Subgroup analysis of East Asian patients in REGARD: A phase III trial of ramucirumab and best supportive care for advanced gastric cancer

Efficacy and safety of ramucirumab for gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Based on the comparison of ramucirumab monoclonal antibody with control treatments in randomized controlled trials, this study aims to elucidate the role of ramucirumab monoclonal antibody in cancer therapy and its potential side effects, providing scientific evidence for clinical treatment.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched systematically to obtain the trials on ramucirumab in the treatment of gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma up to April 13, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab as monotherapy and in combination with other chemotherapy agents as interventions for treating gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

After screening 2200 studies, we finally included 8 eligible studies (involving a total of 3,283 participants). Meta-analysis results showed that compared to the control group, ramucirumab monotherapy significantly improved overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.67, 0.89]) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.48, 95% CI [0.40, 0.58]). Similar results were obtained for ramucirumab combined with paclitaxel. In the treatment combining ramucirumab with paclitaxel, compared to monotherapy, three severe adverse reactions (grade ≥ 3) were observed with significantly increased risks (OR > 2). These include proteinuria (OR = 5.37, 95% CI [1.22, 23.54]), hypertension (OR = 4.02, 95% CI [2.63, 6.14]), and gastrointestinal perforation (OR = 4.64, 95% CI [1.00, 21.60]). Subgroup analysis further indicated that ramucirumab is effective in both non-East Asian and East Asian populations, with East Asian patients more prone to developing proteinuria, while having a lower incidence of hypertension. Additionally, ramucirumab demonstrated comparable efficacy between first-line and second-line treatments, with a higher incidence of proteinuria observed in second-line therapy.

CONCLUSION

Ramucirumab significantly improves the prognosis of patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. When used in combination with paclitaxel, close monitoring of adverse reactions such as proteinuria (especially in East Asian populations), hypertension (especially in non-East Asian populations), and gastrointestinal perforation is essential.

"Hurdles race for CAR T-cell therapy in digestive tract cancer"

Digestive tract cancers (DTC) belong to the most investigated family of tumors. The incidence, prevalence, and mortality rate of DTC remain high, especially for patients with pancreatic cancer. Even though immunotherapy such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of solid cancer types, ICI are still restricted to a very small group of patients and seem to be more efficacious in combination with chemotherapy. Cellular immunotherapy such as CAR T-cell therapy has entered clinical routine in hematological malignancies with outstanding results. There is growing interest on translating this kind of immunotherapy and success into patients with solid malignancies, such as DTC. This review attempts to describe the major advances in preclinical and clinical research with CAR T cells in DTC, considering the most relevant hurdles in each subtype of DTC.

Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Home Parenteral Nutrition for Incurable Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients

Background

Appropriate nutritional support, including supplemental home parenteral nutrition (sHPN), may improve prognosis and quality of life (Qol) of malnourished cancer patients. We aimed to explore the cost-effectiveness of sHPN for incurable gastrointestinal cancer patients from the Chinese healthcare perspective.

Method

Clinical data were extracted from a randomized controlled trial (NCT02066363). Patients were randomized into the sHPN group or the non-sHPN group (receiving best practice nutritional care). A Markov model was established with a 6-week cycle length. Costs were acquired from local hospitals, effect parameters included quality-adjusted life year (QALY), Qol, body mass index, fat-free mass (FFM), FFM index, handgrip strength, and a 6-min walking test. Sensitivity analyses were conducted with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) set at 3 per capita gross domestic product ($29,307/QALY).

Results

When considering QALY as a utility, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $24,289.17, with an incremental cost of $2,051.18 and an incremental QALY of 0.0844 between the sHPN group and the non-sHPN group. Furthermore, we explored the cost-effectiveness of sHPN from multidimensions, where we analyzed various effect parameters at different visits; the results showed a superior benefit for patients in the sHPN group except for the handgrip parameter at visit 2. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the influence of utilities in the sHPN group, but the sHPN group was still cost-effective with a WTP of $2,500/QALY.

Conclusion

In China, sHPN was cost-effective for patients with incurable gastrointestinal cancer, which suggested further applications in clinical practice and provided references for clinical decisions and pricing.

Comparison of Treatment Efficacy and Survival Outcomes Between Asian and Western Patients With Unresectable Gastric or Gastro-Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Gastric cancer and gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma are geographically heterogeneous diseases. Previous studies suggested that Asian and Western patients with late-stage gastric or gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma possess distinct survival outcomes. However, the interregional differences of multiple systemic therapies in unresectable diseases have not been comprehensively described.

Materials and Methods

We searched PubMed-MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from inception to 31 October 2021 and reviewed major conference abstracts for controlled trials of systemic therapies in unresectable gastric or gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma that reported hazard ratios stratified by geographical region. The primary measurements were overall survival and progression-free survival. The pooled hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for overall survival and progression-free survival in Asian and Western populations were calculated using a random effect model. A linear regression model was adopted to compare the overall survival and progression-free survival between Asian and Western patients.

