1
|
Matsuno K, Ueda K, Saito M, Kamii M, Tsuda A, Kawabata A, Morikawa A, Okamoto A. Pilot study of the effect of surgical menopause on bone mineral density and quality in patients with gynecological malignancies. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2025; 51:e16141. [PMID: 39530312 PMCID: PMC11635186 DOI: 10.1111/jog.16141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 10/21/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
AIM To investigate the effects of surgical menopause on bone mineral density and bone quality because bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for the treatment of gynecological malignancies is common even in premenopausal patients. This study is prospective one of bone mineral density and quality measurements after surgery for perimenopausal gynecologic malignancies. METHODS In 50 women who underwent surgical menopause for a diagnosis of gynecological malignancies, bone mineral density (BMD), blood levels of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) as bone metabolism markers, and urinary pentosidine level as bone quality marker were measured before surgery and at multiple points up to 24 months after surgery. RESULTS In a group of 22 patients who did not undergo hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (HRT- group), BMD of the lumbar spine and total hip continued to decrease significantly from 6 months postoperatively. Percentages of changes in BMD progressively increased over time after surgery. TRACP-5b and urinary pentosidine levels significantly increased 6 months postoperatively compared with preoperative levels. Comparisons between 10 patients who underwent HRT (HRT+ group) and the HRT- group revealed significant reductions in the percentage of change in lumbar spine BMD only and TRACP-5b and urinary pentosidine levels 12 months postoperatively in the former group. CONCLUSIONS In this pilot study, we showed that BMD and bone-related markers are altered in patients with surgical menopause. It also suggested that HRT may reduce these influences on bone metabolism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanae Matsuno
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsThe Jikei University School of MedicineMinato‐kuTokyoJapan
| | - Kazu Ueda
- Department of GynecologyInternational University of Health and Welfare, Mita HospitalMinato‐kuTokyoJapan
| | - Mitsuru Saito
- Department of Orthopedic SurgeryThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Misato Kamii
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsThe Jikei University School of MedicineMinato‐kuTokyoJapan
| | - Akina Tsuda
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsThe Jikei University School of MedicineMinato‐kuTokyoJapan
| | - Ayako Kawabata
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsThe Jikei University School of MedicineMinato‐kuTokyoJapan
| | - Asuka Morikawa
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsThe Jikei University School of MedicineMinato‐kuTokyoJapan
| | - Aikou Okamoto
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsThe Jikei University School of MedicineMinato‐kuTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Perrucci E, Macchia G, Cerrotta A, Andrulli AD, Autorino R, Barcellini A, Campitelli M, Corrao G, Costantini S, De Sanctis V, Di Muzio J, Epifani V, Ferrazza P, Fodor A, Garibaldi E, Laliscia C, Lazzari R, Magri E, Mariucci C, Pace MP, Pappalardi B, Pastorino A, Piccolo F, Scoglio C, Surgo A, Titone F, Tortoreto F, De Felice F, Aristei C. Prevention and management of radiotherapy-related toxicities in gynecological malignancies. Position paper on behalf of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology). LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024; 129:1329-1351. [PMID: 39198369 PMCID: PMC11379782 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01844-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024]
Abstract
Multi-modal therapies for gynecological cancers management may determine a wide range of side effects which depend on therapy-related factors and patient characteristics and comorbidities. Curative or adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy is linked with acute and late toxicity due to irradiation of organs at risk, as small and large bowel, rectum, bladder, pelvic bone, vagina and bone marrow. Successful toxicity management varies with its severity, Radiation Centre practice and experience and skills of radiation oncologists. This position paper was designed by the Italian Association of Radiation and Clinical Oncology Gynecology Study Group to provide radiation oncologists with evidence-based strategies to prevent and manage acute and late toxicities and follow-up recommendations for gynecological cancer patients submitted radiotherapy. Six workgroups of radiation oncologists with over 5 years of experience in gynecologic cancers were setup to investigate radiotherapy-related toxicities. For each topic, PubMed database was searched for relevant English language papers from January 2005 to December 2022. Titles and abstracts of results were checked to verify suitability for the document. Reference lists of selected studies and review papers were added if pertinent. Data on incidence, etiopathogenesis, prevention, treatment and follow-up of acute and late side effects for each organ at risk are presented and discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Annamaria Cerrotta
- Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Rosa Autorino
- UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Amelia Barcellini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapy, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Maura Campitelli
- UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Corrao
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Costantini
- Radiation Oncology Centre, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - Vitaliana De Sanctis
- Radiotherapy Oncology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Translational Medicine, St. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Jacopo Di Muzio
- Dipartimento Di Oncologia P.O. S. Anna - SS Radioterapia, A.O.U "Città Della Salute E Della Scienza", Turin, Italy
| | - Valeria Epifani
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
| | | | - Andrei Fodor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Garibaldi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Ospedale Regionale Parini-AUSL Valle d'Aosta, Aosta, Italy
| | - Concetta Laliscia
- Department of Translational Medicine, Radiation Oncology Division, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberta Lazzari
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Magri
- Department of Radiotherapy, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Cristina Mariucci
- Radiotherapy Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Maria Paola Pace
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale Generale Provinciale di Macerata, AST Macerata, Italy
| | - Brigida Pappalardi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Federica Piccolo
- Radiotherapy Unit, Ospedale di Circolo Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
| | - Claudio Scoglio
- Radiotherapy Unit, Ospedale Maggiore di Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Alessia Surgo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Titone
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, "Santa Maria della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Individuals with cancer face unique risk factors for osteoporosis and fractures. Clinicians must consider the additive effects of cancer-specific factors, including treatment-induced bone loss, and premorbid fracture risk, utilizing FRAX score and bone mineral densitometry when available. Pharmacologic therapy should be offered as per cancer-specific guidelines, when available, or local general osteoporosis guidelines informed by clinical judgment and patient preferences. Our objective was to review and summarize the epidemiologic burden of osteoporotic fracture risk and fracture risk assessment in adults with cancer, and recommended treatment thresholds for cancer treatment-induced bone loss, with specific focus on breast, prostate, thyroid, gynecological, multiple myeloma, and hematopoietic stem cell transplant. This narrative review was informed by PubMed searches to July 25, 2022, that combined terms for cancer, stem cell transplantation, fracture, bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score, FRAX, Garvan nomogram or fracture risk calculator, QFracture, prediction, and risk factors. The literature informs that cancer can impact bone health in numerous ways, leading to both systemic and localized decreases in BMD. Many cancer treatments can have detrimental effects on bone health. In particular, hormone deprivation therapies for hormone-responsive cancers such as breast cancer and prostate cancer, and hematopoietic stem cell transplant for hematologic malignancies, adversely affect bone turnover, resulting in osteoporosis and fractures. Surgical treatments such as hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for gynecological cancers can also lead to deleterious effects on bone health. Radiation therapy is well documented to cause localized bone loss and fractures. Few studies have validated the use of fracture risk prediction tools in the cancer population. Guidelines on cancer-specific treatment thresholds are limited, and major knowledge gaps still exist in fracture risk and fracture risk assessment in patients with cancer. Despite the limitations of current knowledge on fracture risk assessment and treatment thresholds in patients with cancer, clinicians must consider the additive effects of bone damaging factors to which these patients are exposed and their premorbid fracture risk profile. Pharmacologic treatment should be offered as per cancer-specific guidelines when available, or per local general osteoporosis guidelines, in accordance with clinical judgment and patient preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie Ye
