Precautionary allergen labelling: NO MORE TRACES!

Time to ACT-UP: Update on precautionary allergen labelling (PAL)

Background

Precautionary Allergen ("may contain") Labelling (PAL) is used by industry to communicate potential risk to food-allergic individuals posed by unintended allergen presence (UAP). In 2014, the World Allergy Organization (WAO) highlighted that PAL use was increasing, but often applied inconsistently and without regulation - which reduces its usefulness to consumers with food allergy and those purchasing food for them. WAO proposed the need for a regulated, international framework to underpin application of PAL. In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations convened an expert consultation to address the issue of PAL, the outputs of which are now being considered by the Codex Committee on Food Labelling (CCFL).

Objectives

To summarise the latest data to inform the application of PAL in a more systematic way, for implementation into global food standards.

Methods

A non-systematic review of issues surrounding precautionary labelling and food allergens in pre-packaged products.

Results

Approximately, 100 countries around the world have legislation on the declaration of allergenic ingredients. Just a few have legislation on UAP. Given the risks that UAP entails, non-regulated PAL creates inconvenience in real life due to its unequal, difficult interpretation by patients. The attempts made so far to rationalize PAL present lights and shadows.

Conclusions

At a time when CCFL is considering the results of the FAO/WHO Expert Consultation 2020-2023, we summarise the prospects to develop an effective and homogeneous legislation at a global level, and the areas of uncertainty that might hinder international agreement on a regulated framework for PAL of food allergens.

Perspectives in precautionary allergen labelling of prepackaged foods after the FAO/WHO consultation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the perspectives regarding precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) of prepackaged foods following the consultation conducted by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the WHO.

RECENT FINDINGS

The FAO/WHO consultation provided a comprehensive assessment of the current status and practices of PAL implementation worldwide. One of the key findings highlighted by the Expert Committee was the need for improvement in existing PAL systems. It was noted that many countries lacked uniformity in PAL practices, leading to inconsistencies in labelling and potentially misleading information for consumers. Furthermore, the consultation emphasized the importance of PAL being risk-based, taking into account both the amount and frequency of unintended allergen presence (UAP) in food products.

SUMMARY

The FAO/WHO consultation shed light on various perspectives and challenges associated with PAL of prepackaged foods. Key findings emphasized the need for improvement in existing PAL systems, including the adoption of a risk-based approach, standardized regulations, and enhanced transparency. Moving forward, collaborative efforts between regulatory agencies, food manufacturers, and consumer advocacy groups will be essential in developing effective PAL strategies that prioritize consumer safety and well being.

Food-labeling issues for severe food-allergic consumers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Food label represent the primary and only source of information before consuming a food product. Deputy government agencies on five continents require allergenic ingredients to be declared when used in prepackaged foods to assist patients in identifying allergenic foods and to help them to choose wisely. Unfortunately, the mandatory allergen list and legislation regarding food labels and reference doses is not uniform and varies by country. This may add difficulties to food-allergic patients, especially those with severe food allergy.

RECENT FINDINGS

A new definition of food allergy severity (the DEFASE grid, developed by the World Allergy Organization), aims to assist clinicians in the identification of the at-risk patients. The FASTER ACT and Natasha's Laws has made important improvements such as the entry of sesame as a major allergen in the United States, and increased evidence of allergens on the food label within prepackaged for direct sale (PPDS) in the UK. The recent introduction of Vital 3.0 brought important new features such as an updated reference doses for many foods.

SUMMARY

Currently, there are still considerable differences regarding food labels in different countries. Growing public and scientific attention to the problem promises to increase the food safety for allergens. Among the next improvements, we expect a reconsideration of the food reference doses, a harmonization of the food oral challenge process, and the promulgation of regulatory rules for the precautionary labeling.

Food allergies on vacation-there and back again

OBJECTIVE

Food allergy is an important public health concern that affects all facets of life, and travel is no exception. We sought to provide a scoping review regarding the literature pertaining to management of FA while traveling.

DATA SOURCES

Medline and Embase were queried for English-language articles published in the last 20 years containing "food allergy" and "travel".

STUDY SELECTIONS

The search produced 83 references which were reviewed. After removal of duplicates and irrelevant material, 23 references that discussed travel and FA remained, 13 of which were conference abstracts published as supplemental material.

RESULTS

Priorities for consideration by patient-families and their allergist-immunologist include concern for reactions away from home, proximity to emergency medical services, risk for various methods of travel including potential for cross-contact exposure resulting in symptoms, and considerations for international travel including language barriers.

CONCLUSION

Patients with FA must use careful planning and preparation to ensure access to safe food and emergency medications at all times while away from home.

