1
|
Jones BP, Vali S, Saso S, Devaney A, Bracewell-Milnes T, Nicopoullos J, Thum MY, Kaur B, Roufosse C, Stewart V, Bharwani N, Ogbemudia A, Barnardo M, Dimitrov P, Klucniks A, Katz R, Johannesson L, Diaz Garcia C, Udupa V, Friend P, Quiroga I, Smith JR. Living donor uterus transplant in the UK: A case report. BJOG 2024; 131:372-377. [PMID: 37607687 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Revised: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin P Jones
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Saaliha Vali
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Cutrale Perioperative and Ageing Group, Sir Michael Uren Hub, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Andrea Devaney
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
| | - James Nicopoullos
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
| | - Meen-Yau Thum
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK
| | - Baljeet Kaur
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- North West London Pathology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Candice Roufosse
- North West London Pathology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Victoria Stewart
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nishat Bharwani
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ann Ogbemudia
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Martin Barnardo
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter Dimitrov
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Andris Klucniks
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Katz
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Cesar Diaz Garcia
- IVI London, IVIRMA Global, London, UK
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Venkatesha Udupa
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter Friend
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Isabel Quiroga
- The Oxford Transplant Centre, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - J Richard Smith
- West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pérez-Blanco A, Seoane JA, Pallás TA, Nieto-Moro M, Calonge RN, de la Fuente A, Martin DE. Uterus Transplantation as a Surgical Innovation. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2023; 20:367-378. [PMID: 37382845 PMCID: PMC10624705 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-023-10272-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Uterus transplantation (UTx) research has been introduced in several countries, with trials in Sweden and the United States producing successful outcomes. The growing interest in developing UTx trials in other countries, such as Spain, the Netherlands, Japan, and Australia, raises important questions regarding the ethics of surgical innovation research in the field of UTx. This paper examines the current state of UTx in the context of the surgical innovation paradigm and IDEAL framework and discusses the ethical challenges faced by those considering the introduction of new trials. We argue that UTx remains an experimental procedure at a relatively early stage of the IDEAL framework, especially in the context of de novo trials, where protocols are likely to deviate from those used previously and where researchers are likely to have limited experience of UTx. We conclude that countries considering the introduction of UTx trials should build on the strengths of the reported outcomes to consolidate the evidence base and shed light on the uncertainties of the procedure. Authorities responsible for the ethical governance of UTx trials are advised to draw on the ethical framework used in the oversight of surgical innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - José-Antonio Seoane
- Philosophy, Constitution and Rationality Research Group, Faculty of Law, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | | | - Montserrat Nieto-Moro
- Paediatric Critical Care Unit, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Dominique E Martin
- Geelong Waurn Ponds Campus, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee JY. Who should provide the uterus? The ethics of live donor recruitment for uterus transplantation. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2023:jme-2023-109227. [PMID: 37640534 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
Uterus transplantation (UTx) is an experimental surgery likely to face the issue of organ shortage. In my article, I explore how this issue might be addressed by changing the prevailing practices around live uterus donor recruitment. Currently, women with children - often the mothers of recipients - tend to be overrepresented as donors. Yet, other potentially eligible groups who may have an interest in providing their uterus - such as transgender men, or cisgender women who do not wish to gestate or to have children - tend to be excluded as potential donors. Moving forward, I recommend that donor inclusion criteria for UTx be broadened to be more inclusive of these latter groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Y Lee
