury warranting operative intervention for exploration, debridement, and repair. The purpose of the study was to evaluate outcomes of microneurosurgical intervention for endotontic-related IAN injuries in terms of achievement of functional sensory recovery (FSR) and pain relief and to identify factors affecting outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients who had microsurgical exploration and repair of IAN injuries sustained during endodontic therapy was performed. The primary predictor variable is time to surgery and the primary outcome variables were time to FSR, whether or not the patient regained FSR, and postoperative pain level at 12 months (1-10 on a visual analog scale). Secondary variables include intraoperative findings, surgical treatment rendered, sensory recovery, and preoperative pain level. Analyses include Kaplan-Meier estimation, Fisher exact test, 1-way and mixed-design analysis of variance, and paired t-test.

RESULTS

The sample included 23 patients with a mean age of 48.6 years with a female:male ratio of 20:3. Painful sensation was present in 17 (73.9%) of 23 patients at initial consultation. Mean time to surgery was 10.9 months (median 4.8 months, standard deviation = ±16.9). FSR was achieved in 10 of 21 patients at 1 year. Pain level at 1 year following surgical intervention improved from 4.86 to 2.76 (P = .001) with no effect from other variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical exploration and repair of endodontic-related IAN injuries is shown to improve neuropathic pain levels, while only delivering a modest recovery of sensory function. These injuries can be severe and debilitating and present with a variety of diagnoses and surgical findings. While this study fails to identify any particular factors affecting outcome, the data presented can help with clinician recommendations for treatment in patient-centered care.