Pancreas Transplantation From Living Donors: A Single Center Experience of 20 Cases

Usefulness of Thiel-Embalmed Cadavers for Training in Organ Procurement

BACKGROUND

The number of brain-dead donors has been increasing; however, the opportunity for young surgeons to experience deceased donor surgeries is extremely limited, especially in many Asian countries including Japan. Deceased donor surgeries require unique surgical skills and knowledge; however, it is difficult to provide on-the-job guidance and education. Therefore, cadaver training is meaningful and suitable for the training of deceased donor surgeries. Thiel's embalming method (TEM) provides natural coloration, flexibility, and tissue plasticity, and is widely used for cadaver surgical training. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of Thiel's embalmed cadaver training for organ procurement surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Each trainee performed hepatectomy, pancreatectomy, and nephrectomy using conventional open techniques. Faculty experts of transplantation surgery and organ procurement took attendees through surgical steps. After the procedure, all participants were asked to complete a voluntary, anonymous survey, consisting of a 10-point satisfaction scale, to evaluate their perceptions of the training.

RESULTS

A total of 33 gastrointestinal surgeons participated in the training program for procuring the liver, pancreas, and kidneys. In the questionnaire administered to the participants, the evaluation was generally satisfactory, with an average of 9.1 points on the 10-point scales. Some participants expressed that Thiel-embalmed cadavers are more suitable for training on organ procurement compared with animals used in wet-lab training.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that organ procurement training in human cadavers preserved by TEM is useful and suitable for practicing deceased donor organ procurement, especially in countries where deceased donors are not common, as in Japan.

Impact of insulin therapy before donation on graft outcomes in pancreas transplantation: An analysis of the OPTN/UNOS database

AIMS

Information on the impact of insulin therapy before pancreas donation on pancreas outcomes is scarce. We aim to explore the influence of insulin therapy before donation on recipient and pancreas graft survival.

METHODS

Registry study including 12,841 pancreas recipients from the OPTN/UNOS registry performed between 2000 and 2017. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to account for covariate imbalance between recipients from a donor with and without insulin requirements.

RESULTS

A total of 7765 (60%) patients received a pancreas from a donor with insulin before donation (IBD). Pancreas graft survival (death-censored) was similar between recipients from IBD and non-IBD donors at 1, 5 and 10 years (89% vs 89%, 78% vs 79 and 69% vs 70%, respectively, P = 0.35). Recipients from IBD donors presented a similar 90-days pancreas graft survival. After IPTW weighting, IBD donors were neither associated with any post-transplant surgical complication (HR 1.11 [95% CI 0.98-1.24], P = 0.06), nor with risk for recipient death (HR 0.94 [95% CI 0.85-1.04], P = 0.26), nor pancreas graft failure (HR 1.06 [95% CI 0.98-1.16], P = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin therapy before donation in accepted pancreas donors was not associated, per se, with an impaired pancreas graft and patient survival.

Challenges of pancreas transplantation in developing countries, exploring the Turkey example

Pancreas transplantation significantly improves the quality of life for people with type 1 diabetes, primarily by eliminating the need for insulin and frequent blood glucose measurements. Despite the growing numbers of solid organ transplantations worldwide, number of pancreas transplantations in the developing countries` remain significantly low. This difference of pancreas transplantation practices was striking among the participating countries at the 1st International Transplant Network Meeting which was held in Turkey on 2018. In this meeting more than 40 countries were represented. Most of these counties were developing countries located in Africa, Middle East or Asia. The aim of this article is to identify the challenges and limiting factors for pancreas transplantations in these developing countries, by exploring the Turkish example. The challenges faced by the developing countries are broadly classified in four categories; wait-listing, donor pool, team work and follow up. Under these categorical titles, issues are further discussed in detail, giving examples from Turkish practice of pancreas transplantation. Additionally, several solutions to these challenges have been proposed- some of which have already been undertaken by the Turkish Ministry of Health. With the insight and methods presented in this article, pancreas transplantation should be made possible for the potential recipients in the developing countries.

Landscape of Living Multiorgan Donation in the United States: A Registry-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The donation of multiple allografts from a single living donor is a rare practice, and the patient characteristics and outcomes associated with these procedures are not well described.

METHODS

Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified 101 living multiorgan donors and their 133 recipients.