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn 1172, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kumnig M, Jowsey-Gregoire SG, Gordon EJ, Werner-Felmayer G. Psychosocial and bioethical challenges and developments for the future of vascularized composite allotransplantation: A scoping review and viewpoint of recent developments and clinical experiences in the field of vascularized composite allotransplantation. Front Psychol 2022; 13:1045144. [PMID: 36591015 PMCID: PMC9800026 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1045144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) has evolved in recent years, encompassing hand, face, uterus, penile, and lower extremity transplantation. Accordingly, without centralized oversight by United States Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) or European Programs, centers have developed their own practices and procedures that likely vary, and accordingly, present different levels of rigor to the evaluation process, internationally. The importance of psychosocial factors in the selection process and treatment course has been widely recognized, and therefore, several approaches have been developed to standardize and guide care of VCA candidates and recipients. We propose to develop an international multidisciplinary platform for the exchange of expertise that includes clinical, patient, and research perspectives. Patient perspectives would derive from peer education and the assessment of patient-reported outcomes. To establish a foundation for such a platform, future research should review and combine current VCA protocols, to develop the ethical framework for a standardized psychosocial evaluation and follow-up of VCA candidates and recipients. This review presents a comprehensive overview of recent results in the field of VCA, developments in structural aspects of VCA, and provides viewpoints driven from clinical experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Kumnig
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, Center for Advanced Psychology Transplantation Medicine (CAPTM), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria,*Correspondence: Martin Kumnig,
| | - Sheila G. Jowsey-Gregoire
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Mayo Graduate School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Elisa J. Gordon
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Gabriele Werner-Felmayer
- Institute of Biological Chemistry and Bioethics Network Ethucation, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kumnig M, Järvholm S. Vascularized composite allotransplantation: emerging psychosocial issues in hand, face, and uterine transplant. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2022; 27:501-507. [PMID: 36227757 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Currently, several research approaches warrant further attention, given the influence of psychosocial and bioethical issues on the success of upper extremity (UETx), face (FTx), and uterine transplantation (UTx). This review will highlight recent results of psychosocial and bioethical research in the field of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA), discuss most recent findings, provide information to guide future research approaches, and address the importance of a multicenter research approach to develop international standards. RECENT FINDINGS Previously published reports have tried to identify psychosocial factors that are essential to predict psychosocial outcomes and guide posttransplant treatment after VCA procedures. These issues in VCA are receiving more attention but we are still at the beginning of a systematic investigation of these domains. This review article summarizes the emerging psychosocial issues in UeTx, FTx, and UTx by including recent literature and current clinical practice. SUMMARY Even though different VCA procedures address different domains leading to specific psychosocial issues, common aspects impacting all forms of VCA would benefit of further coordination. These domains include clinical resources, public attitude and perception, bioethical considerations, adherence and rehabilitation, motives for VCA, information needs and multidisciplinary communication, body image, domains of quality of life, coping strategies, and follow-up care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Kumnig
- Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, Center for Advanced Psychology in Plastic and Transplant Surgery, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Stina Järvholm
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ayoubi JM, Carbonnel M, Racowsky C, de Ziegler D, Gargiulo A, Kvarnström N, Dahm-Kähler P, Brännström M. Evolving clinical challenges in uterus transplantation. Reprod Biomed Online 2022; 45:947-960. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
7
|
Dorafshar AH, Hamidian Jahromi A, Horen SR, Schechter LS, Johannesson L, Testa G, Hertl M, Dewdney S, Aschkenasy J, Wood-Molo M, Brincat C, Cherullo E, Behel JM, Hebert C, Shulman R, Bassi S, Alecci AT, Konety B. Strategic Planning and Essential Steps for Establishing a Uterine Transplant and Rehabilitation Program: From Idea to Reality. Ann Surg 2022; 276:74-80. [PMID: 34793341 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
UTx is performed to address absolute uterine infertility in the presence of uterine agenesis, a nonfunctional uterus, or after a prior hysterectomy. After the initial success of UTx resulting in a livebirth (2014) in Sweden, there are over 70 reported UTx surgeries resulting in more than 40 livebirths worldwide. Currently, UTx has been performed in over 10 countries. As UTx is transitioning from an "experimental procedure" to a clinical option, an increasing number of centers may contemplate a UTx program. This article discusses essential steps for establishment of a successful UTx program. These principles may be implemented in cis- and transgender UTx candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir H Dorafshar
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Sydney R Horen
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Loren S Schechter
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
- The Center for Gender Confirmation Surgery, Weiss Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL
| | - Liza Johannesson
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Martin Hertl
