Onco-testicular sperm extraction: birth of a healthy baby after fertility preservation in synchronous bilateral testicular cancer and azoospermia

Case report: remedial microdissection testicular sperm extraction after onco-microdissection testicular sperm extraction failure

BACKGROUND

Testicular cancer (TC) mostly occurs in men aged 14 to 44. Studies have shown that TC seriously damages male fertility, and 6% to 24% of patients with TC were even found to suffer from azoospermia when they are diagnosed. At present, some studies have pointed out that onco-microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) can extract sperm from tumor testicles. However, there are almost no reports on remedial measures after onco-mTESE failure. Given the valuable opportunity for fertility preservation in patients with TC and azoospermia, it is necessary to provide effective remedial methods for patients with failed onco-mTESE.

METHODS

Two young men, who were diagnosed with TC and also found to have azoospermia, tried onco-mTESE while undergoing radical orchiectomy for fertility preservation. However, sperm extraction failed in both patients. Subsequently, the isolated testicular tissue of the patient in case 1 suffered from TC again, and the patient in case 2 was scheduled to receive multiple cycles of gonadotoxic chemotherapy. Because both had a plan to have a birth in the future, we performed remedial mTESE.

RESULTS

Sperm was successfully extracted from both patients. The patient recovered well, without complications. The patient couple in case 1 underwent 1 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle but did not achieve clinical pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

There is still an opportunity to extract sperm successfully using onco-mTESE, despite the difficulty of fertility preservation in TC patients with azoospermia. If sperm extraction from the tumor testis fails, implementing remedial mTESE as early as possible would likely preserve the last chance of fertility for these patients.

Onco-TESE (Testicular Sperm Extraction): Insights from a Tertiary Center and Comprehensive Literature Analysis

Background and Objectives: The peak of incidence of testicular cancer (TC) occurs among individuals in their reproductive age, emphasizing the importance of fertility preservation as an integral aspect of disease management. Sperm cryopreservation performed before orchiectomy is ineffective in azoospermic men, necessitating alternative approaches such as microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) at the time of orchiectomy (onco-mTESE) to obtain viable sperm. This study presents the findings from our institution's experience with onco-mTESE and critically discusses our results in light of the existing body of literature. Materials and Methods: This is a tertiary center retrospective analysis of onco-mTESE procedures performed at a single center between December 2011 and July 2022. The included patients were post-puberal men with testicular tumors requiring orchiectomy, along with concomitant severe oligozoospermia or azoospermia. Bilateral mTESE was performed in all cases. Surgical outcomes, sperm retrieval rates, the usage of preserved viable sperm, assistive reproductive techniques' results, and post-operative serum testosterone were recorded. Results: A total of nine patients were included, with a median age of 34 (IQR 29-36) years. All patients had germ cell tumors (GCTs), with seminomatous and non-seminomatous GCTs accounting for 44.4% (n = 4) and 55.6% (n = 5) of patients, respectively. Sperm retrieval occurred in three (33%) patients: one patient in the ipsilateral testis, one in the contralateral testis, and one in both testes. No complications were reported during the procedure, and no post-operative hypogonadism was observed. Among the three patients with successful sperm retrieval, an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was performed in two patients, resulting in two pregnancies, leading to one healthy live birth and one miscarriage. Conclusions: In the context of TC, it is essential to conduct a thorough evaluation of testicular function, including a semen analysis and cryopreservation. Onco-mTESE has proven its safety in preserving fertility in azoospermic cases while ensuring the efficacy of oncological treatment.

What should be done in terms of fertility preservation for patients with cancer? The French 2021 guidelines

AIM

To provide practice guidelines about fertility preservation (FP) in oncology.

METHODS

We selected 400 articles after a PubMed review of the literature (1987-2019).

