Laparoscopic donor and recipient hepatectomy followed by robot-assisted liver graft implantation in living donor liver transplantation

Minimally Invasive Liver Transplantation: The Recipient Operation

The introduction of minimally invasive donor hepatectomy (MIDH) operation saw the initiation and incorporation of minimal access surgery into the field of liver transplantation (LT). Several studies, meta-analyses, and consensus guidelines have demonstrated the undisputed advantages of the MIDH operation. Given these positive trends, and the increasing acceptance and acknowledgment of the safety of MIDH among the transplant community, there has been an intuitive thrust to further push the boundaries of what was initially considered unfeasible - to that of the minimally invasive liver transplant recipient surgery (MIRS). Given its extremely steep learning curve and undefined safety profile, the MIRS procedure remains limited to less than a handful of LT units across the world. It does, however, appear inevitable that the MIRS is likely to be performed widely in the future. Nonetheless, embarking on such a project needs not only just a gifted and trained surgeon, but a focussed and united effort of the whole team. This article reviews the current evidence, debates the early trade-offs involved in the introduction of the operation, and importantly, presents a safe and structured algorithm for teams interested in embarking on this very complex, yet exciting new realm of LT.

Midline Incision Living Donor Liver Transplantation as a Step Toward Minimally Invasive Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Performing the living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipient operation via a midline incision (MILT) may reduce perioperative morbidity and postoperative wound related issues. Also, it is likely to bear significance in the current era of minimally invasive recipient surgery (MIRS) as competence in performing an MILT is likely to be the stepping-stone toward and importantly, the safety net in performing a safe MIRS. We present our series of MILT, highlighting the evolution and its technical modifications.

METHODS

Propensity score matched analysis (based on MELD, GRWR, and etiology) of MILT versus standard LDLT (reverse L incision) (SILT) with a 1:2 ratio was performed from a prospectively collected database. All perioperative recipient data including postoperative morbidity and mortality were compared.

RESULTS

Among 75 MILT and 150 SILT patients, there were no significant differences between the groups with regards to operative time (520 ± 73 vs. 522 ± 120 min, p = 0.89) and cold ischemia time (110 ± 45 vs. 118 ± 60 min, p = 0.31). The warm ischemia time was significantly longer in the MILT group (52 ± 24 min vs. 46 ± 14 min, p = 0.02). While the mean blood loss was comparable between the groups (1675 ± 850 vs. 1550 ± 1150 mL, p = 0.41), blood transfusion requirements including packed red cells (5 (IQR:3-7) vs. 3 (IQR:1-6), p = 0.03) and fresh frozen plasma (3 (IQR:2-4) vs. 2 (IQR:0-3), p = 0.02) were significantly higher in MILT patients. There was no difference between the groups with regards to major 90-day morbidity (18.6% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.53), duration of hospital stay (15 (IQR:10-18) vs. 14 (IQR: 12-18) days, p = 0.06), and 1-year (92% vs. 95.3%) and 3-year mortality (92% vs. 91.4%) (p = 0.89).

CONCLUSION

We present the feasibility and safety of MILT in LDLT. In the current milieu of MIRS, competence in performing a safe MILT may become an essential component of the recipient surgeon's armamentarium.

Fully robotic recipient left graft living donor liver transplantation

We report the first 2 cases of fully robotic recipient left graft living donor liver transplants, demonstrating the technical feasibility of using left grafts, accompanied by a video. We anticipate that making the donor selection criteria more liberal, initially confined to right grafts, will result in an increase of the number of recipients who can potentially benefit from robotic liver transplantation. These 2 cases set an example for further studies and the broader application of robotic technology in liver transplantation, aiming to further refine the technique at this early stage and extend its potential advantages to a larger population.

Anesthetic Considerations for Robotic Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation has traditionally been performed through a large, bilateral subcostal incision. Recently, liver transplant programs across the world, including our own, have reported successful liver transplants via total robotic approaches on recipients with low Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores and preexisting abdominal wall laxity. This review discusses the unique anesthetic considerations of robotic liver transplantation based on our group's initial experience with this novel surgical approach. Robotic liver transplantation presents a unique set of considerations and challenges for the anesthesiologist, and a thorough understanding of liver disease, liver transplant surgery, venovenous bypass, and the various implications of robotic surgery is essential to ensure optimal patient outcomes. Specific management topics discussed here include appropriate patient selection, preoperative assessment, and intraoperative management. We also discuss certain theoretical and actual challenges that our group has experienced.

Full Robotic Whole Graft Liver Transplantation: A Step Into The Future

OBJECTIVE

To report the first European series of full robotic whole liver transplantation (RLT) with technical details and future perspectives.

