The effect of intra‐operative passive movement therapy on non‐surgical site pain after breast reconstructive surgery: a preliminary study

Improved patient outcomes using the enhanced recovery pathway in breast microsurgical reconstruction: a UK experience

Introduction

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway is a protocol aimed at optimizing patient care by reducing the physiological alterations caused by surgery, thus reducing recovery time, surgical morbidities and length of stay. This study assessed the impact of ERAS on patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction.

Methods

Patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction over an eight-month period were retrospectively examined. LOS, complication rates and perioperative outcomes were analysed. Results were compared between patients admitted on the traditional recovery after surgery (TRAS) and the ERAS pathways.

Results

One hundred and thirty-eight patients were included. Seventy-two patients were admitted on the TRAS pathway and 66 patients on the ERAS pathway. There was no difference in median LOS (4 days) between the two groups, p = 0.48. We noted a significant reduction in the total number of major complications (ERAS 11%, TRAS 24% p = 0.04) as well as significant differences in time to catheter removal, time to independent mobilisation, total opioid usage and time to removal of PCA, all in favour of the ERAS group. There was a non-significant reduction in return to theatre and readmission rate in the ERAS group (11% versus 21% p = 0.1 and 6% versus 11% p = 0.29 respectively). Obesity and complications were predictors of a prolonged LOS.

Conclusion

The ERAS pathway reduced overall and major complication rates in a tertiary centre using an already streamlined service. Adoption of ERAS pathways to reduce surgical morbidities and improve patient care is encouraged. Further work is required to optimise enhanced recovery in breast microsurgical reconstruction.

Prevention of perioperative limb neuropathies in abdominal free flap breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Perioperative peripheral neuropathies are a significant cause of post-operative morbidity in patients undergoing prolonged procedures. The aims of this study were to determine the incidence and possible causes of peripheral neuropathy in patients undergoing abdominal free flap breast reconstruction and to develop methods of ameliorating this problem.

METHODS

A 4-year retrospective study of patients undergoing abdominal free flap breast reconstruction by a single surgeon and anaesthetist was undertaken to determine the incidence and potential causes of perioperative neuropathy. A new positioning protocol was introduced to minimise the stretch on the brachial plexus and to protect peripheral nerves from compression forces. In addition, regular intraoperative physiotherapy was introduced. A prospective study was then conducted on patients managed by the same team to evaluate the effect of this change in practice on the subsequent incidence of peripheral neuropathies.

RESULTS

Over the 4-year retrospective period, 93 consecutive patients underwent abdominal free flap breast reconstruction, six of whom (6.5%) developed a peripheral neuropathy. Following the introduction of the new positioning protocol, prospective data collected on 65 consecutive patients showed no further occurrences of perioperative neuropathy (p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in the characteristics between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative peripheral neuropathy in abdominal free flap breast reconstruction is a preventable problem. This paper presents a peripheral neuropathy prevention protocol for managing these patients.