Surgical management of chronic subdural haematoma: looking beyond anaesthetic technique

Local anesthesia versus general anesthesia for surgical drainage of chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The optimal anesthetic technique for surgical drainage of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is still uncertain. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if local anesthesia with or without sedation (LA) or general anesthesia (GA) results in better outcomes for surgical drainage of CSDH.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective or retrospective studies that compared GA vs LA for adult patients undergoing surgical drainage of CSDH and reported at least one outcome of interest. Primary outcomes of interest included total duration of surgery, recurrence rate, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included intraoperative adverse events, postoperative complications, and postoperative mortality.

RESULTS

Eight studies (1,542 patients; 926 LA; 616 GA) were included-two were RCTs and six were observational studies. Pooling the estimates of all available studies, we found that LA was associated with a decreased mean LOS by about two days (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.47 to -0.77; P = 0.01; low certainty of evidence) as well as a lower risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.58; P = 0.004; very low certainty of evidence). There was no significant difference in terms of duration of surgery, recurrence rate, intraoperative adverse events, or mortality. The quality of the observational studies was poor to fair, largely because of heterogeneity among the studies. Among the RCTs, one had a low risk of bias and one was deemed to be at high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Local anesthesia with/without sedation for surgical drainage of CSDH may be associated with a shorter LOS, and lower postoperative complications. As most of our included studies were observational in nature, our results should be interpreted as summaries of unadjusted group comparisons. In view of the low certainty of evidence, higher quality evidence is required to corroborate these findings.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42022333388); first submitted 1 June 2022.

The Drainage Dysfunction of Meningeal Lymphatic Vessels Is Correlated with the Recurrence of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: a Prospective Study

Meningeal lymphatic vessels (mLVs) were recently discovered to be involved in the waste drainage process in the brain, which has also been associated with a variety of neurological diseases. This research paper hypothesizes that the drainage function of mLVs may be affected after chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) and the alterations of mLVs' drainage may predict CSDH recurrence. In this prospective observational study, unenhanced 3D T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (3D T2-FLAIR) MRI data were collected from CSDH patients and healthy participants for analysis. Patients with CSDH who underwent surgery received MRI scans before and after surgery, whereas healthy controls and patients with CSDH who received pharmaceutical treatment received only one MRI scan at enrollment. The signal unit ratio (SUR) of mLVs were then measured according to the MRI data and calculated to define mLVs' drainage function. Finally, the relationship between mLVs' drainage function and CSDH recurrence was analyzed accordingly. Thirty-four participants were enrolled in this study, including 27 CSDH patients and 7 controls. The SUR of mLVs in all CSDH patients changed significantly before and after surgery. Moreover, the drainage function of the mLVs ipsilateral to hematoma (mLVs-IH) in CSDH patients was significantly lower than that in the controls (p < 0.05). Last, a higher improvement rate of the drainage function of the mLVs-IH is correlated to a lower risk of recurrence (p < 0.05). This study revealed the mLVs' drainage dysfunction after CSDH through non-invasive MRI. Furthermore, the drainage function of mLVs is an independent predictive factor of CSDH recurrence.

Clinical efficacy of minimally invasive puncture and drainage versus trepanation and drainage for chronic subdural hematoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive puncture and drainage (MIPD) versus trepanation and drainage in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang database were searched for studies on the treatment of CSDH by MIPD and trepanation and drainage. By reading the title, abstract and full text, and screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the qualified articles were confirmed. Subsequently, the literature quality was evaluated based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, and the data of the research subjects and the primary outcome measures were extracted for meta-analysis with RevMan 5.1 software.

RESULTS

Ten articles were included, with a total of 1000 patients. According to the meta-analysis, the 2 groups showed no statistical difference in CSDH recurrence rate (P > .05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of postoperative adverse reactions were lower and the cure rate was higher in the MIPD group compared with trepanation and drainage group (all P < .05). By drawing the funnel plot of the outcome measures with heterogeneity, it can be seen that the distribution on both sides of the funnel was basically symmetrical, suggesting a low deviation possibility of the analysis results and reliable reference significance of our findings.

CONCLUSION

Compared with trepanation and drainage, MIPD has better clinical effects and higher safety in treating CSDH and can effectively reduce surgery-induced damage, which is worth popularizing in clinical practice.