RECOMMENDATIONS

Any child, adolescent and adult of reproductive age should be informed about the risk of treatment gonadotoxicity. In women, systematically proposed FP counselling between 15 and 38 years of age in case of treatment including bifunctional alkylating agents, above 6 g/m2 cyclophosphamide equivalent dose (CED), and for radiation doses on the ovaries ≥3 Gy. For postmenarchal patients, oocyte cryopreservation after ovarian stimulation is the first-line FP technique. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation should be discussed as a first-line approach in case of treatment with a high gonadotoxic risk, when chemotherapy has already started and in urgent cases. Ovarian transposition is to be discussed prior to pelvic radiotherapy involving a high risk of premature ovarian failure. For prepubertal girls, ovarian tissue cryopreservation should be proposed in the case of treatment with a high gonadotoxic risk. In pubertal males, sperm cryopreservation must be systematically offered to any male who is to undergo cancer treatment, regardless of toxicity. Testicular tissue cryopreservation must be proposed in males unable to cryopreserve sperm who are to undergo a treatment with intermediate or severe risk of gonadotoxicity. In prepubertal boys, testicular tissue preservation is: - recommended for chemotherapy with a CED ≥7500 mg/m2 or radiotherapy ≥3 Gy on both testicles. - proposed for chemotherapy with a CED ≥5.000 mg/m2 or radiotherapy ≥2 Gy. If several possible strategies, the ultimate choice is made by the patient.

Microdissection oncoTESE (micro-oncoTESE) in azoospermic men with suspected testicular cancer: Analysis of outcomes from a specialist centre

Objective:

The main aim of this study was to report the outcomes of azoospermic men with suspicious testicular lesions, undergoing microsurgical sperm retrieval (micro-oncoTESE) at the time of radical/partial orchidectomy.

Patients and methods:

Testicular lesions suspicious for cancer were confirmed on ultrasound scanning. In patients undergoing radical inguinal orchidectomy, ex vivo microdissection of the unaffected testicular parenchyma was performed. Microdissection was performed in vivo for partial orchidectomy. The primary outcome measure was surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) rate.

Results:

A total of 33 patients (median age 33 years, interquartile range (IQR) 22) with suspected testicular cancer (TCa) underwent micro-oncoTESE. Histological analysis confirmed TCa in 26 patients and benign pathology in 7 patients. The overall SSR rate was 39%. Sub-analysis of patients with TCa and benign histology found that the SSR was 46% and 14%, respectively. There was no significant difference in maximum tumour length between successful and unsuccessful SSR groups 33.9 mm ± 23 (SD) versus 29.8 mm ± 17.5 (SD) ( p = 0.62).

Conclusion:

Based on our cohort, micro-oncoTESE provides an option for sperm retrieval in azoospermic men with testicular lesions.

Onco-Testicular Sperm Extraction (oncoTESE): A Contemporary Concept Review and Report of Australian Sperm Retrieval Rates and Fertility Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To assess sperm retrieval rates of Onco-Testicular Sperm Extraction (oncoTESE) in men with testicular tumors and coexisting severe spermatogenic impairment.

METHODS

Multi-centre Australian wide retrospective review of oncoTESE procedures performed within the last 10 years. Patients were postpubertal adults having a testicular tumor requiring orchidectomy, with severe oligozoospermia or nonobstructive azoospermia. Ipsilateral testicular sperm extraction was performed following radical inguinal orchidectomy. A contralateral micro-testicular sperm extraction was performed if no sperm or insufficient amounts were initially achieved. Surgical sperm retrieval rates, live birth rates and post operative serum testosterone were recorded.

RESULTS

Four surgeons compiled a total 13 patients. The mean age was 34.9 years. Seven of 13 were germ cell tumor (GCT), 4 of 13 had non-GCT and 2 of 13 contained benign lesions. Twelve of 13 patients were azoospermic and 1 was severely oligozoospermic. Sperm was found in 6 of 7 GCT patients; 3 of 7 were found in the ipsilateral testis whilst the remaining 4 underwent contralateral micro-testicular sperm extraction; sperm was retrieved in 3 of 4. The respective mean pre and post orchidectomy testosterone was 12.0 vs 14.1nmol/L (GCT cohort). Cryopreserved sperm has been used in assisted reproduction in 2 of 13 patients, with median follow up of 38.7 months. Including use of both cryopreserved and fresh sperm, 6 pregnancies were achieved, including 5 healthy live births and 1 miscarriage.

