1
|
Trela KC, Salerno CT, Chuba E, Dhawan R. Donation After Circulatory Death Heart Transplantation: A Narrative Review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2024; 38:2047-2058. [PMID: 38981770 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.03.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Revised: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
Heart transplantation is the definitive treatment for refractory, end-stage heart failure. The number of patients awaiting transplantation far exceeds available organs. In an effort to expand the donor pool, donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation has garnered renewed interest. Unlike donation after brain death, DCD donors do not meet the criteria for brain death and are dependent on life-sustaining therapies. Procurement can include a direct strategy or a normothermic regional perfusion, whereby there is restoration of perfusion to the organ before explantation. There are new developments in cold storage and ex vivo perfusion strategies. Since its inception, there has been a steady improvement in post-transplant outcomes, largely attributed to advancements in operative and procurement strategies. In this narrative review, the authors address the unique considerations of DCD heart transplantation, including withdrawal of care, the logistics of procuring and resuscitating organs, outcomes compared with standard donation after brain death, and ethical considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Constantine Trela
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
| | - Christopher T Salerno
- Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Emuejevoke Chuba
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Richa Dhawan
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kharawala A, Nagraj S, Seo J, Pargaonkar S, Uehara M, Goldstein DJ, Patel SR, Sims DB, Jorde UP. Donation After Circulatory Death Heart Transplant: Current State and Future Directions. Circ Heart Fail 2024; 17:e011678. [PMID: 38899474 DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.124.011678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Orthotopic heart transplant is the gold standard therapeutic intervention for patients with end-stage heart failure. Conventionally, heart transplant has relied on donation after brain death for organ recovery. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is the donation of the heart after confirming that circulatory function has irreversibly ceased. DCD-orthotopic heart transplant differs from donation after brain death-orthotopic heart transplant in ways that carry implications for widespread adoption, including differences in organ recovery, storage and ethical considerations surrounding normothermic regional perfusion with DCD. Despite these differences, DCD has shown promising early outcomes, augmenting the donor pool and allowing more individuals to benefit from orthotopic heart transplant. This review aims to present the current state and future trajectory of DCD-heart transplant, examine key differences between DCD and donation after brain death, including clinical experiences and innovations in methodologies, and address the ongoing ethical challenges surrounding the new frontier in heart transplant with DCD donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amrin Kharawala
- Jacobi Medical Center, New York City Health & Hospitals Corp, Bronx, NY (A.K., J.S., S.P.)
| | - Sanjana Nagraj
- Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (S.N., M.U., D.J.G., S.R.P., D.B.S., U.P.J.)
| | - Jiyoung Seo
- Jacobi Medical Center, New York City Health & Hospitals Corp, Bronx, NY (A.K., J.S., S.P.)
| | - Sumant Pargaonkar
- Jacobi Medical Center, New York City Health & Hospitals Corp, Bronx, NY (A.K., J.S., S.P.)
| | - Mayuko Uehara
- Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (S.N., M.U., D.J.G., S.R.P., D.B.S., U.P.J.)
| | - Daniel J Goldstein
- Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (S.N., M.U., D.J.G., S.R.P., D.B.S., U.P.J.)
| | - Snehal R Patel
- Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (S.N., M.U., D.J.G., S.R.P., D.B.S., U.P.J.)
| | - Daniel B Sims
- Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (S.N., M.U., D.J.G., S.R.P., D.B.S., U.P.J.)
| | - Ulrich P Jorde
- Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (S.N., M.U., D.J.G., S.R.P., D.B.S., U.P.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schmiady MO, Bec LP, Shallah M, Flammer AJ, Vogt PR, Wilhelm MJ. Long-distance donor heart procurement using an innovative cold static storage system. Perfusion 2024; 39:1006-1008. [PMID: 36905360 PMCID: PMC11191656 DOI: 10.1177/02676591231163018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
The global lack of donor shortage poses a major limitation for heart transplantation. New concepts with expanded donor inclusion criteria comprise extended transport distances and prolonged ischemic times with the aim of reaching a larger number of potential donors. Recent developments in cold storage solutions may allow more donor hearts with prolonged ischemic times to be use for transplantation in the future. We present our experience during a long-distance donor heart procurement with the longest reported transport distance and transport time in the current literature. This was made possible through the use of SherpaPak™, an innovative cold storage system which allows for controlled temperatures during transportation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin O Schmiady
- Clinic for Cardiac Surgery, University Heart Center, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Leszek P Bec
- Clinic for Cardiac Surgery, University Heart Center, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mohammed Shallah
- Clinic for Cardiac Surgery, University Heart Center, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Paul R Vogt
- Clinic for Cardiac Surgery, University Heart Center, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Markus J Wilhelm
- Clinic for Cardiac Surgery, University Heart Center, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
D'Alessandro D, Schroder J, Meyer DM, Vidic A, Shudo Y, Silvestry S, Leacche M, Sciortino CM, Rodrigo ME, Pham SM, Copeland H, Jacobs JP, Kawabori M, Takeda K, Zuckermann A. Impact of controlled hypothermic preservation on outcomes following heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2024; 43:1153-1161. [PMID: 38503386 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a major cause of early mortality after heart transplant, but the impact of donor organ preservation conditions on severity of PGD and survival has not been well characterized. METHODS Data from US adult heart-transplant recipients in the Global Utilization and Registry Database for Improved Heart Preservation-Heart Registry (NCT04141605) were analyzed to quantify PGD severity, mortality, and associated risk factors. The independent contributions of organ preservation method (traditional ice storage vs controlled hypothermic preservation) and ischemic time were analyzed using propensity matching and logistic regression. RESULTS Among 1,061 US adult heart transplants performed between October 2015 and December 2022, controlled hypothermic preservation was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of severe PGD compared to ice (6.6% [37/559] vs 10.4% [47/452], p = 0.039). Following propensity matching, severe PGD was reduced by 50% (6.0% [17/281] vs 12.1% [34/281], respectively; p = 0.018). The Kaplan-Meier terminal probability of 1-year mortality was 4.2% for recipients without PGD, 7.2% for mild or moderate PGD, and 32.1%, for severe PGD (p < 0.001). The probability of severe PGD increased for both cohorts with longer ischemic time, but donor hearts stored on ice were more likely to develop severe PGD at all ischemic times compared to controlled hypothermic preservation. CONCLUSIONS Severe PGD is the deadliest complication of heart transplantation and is associated with a 7.8-fold increase in probability of 1-year mortality. Controlled hypothermic preservation significantly attenuates the risk of severe PGD and is a simple yet highly effective tool for mitigating post-transplant morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D'Alessandro
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Jacob Schroder
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Dan M Meyer
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Andrija Vidic
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Yasuhiro Shudo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Scott Silvestry
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, AdventHealth Transplant Institute, Orlando, Florida
| | - Marzia Leacche
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Corewell Health (formerly Spectrum Health), Grand Rapids, Michigan
| | | | - Maria E Rodrigo
- Department of Cardiology, MedStar Health, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Si M Pham
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Hannah Copeland
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lutheran Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana
| | - Jeffrey P Jacobs
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Congenital Heart Center, UF Health Shands Hospital, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Masashi Kawabori
- Department of Surgery, Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Koji Takeda
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic & Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Andreas Zuckermann
- Department for Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sicim H, Tam WSV, Tang PC. Primary graft dysfunction in heart transplantation: the challenge to survival. J Cardiothorac Surg 2024; 19:313. [PMID: 38824545 PMCID: PMC11143673 DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02816-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a life-threatening clinical condition with a high mortality rate, presenting as left, right, or biventricular dysfunction within the initial 24 h following heart transplantation, in the absence of a discernible secondary cause. Given its intricate nature, definitive definition and diagnosis of PGD continues to pose a challenge. The pathophysiology of PGD encompasses numerous underlying mechanisms, some of which remain to be elucidated, including factors like myocardial damage, the release of proinflammatory mediators, and the occurrence of ischemia-reperfusion injury. The dynamic characteristics of both donors and recipients, coupled with the inclination towards marginal lists containing more risk factors, together contribute to the increased incidence of PGD. The augmentation of therapeutic strategies involving mechanical circulatory support accelerates myocardial recovery, thereby significantly contributing to survival. Nonetheless, a universally accepted treatment algorithm for the swift management of this clinical condition, which necessitates immediate intervention upon diagnosis, remains absent. This paper aims to review the existing literature and shed light on how diagnosis, pathophysiology, risk factors, treatment, and perioperative management affect the outcome of PGD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hüseyin Sicim
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Wing Sum Vincy Tam
- School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Paul C Tang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lerman JB, Patel CB, Casalinova S, Nicoara A, Holley CL, Leacche M, Silvestry S, Zuckermann A, D'Alessandro DA, Milano CA, Schroder JN, DeVore AD. Early Outcomes in Patients With LVAD Undergoing Heart Transplant via Use of the SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System. Circ Heart Fail 2024; 17:e010904. [PMID: 38602105 DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.123.010904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heart transplant (HT) in recipients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is associated with poor early post-HT outcomes, including primary graft dysfunction (PGD). As complicated heart explants in recipients with LVADs may produce longer ischemic times, innovations in donor heart preservation may yield improved post-HT outcomes. The SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System is an organ preservation technology that maintains donor heart temperatures between 4 °C and 8 °C, which may minimize ischemic and cold-induced graft injuries. This analysis sought to identify whether the use of SherpaPak versus traditional cold storage was associated with differential outcomes among patients with durable LVAD undergoing HT. METHODS Global Utilization and Registry Database for Improved Heart Preservation-Heart (NCT04141605) is a multicenter registry assessing post-HT outcomes comparing 2 methods of donor heart preservation: SherpaPak versus traditional cold storage. A retrospective review of all patients with durable LVAD who underwent HT was performed. Outcomes assessed included rates of PGD, post-HT mechanical circulatory support use, and 30-day and 1-year survival. RESULTS SherpaPak (n=149) and traditional cold storage (n=178) patients had similar baseline characteristics. SherpaPak use was associated with reduced PGD (adjusted odds ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.32-0.99]; P=0.045) and severe PGD (adjusted odds ratio, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.13-0.75]; P=0.009), despite an increased total ischemic time in the SherpaPak group. Propensity matched analysis also noted a trend toward reduced intensive care unit (SherpaPak 7.5±6.4 days versus traditional cold storage 11.3±18.8 days; P=0.09) and hospital (SherpaPak 20.5±11.9 days versus traditional cold storage 28.7±37.0 days; P=0.06) lengths of stay. The 30-day and 1-year survival was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS SherpaPak use was associated with improved early post-HT outcomes among patients with LVAD undergoing HT. This innovation in preservation technology may be an option for HT candidates at increased risk for PGD. REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04141605.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph B Lerman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (J.B.L., C.B.P., S.C., C.L.H., A.D.D.), Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC
| | - Chetan B Patel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (J.B.L., C.B.P., S.C., C.L.H., A.D.D.), Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC
| | - Sarah Casalinova
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (J.B.L., C.B.P., S.C., C.L.H., A.D.D.), Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, (S.C., A.N., C.A.M., J.N.S.), Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC
| | - Alina Nicoara
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, (S.C., A.N., C.A.M., J.N.S.), Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC
| | - Christopher L Holley
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (J.B.L., C.B.P., S.C., C.L.H., A.D.D.), Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC
| | - Marzia Leacche
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, MI (M.L.)
| | - Scott Silvestry
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, AdventHealth Transplant Institute, Orlando, FL (S.S.)
| | - Andreas Zuckermann
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria (A.Z.)
| | - David A D'Alessandro
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (D.A.D.)
| | - Carmelo A Milano
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, (S.C., A.N., C.A.M., J.N.S.), Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC
| | - Jacob N Schroder
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, (S.C., A.N., C.A.M., J.N.S.), Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC
| | - Adam D DeVore
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (J.B.L., C.B.P., S.C., C.L.H., A.D.D.), Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shelley B, McAreavey R, McCall P. Epidemiology of perioperative RV dysfunction: risk factors, incidence, and clinical implications. Perioper Med (Lond) 2024; 13:31. [PMID: 38664769 PMCID: PMC11046908 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-024-00388-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
In this edition of the journal, the Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) present three manuscripts describing the physiology, assessment, and management of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) as pertains to the perioperative setting. This narrative review seeks to provide context for these manuscripts, discussing the epidemiology of perioperative RVD focussing on definition, risk factors, and clinical implications. Throughout the perioperative period, there are many potential risk factors/insults predisposing to perioperative RVD including pre-existing RVD, fluid overload, myocardial ischaemia, pulmonary embolism, lung injury, mechanical ventilation, hypoxia and hypercarbia, lung resection, medullary reaming and cement implantation, cardiac surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, heart and lung transplantation, and left ventricular assist device implantation. There has however been little systematic attempt to quantify the incidence of perioperative RVD. What limited data exists has assessed perioperative RVD using echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and pulmonary artery catheterisation but is beset by challenges resulting from the inconsistencies in RVD definitions. Alongside differences in patient and surgical risk profile, this leads to wide variation in the incidence estimate. Data concerning the clinical implications of perioperative RVD is even more scarce, though there is evidence to suggest RVD is associated with atrial arrhythmias and prolonged length of critical care stay following thoracic surgery, increased need for inotropic support in revision orthopaedic surgery, and increased critical care requirement and mortality following cardiac surgery. Acute manifestations of RVD result from low cardiac output or systemic venous congestion, which are non-specific to the diagnosis of RVD. As such, RVD is easily overlooked, and the relative contribution of RV dysfunction to postoperative morbidity is likely to be underestimated.We applaud the POQI group for highlighting this important condition. There is undoubtedly a need for further study of the RV in the perioperative period in addition to solutions for perioperative risk prediction and management strategies. There is much to understand, study, and trial in this area, but importantly for our patients, we are increasingly recognising the importance of these uncertainties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Shelley
- Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK.
