The management of clinically suspicious para-aortic lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review

Indocyanine Green Near-Infrared Fluorescence-Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Colon Cancer

Background/Objectives: Indocyanine green (ICG)-guided near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging represents a potentially advantageous approach for the identification of lymphatic drainage pathways. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of ICG-guided NIR fluorescence in mapping lymphatic drainage and facilitating sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients diagnosed with colon cancer. Methods: A prospective cohort of 30 consecutive patients with colon cancer undergoing surgical resection at our institution was enrolled in this study. Peritumoral injection of ICG was performed to facilitate intraoperative identification of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). Identified SLNs were marked and excised ex vivo following specimen retrieval. All the retrieved specimens were submitted for histopathological analysis using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. SLNs that were negative for metastatic disease upon H&E staining underwent further examination via immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results: Successful identification of SLNs was achieved in 83.33% of cases. The false positive rate was 6.6%, and the false negative rate was 8%, respectively. Atypical lymphatic drainage patterns were observed in 6.6% of the patients. Notably, the patients exhibiting atypical lymphatic drainage subsequently developed metastases during the follow-up period. Immunohistochemical analysis failed to detect micrometastases in SLNs that were initially deemed negative based on H&E staining. Conclusions: NIR-ICG fluorescence is a safe, reliable, and technically feasible method for performing SLNB in patients with colon cancer. Furthermore, this technique offers the potential for intraoperative identification of atypical lymphatic drainage pathways, which may have significant implications for determining the optimal extent of standard lymphadenectomy.

Surgery for Infrarenal Retroperitoneal Node Metastases from Colon Cancer

PURPOSE

Treatment of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases (RPN) from colon cancer (CC) is a therapeutic challenge. Available evidence supporting a curative approach is weak and uncertainties remain concerning the extent of the dissection, the optimal timing for surgery, and the role of adjuvant radiotherapy. We report the outcomes of a curative intent strategy in a recent monocentric series of patients.

METHODS

We did a retrospective review of all curative intent surgical treatment of RPN from CC performed consecutively in a French university hospital from June 2015 to April 2021. Demographics, clinicopathological, and molecular characteristics were evaluated. We describe recurrence-free and overall survival and factors related to recurrence.

RESULTS

Records from 18 patients were reviewed. The median age was 69 years. Most of the patients were male (55%), ASA 1-2 (94%), had a left-sided primary colon cancer (73%), and had metachronous RPN (62%). Thirteen patients (72%) experienced recurrence. Recurrence was often limited to RPN (27%) or liver (22%). Four patients underwent a second surgery for RPN recurrence. Median disease-free and overall survival were 22 months and 50 months after RPN surgery. We did not find any factor associated with recurrence. Short-term recurrence (< 6 months) was associated with shorter overall survival (0.031).

CONCLUSION

The current results suggest that RPN resection is feasible and associated with long survival in selected patients. Further studies evaluating the benefit of curative strategies including radical surgery for patients with potentially resectable RPN are warranted.

Outcomes of metachronous para-aortic lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer: a systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Para-aortic lymph node metastasis associated with colorectal cancer is a very rare occurrence, but at the same time an important predictor of survival. Despite its importance, there is still no gold standard management strategy, particularly for lymph nodes detected during follow-up, after resection of the primary tumour. Therefore, this review was undertaken to examine the evidence available on the surgical and non-surgical management of metachronous para-aortic lymph node metastasis (m-PALNM) in colorectal cancer treatment.

METHODS

This is a systematic review using the patient, intervention, comparison, outcome and study strategy. The literature search was undertaken using Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases with the following MeSH terms: lymph node excision, para-aortic lymph node, metastasis, metachronous and colorectal neoplasms.

RESULTS

Five original papers met the study criteria including 188 patients in total (55.3% male, 44.7% female). Surgical resection of the m-PALND was the management of choice in 64% of patients. Reporting styles on survival outcomes were heterogeneous. However, patients undergoing surgical management for m-PALNM had longer disease-free survival and overall survival rates.

CONCLUSION

There is significant paucity in the evidence available on the management of m-PALNM. However, the evidence reported by this review suggests that surgical management should be considered whenever possible, with the aim of prolonging survival. Future randomised trials are needed in order to provide further high-level evidence on m-PALNM management.