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Summer Dewdney
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Mary Wood-Molo
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Cynthia Brincat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Edward Cherullo
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Jay M Behel
- Department of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
- Rush Center for Gender, Sexuality & Reproductive Health, Chicago, IL
| | - Charles Hebert
- Department of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Robert Shulman
- Department of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Shruti Bassi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Badrinath Konety
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Uterus Transplantation: Lessons Learned From a Psychological Perspective. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2022; 65:52-58. [DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Uterus transplantation (UTx) is transitioning from an experimental procedure to a clinical treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI). Standardized protocols for the evaluation and selection of donors and recipients that maximize chances of success - a healthy live birth - are needed. RECENT FINDINGS To date, recipient eligibility has been limited to otherwise healthy women with AUFI who are of childbearing age and are good candidates for in-vitro fertilization (IVF). For donors (living or deceased), selection criteria vary, apart from basic requirements of blood-type compatibility and freedom from critical infectious diseases, but generally require a term birth and a uterus free from uterine pathologies. The stepwise evaluation process for candidate recipients and living donors moves through health screening (medical and psychosocial); initial selection committee review; IVF (recipients only); and final selection committee review. This eliminates candidates with poor chances of success before exposure to unnecessary risks. SUMMARY The currently stringent selection criteria for prospective recipients and donors will likely broaden, as UTx becomes more widely available. Continued research is needed to define the donor, recipient and uterine graft factors associated with successful outcomes, and to support the development of standardized selection criteria.
Collapse
|
10
|
Warren AM, McMinn K, Testa G, Wall A, Saracino G, Johannesson L. Motivations and Psychological Characteristics of Nondirected Uterus Donors From The Dallas UtErus Transplant Study. Prog Transplant 2021; 31:385-391. [PMID: 34713738 DOI: 10.1177/15269248211046027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Uterus transplantation has demonstrated success in clinical trials. Questions regarding how it should transition to a clinical procedure must be addressed. A critical element is an evidence regarding the psychological experiences of living uterus donors, especially donors who are nondirected (altruistic). PROJECT AIMS To describe the motivations for donation, psychological characteristics, and mental health history of nondirected living uterus donors in the Dallas UtErus Transplant Study (NCT02656550). DESIGN An observational design was used to evaluate 44 self-referred nondirected uterus donors for the uterus transplant program. The donors participated in a clinical interview with a licensed psychologist and completed assessment instruments for depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress, health-related quality of life, and resilience at the time of evaluation. RESULTS Among the 11 donors, the median age was 36 years, 10 were married, 10 were of non-Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, and all had given birth (median of 2 children). The most frequent motivations for the donation were to provide another woman with the opportunity to carry her own child and to contribute to science. No participants met clinical criteria for depression, anxiety or posttraumatic stress but 4 reported current mental health conditions and 7 reported past or present treatment. Quality of life and resilience scores were above population norms. CONCLUSION Women selected as nondirected uterus donors were motivated to help other women experience carrying their own child and to contribute to science. A minority of women reported mental health conditions and/or treatment, and this was determined not to exclude participation with uterus donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M Warren
- Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA.,Division of Trauma, Acute Care, and Critical Care Surgery, 22683Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Kenleigh McMinn
- Division of Trauma, Acute Care, and Critical Care Surgery, 22683Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Annette C. and Harold Simmons Transplant Institute, 22683Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Anji Wall
- Annette C. and Harold Simmons Transplant Institute, 22683Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Giovanna Saracino
- Annette C. and Harold Simmons Transplant Institute, 22683Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Liza Johannesson