- Perioperative Medicine and Critical Care Research Group, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
| | - Rhiannon McAreavey
- Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK
- Perioperative Medicine and Critical Care Research Group, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Philip McCall
- Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK
- Perioperative Medicine and Critical Care Research Group, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Grzyb C, Du D, Nair N. Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Predicting the Risks of Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy and Cardiac Transplantation. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2076. [PMID: 38610843 PMCID: PMC11013005 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13072076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The use of AI-driven technologies in probing big data to generate better risk prediction models has been an ongoing and expanding area of investigation. The AI-driven models may perform better as compared to linear models; however, more investigations are needed in this area to refine their predictability and applicability to the field of durable MCS and cardiac transplantation. Methods: A literature review was carried out using Google Scholar/PubMed from 2000 to 2023. Results: This review defines the knowledge gaps and describes different AI-driven approaches that may be used to further our understanding. Conclusions: The limitations of current models are due to missing data, data imbalances, and the uneven distribution of variables in the datasets from which the models are derived. There is an urgent need for predictive models that can integrate a large number of clinical variables from multicenter data to account for the variability in patient characteristics that influence patient selection, outcomes, and survival for both durable MCS and HT; this may be fulfilled by AI-driven risk prediction models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Grzyb
- PennState College of Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Dr, Hershey, PA 17033, USA;
| | - Dongping Du
- Department of Industrial and Structural Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA;
| | - Nandini Nair
- PennState College of Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Dr, Hershey, PA 17033, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moayedifar R, Shudo Y, Kawabori M, Silvestry S, Schroder J, Meyer DM, Jacobs JP, D'Alessandro D, Zuckermann A. Recipient Outcomes With Extended Criteria Donors Using Advanced Heart Preservation: An Analysis of the GUARDIAN-Heart Registry. J Heart Lung Transplant 2024; 43:673-680. [PMID: 38163452 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of end-stage heart failure and patients who could benefit from heart transplantation requires an expansion of the donor pool, relying on the transplant community to continually re-evaluate and expand the use of extended criteria donor organs. Introduction of new technologies such as the Paragonix SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System aids in this shift. We seek to analyze the impact of the SherpaPak system on recipient outcomes who receive extended criteria organs in the GUARDIAN-Heart Registry. METHODS Between October 2015 and December 2022, 1,113 adults from 15 US centers receiving donor hearts utilizing either SherpaPak (n = 560) or conventional ice storage (ice, n = 453) were analyzed from the GUARDIAN-Heart Registry using summary statistics. A previously published set of criteria was used to identify extended criteria donors, which included 193 SherpaPak and 137 ice. RESULTS There were a few baseline differences among recipients in the 2 cohorts; most notably, IMPACT scores, distance traveled, and total ischemic time were significantly greater in SherpaPak, and significantly more donor hearts in the SherpaPak cohort had >4 hours total ischemia time. Posttransplant mechanical circulatory support utilization (SherpaPak 22.3% vs ice 35.0%, p = 0.012) and new extracorporeal membrane oxygenation/ventricular assist device (SherpaPak 7.8% vs ice 15.3%, p = 0.033) was significantly reduced, and the rate of severe primary graft dysfunction (SherpaPak 6.2% vs ice 13.9%, p = 0.022) was significantly reduced by over 50% in hearts preserved using SherpaPak. One-year survival between cohorts was similar (SherpaPak 92.9% vs ice 89.6%, p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS This subgroup analysis demonstrates that SherpaPak can be safely used to utilize extended criteria donors with low severe PGD rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxana Moayedifar
- Department for Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Yasuhiro Shudo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Masashi Kawabori
- Cardiovascular Center, Department of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Scott Silvestry
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, AdventHealth Transplant Institute, Orlando, Florida
| | - Jacob Schroder
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Dan M Meyer
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jeffrey P Jacobs
- Congenital Heart Center, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, UF Health Shands Hospital, Gainesville, Florida
| | - David D'Alessandro
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andreas Zuckermann
- Department for Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schroder JN, Patel CB, DeVore AD, Casalinova S, Koomalsingh KJ, Shah AS, Anyanwu AC, D'Alessandro DA, Mudy K, Sun B, Strueber M, Khaghani A, Shudo Y, Esmailian F, Liao K, Pagani FD, Silvestry S, Wang IW, Salerno CT, Absi TS, Madsen JC, Mancini D, Fiedler AG, Milano CA, Smith JW. Increasing Utilization of Extended Criteria Donor Hearts for Transplantation: The OCS Heart EXPAND Trial. JACC. HEART FAILURE 2024; 12:438-447. [PMID: 38276933 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extended criteria donor (ECD) hearts available with donation after brain death (DBD) are underutilized for transplantation due to limitations of cold storage. OBJECTIVES This study evaluated use of an extracorporeal perfusion system on donor heart utilization and post-transplant outcomes in ECD DBD hearts. METHODS In this prospective, single-arm, multicenter study, adult heart transplant recipients received ECD hearts using an extracorporeal perfusion system if hearts met study criteria. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day survival and absence of severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD). Secondary outcomes were donor heart utilization rate, 30-day survival, and incidence of severe PGD. The safety outcome was the mean number of heart graft-related serious adverse events within 30 days. Additional outcomes included survival through 2 years benchmarked to concurrent nonrandomized control subjects. RESULTS A total of 173 ECD DBD hearts were perfused; 150 (87%) were successfully transplanted; 23 (13%) did not meet study transplantation criteria. At 30 days, 92% of patients had survived and had no severe PGD. The 30-day survival was 97%, and the incidence of severe PGD was 6.7%. The mean number of heart graft-related serious adverse events within 30 days was 0.17 (95% CI: 0.11-0.23). Patient survival was 93%, 89%, and 86% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, and was comparable with concurrent nonrandomized control subjects. CONCLUSIONS Use of an extracorporeal perfusion system resulted in successfully transplanting 87% of donor hearts with excellent patient survival to 2 years post-transplant and low rates of severe PGD. The ability to safely use ECD DBD hearts could substantially increase the number of heart transplants and expand access to patients in need. (International EXPAND Heart Pivotal Trial [EXPANDHeart]; NCT02323321; Heart EXPAND Continued Access Protocol; NCT03835754).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Adam D DeVore
- Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | - Ashish S Shah
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | | | - Karol Mudy
- Minneapolis Heart Institute at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Benjamin Sun
- Minneapolis Heart Institute at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | | - Yasuhiro Shudo
- Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - I-Wen Wang
- Memorial Healthcare System, Hollywood, Florida, USA
| | | | - Tarek S Absi
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Joren C Madsen
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Donna Mancini
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Amy G Fiedler
- University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Jason W Smith
- University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
McGiffin DC, Kure CE, Macdonald PS, Jansz PC, Emmanuel S, Marasco SF, Doi A, Merry C, Larbalestier R, Shah A, Geldenhuys A, Sibal AK, Wasywich CA, Mathew J, Paul E, Cheshire C, Leet A, Hare JL, Graham S, Fraser JF, Kaye DM. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) safely and effectively extends acceptable donor heart preservation times: Results of the Australian and New Zealand trial. J Heart Lung Transplant 2024; 43:485-495. [PMID: 37918701 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cold static storage preservation of donor hearts for periods longer than 4 hours increases the risk of primary graft dysfunction (PGD). The aim of the study was to determine if hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) could safely prolong the preservation time of donor hearts. METHODS We conducted a nonrandomized, single arm, multicenter investigation of the effect of HOPE using the XVIVO Heart Preservation System on donor hearts with a projected preservation time of 6 to 8 hours on 30-day recipient survival and allograft function post-transplant. Each center completed 1 or 2 short preservation time followed by long preservation time cases. PGD was classified as occurring in the first 24 hours after transplantation or secondary graft dysfunction (SGD) occurring at any time with a clearly defined cause. Trial survival was compared with a comparator group based on data from the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Registry. RESULTS We performed heart transplants using 7 short and 29 long preservation time donor hearts placed on the HOPE system. The mean preservation time for the long preservation time cases was 414 minutes, the longest being 8 hours and 47 minutes. There was 100% survival at 30 days. One long preservation time recipient developed PGD, and 1 developed SGD. One short preservation time patient developed SGD. Thirty day survival was superior to the ISHLT comparator group despite substantially longer preservation times in the trial patients. CONCLUSIONS HOPE provides effective preservation out to preservation times of nearly 9 hours allowing retrieval from remote geographic locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C McGiffin
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Transplantation, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Critical Care Research Group, Adult Intensive Care Unit, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Christina E Kure
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Transplantation, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Paul C Jansz
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sam Emmanuel
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Silvana F Marasco
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Transplantation, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Atsuo Doi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Transplantation, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Chris Merry
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Transplantation, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Robert Larbalestier
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Amit Shah
- Department of Cardiology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Agneta Geldenhuys
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Amul K Sibal
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Cara A Wasywich
- Department of Cardiology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jacob Mathew
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eldho Paul
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Angeline Leet
- Department of Cardiology, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - James L Hare
- Department of Cardiology, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sandra Graham
- Department of Cardiology, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - John F Fraser
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Critical Care Research Group, Adult Intensive Care Unit, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; St Andrews War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - David M Kaye
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash-Alfred-Baker Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jia S, Caranasos TG, Kumar PA. Pro: Advantages of Using TransMedics Organ Care System Heart in Heart Transplantation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2024; 38:569-572. [PMID: 38042742 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Jia
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
| | - Thomas G Caranasos
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Priya A Kumar
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Contento J, Cleveland V, Ehtiati T, Olivieri L, Kanter J. A phantom for targeted endomyocardial biopsy training. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 102:1109-1113. [PMID: 37855199 PMCID: PMC10842507 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) of the right ventricular (RV) septal surface during cardiac catheterization is the standard method to assess cardiac allograft rejection, heart failure, or inflammatory cardiomyopathies. We developed methodology using a three-dimensional (3D) printed phantom to provide proof of concept for using biplane overlay technology for targeted EMB. A standard bioptome and steerable sheath were used to discern feasibility of biopsy for seven regions of the RV septum guided by 3D overlay. This novel biopsy phantom can help train operators in biopsy techniques, and biplane overlay technology has the potential to advance targeted EMB in transplant and cardiomyopathy populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vincent Cleveland
- Division of Cardiology, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Tina Ehtiati
- Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Malvern, PA
| | - Laura Olivieri
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Joshua Kanter
- Division of Cardiology, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gosling AF, Wright MC, Cherry A, Milano CA, Patel CB, Schroder JN, DeVore A, McCartney S, Kerr D, Bryner B, Podgoreanu M, Nicoara A. The Role of Recipient Thyroid Hormone Supplementation in Primary Graft Dysfunction After Heart Transplantation: A Propensity-Adjusted Analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2023; 37:2236-2243. [PMID: 37586950 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate whether recipient administration of thyroid hormone (liothyronine [T3]) is associated with reduced rates of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after orthotopic heart transplantation. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Single-center, university hospital. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation. INTERVENTIONS A total of 609 adult heart transplant recipients were divided into 2 cohorts: patients who did not receive T3 (no T3 group, from 2009 to 2014), and patients who received T3 (T3 group, from 2015 to 2019). Propensity-adjusted logistic regression was performed to assess the association between T3 supplementation and PGD. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS After applying exclusion criteria and propensity-score analysis, the final cohort included 461 patients. The incidence of PGD was not significantly different between the groups (33.9% no T3 group v 40.8% T3 group; p = 0.32). Mortality at 30 days (3% no T3 group v 2% T3 group; p = 0.53) and 1 year (10% no T3 group v 12% T3 group; p = 0.26) were also not significantly different. When assessing the severity of PGD, there were no differences in the groups' rates of moderate PGD (not requiring mechanical circulatory support other than an intra-aortic balloon pump) or severe PGD (requiring mechanical circulatory support other than an intra-aortic balloon pump). However, segmented time regression analysis revealed that patients in the T3 group were less likely to develop severe PGD. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicated that recipient single-dose thyroid hormone administration may not protect against the development of PGD, but may attenuate the severity of PGD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre F Gosling
