Patient-centered dupilumab dosing regimen leads to successful dose reduction in persistently controlled atopic dermatitis

[Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps-extension of dupilumab treatment intervals]

BACKGROUND

In patients with severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks can completely resolve nasal polys, sinus disease, and symptoms. In this case, patients ask for de-escalation. Although trials have demonstrated recurrence after stopping the biologic at 24 weeks, reducing the dose of dupilumab to once every 4 weeks did not result in deterioration of control. An extension of the treatment intervals would, however, diverge from the approval text, and is currently not recommended.

METHODS

The course of 29 patients with severe CRSwNP, type‑2 inflammation-associated comorbidities, and an indication for biologic was retrospectively analyzed. After resolution of CRSwNP and symptoms under biweekly dupilumab 300 mg, the dupilumab interval had been prolonged individually, initially up to 4 weeks, thereafter up to 6 weeks, if applicable. Control was assessed via quality of life (22-item sinonasal outcome test, SNOT-22), nasal polyp score, and smell identification test (Sniffin' Sticks; Burghart Messtechnik, Holm, Germany).

RESULTS

All patients showed an excellent improvement within the first 3 months. The dupilumab application interval was extended to 4 weeks after 7-31 months (median 13 months) and to 6 weeks (n = 9) after 17-35 months (median 23 months). No recurrent polyps or symptoms were subsequently observed.

CONCLUSION

In case of maximal regression of polyps and discomfort, extension of dupilumab injection intervals to 4 and potentially 6 weeks is possible without clinical worsening. Further studies on de-escalation or termination of biologic treatment when CRSwNP control is achieved are essential.

Ocular surface disease in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis patients and the effect of biological therapy

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease for which new targeted therapies are currently available. Due to the increased rates of ocular surface disease (OSD) reported during treatment with these new targeted treatments, more insight into the occurrence and pathomechanism of OSD in moderate-to-severe AD patients is needed. Therefore, this review's first part highlights that most patients with moderate-to-severe AD already have characteristics of OSD before starting targeted treatment. Remarkably, not all AD patients with OSD report ocular symptoms. OSD in AD is associated with less conjunctival goblet cells (GC) compared to healthy controls. In addition, OSD severity in AD patients is associated with high AD activity, the presence of eyelid and/or facial eczema, and high levels of AD-related severity biomarkers in tear fluid. The second part of this review highlights that pre-existing ocular pathology (e.g. in combination with the use of ophthalmic medication or eyelid eczema) may be associated with the development of dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease (DAOSD). During dupilumab treatment, DAOSD (which can be new-onset OSD or worsening of pre-existing OSD) is observed in approximately one-third of the dupilumab-treated AD patients. Anti-inflammatory ophthalmic treatment improves DAOSD, and dose reduction of dupilumab may also be an effective treatment option. The pathomechanism of DAOSD is still not fully elucidated. In a prospective study low, but stable conjunctival GC numbers were observed in moderate-to-severe AD patients, before and during dupilumab treatment. However, the Mucin 5 AC (MUC5AC) expression of GCs decreased during dupilumab treatment, suggesting an impairment of the GC function by dupilumab treatment. In addition, higher dupilumab tear fluid levels were found in dupilumab-treated AD patients with moderate-to-severe OSD compared to patients with no or mild OSD, whereas the dupilumab serum levels are similar. Clinicians should be aware of the frequent occurrence of OSD in moderate-to-severe AD patients, and a low-threshold referral to an ophthalmologist is recommended.

Biologicals for pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis: practical challenges and knowledge gaps

Biologicals are becoming increasingly important in the therapeutic landscape of pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Currently, dupilumab and tralokinumab are registered for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD, and novel biologicals are expected to follow. Dupilumab was the first biological registered for AD in pediatric patients and was recently approved for patients aged six months to five years. Current and emerging biologicals may address the unmet need for effective and safe treatment options for pediatric AD patients, however, little is known about the practical implementation of biologicals in infants and preschoolers (aged <6 years), including the timing of treatment initiation, discontinuation, and long-term administration of the subcutaneous injections. Currently, only a small number of biologicals are approved for the treatment of infants and preschoolers for other inflammatory diseases. Consequently, data on the practical implementation of biological treatment remain scarce. In addition, long-term effects, impact on co-morbidities, and impact on live-accentuated vaccination are still unknown. With the introduction of biologicals for AD from the age of six months, potential challenges within the implementation of biologicals may arise. Therefore, we aim to discuss current practical challenges and knowledge gaps of the treatment with biologicals in infants and preschoolers with AD.