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sobecki J, Weigman B, Anderson-Carter I, Barroilhet L, Chandereng T, Kliewer M, Hartenbach E. Opportunistic osteoporosis screening using routine computed tomography images to identify bone loss in gynecologic cancer survivors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:1050-1055. [PMID: 35101963 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cancer treatment-induced bone loss is a known side effect of cancer therapy. Computed tomography (CT) bone mineral density screening is a novel tool for identifying bone loss. This study aims to use routine CT images to determine long-term bone mineral density changes and osteoporosis risk among women with gynecologic cancers. METHODS Bone loss was evaluated in a retrospective cohort of women ≤65 years old with gynecologic cancer who underwent oophorectomy from January 2010 to December 2014. Opportunistic CT-based bone mineral density measurements (Hounsfield units, HU) were performed at baseline and intervals up to 5 years after cancer diagnosis. Osteoporosis risk was categorized by HU. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare baseline to follow-up bone mineral density at 1, 3, and 5 years and to identify predictors of bone loss following diagnosis. RESULTS A total of 185 patients (median age 53 years, range 23-65 years, 78.1% ovarian cancer) were included. Bone mineral density significantly decreased between baseline and 1 year (p<0.001), 3 years (p<0.001), and 5 years (p<0.001). Half with normal bone mineral density at baseline had risk for osteopenia or osteoporosis at 5 years. Four percent had osteoporosis risk at baseline compared with 1 year (7.4%), 3 years (15.7%), and 5 years (18.0%). Pre-treatment bone mineral density was a significant predictor at 1 and 5 years (1 year: p<0.01; 5 years: p<0.01). History of chemotherapy predicted bone loss at 1 year (p=0.03). More lifetime chemotherapy cycles were associated with increased risk of osteoporosis at 1 year (p=0.03) and 5 years (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS Women with gynecologic cancers may experience accelerated cancer treatment-induced bone loss. Routine CT imaging is a convenient screening modality to identify those at highest risk for osteoporosis who warrant further evaluation with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Routine bone mineral density assessments 1 year following oophorectomy for cancer treatment may be warranted in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janelle Sobecki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Benjamin Weigman
- University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - India Anderson-Carter
- University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Lisa Barroilhet
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Thevaa Chandereng
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Mark Kliewer
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Ellen Hartenbach
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Choi HG, Lee JW, Min CY, Yoo DM, Lee SW. Analyses of the association between cervical cancer and osteoporosis/osteoporotic fracture: a cross-sectional study using KoGES HEXA data. Int J Clin Oncol 2021; 26:1752-1758. [PMID: 34091796 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01951-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the association between cervical cancer and the occurrence of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture using data from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES). METHODS In this national cohort study using KoGES health examination (HEXA) data, we extracted data for patients with cervical cancer (n = 493) and control participants (n = 77,571); we then analyzed the occurrence of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture at baseline from 2004 to 2013 and during follow-up from 2012 to 2016. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the odds ratios (ORs) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS The ORs (95% CIs) for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture were 1.49 (95% CI 1.15-1.92, p = 0.03) and 1.06 (95% CI 0.82-1.38, p = 0.634), respectively, in the cervical cancer group. The ORs (95% CIs) for osteoporosis were 2.12 (95% CI 1.14-3.95, p = 0.018) in the ≤ 51-year-old group and 1.43 (95% CI 1.08-1.89, p = 0.011) in the ≥ 52-year-old group of cervical cancer patients. CONCLUSION We concluded that Korean women with cervical cancer had a higher risk of osteoporosis than healthy women, but the same finding was not observed for osteoporotic fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyo Geun Choi
- Hallym Data Science Laboratory, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Republic of Korea.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Woo Lee
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Chan Yang Min
- Hallym Data Science Laboratory, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Myoung Yoo
- Hallym Data Science Laboratory, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Suk Woo Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 22 Gwanpyeong-ro 170beon-gil, Dongan-gu, Anyang, Gyeonggi, 14068, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kumari A, Shonibare Z, Monavarian M, Arend RC, Lee NY, Inman GJ, Mythreye K. TGFβ signaling networks in ovarian cancer progression and plasticity. Clin Exp Metastasis 2021; 38:139-161. [PMID: 33590419 PMCID: PMC7987693 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-021-10077-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death in women. Late-stage diagnosis with significant tumor burden, accompanied by recurrence and chemotherapy resistance, contributes to this poor prognosis. These morbidities are known to be tied to events associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in cancer. During EMT, localized tumor cells alter their polarity, cell-cell junctions, cell-matrix