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
| | - Mary C Wright
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Anne Cherry
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Carmelo A Milano
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Chetan B Patel
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Jacob N Schroder
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Adam DeVore
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Sharon McCartney
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Daryl Kerr
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Benjamin Bryner
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Mihai Podgoreanu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Alina Nicoara
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shudo Y, Leacche M, Copeland H, Silvestry S, Pham SM, Molina E, Schroder JN, Sciortino CM, Jacobs JP, Kawabori M, Meyer DM, Zuckermann A, D’Alessandro DA. A Paradigm Shift in Heart Preservation: Improved Post-transplant Outcomes in Recipients of Donor Hearts Preserved With the SherpaPak System. ASAIO J 2023; 69:993-1000. [PMID: 37678260 PMCID: PMC10602216 DOI: 10.1097/mat.0000000000002036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Traditional ice storage has been the historic standard for preserving donor's hearts. However, this approach provides variability in cooling, increasing risks of freezing injury. To date, no preservation technology has been reported to improve survival after transplantation. The Paragonix SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System (SCTS) is a controlled hypothermic technology clinically used since 2018. Real-world evidence on clinical benefits of SCTS compared to conventional ice cold storage (ICS) was evaluated. Between October 2015 and January 2022, 569 US adults receiving donor hearts preserved and transported either in SCTS (n = 255) or ICS (n = 314) were analyzed from the Global Utilization And Registry Database for Improved heArt preservatioN (GUARDIAN-Heart) registry. Propensity matching and a subgroup analysis of >240 minutes ischemic time were performed to evaluate comparative outcomes. Overall, the SCTS cohort had significantly lower rates of severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) ( p = 0.03). When propensity matched, SCTS had improving 1-year survival ( p = 0.10), significantly lower rates of severe PGD ( p = 0.011), and lower overall post-transplant MCS utilization ( p = 0.098). For patients with ischemic times >4 hours, the SCTS cohort had reduced post-transplant MCS utilization ( p = 0.01), reduced incidence of severe PGD ( p = 0.005), and improved 30-day survival ( p = 0.02). A multivariate analysis of independent risk factors revealed that compared to SCTS, use of ice results in a 3.4-fold greater chance of severe PGD ( p = 0.014). Utilization of SCTS is associated with a trend toward increased post-transplant survival and significantly lower severe PGD and MCS utilization. These findings fundamentally challenge the decades-long status quo of transporting donor hearts using ice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuhiro Shudo
- From the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Marzia Leacche
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Corewell Health (formerly Spectrum Health), Grand Rapids, Michigan
| | - Hannah Copeland
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lutheran Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana
| | - Scott Silvestry
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, AdventHealth Transplant Institute, Orlando, Florida
| | - Si M. Pham
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Ezequiel Molina
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (current affiliation: Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Georgia)
| | - Jacob N. Schroder
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Jeffrey P. Jacobs
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Departments of Surgery and Pediatrics, Congenital Heart Center, UF Health Shands Hospital, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Masashi Kawabori
- Cardiovascular Center, Department of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dan M. Meyer
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Andreas Zuckermann
- Department for Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - David A. D’Alessandro
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ghadimi K, Cappiello JL, Wright MC, Levy JH, Bryner BS, DeVore AD, Schroder JN, Patel CB, Rajagopal S, Shah SH, Milano CA. Inhaled Epoprostenol Compared With Nitric Oxide for Right Ventricular Support After Major Cardiac Surgery. Circulation 2023; 148:1316-1329. [PMID: 37401479 PMCID: PMC10615678 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.122.062464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a leading driver of morbidity and death after major cardiac surgery for advanced heart failure, including orthotopic heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device implantation. Inhaled pulmonary-selective vasodilators, such as inhaled epoprostenol (iEPO) and nitric oxide (iNO), are essential therapeutics for the prevention and medical management of postoperative RVF. However, there is limited evidence from clinical trials to guide agent selection despite the significant cost considerations of iNO therapy. METHODS In this double-blind trial, participants were stratified by assigned surgery and key preoperative prognostic features, then randomized to continuously receive either iEPO or iNO beginning at the time of separation from cardiopulmonary bypass with the continuation of treatment into the intensive care unit stay. The primary outcome was the composite RVF rate after both operations, defined after transplantation by the initiation of mechanical circulatory support for isolated RVF, and defined after left ventricular assist device implantation by moderate or severe right heart failure according to criteria from the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support. An equivalence margin of 15 percentage points was prespecified for between-group RVF risk difference. Secondary postoperative outcomes were assessed for treatment differences and included: mechanical ventilation duration; hospital and intensive care unit length of stay during the index hospitalization; acute kidney injury development including renal replacement therapy initiation; and death at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS Of 231 randomized participants who met eligibility at the time of surgery, 120 received iEPO, and 111 received iNO. Primary outcome occurred in 30 participants (25.0%) in the iEPO group and 25 participants (22.5%) in the iNO group, for a risk difference of 2.5 percentage points (two one-sided test 90% CI, -6.6% to 11.6%) in support of equivalence. There were no significant between-group differences for any of the measured postoperative secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing major cardiac surgery for advanced heart failure, inhaled pulmonary-selective vasodilator treatment using iEPO was associated with similar risks for RVF development and development of other postoperative secondary outcomes compared with treatment using iNO. REGISTRATION URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov; Unique identifier: NCT03081052.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamrouz Ghadimi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Divisions of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, and the Clinical Research Unit (K.G., M.C.W., J.H.L.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - Mary Cooter Wright
- Department of Anesthesiology, Divisions of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, and the Clinical Research Unit (K.G., M.C.W., J.H.L.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Jerrold H Levy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Divisions of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, and the Clinical Research Unit (K.G., M.C.W., J.H.L.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Department of Surgery, Adult Cardiac Surgery Section (J.H.L., B.S.B., J.N.S., C.A.M.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Benjamin S Bryner
- Department of Surgery, Adult Cardiac Surgery Section (J.H.L., B.S.B., J.N.S., C.A.M.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Adam D DeVore
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (A.D.D., C.B.P., S.R., S.H.S.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Jacob N Schroder
- Department of Surgery, Adult Cardiac Surgery Section (J.H.L., B.S.B., J.N.S., C.A.M.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Chetan B Patel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (A.D.D., C.B.P., S.R., S.H.S.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Sudarshan Rajagopal
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (A.D.D., C.B.P., S.R., S.H.S.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Svati H Shah
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (A.D.D., C.B.P., S.R., S.H.S.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Carmelo A Milano
- Department of Surgery, Adult Cardiac Surgery Section (J.H.L., B.S.B., J.N.S., C.A.M.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nesseler N, Mansour A, Cholley B, Coutance G, Bouglé A. Perioperative Management of Heart Transplantation: A Clinical Review. Anesthesiology 2023; 139:493-510. [PMID: 37458995 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000004627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
In this clinical review, the authors summarize the perioperative management of heart transplant patients with a focus on hemodynamics, immunosuppressive strategies, hemostasis and hemorrage, and the prevention and treatment of infectious complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Nesseler
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Pontchaillou, University Hospital of Rennes, France; National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Center of Clinical Investigation, Nutrition, Metabolism, Cancer Mixed Research Unit, University Hospital Federation Survival Optimization in Organ Transplantation, Rennes, France
| | - Alexandre Mansour
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Pontchaillou, University Hospital of Rennes, France; National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Center of Clinical Investigation, Nutrition, Research Institute for Environmental and Occupational Health Mixed Research Unit, Rennes, France
| | - Bernard Cholley
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, European Hospital Georges Pompidou, Public Hospitals of Paris, Paris, France; Paris Cité University, National Institute of Health and Medical Research Mixed Research Unit, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Coutance
- Sorbonne University, Public Hospitals of Paris, Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Cardiology Institute, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Adrien Bouglé
- Sorbonne University, Clinical Research Group in Anesthesia, Resuscitation, and Perioperative Medicine, Public Hospitals of Paris, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Cardiology Institute, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
McCartney SL, Peskoe S, Wright MC, Mamoun N, Schroder JN, DeVore AD, Nicoara A. Health care resource utilization and clinical outcomes for adult heart transplant recipients with primary graft dysfunction. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15048. [PMID: 37363857 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The advent of new technologies to reduce primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and improve outcomes after heart transplantation are costly. Adoption of these technologies requires a better understanding of health care utilization, specifically the costs related to PGD. METHODS Records were examined from all adult patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) between July 1, 2013 and July 30, 2019 at a single institution. Total costs were categorized into variable, fixed, direct, and indirect costs. Patient costs from time of transplantation to hospital discharge were transformed with the z-score transformation and modeled in a linear regression model, adjusted for potential confounders and in-hospital mortality. The quintile of patient costs was modeled using a proportional odds model, adjusted for confounders and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS 359 patients were analyzed, including 142 with PGD and 217 without PGD. PGD was associated with a .42 increase in z-score of total patient costs (95% CI: .22-.62; p < .0001). Additionally, any grade of PGD was associated with a 2.95 increase in odds for a higher cost of transplant (95% CI: 1.94-4.46, p < .0001). These differences were substantially greater when PGD was categorized as severe. Similar results were obtained for fixed, variable, direct, and indirect costs. CONCLUSIONS PGD after OHT impacts morbidity, mortality, and health care utilization. We found that PGD after OHT results in a significant increase in total patient costs. This increase was substantially higher if the PGD was severe. SUMMARY Primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation impacts morbidity, mortality, and health care utilization. PGD after OHT is costly and investments should be made to reduce the burden of PGD after OHT to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon L McCartney
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sarah Peskoe
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mary Cooter Wright
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Negmeldeen Mamoun
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jacob N Schroder
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Adam D DeVore
- Department of Medicine and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alina Nicoara
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Martins RP, Hamel-Bougault M, Bessière F, Pozzi M, Extramiana F, Brouk Z, Guenancia C, Sagnard A, Ninni S, Goemine C, Defaye P, Boignard A, Maille B, Gariboldi V, Baudinaud P, Martin AC, Champ-Rigot L, Blanchart K, Sellal JM, De Chillou C, Dyrda K, Jesel-Morel L, Kindo M, Chaumont C, Anselme F, Delmas C, Maury P, Arnaud M, Flecher E, Benali K. Heart transplantation as a rescue strategy for patients with refractory electrical storm. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2023; 12:571-581. [PMID: 37319361 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuad063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Heart transplantation (HT) can be proposed as a therapeutic strategy for patients with severe refractory electrical storm (ES). Data in the literature are scarce and based on case reports. We aimed at determining the characteristics and survival of patients transplanted for refractory ES. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients registered on HT waiting list during the following days after ES and eventually transplanted, from 2010 to 2021, were retrospectively included in 11 French centres. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Forty-five patients were included [82% men; 55.0 (47.8-59.3) years old; 42.2% and 26.7% non-ischaemic dilated or ischaemic cardiomyopathies, respectively]. Among them, 42 (93.3%) received amiodarone, 29 received (64.4%) beta blockers, 19 (42.2%) required deep sedation, 22 had (48.9%) mechanical circulatory support, and 9 (20.0%) had radiofrequency catheter ablation. Twenty-two patients (62%) were in cardiogenic shock. Inscription on wait list and transplantation occurred 3.0 (1.0-5.0) days and 9.0 (4.0-14.0) days after ES onset, respectively. After transplantation, 20 patients (44.4%) needed immediate haemodynamic support by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). In-hospital mortality rate was 28.9%. Predictors of in-hospital mortality were serum creatinine/urea levels, need for immediate post-operative ECMO support, post-operative complications, and surgical re-interventions. One-year survival was 68.9%. CONCLUSION Electrical storm is a rare indication of HT but may be lifesaving in those patients presenting intractable arrhythmias despite usual care. Most patients can be safely discharged from hospital, although post-operative mortality remains substantial in this context of emergency transplantation. Larger studies are warranted to precisely determine those patients at higher risk of in-hospital mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael P Martins