Food labeling issues for severe food allergic patients

Food allergy carries high importance and responsibility, affecting an estimated 220 million people worldwide. It is a frequent cause of food-induced anaphylaxis, a life-threatening condition requiring a toll of about one death per 50 million people a year worldwide. In order to help patients to identify allergenic foods and thus avoid anaphylactic reactions, 66 countries over the 5 continents require by law that allergenic ingredients must be declared when used in prepackaged foods. Unfortunately, the mandatory allergen list is not uniform, but varies among different countries. The widespread adoption of Precautionary Allergen Labeling (PAL) results in a proliferation of unregulated PALs with different informative statements. In this situation, the need of a scientific consensus on the definition of food allergy and the identification of a tolerable risk with routinely used detection assays, considering not only the eliciting dose but also the food source, is urgent. The aim of this manuscript is: 1) to draw a picture of the global situation in terms of PALs, and 2) to highlight new approaches that could aid in tackling the problem of regulating the labeling of allergens. These include the Voluntary Incidental Trace Allergen Labelling (VITAL) system, which intersects reference doses and labelling decisions, and a direct quantification of trace amounts of allergens at lower limit of detection (LOD) levels in the food itself through proteomics. We here highlight how, although with some limitations, the steady advances in proteomic approaches possess higher sensitivity than the recommended VITAL reference doses, allowing the identification of allergens at much lower LOD levels than VITAL. Considering that each assay used to detect allergen in food products carries method-specific issues, a more comprehensive and harmonized approach implementing both quantitative and qualitative methods could help overcoming the risk stratification approach and the overuse of PALs, offering promise as the field moves forward towards improving consumers' quality of life.

Management of Peanut Allergy

Peanut allergy is a growing public health concern in westernized countries. Peanut allergy is characterized as an often severe and lifelong allergy, which can have detrimental effects on quality of life and trigger anxiety. Although multiple therapeutic options are emerging, the focus of current management strategies is strict peanut avoidance and carriage of self-injectable epinephrine. The greatest risk of reacting to peanut comes from direct ingestion, whereas casual skin contact or airborne exposure is highly unlikely to provoke significant symptoms. Patients and families must be educated about how to best execute strict peanut avoidance through careful label reading as well as how to understand and address likely and unlikely risk with regard to peanut exposure in public, in particular when dining outside of the home and for children attending school or child care. This review discusses the risk of exposure in public such as at school or on an airplane and how such risk can be abated, situations and scenarios when dining out of the house that may pose more risks than others, the essentials of US and EU label reading laws with particular emphasis on precautionary labeling and the risk implied by such, quality of life and psychosocial issues that may affect the peanut allergic individual and family, and a discussion of how risk may differ and evolve based on the patient's age.

Current perspectives on peanut allergy

Peanut allergy is increasingly prevalent and for most patients is a life-long condition, with the potential to cause life-threatening reactions. Accurate diagnosis and appropriate management are essential to minimise risks due to accidental peanut exposure. Current management strategies focus on strict allergen avoidance and access to emergency medicines to treat potential reactions; however, active approaches are an area of intense research. Promising new methods of food allergen immunotherapy are set to change the approach to managing peanut allergic patients in the near future.

Food reactions during avoidance: Focus on peanut

OBJECTIVE

Peanut allergy has historically been difficult to manage, with most cases persisting into adulthood. Novel therapies for peanut allergy treatment are on the horizon, yet allergists must maintain a robust understanding of the risks and benefits of the current standard of therapy, avoidance diet.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive literature search using PubMed of reviews and clinical articles was performed.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Articles discussing peanut or other food-related allergic reactions, accidental exposures or anaphylaxis pertinent to avoidance diet or comparative to oral immunotherapy trials were selected.

RESULTS

Peanut remains a leading allergen associated with accidental ingestions responsible for food-related reactions, both mild and severe. Fatal reactions, however, are rare and measures such as anaphylaxis plans can significantly decrease the risk of accidental anaphylaxis. Patients may over estimate situations thought to increase risk for reactions to peanut, such as inhalation or contact through skin. In oral immunotherapy trials, the rate of anaphylaxis secondary to treatment was significantly higher than avoidance practices.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should continue to discuss avoidance as a viable option for long-term peanut allergy management and empower patients to differentiate relevant situations in which accidental reactions might occur.

GRADE-ing the Benefit/Risk Equation in Food Immunotherapy

Purpose of Review

We reviewed the existing evidence base to desensitisation for food allergy, applying the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to discuss whether desensitisation is likely to become part of routine treatment for patients with food allergy.

Recent Findings

Desensitisation for food allergy to peanut, egg and cow’s milk is efficacious, but whether such interventions are cost-effective is less clear, due to the issues over a sustained desensitisation effect and the increase in allergic reactions occurring in patients on treatment. Few studies have assessed the change in health-related quality of life associated with treatment, and most have not considered discordance between parent-reported changes in health-related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes compared to those of the patients themselves; none to date have controlled for the improvement in HRQL occurring after initial challenge which will confound outcomes.

Summary

The lack of longer-term safety and cost-effectiveness data, as well as an absence of current consensus in the reporting of patient-relevant outcomes, must be addressed in order to be able to recommend the introduction of desensitisation as a routine treatment in healthcare systems.

Are food allergic consumers ready for informative precautionary allergen labelling?

Precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) has resulted in consumer confusion. Previous research has shown that interpretive labels (using graphics, symbols, or colours) are better understood than the traditional forms of labels. In this study, we aimed to understand if consumers would use interpretive labels (symbol, mobile phone application and a toll-free number) with or without medical advice that was advocated by the food industry rather than the normal PAL. This is relevant information for industry and clinicians as it provides an insight into the food allergic perception regarding PAL.