- Annette C. and Harold Simmons Transplant Institute, 22683Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Warren AM, McMinn K, Testa G, Wall AE, Saracino G, Waddimba AC, Johannesson L. Psychological Characteristics of Recipients Pretransplantation in the Dallas UtErus Transplant Study (DUETS). Prog Transplant 2021; 31:330-336. [PMID: 34704857 DOI: 10.1177/15269248211046002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Uterus transplantation is now a viable option for fertility treatment for women with absolute uterine factor infertility. Psychological assessment is recommended as a part of the perioperative evaluation process. RESEARCH OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine the psychological characteristics and mental health history of the 20 women who participated in the Dallas UtErus Transplant Study (DUETS) trial. DESIGN This retrospective observational descriptive study was part of a prospective clinical trial. Prior to transplant, 20 women completed a clinical psychological interview, 19 of whom also completed psychological assessment measures including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire 9 item, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 item, PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, 36-Item Short Form, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10 item, and Dyadic Adjustment Scale. RESULTS Women who participated in the trial had high health-related quality of life and minimal psychological history, with most reporting psychological distress associated with their initial infertility diagnosis (N = 13). None of the participants endorsed psychological distress to meet clinical concerns on the psychological measures used. Satisfaction with relationship adjustment with their partners was also high. CONCLUSIONS Women with absolute uterine factor infertility who underwent uterus transplant demonstrated low psychological distress on assessment measures, were resilient, had high health related quality of life, and strong satisfaction with the quality of relationships with their partners. Although some women reported either current or past psychological diagnosis, most reported psychological distress that occurred at the time of the infertility diagnosis and appeared to resolve over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Marie Warren
- 466551Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA.,Division of Trauma, Acute Care, and Critical Care Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Kenleigh McMinn
- Division of Trauma, Acute Care, and Critical Care Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Annette C. and Harold Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Anji E Wall
- Annette C. and Harold Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Giovanna Saracino
- Annette C. and Harold Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Anthony C Waddimba
- 466551Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA.,Health Systems Science, Department of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Liza Johannesson
- Annette C. and Harold Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vali S, Jones BP, Saso S, Fertleman M, Testa G, Johanesson L, Alghrani A, Smith JR. Uterine transplantation: legal and regulatory implications in England. BJOG 2021; 129:590-596. [PMID: 34532958 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Uterus transplantation (UTx) is fast evolving from an experimental to a clinical procedure, combining solid organ transplantation with assisted reproductive technology. The commencement of the first human uterus transplant trial in the United Kingdom leads us to examine and reflect upon the legal and regulatory aspects closely intertwined with UTx from the process of donation to potential implications for fertility treatment and the birth of the resultant child. As the world's first ephemeral transplant, the possibility of organ restitution requires consideration and is discussed herein. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Uterine transplantation warrants a closer look at the legal frameworks on fertility treatment and transplantation in England.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Vali
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Cutrale Perioperative and Ageing Research Group, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - B P Jones
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.,West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - S Saso
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.,West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - M Fertleman
- Cutrale Perioperative and Ageing Research Group, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - G Testa
- Baylor University Medical Centre, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - L Johanesson
- Baylor University Medical Centre, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - A Alghrani
- School of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - J R Smith
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.,West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Uterine transplantation (UTx) is a fertility restoring treatment for women with absolute uterine factor infertility. At a time when there is no question of the procedure's feasibility, and as the number of livebirths begins to increase exponentially, various important reproductive, fetal, and maternal medicine implications have emerged. Detailed outcomes from 17 livebirths following UTx are now available, which are reviewed herein, along with contextualized extrapolation from pregnancy outcomes in other solid organ transplants. Differences in recipient demographics and reproductive aspirations between UTx and other transplant recipients make extrapolating management strategies and outcomes in other solid organ transplants inappropriate. Whereas preterm delivery remains prominent, small for gestational age or hypertensive disorders do not appear to be as prevalent following UTx when compared to other solid organ transplants. Given the primary objective of undertaking UTx is to achieve a livebirth, publication of reproductive outcomes is essential at this early stage, to reflect on and optimize the management of future cases.
