Axillary dissection in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer: Is the staging information worthwhile for patients?

Modified oncoplastic lift, lymphatic excision, and reconstruction: Introduction of a novel technique in oncoplastic breast surgery with simple surgical principles

INTRODUCTION

Oncoplastic surgery is an important component of the management of breast cancer. As prognosis has improved, the need for proficient techniques to achieve disease eradication while maintaining cosmesis for naturally appearing breasts has gained importance. This study describes an easy-to-learn modified oncoplastic technique for patients undergoing breast-conserving treatment.

DESCRIPTION OF THE TECHNIQUE

Tumor resection is performed through different peri-areolar, inframammary, or radial incisions. To reduce the size of the surgical defect created after tissue resection, an internal purse-string is performed parallel to the chest wall or base of the wound with subsequent staggering in three or more layers as needed, while maintaining the parallel orientation of the needle. This is followed by the creation and overlapping of internal breast tissue flaps that are rearranged to decrease the dead space with the aim of improving cosmesis. The redundant skin is removed for the skin envelope to maintain shape. The wound is closed in layers. We also describe steps in performing sentinel lymph node and tumor extraction through the same periareolar, inframammary, or radial incisions for tumors located in outer quadrants. Following closure, contour and projection of the breast were maintained without indentation or loss of projection, with a symmetrical appearance to the contralateral side.

CONCLUSION

This modified oncoplastic lift, lymphatic excision, and reconstruction (MOLLER) technique can be easily learned and used by surgeons who treat cancer patients and have limited oncoplastic training. It uses basic known surgical principles to decrease the size of the defect created while minimizing the need for larger incisions/pedicles.

The prognostic significance of further axillary dissection for sentinel lymph node micrometastases in female breast cancer: A competing risk analysis using the SEER database

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been widely recognized as an excellent surgical and staging procedure for early-stage breast cancer, and its development has greatly improved the detection of micrometastases. However, the axillary treatment of micrometastasis has been the subject of much debate.

METHODS

We identified 427,131 women diagnosed with breast cancer from 2010 to 2018 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients whose nodal status was micrometastases (pTxN1miM0) were classified into two groups: the SLNB only group and SLNB with complete ALND group, and we used these classifications to carry out propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis. The primary and secondary endpoints were OS and BCSS, respectively. We then implemented the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model and used Fine and Gray competitive risk regression to identify factors associated with the risk of all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

After the PSM, 1,833 pairs were included in total. The SLNB with complete ALND showed no significant difference in OS (HR=1.04, 95% CI: 0.84-1.28, P=0.73) or BCSS (HR= 1.03, 95% CI: 0.79-1.35, P=0.82) compared to the SLNB only group, and axillary treatment was not associated with breast cancer-specific death (BCSD) (HR=1.13, 95% CI: 0.86-1.48, P=0.400) or other cause-specific death (OCSD) (HR=0.98, 95% CI:0.70-1.38, P=0.920). There was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative incidence of BCSD (Grey's test, P=0.819) or OCSD (Grey's test, P=0.788) for between the two groups either. For different molecular subtypes, patients in the SLNB only group showed no statistically significant differences from those in the SLNB with complete ALND group with Luminal A (HR=1.00, 95% CI:0.76-1.32, P=0.98) or Luminal B (HR=0.82, 95% CI:0.42-1.62, P=0.55) but similar OS to HER2-enriched (HR=1.58, 95% CI:0.81-3.07, P=0.19) or triple negative breast cancers (HR=1.18, 95% CI:0.76-1.81, P=0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that in early breast cancer patients with micrometastasis, complete ALND does not seem to be required and that SLNB suffices to control locoregional and distant disease, with no significant adverse effects on survival compared to complete ALND.

Correlation Analysis of Pathological Features and Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer

Objective

To investigate the risk factors of axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Methods

This study retrospectively included 122 cases of invasive breast cancer patients admitted to the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from January 2019 to September 2020. According to postoperative pathological results, axillary lymph node metastasis was divided into axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) group (n =40) and non-axillary lymph node metastasis (NALNM) group (n =82). General demographic information was collected and compared between the two groups. Collected pathological results included lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progestogen receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), and Ki-67 detected by immunohistochemistry. Imaging parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), early enhanced rate, and time-intensity curve (TIC) were also included into univariate analysis. The variables with differences between the two groups were compared by univariate analysis, and the related factors of axillary lymph node metastasis were analyzed by logistic regression model.

Results

There was no significant difference in general demographic information between the two groups. No significant differences were found in the positive rates of HER-2, ER, PR, Ki-67, pathological types, and clavicular lymph node metastasis and skin chest wall invasion between the two groups (P > 0.05). The proportion of LVI in ALNM group was significantly higher than that in NALNM group (37.50% vs. 6.10%, P < 0.001). The proportion of breast cancer on the left side in the ALNM group was higher than that in the NALNM group, and the difference was statistically significant (70.00% vs. 47.56%, P = 0.019). There were no significant differences in the imaging parameters obtained by DCE-MRI between the two groups. Binary logistics regression analysis showed that LVI (OR =12.258, 95% CI =3.681-40.812, P < 0.001) and left breast cancer (OR =3.598, 95% CI =1.404-9.219, P = 0.008) were risk factors for axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Conclusion

The formation of vascular tumor thrombi in breast cancer tissue and left breast cancer are risk factors for axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer and might be helpful for preoperative detailed assessment of the patient's condition.

Predictive value of combining clinicopathological, multimodal ultrasonic characteristics in axillary lymph nodal metastasis burden of patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Since the ACOSOG Z0011 trial, the clinical examination of axillary lymph node-negative early breast cancer patients (cT1-2N0) can be used to predict the burden of axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) by axillary ultrasound (AUS). To improving diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM), we assessed the value of combining clinicopathological, conventional ultrasound, SWE features in the cT1-2N0 breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 285 patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer who underwent preoperative ultrasound examination of the lesion and axillary, with shear wave elastography (SWE) of the lesions. According to the postoperative pathological results, they were divided into ≤2 metastatic ALNs group (low nodal burden, LNB) and >  2 metastatic ALNs group (high nodal burden, HNB). Binary logistic regression analysis was used to screen independent risk factors and establish prediction models. The best cut-off value of continuous variables is determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve, and the performance of the prediction model is evaluated.

RESULTS

Presence of lymphovascular invasion (OR = 7.966, P = 0.010), tumor size (OR = 2.485, P = 0.019), Emean of intratumor (OR = 0.939, P = 0.002) and cortical thickness of lymph node (OR = 9.277, P <  0.001) were independent risk predictors for HNB of cT1-2N0 Group. The predictive model of combined method had better performance in predicting HNB of cT1-2N0 compared with models based on SWE and conventional ultrasound alone (area under the curve: 0.824 vs 0.658, P <  0.001; 0.824 vs 0.789, P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive models of combined method obtained from significant clinicopathological and ultrasonographic features can potentially improve the diagnosis and individual treatment of ALNM in patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer.