1
|
Levine M, Brent J, Wiegand T, Maguire B, Cohen N, Vaerrier D, Beuhler M, Leikin JB, Ganetsky M, Stellpflug S, Ruha AM, Carey J, Geib AJ, Cao DJ, Kleinschmidt K, Vohra R, Riley BD, Moore P, Schwarz E, Neavyn M, Rusyniak DE, Greene S, Nogar J, Manini A, Wermuth M, Pizon A, Hendrickson RG, Griswold M, Aldy K, Wax P, Spyres MB, Campleman S, Macdonald E, Finkelstein Y. Lipid emulsion therapy during management of the critically-ill poisoned patient: a prospective cohort study. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2023; 61:584-590. [PMID: 37655788 DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2023.2248372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite conflicting data, intravenous lipid emulsion has emerged as a potential antidote. The "lipid sink" theory suggests that following intravenous administration of lipid, lipophilic drugs are sequestered in the vascular compartment, thereby reducing their tissue concentrations. This study sought to determine if survival is associated with the intoxicant's degree of lipophilicity. METHODS We reviewed all cases in the Toxicology Investigators Consortium's lipid sub-registry between May 2012 through December 2018. Information collected included demographics, exposure circumstances, clinical course, management, disposition, and outcome. The primary outcome was survival after lipid emulsion therapy. Survival was stratified by the log of the intoxicant's octanol-water partition coefficient. We also assessed the association between intoxicant lipophilicity and an increase in systolic blood pressure after lipid emulsion administration. RESULTS We identified 134 patients, including 81 (60.4%) females. The median age was 40 years (interquartile range 21-75). One hundred and eight (80.6%) patients survived, including 45 (33.6%) with cardiac arrest during their intoxication. Eighty-two (61.2%) were hypotensive, and 98 (73.1%) received mechanical ventilation. There was no relationship between survival and the log of the partition coefficient of the intoxicant on linear analysis (P = 0.89) or polynomial model (P = 0.10). Systolic blood pressure increased in both groups. The median (interquartile range) systolic blood pressure before lipid administration was 68 (60-78) mmHg for those intoxicants with a log partition coefficient < 3.6 compared with 89 (76-104) mmHg after lipid administration. Among those drugs with a log partition coefficient > 3.6, the median (interquartile range) was 69 (60-84) mmHg before lipid and 89 (80-96) mmHg after lipid administration. CONCLUSION Most patients in this cohort survived. Lipophilicity was not correlated with survival or the observed changes in blood pressure. The study did not address the efficacy of lipid emulsion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Levine
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Timothy Wiegand
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Medical Toxicology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Bryan Maguire
- The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Neta Cohen
- The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Vaerrier
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | | | - Jerrold B Leikin
- Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Science and the Occupational and Environmental Medicine Service of UI Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael Ganetsky
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Medical Toxicology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Samuel Stellpflug
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Regions Hospital, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | - Anne-Michelle Ruha
- Department of Medical Toxicology, Banner University Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Jennifer Carey
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts, Worchester, MA, USA
| | | | - Dazhe James Cao
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Medical Toxicology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Kurt Kleinschmidt
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Medical Toxicology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Rais Vohra
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Medical Toxicology, University of California San Francisco-Fresno Medical Center, Fresno, CA, USA
| | - Brad D Riley
- Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Phillip Moore
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Evan Schwarz
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Medical Toxicology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Mark Neavyn
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Daniel E Rusyniak
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Medical Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Spencer Greene
- Department of Emergency Medicine, HCA Houston Healthcare - Kingwood, University of Houston College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joshua Nogar
- Department of Emergency Medicine, North Shore University, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Alex Manini
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Medical Toxicology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Elmhurst Hospital Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary Wermuth
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Medical Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Anthony Pizon
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Medical Toxicology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Robert G Hendrickson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Medical Toxicology, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Matthew Griswold
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Kim Aldy
- American College of Medical Toxicology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Paul Wax
- American College of Medical Toxicology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Meghan Beth Spyres
- Department of Medical Toxicology, Banner University Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Erin Macdonald
- The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yaron Finkelstein
- The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu Y, Zhang J, Yu P, Niu J, Yu S. Mechanisms and Efficacy of Intravenous Lipid Emulsion Treatment for Systemic Toxicity From Local Anesthetics. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:756866. [PMID: 34820396 PMCID: PMC8606423 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.756866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Local anesthetics are widely used clinically for perioperative analgesia to achieve comfort in medical treatment. However, when the concentration of local anesthetics in the blood exceeds the tolerance of the body, local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) will occur. With the development and popularization of positioning technology under direct ultrasound, the risks and cases of LAST associated with direct entry of the anesthetic into the blood vessel have been reduced. Clinical occurrence of LAST usually presents as a series of severe toxic reactions such as myocardial depression, which is life-threatening. In addition to basic life support (airway management, advanced cardiac life support, etc.), intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) has been introduced as a treatment option in recent years and has gradually become the first-line treatment for LAST. This review introduces the mechanisms of LAST and identifies the clinical symptoms displayed by the central nervous system and cardiovascular system. The paper features the multimodal mechanism of LAST reversal by ILE, describes research progress in the field, and identifies other anesthetics involved in the resuscitation process of LAST. Finally, the review presents key issues in lipid therapy. Although ILE has achieved notable success in the treatment of LAST, adverse reactions and contraindications also exist; therefore, ILE requires a high degree of attention during use. More in-depth research on the treatment mechanism of ILE, the resuscitation dosage and method of ILE, and the combined use with other resuscitation measures is needed to improve the efficacy and safety of clinical resuscitation after LAST in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
- Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
- Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang, China
| | - Peng Yu
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Jiangfeng Niu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
- Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang, China
| | - Shuchun Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
- Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|