- Service de Cardiologie, Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, CVHU de Rennes, 2 rue Henri Le Guilloux, F-35000 Rennes, France
| | - Mathilde Hamel-Bougault
- Service de Cardiologie, Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, CVHU de Rennes, 2 rue Henri Le Guilloux, F-35000 Rennes, France
| | - Francis Bessière
- Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Louis Pradel, CHU de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Matteo Pozzi
- Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Louis Pradel, CHU de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | | - Zohra Brouk
- Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Bichat, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Sandro Ninni
- Service de Cardiologie, Service de Cardiologie, CHU de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Céline Goemine
- Service de Cardiologie, Service de Cardiologie, CHU de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Pascal Defaye
- Service de Cardiologie, CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Aude Boignard
- Service de Cardiologie, CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Vlad Gariboldi
- Service de Cardiologie, CHU La Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Pierre Baudinaud
- Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Anne-Céline Martin
- Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Katia Dyrda
- Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | | | - Michel Kindo
- Service de Cardiologie, CHU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | | | | | - Clément Delmas
- Service de Cardiologie, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Philippe Maury
- Service de Cardiologie, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Marine Arnaud
- Service de Cardiologie, Institut du Thorax, Nantes, France
| | - Erwan Flecher
- Service de Cardiologie, Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, CVHU de Rennes, 2 rue Henri Le Guilloux, F-35000 Rennes, France
| | - Karim Benali
- Service de Cardiologie, Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, CVHU de Rennes, 2 rue Henri Le Guilloux, F-35000 Rennes, France
- Service de Cardiologie, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pizanis N, Dimitriou AM, Koch A, Luedike P, Papathanasiou M, Rassaf T, Ruhparwar A, Schmack B, Weymann A, Ferenz KB, Kamler M. Introduction of machine perfusion of donor hearts in a single center in Germany. IJC HEART & VASCULATURE 2023; 47:101233. [PMID: 37388420 PMCID: PMC10300355 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Organ shortage, subsequent use of extended donor criteria organs and high-risk recipients needing redo-surgery are increasing the complexity of heart transplantation. Donor organ machine perfusion (MP) is an emerging technology allowing reduction of ischemia time as well as standardized evaluation of the organ. The aim of this study was to review the introduction of MP and analyze the results of heart transplantation after MP in our center. Methods In a retrospective single-center study, data from a prospectively collected database were analysed. From July 2018 to August 2021, fourteen hearts were retrieved and perfused using the Organ Care System (OCS), 12 hearts were transplanted. Criteria to use the OCS were based on donor/recipient characteristics. Primary objective was 30-day survival, secondary objectives were major cardiac adverse events, graft function, rejection episodes as well as overall survival in the follow-up and assessment of MP technical reliability. Results All patients survived the procedure and the postoperative 30-day interval. No MP related complications were noted. Graft ejection fraction beyond 14 days was ≥ 50% in all cases. Endomyocardial biopsy showed excellent results with no or mild rejection. Two donor hearts were rejected after OCS perfusion and evaluation. Conclusion Ex vivo normothermic MP during organ procurement is a safe and promising technique to expand the donor pool. Reduction of cold ischemic time while providing additional donor heart assessment and reconditioning options increased the number of acceptable donor hearts. Additional clinical trials are necessary to develop guidelines regarding the application of MP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaus Pizanis
- University Hospital Essen, West German Heart and Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Essen, Germany
| | - Alexandros Merkourios Dimitriou
- University Hospital Essen, West German Heart and Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Essen, Germany
| | - Achim Koch
- University Hospital Essen, West German Heart and Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Essen, Germany
| | - Peter Luedike
- University Hospital Essen, West German Heart and Vascular Center, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Essen, Germany
| | - Maria Papathanasiou
- University Hospital Essen, West German Heart and Vascular Center, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Essen, Germany
| | - Tienush Rassaf
- University Hospital Essen, West German Heart and Vascular Center, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Essen, Germany
| | - Arjang Ruhparwar
- University Hospital Essen, West German Heart and Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Essen, Germany
| | - Bastian Schmack
- University Hospital Essen, West German Heart and Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Essen, Germany
| | - Alexander Weymann
- University Hospital Essen, West German Heart and Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Markus Kamler
- University Hospital Essen, West German Heart and Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Schroder JN, Patel CB, DeVore AD, Bryner BS, Casalinova S, Shah A, Smith JW, Fiedler AG, Daneshmand M, Silvestry S, Geirsson A, Pretorius V, Joyce DL, Um JY, Esmailian F, Takeda K, Mudy K, Shudo Y, Salerno CT, Pham SM, Goldstein DJ, Philpott J, Dunning J, Lozonschi L, Couper GS, Mallidi HR, Givertz MM, Pham DT, Shaffer AW, Kai M, Quader MA, Absi T, Attia TS, Shukrallah B, Sun BC, Farr M, Mehra MR, Madsen JC, Milano CA, D'Alessandro DA. Transplantation Outcomes with Donor Hearts after Circulatory Death. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:2121-2131. [PMID: 37285526 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2212438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data showing the efficacy and safety of the transplantation of hearts obtained from donors after circulatory death as compared with hearts obtained from donors after brain death are limited. METHODS We conducted a randomized, noninferiority trial in which adult candidates for heart transplantation were assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive a heart after the circulatory death of the donor or a heart from a donor after brain death if that heart was available first (circulatory-death group) or to receive only a heart that had been preserved with the use of traditional cold storage after the brain death of the donor (brain-death group). The primary end point was the risk-adjusted survival at 6 months in the as-treated circulatory-death group as compared with the brain-death group. The primary safety end point was serious adverse events associated with the heart graft at 30 days after transplantation. RESULTS A total of 180 patients underwent transplantation; 90 (assigned to the circulatory-death group) received a heart donated after circulatory death and 90 (regardless of group assignment) received a heart donated after brain death. A total of 166 transplant recipients were included in the as-treated primary analysis (80 who received a heart from a circulatory-death donor and 86 who received a heart from a brain-death donor). The risk-adjusted 6-month survival in the as-treated population was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88 to 99) among recipients of a heart from a circulatory-death donor, as compared with 90% (95% CI, 84 to 97) among recipients of a heart from a brain-death donor (least-squares mean difference, -3 percentage points; 90% CI, -10 to 3; P<0.001 for noninferiority [margin, 20 percentage points]). There were no substantial between-group differences in the mean per-patient number of serious adverse events associated with the heart graft at 30 days after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS In this trial, risk-adjusted survival at 6 months after transplantation with a donor heart that had been reanimated and assessed with the use of extracorporeal nonischemic perfusion after circulatory death was not inferior to that after standard-care transplantation with a donor heart that had been preserved with the use of cold storage after brain death. (Funded by TransMedics; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03831048.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob N Schroder
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Chetan B Patel
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Adam D DeVore
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Benjamin S Bryner
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Sarah Casalinova
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Ashish Shah
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Jason W Smith
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Amy G Fiedler
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Mani Daneshmand
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Scott Silvestry
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Arnar Geirsson
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Victor Pretorius
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - David L Joyce
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - John Y Um
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Fardad Esmailian
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Koji Takeda
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Karol Mudy
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Yasuhiro Shudo
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Christopher T Salerno
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Si M Pham
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Daniel J Goldstein
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Jonathan Philpott
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - John Dunning
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Lucian Lozonschi
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Gregory S Couper
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Hari Reddy Mallidi
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Michael M Givertz
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Duc Thinh Pham
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Andrew W Shaffer
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Masashi Kai
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Mohammed A Quader
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Tarek Absi
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Tamer S Attia
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Bassam Shukrallah
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Ben C Sun
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Maryjane Farr
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Mandeep R Mehra
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Joren C Madsen
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - Carmelo A Milano
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| | - David A D'Alessandro
- From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (J.N.S., C.B.P., A.D.D., S.C., C.A.M.); Northwestern University (B.S.B., D.T.P.) and the University of Chicago (C.T.S.) - both in Chicago; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (A.S., T.A.); University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.W.S.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (D.L.J.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (A.G.F.), the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (V.P.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles (F.E.), and Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford (Y.S.) - all in California; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta (M.D., T.S.A.); Advent Health, Orlando (S.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville (S.M.P.), and Tampa General Hospital, Tampa (J.D., L.L.) - all in Florida; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.G.); Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (J.Y.U.); Columbia University Medical Center, New York (K.T.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx (D.J.G.), and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla (M.K.) - all in New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (K.M., B.S., B.C.S.) and the University of Minnesota Medical Center (A.W.S.) - both in Minneapolis; Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk (J.P.), and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (M.A.Q.) - both in Virginia; Tufts Medical Center (G.S.C.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (H.R.M., M.M.G., M.R.M.), and Massachusetts General Hospital (J.C.M., D.A.D.) - all in Boston; and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (M.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pállinger É, Székely A, Töreki E, Bencsáth EZ, Szécsi B, Losoncz E, Oleszka M, Hüttl T, Kosztin A, Buzas EI, Radovits T, Merkely B. Donor Pericardial Interleukin and Apolipoprotein Levels May Predict the Outcome after Human Orthotopic Heart Transplantation. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24076780. [PMID: 37047753 PMCID: PMC10095178 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24076780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The proinflammatory cascade that is activated at the time of brain death plays a crucial role in organ procurement. Our aim of this study was to explore the relationship between the clinical outcome of orthotopic heart transplantation, as well as cytokine and apolipoprotein profiles of the pericardial fluid obtained at donation. Interleukin, adipokine and lipoprotein levels in the pericardial fluid, as well as clinical data of twenty donors after brain death, were investigated. Outcome variables included primary graft dysfunction, the need for posttransplantation mechanical cardiac support and International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade ≥ 2R rejection. Hormone management and donor risk scores were also investigated. Lower levels of IL-6 were observed in primary graft dysfunction (median: 36.72 [IQR: 19.47–62.90] versus 183.67 [41.21–452.56]; p = 0.029) and in the need for mechanical cardiac support (44.12 [20.12–85.70] versus 247.13 [38.51–510.38]; p = 0.043). Rejection was associated with lower ApoAII (p = 0.021), ApoB100 (p = 0.032) and ApoM levels (p = 0.025). Lower adipsin levels were detected in those patients receiving desmopressin (p = 0.037); moreover, lower leptin levels were found in those patients receiving glucocorticoid therapy (p = 0.045), and higher T3 levels were found in those patients treated with L-thyroxine (p = 0.047) compared to those patients not receiving these hormone replacement therapies. IL-5 levels were significantly associated with UNOS-D score (p = 0.004), Heart Donor Score (HDS) and Adapted HDS (p < 0.001). The monitoring of immunological and metabolic changes in donors after brain death may help in the prediction of potential complications after heart transplantation, thus potentially optimizing donor heart allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Éva Pállinger