interactions, acquire motility and invasiveness and an exaggerated potential for metastatic spread. Key triggers for EMT include the Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGFβ) family of growth factors which are actively produced by a wide array of cell types within a specific tumor and metastatic environment. Although TGFβ can act as either a tumor suppressor or promoter in cancer, TGFβ exhibits its pro-tumorigenic functions at least in part via EMT. TGFβ regulates EMT both at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels as outlined here. Despite recent advances in TGFβ based therapeutics, limited progress has been seen for ovarian cancers that are in much need of new therapeutic strategies. Here, we summarize and discuss several recent insights into the underlying signaling mechanisms of the TGFβ isoforms in EMT in the unique metastatic environment of EOCs and the current therapeutic interventions that may be relevant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asha Kumari
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, WTI 320B, 1824 Sixth Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Zainab Shonibare
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, WTI 320B, 1824 Sixth Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Mehri Monavarian
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, WTI 320B, 1824 Sixth Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Rebecca C Arend
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology-Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - Nam Y Lee
- Division of Pharmacology, Chemistry and Biochemistry, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA
| | - Gareth J Inman
- Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute and Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Karthikeyan Mythreye
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, WTI 320B, 1824 Sixth Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sobecki JN, Rice LW, Hartenbach EM. Bone health and osteoporosis screening in gynecologic cancer survivors. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 160:619-624. [PMID: 33309416 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.11.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Cancer treatment-induced bone loss is a known side effect of cancer therapy that increases the risk of osteoporosis and bone fracture. Women with gynecologic cancer are at increased risk of bone loss secondary to the combined effect of oophorectomy and adjuvant therapies. Data regarding bone loss in women with gynecologic cancers are overall lacking compared to other cancer populations. Consequently, guidelines for osteoporosis screening in women with cancer are largely based on data generated among non-gynecologic cancer survivors. This article reviews current available data of bone health in women with gynecologic cancer, summarizes best-available guidelines for screening for osteoporosis in women with cancer, and provides guidance for osteoporosis screening in women with gynecologic cancers based on best available evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janelle N Sobecki
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, United States.
| | - Laurel W Rice
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, United States
| | - Ellen M Hartenbach
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Effect of gynecological cancer and its treatment on bone mineral density and the risk of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2020; 63:470-479. [PMID: 32689773 PMCID: PMC7393757 DOI: 10.5468/ogs.20012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of osteopenia and osteoporosis by examining the bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and femur in patients with gynecological cancer without bone metastasis and to evaluate the impact of treatment for different cancers on BMD. Methods This study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 243 women with gynecological cancer and 240 controls between March 2010 and December 2016. Patients with cervical cancer (n=105), endometrial cancer (n=63), and ovarian cancer (n=75) were treated with total hysterectomy including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and/or chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. For the control group, healthy post-menopausal women without gynecologic cancer were selected. Results Before anticancer treatment, the BMD of patients with cervical cancer and ovarian cancer was significantly lower than that of the controls, and the BMD of patients with endometrial cancer was not significantly different from that of the controls. However, the BMD of endometrial cancer significantly decreased after treatment. According to the treatment methods, there were significant differences in the BMD of L3, L4, and the femur neck. Changes in the BMD were lowest in patients who underwent surgical treatment only, and the highest bone loss was found in patients who underwent postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Conclusion Patients with cervical and ovarian cancer had lower BMD than those in the control group before treatment, and patients with endometrial cancer had decreased bone density after treatment. Therefore, during the treatment of gynecological cancer, strategies should be implemented to mitigate these risks.