Results

A total of 9033 patients from 20 studies were included for analysis. Immunotherapy was associated with an improvement in the overall survival for both Asian (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.65–0.98) and Western (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.81–1.00) patients, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.32). Trends of survival benefit with anti-HER2 therapy and anti-angiogenic therapy versus control were observed in both Asian and Western patients, although statistical significance was not denoted. Subgroup analyses yielded a statistically superior overall survival of Asian versus Western patients in trials that investigated first-line immunotherapy (P = 0.04). Due to the linear regression analyses with scatter plot graphs, Asian patients showed a higher overall survival, but not progression-free survival, than Western patients irrespective of treatment type.

Conclusion

Asian and Western patients with unresectable gastric or gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma show similar responses to systemic therapies with limited interregional differences. Exceptionally, first-line immunotherapy could elicit superior survival among Asian populations. In addition, Asian patients with gastric or gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma display a superior OS compared with Western counterparts.

How May Ramucirumab Help Improve Treatment Outcome for Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancers?

GI cancers are characterized by high recurrence rates and a dismal prognosis and there is an urgent need for new therapeutic approaches. This is a narrative review designed to provide a summary of the efficacy as measured by overall survival, progression free survival, and safety data from phase 3 randomized controlled GI clinical trials of ramucirumab including those from important pre-specified patient subgroups and evidence from real clinical practice worldwide. Quality of life (QOL) is discussed where data are available. Our aim was to summarize the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in the treatment of GI cancers using these existing published data with a view to demonstrating how ramucirumab may help improve treatment outcome for patients with GI cancers. The data indicate that ramucirumab is efficacious, safe, and tolerable across the intent-to-treat patient populations as a whole and across several pre-specified subgroups, even those whose disease is traditionally more difficult to treat. Furthermore, survival outcomes observed in real-world clinical practice demonstrate similar data from phase 3 clinical trials even in patients with complications, suggesting that the benefits of ramucirumab translate in actual clinical practice.

Cell differentiation trajectory predicts patient potential immunotherapy response and prognosis in gastric cancer

The purpose of this study was to investigate the differentiation trajectory of gastric cancer (GC) cells and its clinical relevance and generate a prognostic risk scoring (RS) signature based on GC differentiation-related genes (GDRGs) to predict overall survival (OS). Integrated single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and bulk RNA-seq data from GC samples were used for analysis. The cell differentiation trajectory analysis identified three subsets with distinct differentiation states, of which subsets I/II were involved in metabolic disorders, subset II were also associated with hypoxia tolerance, and subset III were related to immune-related pathways. GC samples were divided into three GDRG-based molecular subtypes, and it was found that molecular typing based on cell differentiation successfully predicted patient OS, clinicopathological features, immune infiltration status, and immune checkpoint gene expression. An eight-GDRG-based prognostic RS signature was generated, and the OS of the high-risk group was significantly worse than that of the low-risk group. By integrating the GDRG-based RS signature with prognostic clinicopathological characteristics, a clinicopathologic-genomic nomogram was constructed, and this nomogram yielded strong predictive performance and high accuracy. The study highlights the implication of GC cell differentiation for predicting patient clinical outcome and potential immunotherapy response and proposes a promising treatment direction for GC.

The safety of apatinib for the treatment of gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

Apatinib is an orally administered small-molecule vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 inhibitor. It has been approved and indicated for advanced gastric cancer after the failure of two or more lines of systemic therapy in China. Areas covered: This review summarizes the mechanisms, clinical applications and safety evaluations of apatinib. Apatinib is well tolerated, and its most common adverse effects include hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, proteinuria and neutropenia. Its major grade 3/4 adverse effect is hand-foot syndrome. Expert opinion: Apatinib is an effective and safe drug for advanced gastric cancer patients that shows tolerable and manageable toxicity. However, it should be avoided in patients with a bleeding tendency or at risk of perforation. Worldwide assessments of its efficacy and safety are needed. Additionally, the early presence of antiangiogenesis-related adverse events may predict the drug efficacy of apatinib. List of Abbreviations: GC: gastric cancer; mOS: median overall survival; TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor; EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; VEGFR: vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; mTOR: mammalian target of rapamycin; HGFR: hepatocyte growth factor receptor; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; mPFS: median progression-free survival; T_max: median time to peak drug concentration; C_max: maximum plasma drug concentration; AUC_0-24h: areas under the concentration-time curve 0-24 h; CFDA: China Food and Drug Administration; FAS: full analysis set; ORR: objective response rate; DCR: disease control rate; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; MTD: maximum tolerated dose; AEs: adverse events; IC₅₀: 50% median inhibitory concentration.