Transitions to and from long-term care facilities and length of completed stay: Reuse of population-based survey data

Time-varying risk of death after SARS-CoV-2 infection in Swedish long-term care facility residents: a matched cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether SARS-CoV-2 infection in residents of long-term care (LTC) facilities is associated with higher mortality after the acute phase of infection, and to estimate survival in uninfected residents.

DESIGN

Extended follow-up of a previous, propensity score-matched, retrospective cohort study based on the Swedish Senior Alert register.

SETTING

LTC facilities in Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS

n=3604 LTC residents with documented SARS-CoV-2 until 15 September 2020 matched to 3604 uninfected controls using time-dependent propensity scores on age, sex, health status, comorbidities, prescription medications, geographical region and Senior Alert registration time. In a secondary analysis (n=3731 in each group), geographical region and Senior Alert registration time were not matched for in order to increase the follow-up time in controls and allow for an estimation of median survival.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

All-cause mortality until 24 October 2020, tracked using the National Cause of Death Register.

RESULTS

Median age was 87 years and 65% were women. Excess mortality peaked at 5 days after documented SARS-CoV-2-infection (HR 21.5, 95% CI 15.9 to 29.2), after which excess mortality decreased. From the second month onwards, mortality rate became lower in infected residents than controls. The HR for death during days 61-210 of follow-up was 0.76 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.93). The median survival of uninfected controls was 1.6 years, which was much lower than the national life expectancy in Sweden at age 87 (5.05 years in men, 6.07 years in women).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of death after SARS-CoV-2 infection in LTC residents peaked after 5 days and decreased after 2 months, probably because the frailest residents died during the acute phase, leaving healthier residents remaining. The limited life expectancy in this population suggests that LTC resident status should be accounted for when estimating years of life lost due to COVID-19.

Time-varying risk of death after SARS-CoV-2 infection in Swedish long-term care facility residents: a matched cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether SARS-CoV-2 infection in residents of long-term care (LTC) facilities is associated with higher mortality after the acute phase of infection, and to estimate survival in uninfected residents.

DESIGN

Extended follow-up of a previous, propensity score-matched, retrospective cohort study based on the Swedish Senior Alert register.

SETTING

LTC facilities in Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS

n=3604 LTC residents with documented SARS-CoV-2 until 15 September 2020 matched to 3604 uninfected controls using time-dependent propensity scores on age, sex, health status, comorbidities, prescription medications, geographical region and Senior Alert registration time. In a secondary analysis (n=3731 in each group), geographical region and Senior Alert registration time were not matched for in order to increase the follow-up time in controls and allow for an estimation of median survival.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

All-cause mortality until 24 October 2020, tracked using the National Cause of Death Register.

RESULTS

Median age was 87 years and 65% were women. Excess mortality peaked at 5 days after documented SARS-CoV-2-infection (HR 21.5, 95% CI 15.9 to 29.2), after which excess mortality decreased. From the second month onwards, mortality rate became lower in infected residents than controls. The HR for death during days 61-210 of follow-up was 0.76 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.93). The median survival of uninfected controls was 1.6 years, which was much lower than the national life expectancy in Sweden at age 87 (5.05 years in men, 6.07 years in women).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of death after SARS-CoV-2 infection in LTC residents peaked after 5 days and decreased after 2 months, probably because the frailest residents died during the acute phase, leaving healthier residents remaining. The limited life expectancy in this population suggests that LTC resident status should be accounted for when estimating years of life lost due to COVID-19.

Supporting Older Homeless Persons' Positive Relocations to Long-Term Care: Service Provider Views

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study sought to explore the challenges and opportunities associated with supporting older homeless persons' relocations to long-term care (LTC) from the perspective of service providers. It aims to inform how to improve relocation processes for this vulnerable and growing subpopulation of older persons.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This cross-sectional qualitative study employed semistructured face-to-face interviews with service providers from two Health and Social Service Centres in Montreal, Quebec. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed in five stages.

RESULTS

A total of eight service providers reported on their experiences supporting over 40 relocations of older homeless persons (50+) in the last year. According to participants, older homeless persons' trajectories into LTC typically included a series of neglected medical issues followed by hospitalization and eventual relocation to LTC. Systemic barriers such as limited-time for proper planning, insufficient housing options for persons with minor functional limitations, disregard for preferred geographic location, multiple moves, and staff prejudices worked together to expedite premature relocation and challenge relocation processes.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Older homeless persons appear to be at heightened risk of premature and challenging relocation processes. Expanding housing stock for persons with functional limitations, strengthening intersectoral collaborations, providing education and training to staff, and ensuring flexibility around rules and regulations in receiving LTC homes would both improve access to aging in place for this marginalized group of older persons and ensure conditions are in place to support positive relocations to LTC for those who require it.

What nursing home environment can maximise eating independence among residents with cognitive impairment? Findings from a secondary analysis

To explore the influence of the Nursing Home (NH) environment on eating independence while taking into account individual and nursing care factors, was the aim of the study. A secondary analysis was performed based on data collected in a multicentre prospective observational study involving 13 NHs. Residents aged >65 were included (n = 1,027). Dependence in eating was measured using the Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia scale (EdFED, range 0-20). In addition to individual and nursing care variables, the NHs environments were assessed with the Therapeutic Environment Screening Survey for Nursing Homes (TESS-NH, range 0-149). The mean EdFED score was 2.48 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]=2.22-2.73) and the TESS-NH score was 122.19 (95% CI=115.89-128.49). A linear regression analysis explained 30.8% of the total variance in eating dependence. Alongside individual and nursing care factors, in poor NH unit environments, residents with severe cognitive impairment showed increased eating dependence; in contrast, in better environments, similar residents showed maximal eating performance.

"I Didn't Even Make My Bed": Hospital Relocations and Resident Adjustment in Long-Term Care Over Time

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This prospective longitudinal qualitative study sought to identify the conditions that help or hinder older adults' capacities to adjust to long-term care (LTC) when relocating from hospital.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Informed by the principles of constructivist grounded theory, this study employed semi-structured interviews with LTC home residents. Participants were interviewed 4 weeks after their initial relocation, and again every 6 months until they had either resided in their final LTC home for at least 3 months or been enrolled in the study for 2 years. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using the constant comparative method that employs the principle of comparison to guide the analytic process.

FINDINGS

A total of nine residents participated in 24 interviews and most had undergone two or more moves. Analysis of the data revealed that multiple forced moves challenged residents' capacities to find home in LTC by contributing to anxiety and uncertainty, hindering resident-staff relations, and interfering with residents' desires to connect with one another. Analysis of the data further revealed that relocation frameworks may require adaptations to more accurately reflect older adults' experiences with relocation from hospital to LTC.

IMPLICATIONS

Hospital relocations pose many challenges to residents' capacities to find home in LTC, in part, because they initiate a process of multiple moves. Until the moving process from hospital truly acknowledges and explores residents' preferences, offers choices, and supports joint decision making, it will remain challenging for the LTC home sector to help residents find meaning, purpose, and home in LTC.