Angiotensin II Type 1 receptor antibodies: great expectations?

Rejection and graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with and without angiotensin II receptor type 1 antibodies

AIM

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody (AT1R Ab) is a non-Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA) antibody that is maybe associated with early severe kidney transplant rejection and worse graft outcomes. This study aimed to assess the association between AT1R Ab and kidney transplant rejection and graft outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all adult kidney transplant recipients in an Australian centre who had an AT1R Ab test between 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2020. AT1R Ab positive patients were compared to AT1R Ab negative patients. Primary outcomes were rejection risk, type and histopathological severity scores. Secondary outcomes were 8-week graft function and graft loss.

RESULTS

Of 965 kidney transplants that were performed during the study period, 73 patients had AT1R Ab tested; 16 (22%) were positive and 57(78%) were negative. Positive patients were on average younger and had higher level of donor-specific HLA antibodies. Rejection occurred in 13 (81%) positive patients and 41 (72%) negative patients (P = 0.45). No significant differences in rejection type or severity were found. HLA mismatch and peak panel reactive antibody ≥80%, but not AT1R Ab, independently predicted rejection. Average (132 vs. 177 mmol/L, P = 0.302) and graft loss were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

The study found no evidence that AT1R Ab is associated with rejection type, severity or worse graft function. Future studies should assess its relationship with graft outcomes to help complement immunological risk assessment and potentially provide therapeutic options to alter outcomes.

Impact and production of Non-HLA-specific antibodies in solid organ transplantation

Organ transplantation is an effective way to treat end-stage organ disease. Extending the graft survival is one of the major goals in the modern era of organ transplantation. However, long-term graft survival has not significantly improved in recent years despite the improvement of patient management and advancement of immunosuppression regimen. Antibody-mediated rejection is a major obstacle for long-term graft survival. Donor human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies were initially identified as a major cause for antibody-mediated rejection. Recently, with the development of solid-phase-based assay reagents, the contribution of non-HLA antibodies in organ transplantation starts to be appreciated. Here, we review the role of most studied non-HLA antibodies, including angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT₁ R), K-α-tubulin and vimentin antibodies, in the solid organ transplant, and discuss the possible mechanism by which these antibodies are stimulated.

Pre-transplant AT1R antibodies correlate with early allograft rejection

Studies investigating the potential pathogenic effects of non-HLA antibodies (Ab) have identified Ab against the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT₁R-Ab) as a risk factor for rejection and kidney graft loss. This study sought to validate the risk of AT₁R-Ab for acute rejection and to explore the role of other non-HLA Abs in this capacity. Pre- and post-transplant sera from a cohort of 101 patients (n=453 samples total) were tested for AT₁R-Ab and other non-HLA Ab using a commercially available ELISA kit and the Luminex platform, respectively. Patients positive for pre-transplant AT₁R-Ab were more likely to develop de novo donor-specific Ab (dnDSA) compared to patients that were negative for AT₁R-Ab (28% vs 10%, p=0.027). Pre-transplant positivity for AT₁R-Ab was associated with TCMR in the first year post-transplant (p=0.034), but did not predict graft loss independent of dnDSA (p=0.063). AT₁R-Ab positivity was significantly associated with positivity for Ab against the endothelin A type 1 receptor (ET_AR-Ab) inclusive of all study time points (p=0.0021). Given the high prevalence of AT₁R-Ab pre-transplant (20%) and its association with dnDSA and early TCMR, a prospective study to determine if more intense immunosuppression and/or AT₁R blockade has an impact on outcomes in these patients is warranted.

Anti-Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor and Anti-Endothelial Cell Antibodies: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Pathological Findings in Allograft Biopsies

Background

This is a cross-sectional study designed to evaluate the histologic characteristics of graft injury in the presence of anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody (AT1R-Ab) and anti-endothelial cell antibody (AECA).

Methods

Non-HLA antibody testing was included in the posttransplant evaluation for 70 kidney recipients. Biopsies were performed for cause for 47 patients and as protocol for the remaining 23 patients. Biopsy-proven rejection was defined according to the Banff 2009-2013 criteria. AT1R-Ab was measured on an ELISA platform. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on AT1R-Ab levels (>17, 10-17, and <10 U/ml). AECA was evaluated using an endothelial cell crossmatch (ECXM) in patients whose HLA antibody level was insufficient to cause a positive flow cytometric crossmatch.

Results

AT1R-Ab levels were higher in patients diagnosed with antibody mediated rejection compared to those with no rejection (P = 0.004). Glomerulitis (g) and peritubular capillaritis (ptc) scores were independently correlated with increased AT1R-Ab concentrations in the presence or absence of HLA-DSA (P = 0.007 and 0.03 for g scores; p = 0.005 and 0.03 for ptc scores). Patients with a positive ECXM had higher AT1R-Ab levels compared to those with a negative ECXM (P = 0.005). Microcirculation inflammation (MCI = g + ptc score) was higher in patients with a positive ECXM and with AT1R-Ab >17 U/ml, although this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07).

Conclusions

The data show an association between non-HLA antibodies detected in the ECXM and AT1R ELISA and microvascular injury observed in antibody mediated rejection.