- Department of Genetics, Cell- and Immunobiology, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Andrea Székely
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Evelin Töreki
- Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Erzsébet Zsófia Bencsáth
- Doctoral School of Theoretical and Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Balázs Szécsi
- Doctoral School of Theoretical and Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Eszter Losoncz
- Doctoral School of Theoretical and Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Máté Oleszka
- Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tivadar Hüttl
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Annamária Kosztin
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Edit I. Buzas
- Department of Genetics, Cell- and Immunobiology, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
- HCEMM-SU Extracellular Vesicle Research Group, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
- ELKH-SE Translational Extracellular Vesicle Research Group, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tamás Radovits
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Béla Merkely
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lei I, Huang W, Noly PE, Naik S, Ghali M, Liu L, Pagani FD, Abou El Ela A, Pober JS, Pitt B, Platt JL, Cascalho M, Wang Z, Chen YE, Mortensen RM, Tang PC. Metabolic reprogramming by immune-responsive gene 1 up-regulation improves donor heart preservation and function. Sci Transl Med 2023; 15:eade3782. [PMID: 36753565 PMCID: PMC10068866 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.ade3782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Preservation quality of donor hearts is a key determinant of transplant success. Preservation duration beyond 4 hours is associated with primary graft dysfunction (PGD). Given transport time constraints, geographical limitations exist for donor-recipient matching, leading to donor heart underutilization. Here, we showed that metabolic reprogramming through up-regulation of the enzyme immune response gene 1 (IRG1) and its product itaconate improved heart function after prolonged preservation. Irg1 transcript induction was achieved by adding the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) to a histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution used for donor heart preservation. VPA increased acetylated H3K27 occupancy at the IRG1 enhancer and IRG1 transcript expression in human donor hearts. IRG1 converts aconitate to itaconate, which has both anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Accordingly, our studies showed that Irg1 transcript up-regulation by VPA treatment increased nuclear translocation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) in mice, which was accompanied by increased antioxidant protein expression [hemeoxygenase 1 (HO1) and superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1)]. Deletion of Irg1 in mice (Irg1-/-) negated the antioxidant and cardioprotective effects of VPA. Consistent with itaconate's ability to inhibit succinate dehydrogenase, VPA treatment of human hearts increased itaconate availability and reduced succinate accumulation during preservation. VPA similarly increased IRG1 expression in pig donor hearts and improved its function in an ex vivo cardiac perfusion system both at the clinical 4-hour preservation threshold and at 10 hours. These results suggest that augmentation of cardioprotective immune-metabolomic pathways may be a promising therapeutic strategy for improving donor heart function in transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ienglam Lei
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Wei Huang
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Pierre Emmanuel Noly
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada
| | - Suyash Naik
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Miriyam Ghali
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Liu Liu
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Francis D Pagani
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Ashraf Abou El Ela
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Jordan S Pober
- Department of Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Bertram Pitt
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Platt
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Marilia Cascalho
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Zhong Wang
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Y Eugene Chen
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Richard M Mortensen
- Departments of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, Internal Medicine, and Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Paul C Tang
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Orozco-Hernandez E, DeLay TK, Gongora E, Bellot C, Rusanov V, Wille K, Tallaj J, Pamboukian S, Kaleekal T, Mcelwee S, Hoopes C. State of the art - Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to thoracic transplantation. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14875. [PMID: 36465026 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has revolutionized the treatment of refractory cardiac and respiratory failure, and its use continues to increase, particularly in adults. However, ECMO-related morbidity and mortality remain high. MAIN TEXT In this review, we investigate and expand upon the current state of the art in thoracic transplant and extracorporeal life support (ELS). In particular, we examine recent increase in incidence of heart transplant in patients supported by ECMO; the potential changes in patient care and selection for transplant in the years prior to updated United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) organ allocation guidelines versus those in the years following, particularly where these guidelines pertain to ECMO; and the newly revived practice of heart-lung block transplants (HLT) and the prevalence and utility of ECMO support in patients listed for HLT. CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight encouraging outcomes in patients bridged to transplant with ECMO, considerable changes in treatment surrounding the updated UNOS guidelines, and complex, diverse outcomes among different centers in their care for increasingly ill patients listed for thoracic transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Orozco-Hernandez
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Thomas Kurt DeLay
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Enrique Gongora
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Chris Bellot
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Victoria Rusanov
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Keith Wille
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Jose Tallaj
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Salpy Pamboukian
- Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Thomas Kaleekal
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Sam Mcelwee
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Charles Hoopes
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Holmström EJ, Syrjälä SO, Dhaygude K, Tuuminen R, Krebs R, Nykänen A, Lemström KB. Severe primary graft dysfunction of the heart transplant is associated with increased plasma and intragraft proinflammatory cytokine expression. J Heart Lung Transplant 2023; 42:807-818. [PMID: 36754701 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Heart transplant results have constantly improved but primary left ventricle graft dysfunction (LV-PGD) remains a devastating complication early after transplantation. Donor and recipient systemic inflammatory response may be involved in immune activation of the transplant, and LV-PGD development. Here, we investigated donor and recipient plasma and intragraft cytokine profiles preoperatively and during LV-PGD and searched for predictive markers for LV-PGD. METHODS Donor and recipient plasma samples (n = 74) and myocardial biopsies of heart transplants (n = 64) were analyzed. Plasma and intragraft cytokine levels were determined by multiplexed and next-generation sequencing platforms, respectively. The development of LV-PGD during the first 24 hours, and graft function and mortality up to 1 year after transplantation, were examined. RESULTS Severe LV-PGD, but not mild or moderate LV-PGD, was significantly associated with early mortality, plasma high-sensitivity troponin elevation, and an increase in intragraft and plasma proinflammatory cytokines during reperfusion. Preoperative donor and recipient plasma cytokine levels failed to predict LV-PGD. Cytokine network analysis identified interleukins -6, -8, -10, and -18 as key players during reperfusion. Prolonged cold and total ischemia time, and increased need for red blood cell transfusions during operation were identified as clinical risk factors for severe LV-PGD. CONCLUSIONS Severe LV-PGD was associated with a poor clinical outcome. Donor and recipient plasma cytokine profile failed to predict LV-PGD, but severe LV-PGD was associated with an increase in post-reperfusion intragraft and recipient plasma proinflammatory cytokines. Identified key cytokines may be potential therapeutic targets to improve early and long-term outcomes after heart transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emil J Holmström
- Translational Immunology Research Program, Transplantation Laboratory, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Simo O Syrjälä
- Translational Immunology Research Program, Transplantation Laboratory, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kishor Dhaygude
- Translational Immunology Research Program, Transplantation Laboratory, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Raimo Tuuminen
- Translational Immunology Research Program, Transplantation Laboratory, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Rainer Krebs
- Translational Immunology Research Program, Transplantation Laboratory, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Antti Nykänen
- Translational Immunology Research Program, Transplantation Laboratory, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Karl B Lemström
- Translational Immunology Research Program, Transplantation Laboratory, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kaveevorayan P, Tokavanich N, Kittipibul V, Lertsuttimetta T, Singhatanadgige S, Ongcharit P, Sinphurmsukskul S, Ariyachaipanich A, Siwamogsatham S, Thammanatsakul K, Sritangsirikul S, Puwanant S. Primary isolated right ventricular failure after heart transplantation: prevalence, right ventricular characteristics, and outcomes. Sci Rep 2023; 13:394. [PMID: 36624245 PMCID: PMC9829713 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-27482-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
To determine the prevalence, right ventricular (RV) characteristics, and outcomes of primary isolated RV failure (PI-RVF) after heart transplant (HTX). PI-RVF was defined as (1) the need for mechanical circulatory support post-transplant, or (2) evidence of RVF post-transplant as measured by right atrial pressure (RAP) > 15 mmHg, cardiac index of < 2.0 L/min/m2 or inotrope support for < 72 h, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure < 18 mmHg, and transpulmonary gradient < 15 mmHg with pulmonary systolic pressure < 50 mmHg. PI-RVF can be diagnosed from the first 24-72 h after completion of heart transplantation. A total of 122 consecutive patients who underwent HTX were reviewed. Of these, 11 were excluded because of secondary causes of graft dysfunction (GD). PI-RVF was present in 65 of 111 patients (59%) and 31 (48%) met the criteria for PGD-RV. Severity of patients with PI-RVF included 41(37%) mild, 14 (13%) moderate, and 10 (9%) severe. The median onset of PI-RVF was 14 (0-49) h and RV recovery occurred 5 (3-14) days after HTX. Severe RV failure was a predictor of 30-day mortality (HR 13.2, 95% CI 1.6-124.5%, p < 0.001) and post-transplant dialysis (HR 6.9, 95% CI 2.0-257.4%, p = 0.001). Patients with moderate PI-RVF had a higher rate of 30-day mortality (14% vs. 0%, p = 0.014) and post-operative dialysis (21% vs. 2%, p = 0.016) than those with mild PI-RVF. Among patients with mild and moderate PI-RVF, patients who did not meet the criteria of PGD-RV had worsening BUN/creatinine than those who met the PGD-RV criteria (p < 0.05 for all). PI-RVF was common and can occur after 24 h post-HTX. The median RV recovery time was 5 (2-14) days after HTX. Severe PI-RVF was associated with increased rates of 30-day mortality and post-operative dialysis. Moderate PI-RVF was also associated with post-operative dialysis. A revised definition of PGD-RV may be needed since patients who had adverse outcomes did not meet the criteria of PGD-RV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peerapat Kaveevorayan
- grid.7922.e0000 0001 0244 7875Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nithi Tokavanich
- grid.7922.e0000 0001 0244 7875Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Veraprapas Kittipibul
- grid.7922.e0000 0001 0244 7875Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thana Lertsuttimetta
- grid.7922.e0000 0001 0244 7875Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Seri Singhatanadgige
- grid.7922.e0000 0001 0244 7875Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand ,Cardiac Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330 Thailand
| | - Pat Ongcharit
- grid.7922.e0000 0001 0244 7875Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand ,Cardiac Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330 Thailand ,The Excellent Center of Organ Transplantation, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330 Thailand
| | - Supanee Sinphurmsukskul
- The Excellent Center of Organ Transplantation, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330 Thailand
| | - Aekarach Ariyachaipanich
- grid.7922.e0000 0001 0244 7875Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand ,Cardiac Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330 Thailand ,The Excellent Center of Organ Transplantation, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330 Thailand
| | - Sarawut Siwamogsatham
- grid.7922.e0000 0001 0244 7875Faculty of Medicine, Chula Clinical Research Center, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kanokwan Thammanatsakul
- The Excellent Center of Organ Transplantation, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330 Thailand
| | - Supaporn Sritangsirikul
- The Excellent Center of Organ Transplantation, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330 Thailand
| | - Sarinya Puwanant
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. .,Cardiac Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. .,The Excellent Center of Organ Transplantation, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hwang NC, Sivathasan C. Review of Postoperative Care for Heart Transplant Recipients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2023; 37:112-126. [PMID: 36323595 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.09.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Revised: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The early postoperative management strategies after heart transplantation include optimizing the function of the denervated heart, correcting the causes of hemodynamic instability, and initiating and maintaining immunosuppressive therapy, allograft rejection surveillance, and prophylaxis against infections caused by immunosuppression. The course of postoperative support is influenced by the quality of allograft myocardial protection prior to implantation and reperfusion, donor-recipient heart size matching, surgical technique of orthotopic heart transplantation, and patient factors (eg, preoperative condition, immunologic compatibility, postoperative vasomotor tone, severity and reversibility of pulmonary vascular hypertension, pulmonary function, mediastinal blood loss, and end-organ perfusion). This review provides an overview of the early postoperative care of recipients and includes a brief description of the surgical techniques for orthotopic heart transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nian Chih Hwang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, National Heart Centre, Singapore.
