Use of a Right Lateral Sector Graft in Living Donor Liver Transplantation Is Feasible, but Special Caution Is Needed With Respect to Liver Anatomy

Standardized upfront Glissonean approach and liver hanging maneuver reduces bile leakage from the hepatic hilum in living donors

Biliary complications after hepatectomy in living donors have yet to be eradicated. We hypothesized that a standardized upfront Glissonean approach and liver hanging maneuver (GH) would prevent mechanical and thermal injuries to the hilar plate of the remnant liver by determining the point of bile duct division and the final destination of hepatectomy preceding liver parenchymal transection (safety) and facilitate liver transection deep within the parenchyma and allow maximum length of hilar structures (rationality). GH was implemented in 2016 and its incidence of bile leakage was retrospectively compared against the conventional technique. GH comprises six steps: (1) development of the retrohepatic avascular plane between the right hepatic vein (RHV) and the middle hepatic vein (MHV) and isolation of the hepatic vein(s); (2) isolation of the right or left Glissonean pedicle with the corresponding Glissonean pedicles of the caudate lobe; (3) for right liver grafts and left liver grafts with the caudate lobe, passage of the tape for the liver hanging maneuver along the retrohepatic avascular plane and above the hilar plate, and for left liver grafts without the caudate lobe and for left lateral section grafts, passage of the tape from between the RHV and the MHV, along the Arantius ligament, and to the right of the umbilical portion; (4) liver transection; (5) isolation of hilar structures; and (6) graft procurement. Until 2020, 62 consecutive living donors underwent GH (success rate, 100%). The incidence of bile leakage from the hepatic hilum (0%) was significantly lower than that among 59 donors who underwent the conventional technique in 2011-2015 (9%; p = 0.01). In conclusion, GH is highly effective in reducing bile leakage from the hepatic hilum in living donors.

Living donor liver transplantation for Budd‒Chiari syndrome with right posterior segment graft and patch plasty using the superficial femoral vein: a case report

Background

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for patients with Budd‒Chiari syndrome (BCS), there are several concerns about reconstruction of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and hepatic veins. Herein, we report the case of a patient with BCS who underwent LDLT with right posterior segment graft (RPSG) and patch plasty for reconstruction of the hepatic venous outflow, using the patient’s own superficial femoral vein (SFV).

Case presentation

A 19-year-old man, who was diagnosed with primary BCS, underwent LDLT. His main hepatic veins were totally obstructed, and membranous stenosis was seen in the IVC. The LDLT donor was his mother; however, liver volumetric analysis showed that only her RPSG was appropriate. In the recipient surgery, 16 cm of the left SFV was harvested and was cut longitudinally and opened. The right hepatic vein (RHV) of the RPSG was anastomosed to the sidewall of the SFV graft. After explantation of native diseased liver was completed, the stenotic and thickened wall of the IVC was widely resected, and a large anastomotic orifice was created. Patch cavoplasty was performed with the RHV‒SFV graft patch. After portal reperfusion started, hepatic venous outflow was satisfactory, and there was no venous graft congestion. Both his postoperative course and his long-term course after discharge were uneventful.

Conclusions

In LDLT for BCS patients, ingenuity is required for the reconstruction of venous outflow. The SFV patch can be safely harvested from liver transplant recipients and is suitable for venous reconstruction. In addition, RPSG is an alternative type of liver graft for LDLT if a conventional right- or left-lobe graft cannot be used.

Clinical Significance of Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunts in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) are commonly observed in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT); however, their impact on the outcome after transplantation is unclear. We aimed to assess the type, size, and the effects of SPSS on outcomes after LDLT. A total of 339 LDLT recipients in a single institution were included. The type and diameter of the SPSS (splenorenal shunt [SRS], oesogastric shunt, and umbilical shunt) were retrospectively analyzed. A large shunt was defined as having a diameter ≤7 mm. No portal flow modulation was attempted over time. Portal complications were defined as stenosis, thrombosis, or hepatofugal flow requiring any treatment after transplantation. There were 202 (59.0%) patients who exhibited at least 1 large SPSS. Neither the size nor type of SPSS was associated with mortality, morbidity, or liver function recovery. However, the incidence of portal complications was significantly higher in patients with a large SRS (8.6% versus 2.9%; P = 0.04). Multivariate analysis of portal complications revealed 2 independent predictors: pre-LT portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and SRS size. The observed risk among recipients with pre-LT PVT was 8.3% when the SRS was ≤7 mm, but increased to 38.5% when the SRS was >15 mm. The present study suggests that large SPSS do not negatively affect the outcomes after LDLT. However, a large SRS is associated with a higher risk of portal complications, particularly in recipients with pre-LT PVT, for whom intraoperative intervention for SRS should be considered. Otherwise, a conservative approach to SPSS during LDLT seems reasonable.

Re-evaluation of the Couinaud classification for segmental anatomy of the right liver, with particular attention to the relevance of cranio-caudal boundaries

BACKGROUND

Although the Couinaud classification of liver segments has been challenged by several studies, whether the cranio-caudal boundaries can be delineated in the right liver has not yet been assessed. This study scrutinized the third-order branching pattern of the portal vein in the right liver with attention to the validity of cranio-caudal segmentation.

METHODS

Three-dimensional reconstruction of the portal vein and hepatic vein, using non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 50 healthy participants.

RESULTS

In the right paramedian sector, the portal vein ramified into 2 thick P8s (P8vent and P8dor) in all the participants. Additional thick P8s that ran laterally and/or medially (P8lat and/or P8med) were observed in 18 (32%) participants. In contrast, multiple thin P5s, ranging in number from 2 to 6 (median, 4), branched from the right paramedian trunk, the right portal trunk, and/or even from P8s. In the right lateral sector, an arch-like type in which multiple P6s ramified from a single thick P7 was observed in 26 (52%) participants. A bifurcation type composed of a single P7 and a single P6 was observed in 23 (46%) participants, and a trifurcation type was observed in 1 participant.