CONCLUSION

OncoTESE appears feasible, with acceptable sperm retrieval and subsequent live birth rates, following assisted reproduction. Despite significant underutilisation in the Australian population, oncoTESE should be considered in the management for TC patients with severe oligozoospermia, or nonobstructive azoospermia.

Synchronous bilateral testicular cancer with discordant histopathology occurring in a 20-year-old patient: A case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Bilateral testicular tumors are very rare, accounting for 1%-5% of all testicular germ-cell tumors (TGCTs). The vast majority of primary bilateral TGCTs are metachronous, with synchronous tumors comprising approximately 0.5%-1% of all cases. Those occurring synchronously share mostly the same histological pattern, predominantly seminoma, with synchronous bilateral TGCTs (SBTGCTs) with discordant subtypes being extremely rare.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 20-year-old male complaining of a palpable painless right testicular mass incidentally noticed during sexual intercourse. Ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the scrotum demonstrated bilateral testicular lesions, while staging with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) exhibited normal findings. Right radical orchiectomy and left testis-sparing surgery (TSS) with concomitant onco-testicular sperm extraction (onco-TESE) were initially performed. Histology of the right testis revealed a mixed germ-cell tumor, consisting of seminoma and embryonal carcinoma, while that from the left testis disclosed embryonal carcinoma and intratubular germ-cell neoplasia unclassified (IGCNU) infiltrating the surgical margins. Hence, left orchiectomy was subsequently scheduled with histology unveiling IGCNU in the greatest part of the remaining testicular parenchyma. Following adjuvant chemotherapy, with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP), the patient received testosterone replacement therapy and remained free of recurrence at an 18-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights both the rarity of a bilateral testicular tumor's synchronous appearance and its extremely infrequent discordant histopathology. A comprehensive review of the major series of SBTGCTs with discordant histology cited in the literature is additionally presented.

[Onco-TESE and testicular cancer]

INTRODUCTION

Fertility preservation is essential before cancer treatment. When ejaculated sperm preservation is not possible, testicular tissue can be surgically collected by Onco-TESE technic (Oncological Testicular Sperm Extraction) to isolate sperm. We report on our experience with Onco-TESE in testicular cancer patients at the Rouen University Hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Retrospective study including all pubescent men, treated for testicular cancer, uni- or bilateral, before any carcinological therapy, who have undergone Onco-TESE at the Rouen University Hospital. Fragment weight, detection of sperm or its precursors were analysed. A histological interpretation of the testicular tumor was carried out. For each positive sample, straws were kept at the French Sperm Bank.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients had an Onco-TESE: 58.34% severe sperm alteration (SSA) and 41.36% sperm collection failure (SCF), between 1996 and 2019. The mean age was 26.6 (±5.29) years. The mean procedure and length of stay were 71minutes (±30.7) and 3.75 days (±2.83), respectively. The rate of positive testicular biopsies (TB) was 58.33% overall and 66,67% in the case of TB on tumour testis. One patient had a Clavian-Dindo III complication. The mean number of straws preserved per patient was 14.28 (±15.34) for 7.14% use.

CONCLUSION

Our results seem to confirm that Onco-TESE is an effective solution for preserving fertility in men with testicular cancer in cases of SSA or SCF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

A case of congenital single testis with testicular cancer patient and azoospermia who was able to collect spermatozoa with ipsilateral Onco-TESE

Onco-TESE is a useful strategy for cancer patients with a congenital single testis who wish to preserve their fertility.