BACKGROUND

Few cases of liver transplantation with a minimally invasive approach using partial grafts have been reported so far, and no cases of robotic whole liver transplantation have been reported in the scientific literature.

METHODS

The adopted technique was full robotic liver hepatectomy, followed by robotic implantation after graft introduction through a small midline incision. Patients presenting with hepatocellular carcinoma in liver cirrhosis with a small caudate lobe, low degree of portal hypertension, no porto-mesenteric thrombosis, as well as low Model for End-Stage Liver Disease patients have been considered ideal candidates.

RESULTS

Six patients underwent RLT between February and March 2024 at Lisbon and Modena University Liver Transplant Centers. Warm ischemia time during RLT ranged between 55 and 90 minutes, with a total surgery duration between 440 and 710 minutes. The median total operative time was 595 (±111.3) minutes. Only 1 recipient had prolonged hyperbilirubinemia, which was safely treated. The median in-hospital stay was 7.5 days (±4.8 d).

CONCLUSIONS

RLT is a promising technique to further reduce the impact of liver transplantation thanks to smaller incision, gentle tissue manipulation, high magnification and precision for vascular and biliary anastomosis, and reduced postoperative pain. This is the first step toward the demonstration of the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery in liver transplantation, although further selection and technical refinements are needed to improve reproducibility.

Laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy in living liver donors. Current state and prospects

Minimally invasive living-donor hepatectomy is a relatively new surgical technique that can improve donor safety and expedite donor rehabilitation. Following an early stage of research where donor safety was not adequately established, the minimally invasive approach nowadays yields better outcomes when carried out by experienced surgeons. Important factors include donor selection criteria, hospital equipment, and surgeon’s learning curve. This review describes the current status of laparoscopic and robotic living-donor hepatectomy, along with the challenges facing the advancement of these surgical techniques.

Outcomes of Fully Robotic Recipient Living Donor Liver Transplant in Relation to the Open Approach

BACKGROUND

Over the past 20 y, robotic surgery has entered nearly all surgical disciplines, aiming to improve patient outcomes. Liver transplantation has evolved with these advancements, and fully robotic liver transplants represent the latest innovation in this field. This study reports on the world's first series of fully robotic recipient liver transplants from robotic living donors, comparing them with matched cases from the standard open transplant approach.

METHODS

A case-control study was conducted at our center from August to December 2023. Patient selection criteria for robotic recipient liver transplantation included a Model for End-stage Liver Disease score of ≤25, specific anatomical characteristics, and logistics. A propensity score analysis with a 1:4 matching ratio was used.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 10 fully robotic living donor and robotic recipient liver transplant pairs with a median donor age of 29 y and a recipient age of 61 y. The main indication for transplantation was nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (6/10). There was 1 robotic to open conversion, and the median operation time was 10 h, with a median hospital stay of 13 d, shorter than the 18 d in the open group. Three recipients experienced a complication, and there was no mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The first-ever series of fully robotic living donor recipient liver transplants showed encouraging initial results with a markedly reduced hospital stay. The ultimate goal is to refine the technique to offer robotic liver transplants to the majority of recipients, overcoming the current selection criteria. Further research and a planned randomized controlled trial will aim to confirm these results.

Robotic surgery in the aspect of liver transplantation

Introduction. Almost 60 years have passed since the first liver transplant performed by Thomas Starzl. During this time, medical technologies have gradually improved, which has made it possible to use more and more new methods and approaches in this type of medical care. One of the new techniques of recent decades is robotic surgery, which is gradually being introduced into medical practice, including in the field of transplant medicine.

Objective. The purpose of writing this review was to summarize knowledge and describe the current status of development of robotic surgery in the aspect of liver transplantation, namely: liver resection in donors, as well as graft implantation in the recipient.

Material and methods. The review includes foreign and domestic publications on minimally invasive donor liver surgery. Publications on the topic of robotic liver resection in the aspect of liver transplantation were also processed.

Conclusion. Robotic surgery using advanced robotic systems represents the next step in the development of minimally invasive technologies in liver transplantation. Robotic systems provide more precise and dexterous control of instruments, allowing surgeons to perform complex procedures with greater precision and less risk to patients. However, the robotic approach is still very limited in geographical distribution and requires much more experience than laparoscopy. The upcoming introduction of new robotic systems that support haptic feedback or cavitronic ultrasonic surgical aspirators will further promote a widespread adoption of robotic liver resection in liver donors and liver recipients.