Collapse
|
14
|
Putman JM, Zhang L, Gregg AR, Testa G, Johannesson L. Clinical pregnancy rates and experience with in vitro fertilization after uterus transplantation: Dallas Uterus Transplant Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 225:155.e1-155.e11. [PMID: 33716072 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical pregnancy rates among patients with uterus transplantation have been reported by only a limited number of centers, and those centers have not used preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in their protocol. OBJECTIVE This study examined clinical pregnancy rates among women with absolute uterine-factor infertility undergoing in vitro fertilization using good-quality, expanded-blastocyst-stage, euploid embryos after uterus transplantation. STUDY DESIGN This cohort observational study involved 20 women who underwent uterus transplantation over 3 years. Notably, 14 of these patients had successful transplants and were followed prospectively for a median of 14.1 months (range, 11-34.8 months). In vitro fertilization was performed before subjects underwent uterus transplantation, and good-quality expanded-blastocyst-stage euploid embryos were obtained and frozen for future embryo transfer. Interventions consisted of in vitro fertilization, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, uterus transplantation, and frozen embryo transfer. RESULTS All 14 subjects with successful transplants underwent single embryo transfer of a warmed, good-quality, euploid, expanded blastocyst and had at least 1 documented clinical pregnancy within the uterus. In 71.4%, the first embryo transfer resulted in clinical pregnancy. The median time from successful uterus transplantation to first embryo transfer was 4.5 months; from successful uterus transplantation to first clinical pregnancy, 7.3 months; and from successful uterus transplantation to first live birth, 14.1 months. A total of 13 live births have occurred in 12 subjects. CONCLUSION Women with absolute uterine-factor infertility who have surgically successful uterus transplantation and in vitro fertilization using preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy can achieve high clinical pregnancy rates. We have reduced the time interval from uterus transplantation to embryo transfer by at least 50% and the interval from uterus transplantation to clinical pregnancy by >6 months compared with previous studies. We believe our approach may shorten the time from transplant to clinical pregnancy and therefore decrease patient exposure to immunosuppressant therapies.
Collapse
|
15
|
Aljerian K. Uterine transplant: an ethical framework analysis from a Middle Eastern perspective. Curr Med Res Opin 2021; 37:1049-1060. [PMID: 33705236 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1902296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Significant advances in infertility treatment have been achieved over the past several decades, but women with uterine dysfunction, anomaly, or agenesis still need support to carry a pregnancy to term. Recently, advancements in surgical, anesthetic and immunosuppressive therapy have brought the idea of successful uterine transplant closer to reality, but many challenges must be overcome before uterine transplant can become more common, including ethical challenges related to the study and the conduct of this procedure. METHODS This was an updated ethical analysis of uterine transplant from a Middle Eastern perspective, using an established ethical framework that has been adapted for the analysis of research in non-Western cultures and developing countries. RESULTS Using the ethical framework, this analysis explored research developments in uterine transplant to date, using the following categories: collaborative partnership, social value, scientific validity, a fair selection of study population, favorable risk-benefit ratio, independent review, informed consent, and respect for recruited participants. The analysis revealed a significant need for region- and religion-specific ethical guidelines for uterine transplant procedures. CONCLUSIONS The horizons of research need to expand by addressing and researching the ethical issues related to uterine transplant trials and clinical procedures. LIMITATIONS Limitations included the challenges related to applying ethical analyses to work in developing countries, and the fact that this analysis was based on the views and interpretations of a single researcher.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaldoon Aljerian
- Forensic and Legal Medicine Unit, Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Twelve Live Births After Uterus Transplantation in the Dallas UtErus Transplant Study. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 137:241-249. [PMID: 33416285 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe aggregated pregnancy outcomes after uterus transplantation from a single, experienced center. METHODS This prospective study reports on live births among 20 women who received a uterus transplant from 2016 to 2019 at Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas. These live births occurred between November 2017 and September 2020. The main measures were live birth, maternal complications, and fetal and newborn outcomes. RESULTS There were six graft failures (four surgical complications and two with poor perfusion postoperatively). Of the 14 technically successful transplants, at least one live birth occurred in 11 patients. Thus far, the live birth rate per attempted transplant is 55%, and the live-birth rate per technically successful transplant is 79%. Ten uteri were from nondirected living donors and one uterus was from a deceased donor. In vitro fertilization was performed to achieve pregnancy. Ten recipients delivered one neonate, and one recipient delivered two neonates. One organ rejection episode was detected during pregnancy and was resolved with steroids. The median birth weight was 2,890 g (range 1,770-3,140 g [median 68th percentile]). Maternal weight gain was higher than Institute of Medicine recommendations. Maternal medical complications were observed in five recipients (elevated creatinine level, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension [n=2], and preeclampsia). In five recipients, maternal medical or obstetric complications led to an unplanned preterm delivery (elevated creatinine level, preeclampsia; preterm labor [n=3]). The median gestational age at delivery was 36 6/7 weeks (range 30 6/7-38 weeks). All neonates were liveborn, with Apgar scores of 8 or higher at 5 minutes. CONCLUSION Over the first 3 years, our program experienced a live-birth rate per attempted transplant of 55% and a live-birth rate per technically successful transplant of 79%. In our experience, uterus transplantation resulted in a third-trimester live birth in all cases in which pregnancies reached 20 weeks of gestation. Maternal medical and obstetric complications can occur; however, these were manageable by applying principles of generally accepted obstetric practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02656550.