Fertility considerations in men with testicular cancer

The modern approach to cancer management has evolved into a multidisciplinary initiative focused not only on cancer specific and overall survival, but also patient quality of life and survivorship. Future fertility is often a major concern for young patients undergoing cancer therapy. Fertility preservation has emerged as a viable but significantly underutilized option. Patients and families should be aware of the varying effects of antineoplastic therapy on their future fertility to allow for an informed decision regarding their fertility preservation options. In this review we discuss the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of fertility in the setting of testicular cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Testicular germ cell tumor: a comprehensive review

Testicular tumors are the most common tumors in adolescent and young men and germ cell tumors (TGCTs) account for most of all testicular cancers. Increasing incidence of TGCTs among males provides strong motivation to understand its biological and genetic basis. Gains of chromosome arm 12p and aneuploidy are nearly universal in TGCTs, but TGCTs have low point mutation rate. It is thought that TGCTs develop from premalignant intratubular germ cell neoplasia that is believed to arise from the failure of normal maturation of gonocytes during fetal or postnatal development. Progression toward invasive TGCTs (seminoma and nonseminoma) then occurs after puberty. Both inherited genetic factors and environmental risk factors emerge as important contributors to TGCT susceptibility. Genome-wide association studies have so far identified more than 30 risk loci for TGCTs, suggesting that a polygenic model fits better with the genetic landscape of the disease. Despite high cure rates because of its particular sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy, exploration of mechanisms underlying the occurrence, progression, metastasis, recurrence, chemotherapeutic resistance, early diagnosis and optional clinical therapeutics without long-term side effects are urgently needed to reduce the cancer burden in this underserved age group. Herein, we present an up-to-date review on clinical challenges, origin and progression, risk factors, TGCT mouse models, serum diagnostic markers, resistance mechanisms, miRNA regulation, and database resources of TGCTs. We appeal that more attention should be paid to the basic research and clinical diagnosis and treatment of TGCTs.

Successful onco-testicular sperm extraction from a testicular cancer patient with a single testis and azoospermia

Onco-testicular sperm extraction is used to preserve fertility in patients with bilateral testicular tumors and azoospermia. We report the case of a testicular tumor in the solitary testis of a patient who had previously undergone successful contralateral orchiectomy and whose sperm was preserved by onco-testicular sperm extraction. A 35-year-old patient presented with swelling of his right scrotum that had lasted for 1 month. His medical history included a contralateral orchiectomy during childhood. Ultrasonography revealed a mosaic echoic area in his scrotum, suggesting a testicular tumor. The lesion was palpated within the normal testicular tissue along its edge and semen analysis showed azoospermia. Radical inguinal orchiectomy and onco-testicular sperm extraction were performed simultaneously. Motile spermatozoa were extracted from normal seminiferous tubules under microscopy and were frozen. Eventual intracytoplasmic sperm injection using the frozen spermatozoa is planned. Onco-testicular sperm extraction is an important fertility preservation method in patients with bilateral testicular tumors or a history of a previous contralateral orchiectomy.

Onco-testicular sperm extraction (Onco-TESE) from a single testis with metachronous bilateral testicular cancer: a case report

Background

Although oncologic testicular sperm extraction (onco-TESE) has been increasingly practiced, the evidence of onco-TESE performed in patients with testicular cancer is insufficient. Furthermore, in bilateral testicular cancer, accounting for 0.5%–1% of testicular cancers, onco-TESE is more challenging and has been insufficiently reported.

Case presentation

Here we report the case of a 25-year-old man who underwent onco-TESE from his residual single testis with a nonseminomatous germ cell tumor that occurred 5 years after orchiectomy of the contralateral testis. A second orchiectomy and simultaneous TESE from the noncancerous testicular tissue were performed. The pathological diagnosis was germ cell tumors, tumors of more than one histological type (embryonal carcinoma, immature teratoma, yolk sac tumor, seminoma, and choriocarcinoma; pT1N0M0). The patient subsequently married and hoped for fatherhood 3 years later. Whereas histological diagnosis of the normal testicular tissue was Johnsen score 6 (maturation arrest), morphologically normal and motile sperms were successfully retrieved from thawed TESE samples and used for multiple cycles of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Although the conception has not been succeeded to date, ICSI attempts have been continuing.

