Communication between the distal interphalangeal joint and the navicular bursa in the horse at Computed Tomography Arthrography

Computed tomographic evaluation of the proximity of needles placed for perineural anesthesia of the palmar digital nerves to synovial structures in the foot: an ex vivo study

Background

Potential synovial penetration following palmar digital nerve blocks has not been investigated.

Objectives

To evaluate the proximity of needles placed for palmar digital nerve blocks to nearby synovial structures using computed tomography (CT).

Study design

Descriptive observational study.

Methods

In 18 cadaver forelimbs, sequential injection of the navicular bursa (NB), distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) and digital flexor tendon sheath (DFTS) was performed using 3, 5 and 10 mL diluted radiodense contrast medium, respectively. After each synovial injection, 25 gage needles were placed over the palmar digital nerves at the proximal aspect of the ungular cartilages (distal injections) and 1 cm further proximally (proximal injections), and CT examination was performed. Subsequently, needles were removed, and the synovial structures further distended with the same volume as for the first injection. Perineural needle placement and image acquisition were repeated. The distance between the needle tip and adjacent synovial structures was measured (mm) in reconstructed images. Results were analyzed in separate general linear mixed models, to determine the effect of needle position and synovial distension on the distance from the tip of the needle to the NB, DFTS and DIPJ.

Results

Synovial penetration was confirmed following 12/420 (3%) needle placements (NB n = 5, 1 after proximal and 4 after distal injections; DIPJ n = 2, DFTS n = 2, NB or DIPJ n = 3, all after distal injections). The mean distance from the needle tip to the NB and DIPJ was significantly smaller after the second distension (NB: p = 0.025; DIPJ: p < 0.001) and with the distal needle placements (NB: p < 0.001; DIPJ: p < 0.001). For the DFTS, the distance from the needle tip was significantly smaller with the proximal needle placements (p = 0.001).

Main limitations

Ex-vivo study.

Conclusion

There is a small risk of synovial penetration when performing palmar digital nerve blocks, especially when distension of adjacent synovial structures is present.

Objective evaluation for analgesia of the distal interphalangeal joint, the navicular bursa and perineural analgesia in horses with naturally occurring forelimb lameness localised to the foot

BACKGROUND

The outcome and interpretation of intra-synovial diagnostic analgesia of the distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) and the navicular bursa (NB) remain in dispute, and no objective studies have been carried out to establish the percentage of improvement over time from these two analgesia techniques.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the qualitative and time-dependent outcome of DIPJ-A and NB-A in naturally occurring forelimb lameness.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

METHODS

Twenty-three clinical cases with forelimb lameness were evaluated objectively using a body mounted inertial sensor system (BMIS). Lameness was localised to the foot with a palmar digital nerve block and/or an abaxial sesamoidean nerve block on day 1, and analgesia of the DIPJ (DIPJ-A) and NB (NB-A) were performed on days 2 and 3. Improvement following perineural analgesia was measured after 10 min and intra-synovial blocks after 2-, 5- and 10-min. Horses with at least 70% improvement measured objectively after diagnostic analgesia were included in the study.

RESULTS

There was no significant association between improvement following perineural analgesia and the DIPJ-A and NB-A. The mean improvement in the lameness differed between DIPJ-A and NB-A at 2 min (p < 0.001) and at 5 min (p = 0.04), and it was no longer observed after 10 min (p = 0.06). A positive NB-A produced a high degree of improvement that remained stable, whereas the DIPJ-A improved over time.

MAIN LIMITATIONS

Perineural and intra-synovial analgesia were performed without contrast medium to assess the diffusion of mepivacaine.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that perineural analgesia is not reliable enough to differentiate pain originating from DIPJ and NB. Early evaluation of the DIPJ-A and NB-A can determine the origin of the pain. An improvement following NB-A was constant over time, but an improvement following DIPJ-A varied by up to 10 min.

Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography Findings in 105 Horse Distal Extremities

The poor soft tissue conspicuity of CT can be improved by using intra-arterial CT Angiography (CTA), and intra-articular and intra-bursal contrast enhanced CT (CTAR). This retrospective study describes a combination protocol of CT and CTA of the horse's foot, and CTAR of the distal interphalangeal joint and navicular bursa. It is hypothesized this would provide a comprehensive overview of the range and severity of distal limb pathology. Radiology reports of all horses admitted for distal limb CT over a 5 year period were reviewed. All horses with a complete four stage CT examination and radiology report with lameness isolated to the foot were included. Twenty seven imaging findings using a four grade semiquantitative severity scoring system contributing towards six main diagnostic categories were described. One hundred and five examinations on 56 horses revealed a diagnosis of navicular bone disease in 64%, deep digital flexor tendinopathy in 43%, distal interphalangeal osteoarthritis in 35%, navicular bursitis in 31%, distal interphalangeal collateral ligament desmopathy in 26%, and hoof capsule and distal phalanx pathology in 10%. Only 25% of the navicular bone disease cases were considered clinically significant. The majority of deep digital flexor tendon lesions (77%) and distal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis (51%) were considered significant. Approximately one third of navicular bursa (37%) and collateral ligament (33%) abnormalities were considered significant. Navicular bursa abnormalities were associated with navicular bone and deep digital flexor tendon lesions. The findings support the hypothesis and the use of this protocol for evaluation of foot lameness.

Is the T-ligament a ligament? A histological study in equine cadaver forelimbs

Foot pain is a frequent cause of lameness in horses and can involve multiple structures within the hoof. The T-ligament (an anatomical structure connecting the synovium of the distal interphalangeal joint, the digital flexor tendon sheath and the navicular bursa) is poorly described. Five pairs of equine cadaver distal forelimbs were collected from a slaughterhouse. Sagittal sections (medial, middle and lateral) were obtained and processed with Haematoxylin Eosin Safran, Unna's Orcein, and Picrosirius red stains. Histological assessment revealed that the T-ligament was covered by the surrounding synovia of the distal interphalangeal joint, the digital flexor tendon sheath and the navicular bursa. Its collagen content was lower (30.01%±10.15) than that of the collateral sesamoidean ligament (89.48%±5.8; P = .0008) and the middle phalanx (85.72%±3.67; P = .0008). Under polarized light microscopy, it showed a slight heterogeneous pattern of birefringence, with angle-related changes. Elastic fibres were more numerous (21.76%±8.72) than in the collateral sesamoidean ligament (0.28%±0.45), or deep digital flexor tendon (0.04%±0.02); and were more densely packed. Mean cell count was higher for the T-ligament than for other tissues (P = .0007). Blood vessels were identified in the T-ligament and were penetrating the deep digital flexor tendon (8/10 limbs, 5/5 horses). In conclusion, the T-ligament looked like a vinculum for the deep digital flexor tendon, with a central elastic core, surrounding loose connective tissue and blood vessels. It is not a ligament. Its clinical relevance still needs to be determined.

The influence of tenoscopic approaches on radiocarpal joint perforation during carpal sheath tenoscopy in horses

OBJECTIVE

To report the frequency of radiocarpal joint (RCJ) perforation during two proximolateral carpal sheath (CS) approaches and to investigate whether the presence or absence of a natural communication between the RCJ and CS.

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental, randomized, controlled study.

SAMPLE POPULATION

Twelve adult horses and 12 cadaver front limbs.

METHODS

Proximolateral CS tenoscopy was performed on both carpi of 12 horses under general anaesthesia. Limbs were randomly assigned into two groups. In group 1, the instrument portal was centered at the level of the distal radial physeal remnant (PR). In group 2, the instrument portal was centered 2 cm proximal to the PR. Immediately after tenoscopy, dye-coloured fluid was instilled arthroscopically into the dorsolateral RCJ, and the open tenoscopic portals were evaluated for leakage. Twelve cadaver front limbs were examined for naturally occuring RCJ and CS communication by using positive-contrast computed tomography (CT). Frequency of perforations were compared with McNemar's test for two matched proportions.

RESULTS

In group 1, 10 of 12 RCJ were perforated during tenoscopy, and, in group 2, four of 12 RCJ were perforated (P = 0.03). No diffusion of contrast from the RCJ to the CS was detected by CT.

CONCLUSION

Perforation of the RCJ was common when CS instrument portals were placed at the level of the PR. No natural communication was detected between the RCJ and CS.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Carpal sheath tenoscopic instrument portals may need to be placed >2 cm proximal to the PR to prevent inadvertent RCJ perforation, especially in horses undergoing tenoscopic treatment of a septic CS.