| | - Cumaraswamy Sivathasan
- Mechanical Cardiac Support and Heart Transplant Program, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, National Heart Centre, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ram E, Lavee J, Kassif Y, Peysakhovich Y, Sternik L, Segev A, Patel J, Peled Y. Primary heart dysfunction is greater with combined heart and lung compared with isolated heart procurement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 165:186-195.e4. [PMID: 33691941 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.01.090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Combined heart and lungs (CHL) procurement differs from isolated heart (IH) procurement in several aspects, including lung recruitment, cannulation, and preservation requirements. We aimed to investigate whether CHL versus IH procurement contributes to the development of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after heart transplantation (HT). METHODS Between 1999 and 2019, we assessed 175 patients undergoing HT at a single center. Patients were divided into IH (n = 61) or CHL (n = 114) procurement groups. End points included PGD (defined according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus statement) and long-term survival. RESULTS The incidence of PGD was significantly greater in CHL recipients compared with IH recipients (53.5% vs 16.4%, P < .001). Multivariable analysis showed that CHL procurement was independently associated with a significant 4.6-fold increased risk for PGD (95% confidence interval, 2.1-11, P < .001). Univariable and multivariable analyses showed that the overall survival was not significantly affected by the procurement group (log-rank P = .150, hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-1.88, P = .646). The simultaneous procurement of abdominal organs was not associated with an increased risk of PGD in HT recipients. These results remained consistent in a propensity-matched analysis. CONCLUSIONS Combined procurement of heart and lungs is independently associated with an increased risk of PGD. Further prospective studies are needed to validate this hypothesis-generating study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eilon Ram
- Leviev Cardiothoracic and Vascular Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Jacob Lavee
- Leviev Cardiothoracic and Vascular Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yigal Kassif
- Leviev Cardiothoracic and Vascular Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yury Peysakhovich
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Leonid Sternik
- Leviev Cardiothoracic and Vascular Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Amit Segev
- Leviev Cardiothoracic and Vascular Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jignesh Patel
- Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute and David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Calif
| | - Yael Peled
- Leviev Cardiothoracic and Vascular Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ayer A, Truby LK, Schroder JN, Casalinova S, Green CL, Bishawi MA, Bryner BS, Milano CA, Patel CB, Devore AD. Improved Outcomes in Severe Primary Graft Dysfunction After Heart Transplantation Following Donation After Circulatory Death Compared With Donation After Brain Death. J Card Fail 2023; 29:67-75. [PMID: 36351494 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.10.429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary graft dysfunction (PGD), the leading cause of early mortality after heart transplantation, is more common following donation after circulatory death (DCD) than donation after brain death (DBD). We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study to compare the incidence, severity and outcomes of patients experiencing PGD after DCD compared to DBD heart transplantation. METHODS AND RESULTS Medical records were reviewed for all adult heart transplant recipients at our institution between March 2016 and December 2021. PGD was diagnosed within 24 hours after transplant according to modified International Society for Heart and Lung Transplant criteria. A total of 459 patients underwent isolated heart transplantation during the study period, 65 (14%) following DCD and 394 (86%) following DBD. The incidence of moderate or severe PGD in DCD and DBD recipients was 34% and 23%, respectively (P = 0.070). DCD recipients were more likely to experience severe biventricular PGD than DBD recipients (19% vs 7.4%; P = 0.004). Among patients with severe PGD, DCD recipients experienced shorter median (Q1, Q3) duration of post-transplant mechanical circulatory support (6 [4, 7] vs 9 [5, 14] days; P = 0.039), shorter median post-transplant hospital length of stay (17 [15, 29] vs 52 [26, 83] days; P = 0.004), and similar 60-day survival rates (100% [95% CI: 76.8%-100%] vs 80.0% [63.1%-91.6%]; P = 0.17) and overall survival (log-rank; P = 0.078) compared with DBD recipients. CONCLUSIONS DCD heart transplant recipients were more likely to experience severe, biventricular PGD than DBD recipients. Despite this, DCD recipients with severe PGD spent fewer days on mechanical circulatory support and in the hospital than similar DBD patients. These findings suggest that patterns of graft dysfunction and recovery may differ between donor types, and they support the expansion of the heart-donor pool with DCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin Ayer
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Lauren K Truby
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Jacob N Schroder
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Sarah Casalinova
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - Muath A Bishawi
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Benjamin S Bryner
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Carmelo A Milano
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Chetan B Patel
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Adam D Devore
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Immohr MB, Boeken U, Bruno RR, Sugimura Y, Mehdiani A, Aubin H, Westenfeld R, Tudorache I, Lichtenberg A, Akhyari P. Optimizing Anastomoses Technique in Orthotopic Heart Transplantation: Comparison of Biatrial, Bicaval and Modified Bicaval Technique. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2022; 9:jcdd9110404. [PMID: 36421939 PMCID: PMC9693903 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd9110404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Implantation techniques for orthotopic heart transplantation (HTx) have evolved over the centuries. Recently new approaches of modified bicaval techniques to minimize warm ischemia are gaining popularity in the literature. Between 2010 and 2022 n = 238 patients underwent HTx in our department. The recipients were retrospectively reviewed and divided regarding their anastomoses’ technique. Anastomoses were sutured either in biatrial (n = 37), bicaval (n = 191) or in a modified bicaval (n = 10) manner with suturing of the superior cava vein and A. pulmonalis anastomosis after removing the aortic cross-clamp during the reperfusion. Warm ischemia was 62 ± 11 min for biatrial, 66 ± 15 min for bicaval, but only 48 ± 10 min for modified bicaval technique (p < 0.001). The incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) was comparable between biatrial (27.0%) and bicaval (28.8%) anastomoses. In contrast, in patients with modified bicaval technique PGD occurred only in a single patient (10.0%). The incidence of postoperative pacemaker implantation was 18.2% for biatrial compared to 3.0% for bicaval and 0.0% for modified bicaval technique (p = 0.01). The modified bicaval technique enables to decrease the crucial warm ischemia during HTx compared to both biatrial and regular bicaval techniques. Therefore, we strongly recommend bicaval anastomoses, ideally in a modified manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Benjamin Immohr
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Udo Boeken
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-211-8118331
| | - Raphael Romano Bruno
- Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Angiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Yukiharu Sugimura
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Arash Mehdiani
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Hug Aubin
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Ralf Westenfeld
- Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Angiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Igor Tudorache
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Artur Lichtenberg
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Payam Akhyari
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Multicenter Registry Using Propensity Score Analysis to Compare a Novel Transport/Preservation System to Traditional Means on Postoperative Hospital Outcomes and Costs for Heart Transplant Patients. ASAIO J 2022; 69:345-349. [PMID: 36399786 PMCID: PMC10045959 DOI: 10.1097/mat.0000000000001844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The standard method for cardiac allograft preservation for the past 50 years has been static storage using crushed ice. A heart transplant transportation system designed to improve preservation quality with temperature monitoring, the Paragonix SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System (SCTS), was evaluated for its impact on postoperative costs relative to conventional ice storage. Observational US multicenter registry data collected during the August 2015 to November 2021 timeframe from 12 transplant hospitals were analyzed using logistic regression analysis and propensity matching to balance measured baseline covariates and to reduce selection bias. Hospital cost and outcome data post-transplant were then evaluated using various statistical methods. One hundred seventy-four (174) patients were identified resulting in 87 matches. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The SCTS group had a significantly lower proportion of ICU days on post-transplant mechanical circulatory support (p < 0.0001); significantly fewer patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (p = 0.017); and significantly fewer patients experiencing severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) (p = 0.03). Overall hospital plus mechanical circulatory support post-transplant costs were significantly lower by $26.7K in the CTS cohort (p = 0.03). Use of the SCTS is associated with improved clinical outcomes resulting in significantly lower overall hospital care costs.
Collapse
|
32
|
McDonald MM, Mihalj M, Zhao B, Nathan S, Matejin S, Ottaviani G, Jezovnik MK, Radovancevic R, Kar B, Gregoric ID, Buja LM. Clinicopathological correlations in heart transplantation recipients complicated by death or re-transplantation. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:1014796. [PMID: 36407445 PMCID: PMC9669710 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1014796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to identify and correlate pathological findings with clinical outcomes in patients after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) who either died or underwent a re-transplantation. Methodology and study design Single-center retrospective analysis of primary OHT patients who died or were re-transplanted between October 2012 and July 2021. Clinical data were matched with corresponding pathological findings from endomyocardial biopsies on antibody-mediated rejection, cellular rejection, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Re-assessment of available tissue samples was performed to investigate acute myocardial injury (AMI) as a distinct phenomenon. These were correlated with clinical outcomes, which included severe primary graft dysfunction. Patients were grouped according to the presence of AMI and compared. Results We identified 47 patients with truncated outcomes after the first OHT. The median age was 59 years, 36 patients (76%) were male, 25 patients (53%) had a prior history of cardiac operation, and 21 patients (45%) were supported with a durable assist device before OHT. Of those, AMI was identified in 22 (47%) patients (AMI group), and 25 patients had no AMI (non-AMI group). Groups were comparable in baseline and perioperative data. Histopathological observations in AMI group included a non-significant higher incidence of antibody-mediated rejection Grade 1 or higher (pAMR ≥ 1) (32% vs. 12%, P = 0.154), and non-significant lower incidence of severe acute cellular rejection (ACR ≥ 2R) (32% vs. 40%, P = 0.762). Clinical observations in the AMI group found a significantly higher occurrence of severe primary graft dysfunction (68% vs. 20%, P = 0.001) and a highly significant shorter duration from transplantation to death or re-transplantation (42 days [IQR 26, 120] vs. 1,133 days [711–1,664], P < 0.0001). Those patients had a significantly higher occurrence of cardiac-related deaths (64% vs. 24%, P = 0.020). No difference was observed in other outcomes. Conclusion In heart transplant recipients with a truncated postoperative course leading to either death or re-transplantation, AMI in endomyocardial biopsies was a common pathological phenomenon, which correlated with the clinical occurrence of severe primary graft dysfunction. Those patients had significantly shorter survival times and higher cardiac-related deaths. The presence of AMI suggests a truncated course after OHT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M. McDonald
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Maks Mihalj
- Department of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapies and Transplantation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Bihong Zhao
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sriram Nathan
- Department of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapies and Transplantation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stanislava Matejin
- Department of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapies and Transplantation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Giulia Ottaviani
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
- Cardiovascular Pathology, Lino Rossi Research Center, Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mateja K. Jezovnik
- Department of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapies and Transplantation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Rajko Radovancevic
- Department of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapies and Transplantation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Biswajit Kar
- Department of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapies and Transplantation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Igor D. Gregoric
- Department of Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapies and Transplantation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - L. Maximilian Buja
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
- *Correspondence: L. Maximilian Buja,
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Farina FM, Santovito D, Weber C. Two-Faced Janus: CCR2-Expressing Macrophages and Their Dual Role in Allograft Rejection of the Transplanted Heart. Circulation 2022; 146:639-642. [PMID: 35994560 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.122.061088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Floriana M Farina
- Institute for Cardiovascular Prevention (IPEK), LMU Munich, Germany (F.M.F., D.S., C.W.)
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Germany (F.M.F., D.S., C.W.)
| | - Donato Santovito
- Institute for Cardiovascular Prevention (IPEK), LMU Munich, Germany (F.M.F., D.S., C.W.)
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Germany (F.M.F., D.S., C.W.)
- Institute for Genetic and Biomedical Research (IRGB), National Research Council, Unit of Milan, Italy (D.S.)
| | - Christian Weber
- Institute for Cardiovascular Prevention (IPEK), LMU Munich, Germany (F.M.F., D.S., C.W.)
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Germany (F.M.F., D.S., C.W.)
- Department of Biochemistry, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, The Netherlands (C.W.)