CONCLUSION

No clear cranio-caudal intersegmental plane could be delineated in the right liver in most of the participants. The resection of a whole Couinaud segment in the right liver should not be regarded as a systematic, anatomic resection from an oncologic viewpoint. In contrast, detailed information on the third-order portal vein ramification pattern is likely to be helpful when performing smaller anatomic resections.

Biliary Complications After Single- and Dual-Graft Living-Donor Liver Transplantation Using a Right Posterior Section Graft of Donor with a Type III Portal Vein Variation

BACKGROUND

When the donor's left lobe volume is <30%, donor selection for the right posterior section graft (RPSG) is based on the type III portal vein (PV) anatomic variation. Herein, we validated the selection of a donor with a type III PV variation for RPSG to prevent biliary complications (BCs) after single-graft (SG) and dual-graft (DG) living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

The clinical data of recipients and donors with a type III PV variation for LDLT using an RPSG performed between January 2004 and June 2018 were retrospectively collected and analyzed to determine the occurrence of BCs.

RESULTS

The 26 LDLTs performed using an RPSG, including 20 DG LDLT cases, accounted for 0.6% of all LDLT cases (n=4292). BCs developed in 6 recipients (23.0%), including biliary stricture in 4 (15.3%) and bile leakage in 2 (7.6%). No vascular complications occurred. The RPSG volume was significantly smaller in recipients with BCs than in those without BCs (400.8±79.9 vs 504.1±96.5 mL, P = .015). The bile duct types were A, B, C1, C2, and D in 6 (18.8%), 5 (15.6%), 3 (9.4%), 13 (40.6%), and 5 (15.6%) patients, respectively. All the RPSGs had a single-orifice bile duct. The bile duct size of the RPSG was relatively smaller in recipients with BCs than in those without BCs (2.8±1.0 vs 3.6±1.4 mm, P = .237).

CONCLUSIONS

When the left liver volume is disproportionately small, selection of a donor with a type III PV variation can prevent BCs after SG and DG LDLTs using an RPSG.

How Has Virtual Hepatectomy Changed the Practice of Liver Surgery?: Experience of 1194 Virtual Hepatectomy Before Liver Resection and Living Donor Liver Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To assess how virtual hepatectomy (VH), conducted using surgical planning software, influences the outcomes of liver surgery.

BACKGROUND

Imaging technology visualizes the territories of the liver vessels, which were previously impossible. However, the clinical impact of VH has not been evaluated.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2013, we performed 1194 VHs preoperatively. Outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)/colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) were compared between patients in whom VH was performed (VH) and those without VH evaluation (non-VH).

RESULTS

In LDLT, the rate of right liver graft use was higher in the VH (62.1%) than in the non-VH (46.5%) (P < 0.01), which did not increase morbidity of donor surgery. Duration of recipient surgery in the VH in which middle hepatic vein branch reconstruction was skipped was shorter than that in the VH with venous reconstruction. Among HCC patients with impaired liver function, portal territory-oriented resection was conducted more often in the VH than in the non-VH. The 5-year disease-free survival rate for localized HCC was higher in the VH than in the non-VH (37.2% vs 23.9%; P = 0.04). In CRLM, long-term outcomes were similar in the VH and non-VH despite the larger tumor load in the VH.

CONCLUSIONS

VH in LDLT allows double equipoise for the recipient and donor by optimizing decision-making on graft selection and venous reconstruction. VH offers a chance for radical hepatectomy even in HCC patients with impaired liver function and CRLM patients with advanced tumors, without compromising survival.

Clinical Anatomy of the Liver: Review of the 19th Meeting of the Japanese Research Society of Clinical Anatomy

Precise clinical knowledge of liver anatomy is required to safely perform a hepatectomy, for both open and laparoscopic surgery. At the 19th meeting of the Japanese Research Society of Clinical Anatomy (JRSCA), we conducted special symposia on essential issues of liver surgery, such as the history of hepatic segmentation, the glissonean pedicle approach, application of 3-D imaging simulation and fluorescent imaging using indocyanine green solution, a variety of segmentectomies including caudate lobectomy, the associating liver partition and portal vein embolization for stage hepatectomy and harvesting liver grafts for living donor liver transplantation. The present review article provides useful information for liver surgeons and anatomic researchers.

Liver transplantation in Japan

As of December 31, 2014, 7937 liver transplants (7673 living donor transplants and 264 deceased donor liver transplantations [DDLTs; 261 from heart-beating donors and 3 from non-heart-beating donors]) have been performed in 67 institutions in Japan. The revised Organ Transplant Law in Japan came into effect in July 2010, which allows organ procurement from brain-dead individuals, including children, with family consent if the patient had not previously refused organ donation. However, the number of deceased donor organ donations has not increased as anticipated. The rate of deceased organ donations per million population (pmp) has remained at less than 1. To maximize the viability of the limited numbers of donated organs, a system has been adopted that includes the partnership of well-trained transplant consultant doctors and local doctors. For compensating for the decreased opportunity of on-site training, an educational system regarding quality organ procurement for transplant surgeons has also been established. Furthermore, experts in the field of liver transplantation are currently discussing adoption of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score for allocation, promoting split-liver transplantation, arranging in-house coordinators, and improving the frequency of proposing the option to donate organs to the families. To overcome the shortage of donors during efforts to promote organ donation, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been developed in Japan. Continuous efforts to increase DDLT in addition to the successful experience of LDLT will increase the benefits of liver transplantation for more patients. Liver Transplantation 22 1401-1407 2016 AASLD.