En Bloc Liver Kidney Transplantation Using Donor Splenic Artery as Inflow to the Kidney: Report of Two Cases

En Bloc Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation Compared to the Traditional Technique: Results From a Single Center

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation is indicated for patients with concomitant end-stage liver disease and end-stage renal disease. The traditional technique involves separate implantations of the liver and the kidney. In the en bloc approach, the liver is recovered en bloc with the right kidney and the donor renal artery is anastomosed to the donor splenic artery. We aimed to compare the outcomes of the traditional and en bloc techniques for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation in a single center.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study involved all adult patients who underwent simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation from brain-dead donors from January 2017 to December 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients were included: 10 transplanted with the traditional technique and 5 with the en bloc approach. Patients in the en bloc group presented higher body mass index, shorter kidney cold and total ischemia times, shorter overall surgical time and longer kidney warm ischemia time (29.07 kg/m2vs 23.20 kg/m2 [P = .048]; 560 minutes vs 880 minutes [P = .026]; 615 minutes vs 908 minutes [P = 0.025]; 405 minutes vs 485 minutes [P = .046]; 46 minutes vs 33.5 minutes [P = 0.027], respectively). Ureteroneocystostomy was performed in 2 patients of the en bloc group and ureteroureterostomy in the remaining 3 patients. One patient in the en bloc group presented stenosis of renal artery anastomosis and underwent percutaneous angioplasty. This same patient eventually developed late urinary fistula. In the traditional technique group, there were 2 cases of renal vein thrombosis and 1 of ureteral stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the traditional technique, the en bloc approach is feasible and safe, reducing kidney total ischemia time and overall surgical time.

Modified Mercedes Single Incision for Combined Liver Kidney Transplant: A Case Series Report

BACKGROUND

The traditional approach in combined liver-kidney transplantation involves 2 separate and sequential incisions. We describe a modification of the standard Mercedes incision that allows a single-incision operation while providing and maintaining adequate exposure to enable safe dual-allograft transplantation.

METHODS

Modification of the standard Mercedes incision includes bilateral, subcostal, muscle splitting incision 4 fingerbreadths below the rib edge with a midline, cephalad incision and inferior ± medial ipsilateral extension on the side of intended iliac fossa laterality for renovascular and ureteroneocystostomy anastomosis.

RESULTS

Five consecutive patients (3 women/2 men; mean age, 49 years; median body mass index, 29.8 kg/m²) underwent combined liver-kidney transplantation for end-stage liver disease and progressive hepatorenal syndrome via a modified Mercedes single-incision approach (at a median Model for End-stage Liver Disease of 37) without an additional kidney transplant incision, extraperitoneal exposure, or addition of wound retractors. Two out of the 5 patients experienced postoperative wound complications, including 1 with delayed wound healing and 1 with superficial dehiscence. All patients have normal dual-allograft function at or beyond 6 months posttransplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified Mercedes single-incision technique is safe and feasible. Lowering the subcostal incisions with unilateral, inferomedial extension allows adequate visualization of the lower abdominopelvic area without compromising exposure of the upper abdomen for both renal and liver allograft implantation. Further studies are needed to prove the theoretical benefits of this technique.

Simultaneous right-sided nephrectomy with orthotopic liver and kidney transplantation-An alternative method for patients with autosomal dominant polycystic liver and kidney disease

PURPOSE

In patients suffering from autosomal dominant polycystic liver and kidney disease (ADPLKD), combined organ transplantation often poses a technical challenge due to the large volume of both organs. To simplify the transplantation procedure by improving the exposure of anatomical structures, we introduce a novel surgical technique of orthotopic liver and kidney transplantation.

METHODS

The modified simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation technique via a right-sided L-incision included three steps: (1) right-sided nephrectomy in the recipient followed by (2) orthotopic liver transplantation in cava replacement technique and (3) the orthotopic kidney transplantation with arterial reconstruction to the right common iliac artery.

RESULTS

In total, seven patients with ADPLKD were transplanted by using the modified transplantation technique. The mean operation time was 342.43 min (±68.77). Postoperative patients were treated for 6.28 days (±2.50) in the intensive care unit and were discharged from the surgical ward approximately 28 days (±5.66) after the operation with normal graft function. Complications associated with the use of the modified technique, such as bleeding, anastomotic stenosis, biloma, or urinoma, did not occur.

CONCLUSION

Modified simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation is a safe alternative for patients with ADPLKD. By combining right-sided nephrectomy and orthotopic graft transplantation, the approach optimizes the exposure of anatomical structures and simplifies the transplantation procedure. Additionally, the modified transplantation technique does not require a particular organ explantation procedure and can be applied for all liver and kidney grafts.

Outcomes of en bloc simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation compared to the traditional technique

Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) is indicated for patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and concurrent renal insufficiency. En bloc SLKT is an alternative to traditional separate implantations, but studies comparing the two techniques are limited. The en bloc technique maintains renal outflow via donor infrahepatic vena cava and inflow via anastomosis of donor renal artery to donor splenic artery. Comparison of recipients of en bloc (n = 17) vs traditional (n = 17) SLKT between 2013 and 2017 was performed. Recipient demographics and comorbidities were similar. More recipients of traditional SLKT were dialysis dependent (82.4% vs 41.2%, P = .01) with lower baseline pretransplant eGFR (14 vs 18, P = .01). En bloc SLKT was associated with shorter kidney cold ischemia time (341 vs 533 minutes, P < .01) and operative time (374 vs 511 minutes, P < .01). Two en bloc patients underwent reoperation for kidney allograft inflow issues due to kinking and renal steal. Early kidney allograft dysfunction (23.5% in both groups), 1-year kidney graft survival (88.2% vs 82.4%, P = 1.0), and posttransplantation eGFR were similar between groups. In our experience, the en bloc SLKT technique is safe and feasible, with comparable outcomes to the traditional method.

En bloc liver-kidney transplantation with renal artery variation using donor splenic artery and left gastric artery as inflow to the kidney: Case report

INTRODUCTION

En bloc liver-kidney transplantation can be difficult with renal artery variations for which the risk of multiple anastomoses can outweigh the benefits.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

This report is the first to describe an en bloc liver-kidney transplantation using a donor kidney with double renal arteries. The indication for a combined liver-kidney transplant was non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis with chronic kidney disease secondary to hypertension and diabetes compounded by hepato-renal syndrome. The explant pathology was consistent with steatohepatitis, but did have PAS/D-positive intracytoplastic globules which suggest an additional component of alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency.

DISCUSSION

Diminished arterial inflow to the inferior renal pole was noted intraoperatively, requiring re-anastomosis of the inferior renal polar artery to the donor left gastric artery. The post-operative course was uncomplicated with patient discharge on post-operative day six.

CONCLUSION

With increasing numbers of simultaneous liver-kidney transplants being performed, kidneys with multiple renal arteries can successfully be transplanted en-bloc without compromising ischemia time.