Collapse
|
17
|
Van Pilsum Rasmussen SE, Ferzola A, Cooney CM, Shores JT, Lee WA, Goldman E, Kaufman CL, Brandacher G, Segev DL, Henderson ML. Psychosocial factors and medication adherence among recipients of vascularized composite allografts. SAGE Open Med 2020; 8:2050312120940423. [PMID: 32695395 PMCID: PMC7350038 DOI: 10.1177/2050312120940423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Psychosocial factors are important predictors of medication adherence, and subsequently graft survival, in solid organ transplantation. Early experiences suggest this may also be the case in vascularized composite allotransplantation. Methods Using validated tools, we surveyed upper extremity transplant recipients at two centers to assess depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), personality (Ten-Item Personality Inventory), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale), post-traumatic stress disorder (Primary Care Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Screen for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition), and social support (Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support). Medication adherence among vascularized composite allotransplantation recipients at two centers was assessed by a member of the clinical research team using the recipients' medical records. Results Medication adherence was reported for 12 vascularized composite allotransplantation recipients, and 9 vascularized composite allotransplantation recipients completed psychosocial assessments. Most recipients were believed to be adherent to their immunosuppression, however, three recipients were believed to be non-adherent and a member of the clinical team had discussed non-adherence at least once with five recipients. Results from the psychosocial assessment (n = 9) indicated that eight participants had high levels of social support, and eight demonstrated high levels of conscientiousness which have been associated with better medication adherence in solid organ transplantation. However, three participants demonstrated mild anxiety, two demonstrated minimal symptoms of depression, and one demonstrated post-traumatic stress disorder which have been associated with worse medication adherence in solid organ transplantation. Conclusion These findings lay the groundwork for future assessments of the role psychosocial factors play in facilitating medication adherence and broader transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexander Ferzola
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Carisa M Cooney
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jaime T Shores
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Wp Andrew Lee
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Emily Goldman
- Christine M. Kleinert Institute for Hand and Microsurgery, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Christina L Kaufman
- Christine M. Kleinert Institute for Hand and Microsurgery, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Gerald Brandacher
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Macey L Henderson
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Acute and Chronic Care, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Järvholm S, Enskog A, Hammarling C, Dahm-Kähler P, Brännström M. Uterus transplantation: joys and frustrations of becoming a ‘complete’ woman—a qualitative study regarding self-image in the 5-year period after transplantation. Hum Reprod 2020; 35:1855-1863. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION
How is a women’s self-image affected by uterus transplantation (UTx)?