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Germany (C.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Aleksova N, Fan CPS, Foroutan F, Moayedi Y, Posada JD, Guinty CM, Luk A, Stehlik J, Ross HJ, Alba AC. Predicted heart mass for size matching in obese heart transplant donors and recipients. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14744. [PMID: 35770834 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Predicted heart mass (PHM) was neither derived nor evaluated in an obese population. Our objective was to evaluate size mismatch using actual body weight or IBW-adjusted PHM on mortality and risk assessment. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult recipients with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 or recipients of donors with BMI≥30 kg/m2 from the ISHLT registry. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate 30 day and 1-year mortality. The 2 models were compared using net reclassification index. RESULTS 10,817 HT recipients, age 55 (IQR 46-62) years, 23% female, BMI 31 kg/m2 (IQR 28-33) were included. Donors were age 34 (IQR 24-44) years, 31% female, and BMI 31 kg/m2 (IQR 26-34). There was a significant non-linear association between mortality and actual PHM but not IBW-adjusted PHM. Undersizing using actual PHM was associated with higher 30-day and 1-year mortality (p<0.01), not seen with IBW-adjusted PHM. Actual PHM better risk classified 0.6% (95% CI 0.3-0.8%) patients compared to IBW-adjusted PHM. CONCLUSION Actual PHM can be used for size matching when assessing mortality risk in obese recipients or recipients of obese donors. There is no advantage to re-calculating PHM using IBW to define candidate risk at the time of organ allocation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Aleksova
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Chun-Po S Fan
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Farid Foroutan
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Yas Moayedi
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Juan Duero Posada
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Adriana Luk
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Josef Stehlik
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Heather J Ross
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ana C Alba
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kakuda N, Amiya E, Hatano M, Tsuji M, Bujo C, Ishida J, Yagi H, Saito A, Narita K, Isotani Y, Fujita K, Ando M, Shimada S, Kinoshita O, Ono M, Komuro I. Residual Pulmonary Vascular Resistance Increase Under Left Ventricular Assist Device Support Predicts Long-Term Cardiac Function After Heart Transplantation. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:904350. [PMID: 35722119 PMCID: PMC9198244 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.904350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims We compared hemodynamics and clinical events after heart transplantation (HTx) in patients stratified by the severity of residual pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation for bridge to transplantation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients who had undergone HTx at the University of Tokyo Hospital. We defined the high PVR group as patients with PVR of >3 Wood Units (WU) as measured by right heart catheterization performed 1 month after LVAD implantation. Results We included 85 consecutive HTx recipients, 20 of whom were classified in the high PVR group and 65 in the low PVR group. The difference in PVR between the two groups became apparent at 2 years after HTx (the high PVR group: 1.77 ± 0.41 WU, the low PVR group: 1.24 ± 0.59 WU, p = 0.0009). The differences in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), mean right arterial pressure (mRAP), and mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (mPCWP) tended to increase from the first year after HTx, and were all significantly higher in the high PVR group at 3 years after HTx (mPAP: 22.7 ± 9.0 mm Hg vs. 15.4 ± 4.3 mm Hg, p = 0.0009, mRAP: 7.2 ± 3.6 mm Hg vs. 4.1 ± 2.1 mm Hg, p = 0.0042, and mPCWP: 13.4 ± 4.5 mm Hg, 8.8 ± 3.3 mm Hg, p = 0.0040). In addition, pulmonary artery pulsatility index was significantly lower in the high PVR group than in the low PVR group at 3 years after HTx (2.51 ± 1.00 vs. 5.21 ± 3.23, p = 0.0033). The composite event including hospitalization for heart failure, diuretic use, and elevated intracardiac pressure (mRAP ≥ 12 mm Hg or mPCWP ≥ 18 mm Hg) between the two groups was significantly more common in the high PVR group. Residual high PVR was still an important predictor (hazard ratio 6.5, 95% confidence interval 2.0–21.6, and p = 0.0023) after multivariate Cox regression analysis. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that patients with residual high PVR under LVAD implantation showed the increase of right and left atrial pressure in the chronic phase after HTx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobutaka Kakuda
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - Eisuke Amiya
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
- Department of Therapeutic Strategy for Heart Failure, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
- *Correspondence: Eisuke Amiya,
| | - Masaru Hatano
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
- Advanced Medical Center for Heart Failure, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - Masaki Tsuji
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - Chie Bujo
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - Junichi Ishida
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - Hiroki Yagi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - Akihito Saito
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - Koichi Narita
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Isotani
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - Kanna Fujita
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
- Department of Computational Radiology and Preventive Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - Masahiko Ando
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - Shogo Shimada
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - Osamu Kinoshita
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - Minoru Ono
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - Issei Komuro
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bitargil M, Haddad O, Pham SM, Garg N, Jacob S, El-Sayed Ahmed MM, Landolfo K, Patel PC, Goswami RM, Leoni Moreno JC, Yip DS, Sareyyupoglu B. Packing the donor heart: Is SherpaPak cold preservation technique safer compared to ice cold storage. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14707. [PMID: 35543679 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The present study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of heart transplant patients whose donor hearts were preserved with the SherpaPak controlled cold organ system versus the conventional ice storage technique. METHODS All patients undergoing heart transplantation at our center between January 2019 and April 2021 were divided into two groups according to the technique used during donor heart preservation and transport. The first group consisted of 34 SherpaPak controlled temperature preservation patients, and the second group consisted of 47 patients where the conventional three bags and ice technique was utilized during organ transportation. The two groups were compared based on demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS There were no significant differences between the groups regarding Vasoactive Inotropic Score (VIS), Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD), and the need for a transient pacer. However, the VIS, PGD, and pacing trends were lower in the SherpaPak patients even though the total ischemic and cardiopulmonary bypass times were significantly longer. Furthermore, SherpaPak patients exhibited a shorter stay in the ICU with no severe PGD and mortality. CONCLUSION The SherpaPak donor heart preservation provides safe outcomes in heart transplant patients. Further research is needed to utilize this method for longer durations of ischemic time and expand travel distances for organ transportation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Macit Bitargil
- Mayo Clinic Hospital, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Osama Haddad
- Mayo Clinic Hospital, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Si M Pham
- Mayo Clinic Hospital, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Neha Garg
- Mayo Clinic Hospital, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Samuel Jacob
- Mayo Clinic Hospital, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Kevin Landolfo
- Mayo Clinic Hospital, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Parag C Patel
- Mayo Clinic Hospital, Department of Transplantation, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Rohan M Goswami
- Mayo Clinic Hospital, Department of Transplantation, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Daniel S Yip
- Mayo Clinic Hospital, Department of Transplantation, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Basar Sareyyupoglu
- Mayo Clinic Hospital, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Jacob S, Garg P, El-Sayed Ahmed MM, Goswami RM, Landolfo KP, Pham SM, Sareyyupoglu B. Biatrial Transplantation of a Donor Heart with a Single Left Superior Vena Cava Draining to Coronary Sinus. JTCVS Tech 2022; 14:127-129. [PMID: 35967201 PMCID: PMC9366616 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Jacob
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla
| | - Pankaj Garg
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla
| | | | | | - Kevin P. Landolfo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla
| | - Si M. Pham
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla
| | - Basar Sareyyupoglu
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla
- Address for reprints: Basar Sareyyupoglu, MD, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mascaro J. Trasplante cardíaco: estado actual. REVISTA MÉDICA CLÍNICA LAS CONDES 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmclc.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
39
|
Tang PC, Wu X, Zhang M, Likosky D, Haft JW, Lei I, Abou El Ela A, Si MS, Aaronson KD, Pagani FD. Determining optimal donor heart ischemic times in adult cardiac transplantation. J Card Surg 2022; 37:2042-2050. [PMID: 35488767 PMCID: PMC9325483 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Unsupervised statistical determination of optimal allograft ischemic time (IT) on heart transplant outcomes among ABO donor heart types. Methods We identified 36,145 heart transplants (2000–2018) from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed with parametric and nonparametric testing. Determination of IT cutoffs for survival analysis was performed using Contal and O'Quigley univariable method and Vito Muggeo multivariable segmented modeling. Results Univariable and multivariable IT threshold determination revealed a cutoff at about 3 h. The hourly increase in survival risk with ≥3 h IT is asymmetrically experienced at the early 90 days (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.29, p < .001) and up to 1‐year time point (HR = 1.16, p < .001). Beyond 1 year the risk of prolonged IT is less impactful (HR = 1.04, p = .022). Longer IT was associated with more postoperative complications such as stroke (2.7% vs. 2.3, p = .042), dialysis (11.6% vs. 9.1%, p < .001) and death from primary graft dysfunction (1.8% vs. 1.2%, p < .001). O blood type donor hearts with IT ≥ 3 h has significantly increased hourly mortality risk at 90 days (HR = 1.27, p < .001), 90 days to 1 year (HR = 1.22, p < .001) and >1 year (HR = 1.05, p = .041). For non‐O blood types with ≥3 h IT hourly mortality risk was increased at 90 days (HR = 1.33, p < .001), but not at 90 days to 1 year (HR = 1.09, p = .146) nor ≥1 year (HR = 1.08, p = .237). Conclusions The donor heart IT threshold for survival determined from unbiased statistical modeling occurs at 3 h. With longer preservation times, transplantation with O donor hearts was associated with worse survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul C Tang
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Xiaoting Wu
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Min Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Donald Likosky
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jonathan W Haft
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Ienglam Lei
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Ashraf Abou El Ela
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Ming-Sing Si
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Keith D Aaronson
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Francis D Pagani
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kvitting JPE, Eek CH, Andreassen AK, Lundblad R. Thrombus formation in the noncoronary sinus of Valsalva following primary graft dysfunction. J Card Surg 2022; 37:2098-2099. [PMID: 35384051 PMCID: PMC9325557 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
We hereby present a case of thrombus formation in the noncoronary sinus of Valsalva following primary graft dysfunction. The case highlights that stagnant and nonpulsatile flow can form thrombi in the noncoronary sinus since this sinus does not have a natural distal runoff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John-Peder Escobar Kvitting
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Christian H Eek
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arne K Andreassen
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Runar Lundblad
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lozano-Edo S, Sánchez-Lázaro I, Portolés M, Roselló-Lletí E, Tarazón E, Arnau-Vives MA, Ezzitouny M, Lopez-Vilella R, Almenar-Bonet L, Martínez-Dolz L. Plasma Levels of SERCA2a as a Noninvasive Biomarker of Primary Graft Dysfunction After Heart Transplantation. Transplantation 2022; 106:887-893. [PMID: 33901112 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Noninvasive detection of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains a major challenge. SERCA2a plays an important role in cardiac homeostasis and its dysregulation has been associated with ventricular dysfunction and rejection. This study aimed to determine the potential utility of plasma levels of SERCA2a as a biomarker of PGD. METHODS One hundred thirty-five plasma samples were collected from adult recipients 2-6 hours before heart transplantation (HT). Plasma concentrations of SERCA2a were determined using a specific sandwich ELISA. Variables related to the recipient, the donor, and the periprocedural were collected to determine a multivariate predictive model of PGD. RESULTS Levels of SERCA2a were decreased in patients who developed PGD (median 0.430 ng/mL [interquartile range, 0.260-0.945] versus 0.830 ng/mL [interquartile range, 0.582-1.052]; P = 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that SERCA2a discriminated between patients with and without PGD (AUC = 0.682; P = 0.001), and a cutoff point ≥ 0.60 ng/mL was a protective independent predictor of PGD (odds ratio 0.215 [P = 0.004]). Three independent predictors of PGD in this study were reduced levels of pre-HT SERCA2a, increased bilirubin levels, and short-term mechanical circulatory support bridge to transplantation. The analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve of the model obtained a significant AUC 0.788, P = 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that assessment of SERCA2a plasma levels may improve risk prediction for the occurrence of PGD and could be considered as a novel noninvasive biomarker in patients undergoing HT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Lozano-Edo
- Heart Failure and Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Department, University and Polytechnic La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain
- Myocardial Dysfunction and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain
| | - Ignacio Sánchez-Lázaro
- Heart Failure and Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Department, University and Polytechnic La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain
- Myocardial Dysfunction and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain
- Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, M.P (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel Portolés
- Myocardial Dysfunction and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain
- Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, M.P (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Esther Roselló-Lletí
- Myocardial Dysfunction and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain
- Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, M.P (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Estefania Tarazón
- Myocardial Dysfunction and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain
- Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, M.P (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Angel Arnau-Vives
- Heart Failure and Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Department, University and Polytechnic La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain
- Myocardial Dysfunction and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain
| | - Meryem Ezzitouny
- Heart Failure and Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Department, University and Polytechnic La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain
- Myocardial Dysfunction and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain
| | - Raquel Lopez-Vilella
- Heart Failure and Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Department, University and Polytechnic La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain
- Myocardial Dysfunction and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain
| | - Luis Almenar-Bonet
- Heart Failure and Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Department, University and Polytechnic La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain
- Myocardial Dysfunction and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain
- Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, M.P (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Martínez-Dolz
- Heart Failure and Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Department, University and Polytechnic La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain
- Myocardial Dysfunction and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain
- Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, M.P (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Smith NF, Salehi Omran S, Genuardi MV, Horn ET, Kilic A, Sciortino CM, Keebler ME, Kormos RL, Hickey GW. Primary Graft Dysfunction in Heart Transplant Recipients-Risk Factors and Longitudinal Outcomes. ASAIO J 2022; 68:394-401. [PMID: 34593684 DOI: 10.1097/mat.0000000000001469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Before the 33rd Annual International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation conference, there was significant intercenter variability in definitions of primary graft dysfunction (PGD). The incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of consensus-defined PGD warrant further investigation. We retrospectively examined 448 adult cardiac transplant recipients at our institution from 2005 to 2017. Patient and procedural characteristics were compared between PGD cases and controls. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model PGD and immediate postoperative high-inotrope requirement for hypothesized risk factors. Patients were followed for a mean 5.3 years to determine longitudinal mortality. The incidence of PGD was 16.5%. No significant differences were found with respect to age, sex, race, body mass index, predicted heart mass mismatch, pretransplant amiodarone therapy, or pretransplant mechanical circulatory support (MCS) between recipients with PGD versus no PGD. Each 10 minute increase in ischemic time was associated with 5% greater odds of PGD (OR = 1.05 [95% CI, 1.00-1.10]; p = 0.049). Pretransplant MCS, predicted heart mass mismatch ≥30%, and pretransplant amiodarone therapy were associated with high-immediate postoperative inotropic requirement. The 30 day, 1 year, and 5 year mortality for patients with PGD were 28.4%, 38.0%, and 45.8%, respectively, compared with 1.9%, 7.1%, and 21.5% for those without PGD (log-rank, p < 0.0001). PGD heralded high 30 day, 1 year, and 5 year mortality. Pretransplant MCS, predicted heart mass mismatch, and amiodarone exposure were associated with high-inotrope requirement, while prolonged ischemic time and multiple perioperative transfusions were associated with consensus-defined PGD, which may have important clinical implications under the revised United Network for Organ Sharing allocation system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas F Smith
- From the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sina Salehi Omran
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael V Genuardi
- Division of Cardiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Edward T Horn
- Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Arman Kilic
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Christopher M Sciortino
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mary E Keebler
- ‖Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert L Kormos
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Gavin W Hickey
- ‖Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Settepani F, Pedrazzini GL, Olivieri GM, Merlanti B, Cannata A, Lanfranconi M, Frigerio M, Russo CF. Long-term effects of primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation. J Card Surg 2022; 37:1290-1298. [PMID: 35229361 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We studied the incidence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD), its impact on in-hospital and follow-up outcomes and searched for independent risk factors. METHODS During an 18-year period, 508 individuals underwent heart transplantation at our institution. Patients were diagnosed with none, mild, moderate or severe PGD according to ISHLT criteria. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients (7.5%) met the ISHLT criteria for mild PGD, 92 (18.1%) for moderate PGD and 23 (4.5%) for severe PGD. Patients were classified into none/mild PGD (77.4%) and moderate/severe PGD (22.6%) groups. In-hospital mortality was 12.4% (7.8% for none/mild PGD and 28.7% for moderate/severe PGD; p < .001). Survival at 1, 5, and 15 years was 85.5 ± 1.9% versus 67.2 ± 4.5%, 80 ± 2.2% versus 63.5 ± 4.7%, and 60.4 ± 3.6% versus 45.9 ± 8.4%, respectively (p < .001). Excluding the events occurring during the first month of follow-up, survival was comparable between the two groups (93.1 ± 1.4% vs. 94.7 ± 2.6 at 1 year and 65.6 ± 3.8% vs. 70.4 ± 10.4% at 15 years, respectively; p = .88). Upon multivariate logistic regression analysis preoperative mechanical circulatory support (odds ratio [OR] = 5.86) and preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) (OR = 9.58) were independently associated with moderate/severe PGD. CONCLUSIONS Our results confirm that PGD is associated with poor in-hospital outcome. The poor outcome does not extend beyond the first month of follow-up, with comparable survival between patients with none/mild PGD and moderate/severe PGD in the short and long-term. Mechanical circulatory support and preoperative IABP were found to be independent risk factors for moderate/severe PGD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Settepani
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanna L Pedrazzini
- Intensive Care Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido M Olivieri
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Bruno Merlanti
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Aldo Cannata
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Lanfranconi
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Frigerio
- Cardiology 2 Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio F Russo
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
The Interaction of Amiodarone and Continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Use in Risk of Severe Primary Graft Dysfunction Following Heart Transplantation. Transplant Direct 2022; 8:e1281. [PMID: 35047663 PMCID: PMC8759622 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background. Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) increases morbidity and mortality after heart transplant. Here we investigated (1) the association of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD), amiodarone, and severe PGD and (2) the safety of amiodarone discontinuation in CF-LVAD patients. Methods. Retrospective, single-center study of heart transplant recipients was conducted to investigate the association of risk factors and severe PGD. Patients were grouped into 4 groups based on the presence (denoted +) or absence (denoted –) of amiodarone and CF-LVAD. Prospective amiodarone discontinuation was undertaken to investigate its safety in a cohort of CF-LVAD patients. Study endpoints were severe PGD and recurrence of arrhythmia. Results. Severe PGD was strongly associated with CF-LVAD and amiodarone use, and its prevalence is highest if both risk factors were present (CF-LVAD–/amiodarone – 1.5%, CF-LVAD –/amiodarone+ 4.5%, CF-LVAD+/amiodarone – 7.1%, CF-LVAD+/amiodarone+ 21.8%; P < 0.01). The product of every 1-y additional CF-LVAD support by every 100 mg amiodarone was associated with severe PGD (adjusted odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.78; P < 0.01). Amiodarone was prospectively discontinued in 28 CF-LVAD patients. Of them, 6 patients had recurrence of arrhythmia requiring treatment or heart failure admission. There were no deaths. Nine patients in whom amiodarone had been discontinued had heart transplants with no severe PGD. Conclusions. Amiodarone and CF-LVAD were independently associated with severe PGD. The combination of both risk factors was associated with a higher prevalence of severe PGD. Amiodarone discontinuation was associated with recurrence of arrhythmia in 6 CF-LVAD patients. There was no mortality associated with amiodarone discontinuation.