Laparoscopic-assisted full-sized liver transplantation with magnetically fast portal vein anastomosis: an initial cohort study

BACKGROUND

Some cases of laparoscopic-assisted liver transplantation (LA-LT) with utilization of reduced-size grafts has been reported. The authors here introduced successful utilization of LA-LT with whole liver grafts and magnetic portal vein anastomosis.

METHODS

Eight patients with liver cirrhosis were included for LA-LT using donor organs after cardiac death. The surgical procedures included purely laparoscopic explant hepatectomy and whole-liver graft implantation via the midline incision. After explant removal, the whole-liver graft was then placed in situ, and a side-to-side cavo-caval anastomosis with 4-5 cm oval opening was performed. The magnetic rings were everted on the donor and recipient portal vein, respectively, and the instant attachment of the two magnets at the donor and recipient portal vein allowed fast blood reperfusion, followed by continuous suturing on the surface of the magnets.

RESULTS

The median operation time was 495 (range 420-630). The median time of explant hepatectomy and inferior vena cava anastomosis was 239 (range 150-300) min and 14.5 (range 10-19) min, respectively. Of note, the median anhepatic time was 25 (range 20-35) min. All the patients were discharged home with no major complications after more than 12 months follow-up.

CONCLUSION

LA-LT with full-size graft is feasible and utilization of magnetic anastomosis would further simplify the procedure.

The future of liver transplantation

Over the last 50 years, liver transplantation has evolved into a procedure routinely performed in many countries worldwide. Those able to access this therapy frequently experience a miraculous risk-benefit ratio, particularly if they face the imminently life-threatening disease. Over the decades, the success of liver transplantation, with dramatic improvements in early posttransplant survival, has aggressively driven demand. However, despite the emergence of living donors to augment deceased donors as a source of organs, supply has lagged far behind demand. As a result, rationing has been an unfortunate focus in recent decades. Recent shifts in the epidemiology of liver disease combined with transformative innovations in liver preservation suggest that the underlying premise of organ shortage may erode in the foreseeable future. The focus will sharpen on improving equitable access while mitigating constraints related to workforce training, infrastructure for organ recovery and rehabilitation, and their associated costs. Research efforts in liver preservation will undoubtedly blossom with the aim of optimizing both the timing and conditions of transplantation. Coupled with advances in genetic engineering, regenerative biology, and cellular therapies, the portfolio of innovation, both broad and deep, offers the promise that, in the future, liver transplantation will not only be broadly available to those in need but also represent a highly durable life-saving therapy.

Essential updates 2022/2023: A review of current topics in robotic hepatectomy

The liver requires careful handling intra-operatively owing to its vital functions and complexity. Traditional open hepatectomy, while standard, is invasive and requires long recovery periods. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is a less invasive option, with its own challenges. The rise of robotic surgery, such as the da Vinci® system, improves precision and control, addressing the limitations of conventional methods, but brings new concerns, such as costs and training. This review focuses on the latest advancements in robotic hepatectomy from 2022/23 articles, delving into topics like "robotic surgery in liver transplantation," "robotic hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma," "robotic vascular reconstruction following hepatectomy," "robotic repeat hepatectomy," and "prospective trials in robotic hepatectomy." To retrieve articles, a focused literature search was conducted using PubMed for articles from 2022/23 with a 5-year filter, excluding reviews. Initially, abstracts were screened, and relevant articles on robotic surgery were examined in full for inclusion in this review. Although all the above items are cutting-edge, and many of the references are necessarily at the level of case reports, recent articles are still accompanied by surgical videos, which are useful to readers, especially surgeons who are considering imitating the procedures. In summary, we examined the recent advancements in robotic liver resection. The inclusion of videos that present new techniques aids in knowledge transfer. We anticipate the continued growth of this field of research.

Total robotic liver transplant: the final frontier of minimally invasive surgery

The use of robotic surgery in transplantation is increasing; however, robotic liver transplantation (RLT) remains a challenging undertaking. To our knowledge, this is a report of the first RLT in North America and the first RLT using a whole graft from a deceased donor in the world. This paper describes the preparation leading to the RLT and the surgical technique of the operation. The operation was performed in a 62-year-old man with hepatitis C cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma with a native Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 10. The total console time for the operation was 8 hours 30 minutes, and the transplant hepatectomy took 3 hours 30 minutes. Warm ischemia time was 77 minutes. Biliary reconstruction was performed in a primary end-to-end fashion and took 19 minutes to complete. The patient had an uneventful recovery without early allograft dysfunction or surgical complications and continues to do well after 6-months follow-up. This paper demonstrates the feasibility of this operation in highly selected patients with chronic liver disease. Additional experience is required to fully understand the role of RLT in the future of transplant surgery. Narrated video is available at https://youtu.be/TkjDwLryd3I.