Identification of clinical predictors for dupilumab dose spacing in adults with atopic dermatitis: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody against the IL-4/IL-13 receptor-subunit approved for the treatment of moderate-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Some attempts to increase dose interval have been described in both trial and real-world settings.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify predictive clinical and demographic factors affecting patient selection for dose spacing or treatment withdrawal due to satisfactory response.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab for at least 16 weeks. Descriptive statistics were performed to analyze demographic and clinical variables. Logistic regression models were used to identify predictor variables.

RESULTS

A total of 818 adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD was included in the study and 12% (97/818) of them performed dose spacing to 3-4 weeks or treatment withdrawal (8%, 67/818). The presence of non-cutaneous atopic manifestations (OR = 1.59, 95%CI = 1.06-2.38, p = 0.024), prurigo nodularis phenotype (OR = 4.5, 95%CI = 1.87-10.9, p = 0.001) and the age at treatment initiation (OR = 1.82, 95%CI = 1.12-2.94, p = 0.015) were confirmed as the strongest predictors of dose spacing or treatment withdrawal while maintaining dupilumab effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Our findings contribute to define the patient profile that could maintain the therapeutic response after dose spacing or treatment withdrawal.

Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Older Patients (Aged 80 Years and Above) with Atopic Dermatitis: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis presents unique challenges in the older population owing to age-related changes in skin barrier function and immune regulation. However, there is limited evidence on the efficacy and safety of dupilumab, an anti-interleukin-4Rα monoclonal antibody, in patients with atopic dermatitis aged 80 years and above.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of dupilumab treatment in patients with atopic dermatitis aged 80 years and above.

METHODS

Twenty-eight older patients received dupilumab and were evaluated based on several clinical parameters, including the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DELI), and AD Control Tool (ACT). Safety assessments and monitoring of concomitant medication use were conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients completed 16 weeks of treatment, 13 completed 28 weeks, and two completed more than 36 weeks. Dupilumab treatment resulted in a significant improvement in atopic dermatitis symptoms after 16 weeks as demonstrated by reduced EASI, NRS, DLQI, and ADCT scores. Dupilumab had no significant impact on underlying diseases or medication use. No common adverse reactions, such as conjunctivitis and erythema of the face and neck, were identified. Among the 26 patients receiving dupilumab treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic, 17 remained uninfected or experienced milder COVID-19 symptoms than experienced in the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

Dupilumab treatment showed significant efficacy in improving atopic dermatitis symptoms in patients aged 80 years and above with a high level of safety. Larger long-term clinical trials are needed to validate these results and provide further evidence for the use of dupilumab in older patients with atopic dermatitis.

Two-year results of tapered dupilumab for CRSwNP demonstrates enduring efficacy established in the first 6 months

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab is an anti-T2-inflammatory biological registered for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), indicated by integrated CRS-care pathways when optimal medico-surgical treatment yields insufficient CRS control. This study aims to evaluate long-term results with focus on established therapeutic efficacy while tapering dupilumab.

METHODS

Real-life, prospective observational cohort study in single tertiary referral center with add-on dupilumab as primary biological treatment in adult (≥18 years) biological-naïve CRSwNP patients per the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS)2020-indication with a 2-year follow-up. Tapering (increasing interdose interval) applied every 24 weeks, conditional to sufficient treatment response and CRS control.

RESULTS

Mean scores (s.d.) of all co-primary outcomes improved significantly from baseline ( 228) to the 48 ( 214) and 96-weeks ( 99) timepoints: Nasal Polyp Score (0-8) improved from 5,3 (1,9) to 1,4 (1,8) and 1,3 (1,7); SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 (0-110) improved from 53,6 (19,6) to 20,2 (15,4) and 21,2 (15,6); Sniffin'Sticks-12 identification test (0-12; 0-6 anosmia, 7-10 hyposmia, 11-12 normosmia) improved from 3,7 (2,4) to 7,7 (2,9) and 7,3 (3,04); Asthma Control Test (5-25; >19 indicating well-controlled asthma) improved from 18,5 (4,8) to 21,8 (3,8) and 21,4 (3,9). Tapering was feasible in 79,5% of the patients at the 24-weeks timepoint, and in 93,7% and 95,8% at the 48- and 96-weeks timepoints, respectively. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA demonstrated no significant alterations of individual co-primary outcome mean-scores from 24 weeks onward.

CONCLUSION

This first long-term real-life prospective observational cohort study shows high therapeutic efficacy of dupilumab for severe CRswNP in the first 2 years. Therapeutic efficacy is principally established within 24 weeks and endures while tapering dupilumab conditional to treatment response and CRS control.