Collapse
|
45
|
Bitargil M, Haddad O, Pham SM, Goswami RM, Patel PC, Jacob S, El‐Sayed Ahmed MM, Leoni Moreno JC, Yip DS, Landolfo K, Sareyyupoglu B. Controlled temperatures in cold preservation provides safe heart transplantation results. J Card Surg 2022; 37:732-738. [DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Macit Bitargil
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Mayo Clinic Hospital Jacksonville Florida USA
| | - Osama Haddad
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Mayo Clinic Hospital Jacksonville Florida USA
| | - Si M. Pham
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Mayo Clinic Hospital Jacksonville Florida USA
| | - Rohan M. Goswami
- Department of Transplantation Mayo Clinic Hospital Jacksonville Florida USA
| | - Parag C. Patel
- Department of Transplantation Mayo Clinic Hospital Jacksonville Florida USA
| | - Samuel Jacob
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Mayo Clinic Hospital Jacksonville Florida USA
| | | | | | - Daniel S. Yip
- Department of Transplantation Mayo Clinic Hospital Jacksonville Florida USA
| | - Kevin Landolfo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Mayo Clinic Hospital Jacksonville Florida USA
| | - Basar Sareyyupoglu
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Mayo Clinic Hospital Jacksonville Florida USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Primary graft dysfunction in heart transplantation: How to recognize it, when to institute extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and outcomes. JTCVS OPEN 2021; 8:128-133. [PMID: 36004187 PMCID: PMC9390270 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
47
|
Immohr MB, Aubin H, Erbel-Khurtsidze S, Dalyanoglu H, Bruno RR, Westenfeld R, Tudorache I, Akhyari P, Boeken U, Lichtenberg A. Impact of pretransplant left ventricular assist device support duration on outcome after heart transplantation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2021; 34:462-469. [PMID: 34647129 PMCID: PMC8860434 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivab265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Heart transplantation after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains challenging. It is still unclear whether its support duration impacts the outcome after transplantation.
METHODS All patients undergoing heart transplantation between 2010 and 2021 at a single department after previous left ventricular assistance were retrospectively reviewed and divided into 4 different study groups with regard to the duration of LVAD support to examine the impact on the postoperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS A total of n = 198 patients were included and assigned to the 4 study groups (group 1: <90 days, n = 14; group 2: 90 days to 1 year, n = 31; group 3: 1–2 years, n = 29; group 4: >2 years, n = 24). Although there were no differences between the 4 groups concerning relevant mismatch between the recipients and donors, the incidence of primary graft dysfunction was numerically increased in patients with the shortest support duration, and also those patients with >1 year of support (group 1: 35.7%, group 2: 25.8%, group 3: 41.4%, group 4: 37.5%, P = 0.63). The incidence of acute graft rejection was by trend increased in patients of group 1 (group 1: 28.6%, group 2: 3.3%, group 3: 7.1%, group 4: 12.5%, P = 0.06). Duration of LVAD support did not impact on perioperative adverse events (infections, P = 0.79; acute kidney injury, P = 0.85; neurological events, P = 0.74; thoracic bleeding, P = 0.61), neither on postoperative survival (1-year survival: group 1: 78.6%, group 2: 66.7%, group 3: 80.0%, group 4: 72.7%, P = 0.74). CONCLUSION We cannot identify a significant impact of the duration of pretransplant LVAD support on postoperative outcome; therefore, we cannot recommend a certain timeframe for transplantation of LVAD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Benjamin Immohr
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Hug Aubin
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Sophiko Erbel-Khurtsidze
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Hannan Dalyanoglu
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Raphael Romano Bruno
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Angiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Ralf Westenfeld
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Angiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Igor Tudorache
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Payam Akhyari
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Udo Boeken
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Artur Lichtenberg
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hess NR, Seese LM, Sultan I, Wang Y, Hickey GW, Kilic A. Geographic disparities in heart transplantation persist under the new allocation policy. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14459. [PMID: 34398485 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2020] [Revised: 07/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluated the impact of the 2018 heart allocation policy change on geographic disparities in United States orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). METHODS The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried to measure geographic disparity in OHT rates between pre-policy and post-policy change eras. We performed multilevel Poisson regression to measure region-level OHT rates. We derived an allocation priority-adjusted median incidence rate ratio (MIRR) for each policy era, a measure of median change in OHT rates between regions. RESULTS 5958.78 waitlist person-years were analyzed, comprising 6596 OHT procedures (3890 pre-policy and 2706 post-policy). Median region-level OHT rate was .94 transplants/person-years before and 1.51 transplants/person-years after the policy change (P < .001). The unadjusted OHT MIRR across regions was 1.29 (95% CI 1.00-1.50) pre-policy change and 1.17 (95% CI 1.00-1.43) post-policy change, suggesting that the region-related variance in OHT rates decreased under the new allocation. After adjustment for allocation priority risk factors, the MIRR pre-policy change was 1.13 (95% CI 1.01-1.32) and post-policy change was 1.15 (95% CI 1.00-1.35). CONCLUSIONS Geography accounts for ∼10% of the disparity among United States OHT rates. Despite broader heart sharing, the updated allocation policy did not substantially alter the existing geographic disparities among OHT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas R Hess
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Laura M Seese
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ibrahim Sultan
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yisi Wang
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gavin W Hickey
- Department of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Arman Kilic
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lechiancole A, DE Manna ND, Vendramin I, Sponga S, Livi U. Contemporary contribution of cardiac surgery for the treatment of cardiomyopathies and pericardial diseases. Minerva Cardiol Angiol 2021; 70:258-272. [PMID: 34338489 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5683.21.05801-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Cardiomyopathy refers to a spectrum of heterogeneous myocardial disorders characterized by morphological and structural alterations leading eventually to heart failure, by affecting cardiac filling and/or the cardiac systolic function. Heart transplantation is currently the gold standard surgical treatment for patients with heart failure, with a median survival in adults of 12 years according to international registries. However, the limited available donor pool does not allow its extensive employment. For this reason, mechanical circulatory supports are increasingly used, and in the short term are becoming as possible alternatives to heart transplantation, owing to improved technologies and increased biocompatibility. However, long-term outcomes of mechanical assist devices are still burdened with a high rate of adverse events. Conventional surgical treatments could be still considered as alternatives to heart replacement treatment when tailored both on patient clinical conditions and etiology of cardiac diseases. In particular, among patients affected by ischemic cardiomyopathy, coronary artery bypass grafting has proven to improve survival when associated to optimal medical treatment, and surgical ventricular restoration might be considered as a valid treatment in particular cases. Correction of functional mitral valve regurgitation by mitral annuloplasty, which aims to restore left ventricular geometry, has not demonstrated unambiguous results, and outcomes of this procedure are still controversial. Pericardial pathology becomes of surgical interest when it is responsible for a reduced filling capacity of the heart chambers, which can develop acutely (cardiac tamponade) or chronically (as in the case of constrictive pericarditis). This review focuses on the different surgical approaches that could be adopted to treat patients with heart failure and pericardial diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nunzio D DE Manna
- Cardiothoracic Department, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Igor Vendramin
- Cardiothoracic Department, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Sandro Sponga
- Cardiothoracic Department, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Ugolino Livi
- Cardiothoracic Department, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Venema CS, Erasmus ME, Mariani M, Voors AA, Damman K. Post-transplant inotrope score is associated with clinical outcomes after adult heart transplantation. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14347. [PMID: 33969543 PMCID: PMC8519078 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inotrope score has been proposed as a marker of clinical outcome after adult heart transplantation (HTx) but is rarely used in practice. METHODS Inotrope score during the first 48 h after HTx was calculated in 81 patients as: dopamine + dobutamine + amrinone + milrinone (dose × 15) + epinephrine (dose × 100) + norepinephrine (dose × 100) + enoximone + isoprenaline (dose × 100), with each drug in µg/kg/min. Determinants of inotrope score were identified with linear regression. Cox regression was used to determine the association of inotrope score with mortality. RESULTS The mean recipient age was 52 ± 11 years, and 32 (39.5%) patients were female. Determinants of inotrope score were preoperative C-reactive protein, serum urea, congenital heart disease, and donor cardiac arrest (R2 = .30). Inotrope score was associated with 5-year mortality, independent of recipient age and gender (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.07). This association was attenuated when adjusting for female-to-male transplant and ischemia time. Inotrope score was also strongly associated with continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.12). CONCLUSION High inotrope score post-HTx was observed in recipient congenital heart disease and was associated with a higher risk of mortality and acute kidney injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantijn S. Venema
- Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryUniversity of GroningenUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
- Department of CardiologyUniversity of GroningenUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Michiel E. Erasmus
- Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryUniversity of GroningenUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Massimo Mariani
- Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryUniversity of GroningenUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A. Voors
- Department of CardiologyUniversity of GroningenUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Kevin Damman
- Department of CardiologyUniversity of GroningenUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|