Trends of liver transplantation in Asia

Liver transplantation (LT) in Asia started comparatively early in 1964, just 1 year after Starzl's trail-blazing first attempt. Despite the quick start, LT was slow to develop in this region. Limited access to universal healthcare, lack of public understanding and support as well as the absence of strong legislation, on a backdrop of a wide range of diverse social, religious, economic and cultural background are all contributory factors. Through strong administrative efforts, the number of DDLTs in selected Asian countries has been slowly rising in recent years. However, Asians are generally still less likely to donate organs than Caucasians after death. The strong demand for LT with limited access to deceased organs has, therefore, led to constant need for innovation in LT this region, with the pioneering of various LDLT techniques and safe expansion of donor pool being driven primarily by Asian centers. Familiarity and the development of technical expertise in donor surgery have also resulted in Asian centers repeatedly pushing the boundaries on minimally invasive donor and recipient surgery. In this article, we focus on the past and present states of LT in Asia and explore the future trends of LT in this region.

Feasibility of venous cuff using an open round ligament or inferior mesenteric vein around the hepatic vein for a left lobe graft in living-donor liver transplantation

Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an established treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease or acute liver failure, and outflow reconstruction is considered one of the most vital techniques in LDLT. To date, many strategies have been reported to prevent outflow obstruction, which can be refractory to liver dysfunction and can cause life-threatening graft loss or mortality. In addition, in this era of laparoscopic hepatectomy in donor surgery, especially LDLT using a left liver graft, it has been predicted that cutting the hepatic vein with automatic linear staplers will lead to more outflow-related problems than with conventional open hepatectomy because of the short neck of the anastomosis orifice. We herein review 10 cases of venoplasty performed with a novel venous cuff system using a donor's round ligament around the hepatic vein in LDLT with a left lobe graft, which makes anastomosis of the hepatic vein sterically easy for postoperative venous patency.

Minimally Invasive Surgery in Liver Transplantation: From Living Liver Donation to Graft Implantation

Since the end of the 20th century and the establishment of minimally invasive techniques, they have become the preferred operative method by many surgeons. These techniques were applied to liver surgery for the first time in 1991, while as far as transplantation is concerned their application was limited to the living donor procedure. We performed a review of the literature by searching in Pubmed and Scopus using the following keywords: Liver transplantation, Minimally invasive surgery(MIS) living liver donor surgery. Applications of MIS are recorded in surgeries involving the donor and the recipient. Regarding the recipient surgeries, the reports are limited to 25 patients, including combinations of laparoscopic, robotic and open techniques, while in the living donor surgery, the reports are much more numerous and with larger series of patients. Shorter hospitalization times and less blood loss are recorded, especially in centers with experience in a large number of cases. Regarding the living donor surgery, MIS follows the same principles as a conventional hepatectomy and is already the method of choice in many specialized centers. Regarding the recipient surgery, significant questions arise mainly concerning the safe handling of the liver graft.

Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy: Experience of 556 cases at Seoul National University Hospital

Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH) has become a routine procedure at Seoul National University Hospital, and the pure laparoscopic method is now being applied to liver recipients as well. This study aimed to review the procedure and outcomes of PLDH to identify any areas that required improvement. Data from 556 donors who underwent PLDH between November 2015 and December 2021 and their recipients were retrospectively reviewed. Among these, 541 patients underwent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH). The mean hospital stay of the donor was 7.2 days, and the rate of grade I, II, IIIa, and IIIb complications was 2.2%, 2.7%, 1.3%, and 0.9%, respectively, without any irreversible disabilities or mortalities. The most common early and late major complications in the recipient were intraabdominal bleeding (n = 47, 8.5%) and biliary problems (n = 198, 35.6%), respectively. Analysis of the PLDRH procedure showed that operative time, liver removal time, warm ischemic time, Δhemoglobin%, Δtotal bilirubin%, and postoperative hospital stay decreased significantly as the number of cases accumulated. In conclusion, the operative outcomes of PLDRH improved as the number of cases increased. However, continuous caution is needed because major complications still occur in donors and recipients even after hundreds of cases.

