Dual-targeting fucoidan-based microvesicle for arterial thrombolysis and re-occlusion inhibition

Arterial thrombosis is a critical thrombotic disease that poses a significant threat to human health. However, the existing clinical treatment of arterial thrombosis lacks effective targeting and precise drug release capability. In this study, we developed a system for targeted delivery and on-demand release in arterial thrombosis treatment. The carrier was constructed using chitosan (CS) and fucoidan (Fu) through layer-by-layer assembly, with subsequent surface modification using cRGD peptide. Upon encapsulation of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), the resulting therapeutic drug delivery system, uPA-CS/Fu@cRGD, demonstrated dual-targeting abilities towards P-selectin and αIIbβ3, as well as pH and platelet-responsive release properties. Importantly, we have demonstrated that the dual targeting effect exhibits higher targeting efficiency at shear rates simulating thrombosed arterial conditions (1800 s-1) compared to single targeting for the first time. In the mouse common iliac artery model, uPA-CS/Fu@cRGD exhibited great thrombolytic capability while promoting the down-regulation of coagulation factors (FXa and PAI-1) and inflammatory factors (TNF-α and IL-6), thus improving the thrombus microenvironment and exerting potential in preventing re-occlusion. Our dual-target and dual-responsive, fucoidan-based macrovesicle represent a promising platform for advanced drug target delivery applications, with potential to prevent coagulation tendencies as well as improving thrombolytic and reducing the risk of re-occlusion.

General Anesthesia Compared With Non-GA in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke is either performed under general anesthesia (GA) or with non-GA techniques such as conscious sedation or local anesthesia alone. Previous small meta-analyses have demonstrated superior recanalization rates and improved functional recovery with GA when compared with non-GA techniques. The publication of further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) could provide updated guidance when choosing between GA and non-GA techniques.

METHODS

A systematic search for trials in which stroke EVT patients were randomized to GA or non-GA was performed in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A systematic review and meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. These trials included a total of 980 participants (GA, N = 487; non-GA, N = 493). GA improves recanalization by 9.0% (GA 84.6% vs non-GA 75.6%; odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.26-2.42, p = 0.0009), and the proportion of patients with functional recovery improves by 8.4% (GA 44.6% vs non-GA 36.2%; OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.04-1.98, p = 0.03). There was no difference in hemorrhagic complications or 3-month mortality.

DISCUSSION

In patients with ischemic stroke treated with EVT, GA is associated with higher recanalization rates and improved functional recovery at 3 months compared with non-GA techniques. Conversion to GA and subsequent intention-to-treat analysis will underestimate the true therapeutic benefit. GA is established as effective in improving recanalization rates in EVT (7 Class 1 studies) with a high Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) certainty rating. GA is established as effective in improving functional recovery at 3 months in EVT (5 Class 1 studies) with a moderate GRADE certainty rating. Stroke services need to develop pathways to incorporate GA as the first choice for most EVT procedures in acute ischemic stroke with a level A recommendation for recanalization and level B recommendation for functional recovery.

Inhalational versus Intravenous General Anesthesia for mechanical thrombectomy for stroke: A single centre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

When general anesthesia is used for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), the choice of anesthetic agents for maintenance remains inconclusive. The different effects of intravenous anesthetic and volatiles agents on cerebral hemodynamics are known and may explain differences in outcomes of patients with cerebral pathologies exposed to the different anesthetic modalities. In this single institutional retrospective study, we assessed the impact of total intravenous (TIVA) and inhalational anesthesia on outcomes after EVT.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients ≥ 18 years who underwent EVT for AIS of the anterior or posterior circulation under general anesthesia. Baseline patient characteristics, anesthetic agents, intra operative hemodynamics, stroke characteristics, time intervals and clinical outcome data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 191 patients. After excluding 76 patients who were lost to follow up at 90 days, 51 patients received inhalational anesthesia and 64 patients who received TIVA were analyzed. The clinical characteristics between the groups were comparable. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of outcome measures for TIVA versus inhalational anesthesia showed significantly increased odds of good functional outcome (mRS 0-2) at 90 days (adjusted odds ratio, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.25-8.36; p = 0.015) and a non-significant trend towards decreased mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.73; CI, 0.15-3.6; p = 0.70).

CONCLUSION

Patients who had TIVA for mechanical thrombectomy had significantly increased odds of good functional outcome at 90 days and a non-significant trend towards decrease in mortality. These findings warrant further investigation with large randomized, prospective trials.

Updates in mechanical thrombectomy

Stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. The advent of mechanical thrombectomy has largely improved patient outcomes. This article reviews the features and outcomes associated with aspiration, stent retrievers, and combination catheters used in current practice. There is also a discussion on clinical considerations based on anatomical features and clot composition. The reperfusion grading scale and outcome metrics commonly used following thrombectomy when a patient is still in the hospital are reviewed. Lastly, there are proposed discharge and outpatient follow-up goals in caring for patients hospitalized for a stroke.

End the confusion: general anaesthesia improves patient outcomes in endovascular thrombectomy

Expert physiological and pharmacological care by anaesthetists is required in all stroke endovascular thrombectomy cases. RCTs show clinical benefits in recanalisation rates and functional recovery after endovascular thrombectomy with general anaesthesia compared with sedation. Many stroke centres will require wholesale reorganisation of stroke pathways to ensure anaesthesia services are available for all cases. Anaesthetists have an integral role in improving clinical outcomes in large vessel occlusion stroke.