The histologic characteristics of kidney graft injury are examined in terms of the presence of anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody (AT1R-Ab) and anti-endothelial cell antibody (AECA). The presence of AECA or AT1R-Ab correlates with microvascular injury observed in antibody-mediated rejection.

Humoral Immune Response and Allograft Function in Kidney Transplantation

HLA antibodies can damage a kidney transplant. In January 2013, consensus guidelines from The Transplantation Society were published regarding technical aspects of HLA antibody determination, as well as their potential significance in the pre- and posttransplantation periods. During the past 2 years, new studies have been reported, but controversies remain. In this article, these new data related to HLA antibodies in kidney transplantation are reviewed and compared to relevant prior research. Pretransplantation sensitization issues are discussed, including the new more sensitive assays (flow cytometry and solid-phase immunoassays such as Luminex single-antigen bead assays). A positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch remains an absolute contraindication to transplantation, although a positive flow cytometry crossmatch is only a relative contraindication. Positivity only by solid-phase assays increases the risk for acute rejection and transplant loss, but acceptable cutoffs are not defined. The sensitizing effect of red blood cell transfusions is substantiated. Following allograft failure, continued immunosuppression decreases the risk of sensitization, whereas overall, the effect of nephrectomy remains uncertain. Regarding the posttransplantation period, new data are available concerning the timing and significance of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Whereas some centers report DSA appearance after years, others detect DSA within months. The prominence of class II DSA, especially DQ, in the posttransplantation period is noted. The relevance of non-HLA antibodies is discussed, including anti-endothelial cell antibodies, major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related protein A antibodies, and angiotensin II type 1 receptor autoantibodies.

Better understanding of transplant glomerulopathy secondary to chronic antibody-mediated rejection

Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is generally accepted to result from repeated episodes of endothelial activation, injury and repair, leading to pathological abnormalities of double contouring or multi-layering of the glomerular basement membrane. TG is a major sequel of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (cABMR), from pre-existing or de novo anti-HLA antibodies. Hepatitis C infection, thrombotic microangiopathy or other factors may also contribute to TG development. TG prevalence is 5-20% in most series, reaching 55%, in some high-risk cohorts, and is associated with worse allograft outcomes. Despite its prevalence and clinical significance, few well-studied treatment options have been proposed. Similar to desensitization protocols, plasmapheresis with or without immunoabsorption, high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab, bortezomib and eculizumab have been proposed in the treatment of TG due to cABMR individually or in various combinations. Robust clinical trials are urgently needed to address this major cause of allograft loss. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the epidemiology, etiology, pathology, and the preventive and treatment options for TG secondary to cABMR.

Human pregnancy and generation of anti-angiotensin receptor and anti-perlecan antibodies

Non-HLA antibodies against the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1 R) and the C-terminal fragment of perlecan (i.e., LG3) are associated with the development of renal allograft rejection. It is currently unknown how humans develop anti-AT1 R or anti-LG3 antibodies. The aim of this study was to investigate whether pregnancy-as a model of sensitization to polymorphic proteins-induces anti-AT1 R and/or anti-LG3 antibodies. We included 104 samples from women obtained after physiologic full-term pregnancy and 80 samples from healthy nonsensitized controls (40 women and 40 men). Both anti-AT1 R and anti-LG3 antibody levels were lower in pregnancy samples than in controls (both P < 0.05). By multivariate analysis, male gender was an independent predictor for high anti-AT1 R antibody levels (OR 3.66, P = 0.04) and pregnancy was predictive for low anti-LG3 antibody levels (OR 6.53, P = 0.0001). There was no correlation of anti-AT1 R with anti-LG3 antibody levels, either in the pregnancy or in the control samples (r(2) ≤ 0.03, P ≥ 0.26). In conclusion, physiologic full-term pregnancy does not induce anti-AT1 R or anti-LG3 antibodies and may even lower their levels. Therefore, anti-AT1 R and anti-LG3 antibodies are likely not caused by allosensitization. The lack of correlation of anti-AT1 R with anti-LG3 antibodies suggests different mechanisms of generation, which remain to be elucidated.

AST Cutting Edge of Transplantation 2013 Meeting Report: a comprehensive look at B cells and antibodies in transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) represents a significant clinical challenge for solid organ transplantation. Mechanistic understanding of ABMR is incomplete and diagnostic accuracy for ABMR is limited, and as a result, targeted treatment remains elusive and new treatment modalities are difficult to validate. Three hundred twenty-six participants from 15 countries met for the first Cutting Edge of Transplantation (CEOT) symposium organized by the American Society of Transplantation (AST) in Chandler, Arizona, February 14-16, 2013. During the 3-day interactive symposium, presentations, moderated poster sessions and round table discussions addressed cutting edge knowledge of B and plasma cell biology, mechanisms of antibody-mediated tissue injury, advances and limitations in ABMR diagnostics, as well as current and potential new treatment options for ABMR. The outcome of the meeting identified the following unmet needs for: (a) improved understanding of the regulation of B cell maturation and antibody response to enable targeted therapies; (b) more precise diagnostics of ABMR, including molecular pathology, risk stratification by sensitive antibody testing and monitoring of treatment effects; and (c) innovative multicenter trial designs that enhance observational power, in particular, in assessing synergistic multimodality therapies with reduced toxicities.