Collapse
|
9
|
Dolly A, Lecomte T, Bouché O, Borg C, Terrebonne E, Douillard JY, Chautard R, Raoul W, Ternant D, Leger J, Bleuzen A, Dumas JF, Servais S, Baracos VE. Concurrent losses of skeletal muscle mass, adipose tissue and bone mineral density during bevacizumab / cytotoxic chemotherapy treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Nutr 2020; 39:3319-3330. [PMID: 32164981 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2019] [Revised: 01/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Changes in skeletal muscle mass (SMM), total adipose tissue mass (TAT) or bone mineral density (BMD) have been described in patients with cancer undergoing various treatments; simultaneous variations of all 3 tissues has not been reported. METHODS Data were prospectively collected in a clinical study (NCT00489697) including patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer who received 4 cycles of bevacizumab in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Computerized tomography (CT) at baseline and after chemotherapy was used to quantify skeletal muscle and adipose tissue cross-sectional areas, and mean lumbar spine BMD using validated approaches. RESULTS After exclusion of patients lacking adequate CT images or missing data, 72 subjects were included. Patients were 63% male, aged 63.2 ± 10.3 years, 100% had liver metastases and 54%, 24% and 22% respectively has 0, 1 and ≥2 extrahepatic metastases. 100% tolerated 4 cycles of treatment and none showed progressive disease at the end of treatment. The scan interval was 70 days (95% CI, 62.3 to 80.5). Thresholds for loss of tissue were defined as loss ≥ measurement error. 10% of patients showed no loss of any tissue and a further 43% lost one tissue (SMM, TAT or BMD); 47% of patients lost 2 tissues (16.5% lost SMM + TAT, 8% lost SMM + BMD, 10% lost TAT + BMD) or all 3 tissues (12.5%). Catabolic behavior (2 or 3 tissue loss vs 0 or 1 tissue loss) associated with disease burden, including unresectable primary tumor (p = 0.010), presence of extrahepatic (EH) metastases (p = 0.039) and number of EH metastases (p = 0.004). No association was found between the number of tissues lost and treatment response, which was uniformly high, or treatment toxicity, which was uniformly low. CONCLUSION Multiple tissues can be measured in routine CT images and these show considerable inter-individual variation. Substantial losses in some individuals appear to associate with disease burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adeline Dolly
- INSERM UMR1069, "Nutrition, Croissance et Cancer", University of Tours, France
| | - Thierry Lecomte
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hôpital Trousseau, CHRU de Tours, 37044, Tours, Cedex 09, France; EA GICC 7501, University of Tours, 10 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37000, Tours, France
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Hôpital Robert Debré, CHU de Reims, Avenue Général Koenig, 51092, Reims, Cedex, France
| | - Christophe Borg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Jean Minjoz, CHRU de Besançon, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France
| | - Eric Terrebonne
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hôpital du Haut Lêvèque, CHU de Bordeaux, Avenue Magellan, 33604, Pessac Cedex, France
| | - Jean-Yves Douillard
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICO René Gauducheau, 44805, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Romain Chautard
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hôpital Trousseau, CHRU de Tours, 37044, Tours, Cedex 09, France; EA GICC 7501, University of Tours, 10 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37000, Tours, France
| | - William Raoul
- EA GICC 7501, University of Tours, 10 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37000, Tours, France
| | - David Ternant
- EA GICC 7501, University of Tours, 10 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37000, Tours, France; Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Hôpital Bretonneau, CHRU de Tours, 37044, Tours, Cedex 09, France
| | - Julie Leger
- INSERM CIC 1415, CHRU de Tours, CHRU de Tours, 37044, Tours, Cedex 09, France
| | - Aurore Bleuzen
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Bretonneau, CHRU de Tours, CHRU de Tours, 37044, Tours, Cedex 09, France
| | - Jean-François Dumas
- INSERM UMR1069, "Nutrition, Croissance et Cancer", University of Tours, France
| | - Stéphane Servais
- INSERM UMR1069, "Nutrition, Croissance et Cancer", University of Tours, France.
| | - Vickie E Baracos
- Department of Oncology, Division of Palliative Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gebauer J, Higham C, Langer T, Denzer C, Brabant G. Long-Term Endocrine and Metabolic Consequences of Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review. Endocr Rev 2019; 40:711-767. [PMID: 30476004 DOI: 10.1210/er.2018-00092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The number of patients surviving ≥5 years after initial cancer diagnosis has significantly increased during the last decades due to considerable improvements in the treatment of many cancer entities. A negative consequence of this is that the emergence of long-term sequelae and endocrine disorders account for a high proportion of these. These late effects can occur decades after cancer treatment and affect up to 50% of childhood cancer survivors. Multiple predisposing factors for endocrine late effects have been identified, including radiation, sex, and age at the time of diagnosis. A systematic literature search has been conducted using the PubMed database to offer a detailed overview of the spectrum of late endocrine disorders following oncological treatment. Most data are based on late effects of treatment in former childhood cancer patients for whom specific guidelines and recommendations already exist, whereas current knowledge concerning late effects in adult-onset cancer survivors is much less clear. Endocrine sequelae of cancer therapy include functional alterations in hypothalamic-pituitary, thyroid, parathyroid, adrenal, and gonadal regulation as well as bone and metabolic complications. Surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy all contribute to these sequelae. Following irradiation, endocrine organs such as the thyroid are also at risk for subsequent malignancies. Although diagnosis and management of functional and neoplastic long-term consequences of cancer therapy are comparable to other causes of endocrine disorders, cancer survivors need individually structured follow-up care in specialized surveillance centers to improve care for this rapidly growing group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Gebauer
- Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Claire Higham
- Department of Endocrinology, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Thorsten Langer
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Christian Denzer
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
| | - Georg Brabant
- Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.,Department of Endocrinology, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Barreto R, Kitase Y, Matsumoto T, Pin F, Colston KC, Couch KE, O'Connell TM, Couch ME, Bonewald LF, Bonetto A. ACVR2B/Fc counteracts chemotherapy-induced loss of muscle and bone mass. Sci Rep 2017; 7:14470. [PMID: 29089584 PMCID: PMC5665981 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15040-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy promotes the development of cachexia, a debilitating condition characterized by muscle and fat loss. ACVR2B/Fc, an inhibitor of the Activin Receptor 2B signaling, has been shown to preserve muscle mass and prolong survival in tumor hosts, and to increase bone mass in models of osteogenesis imperfecta and muscular dystrophy. We compared the effects of ACVR2B/Fc on muscle and bone mass in mice exposed to Folfiri. In addition to impairing muscle mass and function, Folfiri had severe negative effects on bone, as shown by reduced trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV), thickness (Tb.Th), number (Tb.N), connectivity density (Conn.Dn), and by increased separation (Tb.Sp) in trabecular bone of the femur and vertebra. ACVR2B/Fc prevented the loss of muscle mass and strength, and the loss of trabecular bone in femurs and vertebrae following Folfiri administration. Neither Folfiri nor ACVR2B/Fc had effects on femoral cortical bone, as shown by unchanged cortical bone volume fraction (Ct.BV/TV), thickness (Ct.Th) and porosity. Our results suggest that Folfiri is responsible for concomitant muscle and bone degeneration, and that ACVR2B/Fc prevents these derangements. Future studies are required to determine if the same protective effects are observed in combination with other anticancer regimens or in the presence of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Barreto
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Yukiko Kitase
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.,Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Tsutomu Matsumoto
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.,Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Fabrizio Pin
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.,Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Kyra C Colston
- Indianapolis Project STEM, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Katherine E Couch
- Indianapolis Project STEM, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Thomas M O'Connell
- Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.,Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.,IUPUI Center for Cachexia Research Innovation and Therapy, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Marion E Couch
- Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.,Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.,IUPUI Center for Cachexia Research Innovation and Therapy, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Lynda F Bonewald
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.,Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.,Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.,IUPUI Center for Cachexia Research Innovation and Therapy, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Andrea Bonetto
