Improving timely access to food allergy care: A pragmatic controlled trial

Effectiveness of educational interventions for quality of life of parents and children with food allergy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Educational intervention along with medical treatment is important to improve the quality of life of children with food allergies and their parents. This systematic review was designed to investigate the effects of education programs for parents and children with food allergies to provide a direction for developing an intervention program to improve their quality of life.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant studies published between January 2010 and August 2021 were identified through a systematic search of 5 databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial, and Psycho Info).

RESULTS

A total of 2351 articles were identified. Of these, 9 met the inclusion criteria after duplicates were removed. Among these, only 2 studies, using the support and handbook provided, showed significant results on quality of life.

DISCUSSION

There is a lack of educational interventions for children with food allergies and their parents. Educational intervention, an essential intervention, can maximize medical treatment and improve overall quality of life. Hence, these interventions should be actively developed and applied in the future.

Costs and uptake of a community model of paediatric food allergy care versus specialist hospital care: A before-and-after controlled trial

AIM

To compare the costs of community-based food allergy model of care (intervention cohort, IC) with a tertiary-hospital, specialist allergy clinic model of care (control cohort, CC).

METHODS

In this pragmatic controlled trial, children (aged 0-12 years) newly referred to the allergy clinic at Melbourne's Royal Children's Hospital with suspected/known food allergy to three or fewer foods were allocated to see either a community-based paediatrician, trained via online webinars and web-based clinical decision support tools for food allergy diagnosis and management, or a hospital allergist. Per-patient costs to the health-care system and out-of-pocket costs to families seen within 12 months (clinician time, allergy tests and medicare billing) were compared between the two models of care.

RESULTS

At 12 months, 54/181 (30%) CC families had been seen in the allergy clinic and 93/115 (81%) of the IC families who chose to see a community paediatrician had been seen. In an intention-to-treat analysis (ITT), health-care system costs per IC patient were higher than the costs per CC patient (mean cost $333 versus $319, respectively; mean difference $14, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) -97 to 118, P = 0.81). Total out-of-pocket costs to family were $129 in the IC compared with $89 in the CC (mean difference $40, 95% CI $4-$77, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

A community-based model of care for simple food allergy showed that costs to the health-care system were similar between the community model and hospital care but did not show reduced out-of-pocket costs to the families 12-months post-enrolment.