RESULTS

The 49 sequential (donations during separate procedures) multiorgan donors provided grafts to 81 recipients: 21 kidney-then-liver, 15 liver-then-kidney, 5 lung-then-kidney, 3 liver-then-intestine, 3 kidney-then-pancreas, 1 lung-then-liver, and 1 pancreas-then-kidney. Of these donors, 38% donated 2 grafts to the same recipient and 15% donated 2 grafts as non-directed donors. Compared to recipients from first-time, single organ living donors, recipients from second-time living donors had similar graft and patient survival. The 52 simultaneous (multiple donations during one procedure) multiorgan donors provided 2 grafts to 1 recipient each: 48 kidney-pancreas and 4 liver-intestine. Donors had median of 13.4 years (interquartile range, 8.3-18.5 years) of follow-up. There was one reported death of a sequential donor (2.5 years after second donation). Few postdonation complications were reported over a median of 116 days (interquartile range, 0-295 days) of follow-up; however, routine living donor follow-up data were sparse. Recipients of kidneys from second-time living donors had similar graft (P = 0.2) and patient survival (P = 0.4) when compared with recipients from first-time living donors. Similarly, recipients of livers from second-time living donors had similar graft survival (P = 0.9) and patient survival (P = 0.7) when compared with recipients from first-time living donors.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful documentation of outcomes is needed to ensure ethical practices in selection, informed consent, and postdonation care of this unique donor community.

Association between the pancreas transplantation and survival of patients with diabetes: A single center experience

Pancreas transplantation is considered a therapeutic option for patients with complicated diabetes mellitus. In this study, we compared survival rate between patients on the waiting list for pancreas transplant alone(PTA), simultaneous pancreas–kidney(SPK) transplant, and pancreas after kidney(PAK) transplant and transplant recipients. A total of 503 patients (PTA:n = 116; SPK:n = 303; PAK:n = 84) and 280 PT recipients (PTA:n = 89; SPK:n = 155; PAK:n = 36) were retrospectively analyzed at our center between February 2000 and December 2015; 11.9%(60/503) of the patients on the waiting list and 4.3%(12/280) of the PT recipients died. The overall survival rate was higher in the waiting list group for the first year (99.3% vs. 97.8%), after which it was significantly higher in PT group (p = 0.039). The overall relative risk of all-cause mortality for transplant recipients was 2.145(p = 0.285) for PTA, 0.688(p = 0.735) for PAK, however,0.361 (p = 0.012) for SPK compared with that for the waiting list patients. SPK transplant recipients had considerable higher survival benefits, despite the relatively long waiting period, especially after 1 year. In addition, PTA and PAK can also be considered as a treatment option as patient survival was not poor.

Diabetes Mellitus in Living Pancreas Donors: Use of Integrated National Registry and Pharmacy Claims Data to Characterize Donation-Related Health Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Living donor pancreas transplant is a potential treatment for diabetic patients with end-organ complications. Although early surgical risks of donation have been reported, long-term medical outcomes in living pancreas donors are not known.

METHODS

We integrated national Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data (1987-2015) with records from a nationwide pharmacy claims warehouse (2005-2015) to examine prescriptions for diabetes medications and supplies as a measure of postdonation diabetes mellitus. To compare outcomes in controls with baseline good health, we matched living pancreas donors to living kidney donors (1:3) by demographic traits and year of donation.

RESULTS

Among 73 pancreas donors in the study period, 45 were identified in the pharmacy database: 62% women, 84% white, and 80% relatives of the recipient. Over a mean postdonation follow-up period of 16.3 years, 26.7% of pancreas donors filled prescriptions for diabetes treatments, compared with 5.9% of kidney donors (odds ratio, 4.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.91-8.93; P = 0.0003). Use of insulin (11.1% vs 0%) and oral agents (20.0% vs 5.9%; odds ratio, 4.50, 95% confidence interval, 2.09-9.68; P = 0.0001) was also higher in pancreas donors.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes is more common after living pancreas donation than after living kidney donation, supporting clinical consequences from reduced endocrine reserve.

Diabetic Foot Complications Despite Successful Pancreas Transplantation

BACKGROUND

It is known that successful pancreas transplantation enables patients with diabetes to maintain a normal glucose level without insulin and reduces diabetes-related complications. However, we have little information about the foot-specific morbidity in patients who have undergone successful pancreas transplantation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and predisposing factors for foot complications after successful pancreas transplantation.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 218 patients (91 males, 127 females) who had undergone pancreas transplantation for diabetes. The mean age was 40.7 (range, 15-76) years. Diabetes type, transplantation type, body mass index, and diabetes duration before transplantation were confirmed. After pancreas transplantation, the occurrence and duration of foot and ankle complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (10.1%) had diabetic foot complications. Fifteen patients (6.9%) had diabetic foot ulcer and 7 patients (3.2%) had Charcot arthropathy. Three patients had both diabetic foot ulcer and Charcot arthropathy. Three insufficiency fractures (1.4%) were included. Mean time of complications after transplantation was 18.5 (range, 2-77) months. Creatinine level 1 year after surgery was higher in the complication group rather than the noncomplication group ( P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Complications of the foot and ankle still occurred following pancreas transplantation in patients with diabetes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative study.