The yesterday, today and tomorrow of liver transplant

With a very long history of setbacks and successes, organ transplantation is one of the greatest medical achievements of the twentieth century. Liver transplantation is currently the most effective method for treating end-stage liver disease. From humble beginnings, improvements in surgical technique, perioperative management, and immunosuppressive therapy have yielded excellent graft and patient outcomes. Most established 'liver transplant' (LT) centres have a 1-year survival rate exceeding 90%, and a 3-year survival rate of over 80%. With immense success, the need for hepatic grafts substantially exceeds their availability. This problem has been partially addressed by using split grafts, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), and extended criteria grafts (ECG). This article reviews the immense progress made in various aspects of LT including evaluation, increasing donor pool, surgical advances, immunosuppression and anaesthesia related aspects and the way forward. With ongoing cutting edge research in technologies like artificial liver devices, tissue bioengineering and hepatocyte 'farms', the future of LT is more exciting than ever before.

Total robot-assisted recipient's surgery in living donor liver transplantation: First step towards the future

Lee and colleagues describe a groundbreaking total robot-assisted explant hepatectomy followed by robotic engraftment for a patient requiring a living donor liver transplant. This report represents a crucial step towards implementing robot-assisted liver transplantation, a cutting-edge surgical technique that could change the surgical trend in recipient surgery for liver transplantation.

New Developments and Challenges in Liver Transplantation

Liver disease is increasing in incidence and is the third most common cause of premature death in the United Kingdom and fourth in the United States. Liver disease accounts for 2 million deaths globally each year. Three-quarters of patients with liver disease are diagnosed at a late stage, with liver transplantation as the only definitive treatment. Thomas E. Starzl performed the first human liver transplant 60 years ago. It has since become an established treatment for end-stage liver disease, both acute and chronic, including metabolic diseases and primary and, at present piloting, secondary liver cancer. Advances in surgical and anaesthetic techniques, refined indications and contra-indications to transplantation, improved donor selection, immunosuppression and prognostic scoring have allowed the outcomes of liver transplantation to improve year on year. However, there are many limitations to liver transplantation. This review describes the milestones that have occurred in the development of liver transplantation, the current limitations and the ongoing research aimed at overcoming these challenges.

Early experiences with developing techniques for pure laparoscopic explant hepatectomy in living donor liver transplantation

In recent years, laparoscopic techniques for liver resection or living donor hepatectomy have become common surgical methods. However, reports on laparoscopic surgeries for recipients are lacking. Our center has launched the minimally invasive living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) program in March 2020, which is led by two surgeons who are experienced in laparoscopic surgeries. Recently, we reported our first successful pure laparoscopic recipient explant hepatectomy and the first laparoscopic explant hepatectomy and robotic-assisted graft implantation. In this article, we introduce a series of minimally invasive surgical cases that were conducted by a single experienced surgeon to share our early experiences leading to our recent successes. We included 10 cases performed from June 2020 to May 2021 in our initial attempt at laparoscopic explant hepatectomy, graft implantation using midline incision, and robotic-assisted graft implantation surgery. The first four cases required open conversion during the liver mobilization process because of bleeding. The next two cases required open conversion to facilitate portal vein and hepatic artery division. We successfully performed pure laparoscopic explant hepatectomy in the last four cases. For the last case, we attempted to perform graft implantation using a robotic system, but bleeding required open conversion. All patients recovered without any significant acute postoperative problems and were discharged within 2 weeks. All 10 patients were followed up at outpatient clinics, and only one of the 10 patients had a late complication of LDLT. This study has shown that the minimally invasive approach in LDLT may be conducted safely without significant complications if it is performed by highly experienced surgeons working in high-volume centers.

A hybrid procedure of living donor liver transplantation for a pediatric patient with citrin deficiency

BACKGROUND

The application of laparoscopic procedures in the liver surgery has been growing. We herein present the first case of a pediatric patient who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using a hybrid procedure with hand-assisted laparoscopic mobilization of the liver, subsequent explantation of the diseased liver, and implantation of the graft under direct vision.

METHODS

A 12-year-old girl with citrin deficiency was scheduled for LDLT with a left lobe graft. After making an 8-cm upper midline incision, a 5-mm trocar was placed at the umbilicus and the right upper abdomen. Mobilization of the right liver lobe was performed using a hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) procedure. After the extension of the midline incision, short hepatic vein dissection, encircling the right hepatic vein and hepatic hilum dissection was performed. Explantation of the liver and subsequent implantation of the liver graft were conducted under direct vision.

RESULTS

Since the operation, her normal activities of daily life have been maintained with a normal liver function. Subsequently, her secondary sexual characteristics have recovered without any wound-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

A hybrid LDLT procedure was feasible for a pediatric patient. This procedure's benefits are considered meaningful for pediatric patients as it does not disrupt the rectus muscles or nerves and achieves cosmesis.