Conclusion

This case demonstrates the effectiveness of onco-TESE for challenging cases such as bilateral and nonseminmatous testicular cancer.

Onco-testicular sperm extraction (onco-TESE) for bilateral testicular tumors: two case reports

Background

Most patients with testicular cancer are infertile; thus, the preservation of the sperm after surgery is an important factor to consider. We report two cases of bilateral testicular cancer in patients who underwent bilateral higher orchiectomy and simultaneous testicular sperm extraction.

Case presentation

Two Asian-Japanese men were referred to our hospital with bilateral testicular tumors. Both of the patients were preoperatively diagnosed with azoospermia and requested testicular sperm extraction at the time of higher orchiectomy. In one patient, sperm was successfully harvested and then frozen. In the other patient, sperm could not be retrieved from the patient’s testis. In both patients, the pathological diagnosis was seminoma. Testicular tumors often occur in patients of reproductive age. The preservation of sperm before chemotherapy or bilateral orchiectomy is necessary for patients with testicular tumors who wish to be fathers.

Conclusions

Onco-testicular sperm extraction might be an option for patients with testicular cancer and azoospermia or severe oligospermia.

New Promising Strategies in Oncofertility

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 70,000 adolescent and young adults (AYA) are diagnosed with cancer each year. While advancements in treatment have led to improved prognosis and survival for patients, these same treatments can adversely affect AYA reproductive capacity. Localized treatments such as surgery and radiation therapy may affect fertility by removing or damaging reproductive organs, and systemic therapies such as chemotherapy can be toxic to gonads, (ovaries and testicles), thus affecting fertility and/or endocrine function. This can be traumatic for AYA with cancer as survivors often express desire to have genetic children and report feelings of regret or depression as a result of infertility caused by cancer treatments.

AREAS COVERED

Emerging technologies in the field of assisted reproductive technology offer new promise for preserving the reproductive capacity of AYA cancer patients prior to treatment as well as providing alternatives for survivors. The following review revisits contemporary approaches to fertility preservation as well newly developing technologies.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

There are several advances in ART that hold promise for patients and survivors. However there are challenges that inhibit uptake including poor communication between providers and patients about risks and fertility preservation options; high costs; and lack of insurance coverage for fertility preservation services.

ONCO-TESE: Obtaining spermatozoa after radical orchiectomy for testicular tumour and azoospermia

OBJECTIVE

There is the possibility of diagnosing azoospermia in cases of testicular tumours in patients who wish to preserve fertility. Our objective is to present a technique for obtaining spermatozoa from testicles with ex vivo tumours in order to preserve fertility in these patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A 34-year-old patient was referred for azoospermia. The physical examination revealed a node in the lower pole of the left testicle. In the scrotal ultrasound, the testicle presented disperse microcalcifications and a 1-cm hypoechoic mass in the lower pole. The tumour markers were negative, and the CT showed no distant disease. Left radical orchiectomy was performed, along with the placement of a testis prosthesis. Bench surgery was then performed, with extraction of the seminiferous tubules in the upper pole.

RESULTS

Of the submitted samples, 4 progressive and 1 nonprogressive motile spermatozoa were identified per field. Two samples were cryopreserved. The pathological report indicated the presence of a seminoma measuring 1.3 × 1 cm, with free margins and with no invasion of the rete testis (stage I). An assisted reproduction technique (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) was performed on the patient's partner with the frozen spermatozoa, which resulted in pregnancy and the subsequent birth of a healthy child.

CONCLUSION

We propose this technique as the method of choice for obtaining spermatozoa from patients who simultaneously present azoospermia and testicular tumours and who wish to preserve their fertility.