TLR-MyD88 signaling blockades inhibit refractory B-1b cell immune responses to transplant-related glycan antigens

Differences between xenotransplantation and allogeneic kidney transplantation: the current situation and future challenges in Japan

Kidney transplantation is the only curative option for patients with chronic renal failure, significantly improving their survival and quality of life. However, this treatment remains limited by the shortage of organ donors. The shortage of kidney donors remains a serious problem all over the world, and is particularly severe in Japan. While advancements in immunosuppressive therapies and histocompatibility testing have improved outcomes in allogeneic kidney transplantation, the rising number of dialysis patients has worsened the gap between the demand for and supply of suitable donor organs. In response to this pressing need, xenotransplantation has gained attention as a promising alternative solution. Recent progress driven by gene-editing technologies, including CRISPR-Cas9, has facilitated the development of genetically modified pigs suitable for potential human transplantation. This review provides an overview of the key differences in immune response and infection risks between xenogeneic and allogeneic kidney transplants. In addition, it comprehensively examines the challenges and potential of xenogeneic kidney transplantation from multiple perspectives, including differences in immunosuppressive therapies between allogeneic and xenogeneic transplantation. We also discuss the feasibility of xenogeneic kidney transplantation as a solution to the organ shortage in Japan and present directions for addressing challenges toward clinical application. We hope this review will provide valuable insights into the potential of xenogeneic kidney transplantation as a new treatment option for chronic renal failure and contribute to efforts to address the donor shortage problem in Japan.

Treatment of a MyD88 inhibitor alleviates rejection and inflammation in xenotransplantation by inhibiting dendritic cells activation and trained immunity in macrophages

BACKGROUND

Acute vascular rejection (AVR) and systemic inflammation in xenograft recipients (SIXR) negatively impact the xenografts survival, and novel immunosuppressants are required to improve survival outcomes. We previously reported that TJ-M2010-5, a myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) inhibitor, exerts excellent anti-rejection effects in allogeneic transplantation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of TJ-M2010-5 in preventing AVR and SIXR and to investigate whether combined treatment of TJ-M2010-5 with anti-CD154 antibody (MR1) could prolong xenograft survival furthermore.

METHODS

A model involving heart transplantation from Sprague-Dawley rats to BALB/c mice was established in vivo, and the xenografts developed typical AVR. Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells and macrophages were cultured to study the underlying mechanisms induced by rat cardiomyocyte lysate stimulation in vitro.

RESULTS

TJ-M2010-5 monotherapy prolonged xenograft survival, although combination treatment with MR1 further enhanced the anti-AVR and anti-SIXR effects with about 21 days graft survival, compared to monotherapy. TJ-M2010-5 reduced dendritic cell and macrophage activation induced by xenotransplantation, downregulated CD80/CD86 expression, suppressed B-cell activation and anti-donor antibody generation, reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine production and tissue factor expression, and attenuated epigenetic modifications underlying interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α production in macrophages by inhibiting nuclear factor kappa B nuclear translocation.

CONCLUSIONS

TJ-M2010-5 attenuated AVR and SIXR and contributed to xenograft survival by inhibiting dendritic cell and macrophage activation. A dual-system inhibition strategy combining TJ-M2010-5 with anti-CD154 antibody achieved better results in xenotransplantation.