Successful tapering of dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis with low disease activity: a large pragmatic daily practice study from the BioDay registry

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available regarding patient-centred dosing of dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) in daily practice.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate our patient-centred dupilumab dosing regimen in daily practice, to assess prognostic factors for successful tapering and to estimate medication-related cost savings.

METHODS

This prospective multicentre study included adult patients with AD, participating in the BioDay registry, treated with dupilumab for ≥ 1.3 years. Interval prolongation was considered in the case of dupilumab standard dose for ≥ 1 year and persistent controlled AD [Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≤ 7; ≥ 6 months]. Primary endpoints were the mean EASI and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-pruritus after the start of tapering. Prognostic factors for successful tapering were analysed with logistic regression and a cost-savings analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 595 patients were included, of whom 401 patients [mean EASI 2.5 (SD 2.3); NRS-pruritus of 2.4 (SD 1.9) at the start of tapering] prolonged their dupilumab interval. In 83.3% of these patients tapering was successful; most patients used dupilumab every 3 or 4 weeks (Q3W/Q4W). A significant small increase was observed for EASI (highest mean 3.5) and NRS-pruritus (highest mean 3.2) (P < 0.001); however, scores remained low. Predicting successful tapering showed nonsignificant odds ratios for all incorporated variables. The estimated cost savings was €3 977 033.98 for 401 patients between January 2019 and June 2022.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed successful tapering of dupilumab in 83.3% of patients with AD who attempted tapering, while maintaining controlled disease and with the majority using Q3W/Q4W. Interval prolongation can be beneficial both for the patient and from a socio-economic perspective.

How to Understand Personalized Medicine in Atopic Dermatitis Nowadays?

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a heterogeneous disease in terms of its phenotypical, barrier, and immunological presentation. Emerging therapies are undoubtedly contributing to a new chapter in the treatment of AD, bringing an excellent possibility of individualization, and thereby creating a tailored approach. The two most promising substance groups are biological drugs (dupilumab, tralokinumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) (baricitinib, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib). The vision that certain well-defined phenotypes and endotypes, as well as personal preferences, may guide the future treatment of AD is both tempting and appealing, but not yet reality. The accessibility of new drugs such as biologics and small molecules has opened up the discussion regarding personalized medicine, referring to the complex nature of AD as well as the experiences from clinical trials and real-world evidence. We have now reached the point of creating new strategies and AD treatment goals by increasing the amount of new information concerning the efficacy and safety of new drugs. This article has reviewed the novel treatment options for AD in the light of the heterogeneity of this disease and proposes a broader vision on the strategy of personalized treatment of AD.

Dupilumab dose spacing after initial successful treatment or adverse events in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: A retrospective analysis

Strategies on long-term management of patients affected by atopic dermatitis (AD) undergoing treatment with dupilumab achieving good clinical response (GCR) or experiencing dupilumab-related adverse events (AEs) are scant. Data of patients who implemented longer than scheduled dupilumab dosing interval due to GCR (at least 52 weeks of treatment and controlled AD activity [Eczema Area Severity Index ≤7 and Dermatology Life Quality Index ≤5 for at least 6 months]) or AEs (dupilumab-related and treatment-resistant conjunctivitis) were retrospectively collected. Dupilumab was tapered to Q3W or Q4W based on physician-patient shared decision. At baseline (T0) and each follow-up (week 16 [T1] and week 32 [T2]) disease severity was assessed. A total of 59 patients implemented longer than scheduled dosing interval (44 GCR, 15 AEs). Among these, 50 (35 GCR and 15 conjunctivitis) patients switched to 300 mg Q3W, while nine GCR subjects to Q4W. In the GCR group Q3W, 34 and 31 patients maintained clinical response at T1 and T2, whereas eight and seven Q4W subjects maintained clinical response at the same timepoints, respectively. No significant differences in AD severity were observed between T1 and T2 in both groups. Contrariwise, one Q3W and one Q4W patients at T1, and three Q3W and one Q4W subjects at T2, returned to dupilumab labeled dosage due to AD worsening. In conjunctivitis group, dupilumab Q3W was maintained in eight and four patients at T1 and T2, respectively. Three patients at T1 and three at T2 subjects returned to the labeled interval due to conjunctivitis remission. Four patients at T1 and four subjects at T2 interrupted dupilumab due to the persistence of conjunctivitis. A longer dupilumab dosing interval may be a valuable option in patients with a GCR and may be a useful strategy to reduce treatment-related conjunctivitis, also with pharmacoeconomic benefit.