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. .,Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. .,Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. .,Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. .,Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. .,IUPUI Center for Cachexia Research Innovation and Therapy, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schofield C, Newton RU, Galvão DA, Cohen PA, Peddle-McIntyre CJ. A Physiological Profile of Ovarian Cancer Survivors to Inform Tailored Exercise Interventions and the Development of Exercise Oncology Guidelines. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017; 27:1560-1567. [PMID: 29036032 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Physical activity has become increasingly important in supportive cancer care. However, physical activity and exercise guidelines for ovarian cancer survivors remain generic. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize existing data regarding the physiological characteristics (treatment-related adverse effects, concurrent comorbidities, body weight and composition, physical fitness and function, and physical activity behavior) of ovarian cancer survivors to further understanding of their cancer-specific physical activity and exercise needs. We also highlight gaps in the current knowledge base. METHODS We undertook a narrative review of current literature on the physiological status of ovarian cancer survivors. We defined physiological status as treatment-related adverse effects, concurrent comorbidities, body weight and composition, physical fitness and function, and physical activity behavior. RESULTS In addition to disease- and treatment-related symptoms and adverse effects, the majority of ovarian cancer survivors have comorbidities, which may adversely affect treatment effectiveness and safety, as well as survival. Despite high overweight and obesity rates, a large percentage of women are malnourished at diagnosis, with potentially compromised muscle mass and muscle density. Low muscle density at diagnosis and loss of muscle mass during treatment may be associated with worse survival outcomes. A small number of studies have observed impaired physical function and cardiorespiratory fitness in ovarian cancer survivors. The majority of ovarian cancer survivors are insufficiently active or sedentary. CONCLUSIONS Our review suggests that ovarian cancer survivors could benefit from physical activity and exercise oncology interventions aimed at addressing detrimental changes to physiological status due to disease and treatment. However, current knowledge gaps regarding the physiological characteristics of ovarian cancer survivors throughout the entire survivorship spectrum challenge the development of tailored exercise intervention studies and exercise oncology guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christelle Schofield
- *Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia; †UQ Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland; and ‡St John of God Hospital Bendat Family Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Subiaco; §Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth; and ∥Institute for Health Research, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bonetto A, Kays JK, Parker VA, Matthews RR, Barreto R, Puppa MJ, Kang KS, Carson JA, Guise TA, Mohammad KS, Robling AG, Couch ME, Koniaris LG, Zimmers TA. Differential Bone Loss in Mouse Models of Colon Cancer Cachexia. Front Physiol 2017; 7:679. [PMID: 28123369 PMCID: PMC5225588 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Cachexia is a distinctive feature of colorectal cancer associated with body weight loss and progressive muscle wasting. Several mechanisms responsible for muscle and fat wasting have been identified, however it is not known whether the physiologic and molecular crosstalk between muscle and bone tissue may also contribute to the cachectic phenotype in cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether tumor growth associates with bone loss using several experimental models of colorectal cancer cachexia, namely C26, HT-29, and ApcMin/+. The effects of cachexia on bone structure and strength were evaluated with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), micro computed tomography (μCT), and three-point bending test. We found that all models showed tumor growth consistent with severe cachexia. While muscle wasting in C26 hosts was accompanied by moderate bone depletion, no loss of bone strength was observed. However, HT-29 tumor bearing mice showed bone abnormalities including significant reductions in whole-body bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), femoral trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular number (Tb.N), and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), but no declines in strength. Similarly, cachexia in the ApcMin/+ mice was associated with significant decreases in BMD, BMC, BV/TV, Tb.N, and Tb.Th as well as decreased strength. Our data suggest that colorectal cancer is associated with muscle wasting and may be accompanied by bone loss dependent upon tumor type, burden, stage and duration of the disease. It is clear that preserving muscle mass promotes survival in cancer cachexia. Future studies will determine whether strategies aimed at preventing bone loss can also improve outcomes and survival in colorectal cancer cachexia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Bonetto
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, IN, USA; Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis, Center for Cachexia Research, Innovation and Therapy, Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Joshua K Kays
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Valorie A Parker
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Ryan R Matthews
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Rafael Barreto
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Melissa J Puppa
- Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Kyung S Kang
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - James A Carson
- Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Theresa A Guise
- Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Khalid S Mohammad
- Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Alexander G Robling
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Marion E Couch
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis, Center for Cachexia Research, Innovation and Therapy, Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Leonidas G Koniaris
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, IN, USA; Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis, Center for Cachexia Research, Innovation and Therapy, Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Teresa A Zimmers
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, IN, USA; Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis, Center for Cachexia Research, Innovation and Therapy, Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|