RANZCOG Fellows’ adherence to guidelines following cytological prediction of cervical adenocarcinoma‐ in‐situ : Cause for concern?

Excisional treatment comparison for in situ endocervical adenocarcinoma (EXCISE): A phase 2 pilot randomized controlled trial to compare histopathological margin status, specimen size and fragmentation after loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife cone biopsy

OBJECTIVE

Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the cervix is a precursor to cervical adenocarcinoma. When AIS is detected by cervical screening an excision biopsy is mandatory to exclude invasion. We aimed to compare margins status, specimen size and fragmentation after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and 'cold knife cone biopsy' (CKC).

METHODS

The EXCISE Trial was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, phase 2, randomized study. Patients were enrolled at seven hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. We randomly assigned women aged ≥18 to ≤45 years with screen detected AIS to LEEP or CKC. Co-primary endpoints were margin status, specimen size and fragmentation. Analysis was by intention-to-treat.

RESULTS

Between August 2, 2017 and September 6, 2019, 40 patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to LEEP or CKC. Margin status was evaluable in 36 cases. The proportion of patients with involved margins did not differ between groups. 25 of 26 LEEP and all 14 CKC biopsies were excised as single specimens (p = 1·00). There were no differences in specimen dimensions. Patients in the CKC group had more post-operative complications (64.3% compared to 15.4% for LEEP p = ·00). There were no differences in grade three complications (p = ·65).

CONCLUSIONS

LEEP was not associated with a greater likelihood of positive margins, specimen fragmentation or smaller excision compared to CKC when performed according to a standardized protocol. However, the study was not powered to establish non-inferiority of LEEP and a definitive phase 3 trial to compare margin status and rates of treatment failure after LEEP and CKC is warranted.

High methylation of ZNF582 in cervical adenocarcinoma affects radiosensitivity and prognosis

Background

Our previous study demonstrated hypermethylation of the ZNF582 gene in cervical cancer, but its prognostic value in cervical cancer, especially in cervical adenocarcinoma (CAC), remains unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the value of ZNF582 gene methylation for diagnosis and prediction of radiochemotherapy sensitivity and prognosis in CAC.

Methods

We first determined ZNF582 methylation levels using quantitative methylation-specific PCR in a training set. Disease-free survival and overall survival (DFS and OS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox regression model was used to assess the prognostic significance of ZNF582 gene methylation in CAC patients. Immunohistochemistry was used to test ZNF582 protein expression in CAC tissues, and an MTT assay evaluated the sensitivity of Hela cells (with or without ZNF582 transfection) to radiation and chemotherapy.

Results

The ZNF582 gene showed a higher level of methylation in the CAC group than in the noncancer group, and patients negative for ZNF582 methylation had worse prognoses. We also found that ZNF582 methylation levels were reduced in concomitant chemo-radio-therapy (NCRT) patients compared with that in non-NCRT patients. Methylation-negative status was correlated with high ZNF582 protein expression, and ZNF582 protein overexpression could increase resistance to radiation and chemotherapy in Hela cells.

Conclusions

Aberrant high methylation of ZNF582 may be a potential biomarker for CAC detection and prognosis monitoring. Overexpression of ZNF582 protein could increase CAC chemoradiotherapy resistance.