SUMMARY ANSWER
Women experienced receiving a uterus in both positive and negative ways, but in general, their self-image was positively affected; regardless of whether they have given birth to a child or not, recipients describe themselves as being ‘back to normal’ after the hysterectomy to remove the transplanted uterus.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
UTx has repeatedly proved to be a successful treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility. However, there has been no previous qualitative long-term research into the self-image of women undergoing UTx.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
This complete, prospective cohort study included the nine recipients of the first UTxs performed in Sweden mostly in 2013. Interviews took place in the 5 years following surgery.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
Eight out of the nine recipients had congenital absence of the uterus, a characteristic of Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome, and one recipient lacked a uterus after a radical hysterectomy due to cervical cancer. The mean age of participants was 31.5 years at inclusion and at this time they all lived in stable marital relationships. Post-transplantation, interviews were performed annually for 5 years, comprising a total of 43 interviews. The interview followed a semi-structured guide. All interviews (median duration of around 25 minutes) were recorded, transcribed verbatim and then analysed by thematic approach.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
The joys and frustrations of becoming a ‘complete’ woman are seen as a master theme, which influences the three underlying subthemes, a changed self-perception, a changed body and a changed sexuality. Each of these subthemes have three underlying categories.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
The small sample size is a limitation.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
The results provide information that will be helpful in pre-operative screening procedures and in the psychological support offered both to women who experienced successful and unsuccessful outcomes following UTx.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
Funding was received from the Jane and Dan Olsson Foundation for Science; the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation; an ALF grant from the Swedish state under an agreement between the government and the county councils; the Swedish Research Council; a Ferring Pharmaceuticals scholarship in memory of Robert Edwards; and the Iris Jonzén-Sandblom and Greta Jonzén Foundation. The authors have no competing interests.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT01844362.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stina Järvholm
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anders Enskog
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Catrina Hammarling
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Pernilla Dahm-Kähler
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mats Brännström
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Stockholm IVF-EUGIN, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Uterine transplantation and IVF for congenital or acquired uterine factor infertility: A systematic review of safety and efficacy outcomes in the first 52 recipients. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0232323. [PMID: 32348371 PMCID: PMC7190173 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 04/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterine transplantation (UTx) associated with IVF restores fertility in women affected by absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI). Pregnancies achieved both in women undergoing any solid organ transplantation and following IVF are associated with an increased risk of maternal and neonatal complications. This systematic review evaluated this risk in UTx-IVF treated women focusing on the safety and efficacy features of the treatment. Twenty-two studies and three press releases reporting on 52 UTx-IVF treatments were identified. Regarding the safety of treatment, 38/52 (73,1%) of surgical procedures led to the restoration of uterine function in recipients, 12/52 (23,1%) of recipients experienced post-operative complications requiring hysterectomy, and 2/52 (3,8%) of procedures failed before uterine recipients’ surgery due to intra-operative complications. Regarding the efficacy of treatment, results focused on transplanted patients showing full recovery of organ functioning: 16/38 (42,1%) of patients achieved a pregnancy, including two women who gave births twice. UTx-IVF pregnancies led to 16 deliveries and all new-borns were healthy. Six out of 16 (37,5%) UTx pregnancies faced major complications during gestation. Preterm births occurred in 10/16 (62,5%) UTx deliveries. Our data indicates that the risk of gestational and delivery complications deserves important consideration in AUFI women receiving UTx-IVF treatments. However, these observations are preliminary and need to be revised after larger series of data are published.
Collapse
|
20
|
Kvarnström N, Enskog A, Dahm-Kähler P, Brännström M. Live versus deceased donor in uterus transplantation. Fertil Steril 2019; 112:24-27. [PMID: 31277763 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Revised: 05/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Uterus transplantation to treat absolute uterine factor infertility is a rapidly evolving field still at its early clinical experimental stage. Most human uterus transplantation attempts and live births have been after transplantation with uteri from live donors, who, in most cases, are closely related to the recipient. However, successful transplant with live births after uterus transplantation from deceased donors has also been reported. This article discusses the pros and cons in relation to live and deceased donors for uterus transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anders Enskog
- Department of Anesthesiology & Intensive Care, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Pernilla Dahm-Kähler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Mats Brännström
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden; Stockholm IVF-EUGIN, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Absolute uterine factor infertility is the final hurdle for assisted reproductive treatments. Uterus transplant trials are happening worldwide; to advance the debate around uterine transplantation (UTx), this article considers selection criteria for clinical trials from a UK perspective and makes recommendations for future selection criteria for UTx treatment. Recommendations advanced include the use of donor eggs, access for single women and women in same-sex relationships, prohibiting participation of women who are already mothers, and a preference for deceased donors and bioengineered uteri. With UTx treatment on the horizon, it is important to proactively consider future selection criteria. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Review of UK selection criteria for clinical trials for uterus transplantation; recommendations for the future.
Collapse
|