Fertility potential in adult men treated for uncorrected bilateral cryptorchidism: A systematic literature review and analysis of case reports

Post-pubertal management of undescended testes from the malignancy risk point of view: a systematic review

Background

Undescended testes (UDT) is a condition where one or both testes is absent in the scrotum. The general age recommendation in which the treatment should be performed is before 18 months old due to the infertility risk and malignancy in later life. In post-pubertal UDT, the current guideline recommends orchiectomy; however, the strength rating of this recommendation is weak. Therefore, this study aimed to provide a systematic review of post-pubertal UDT treatment, focusing on the malignancy risk point of view.

Methods

A systematic search was performed using PubMed, Wiley Online Library and the Cochrane Library up to 5 March 2023. Any study with either post-pubertal orchiectomy or orchidopexy in patients with UDT and reporting the testicular malignancy was included. The exclusion criteria were studies with lack of information of UDT correction time, no history of correction and the full text wasn't available. The data collected were the occurrence of testicular malignancy in post-pubertal UDT patients corrected with any method. Quality and bias assessment was assessed with Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Joanna Briggs Institute tools.

Results

Seven articles (three case reports and four observational studies) were reviewed with a total of 42 patients who underwent post-pubertal correction of either unilateral or bilateral UDT. The correction age ranged from 13 to 34 years old, with follow-up of 48.7-252 months. Among those who developed malignancies, the most common were seminoma, teratoma and carcinoma in situ of the testes. In addition, this study was able to propose an algorithm for post-pubertal UDT treatment strategy.

Conclusions

The scarce resource was the main limitation of this study. Nevertheless, this review showed that post-pubertal UDT management should be tailored individually. Several factors that should be considered include the condition of the contralateral descended testis, UDT location, serum testosterone level, patient's age, comorbidities, and interest in fertility.

Gonadal Function in Boys with Bilateral Undescended Testes

Background

Bilateral undescended testes (BUDT) may be a marker of an underlying condition that affects sex development or maturation.

Aims

To describe the extent of gonadal dysfunction in cases of BUDT who had systematic endocrine and genetic evaluation at a single tertiary pediatric center.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of all boys with BUDT who had endocrine evaluation between 2008 and 2021 at the Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow (RHCG). Continuous variables were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and non-continuous variables using Fisher's exact, via Graphpad Prism v 8.0. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify any associations between groups. A P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 243 bilateral orchidopexies were performed at RHCG between 2008 and 2021. Of these 130 (53%) boys were seen by the endocrine team. The median (range) age at first orchidopexy was 1 year (0.2, 18.0) with 16 (12%) requiring re-do orchidopexy. The median External Masculinization Score of the group was 10 (2, 11) with 33 (25%) having additional genital features. Of the 130 boys, 71 (55%) had extragenital anomalies. Of the 70 who were tested, a genetic abnormality was detected in 38 (54%), most commonly a chromosomal variant in 16 (40%). Of the 100 who were tested, endocrine dysfunction was identified in 38 (38%).

Conclusion

Genetic findings and evidence of gonadal dysfunction are common in boys who are investigated secondary to presentation with BUDT. Endocrine and genetic evaluation should be part of routine clinical management of all cases of BUDT.

A Contemporary Review of Cryptorchidism Management in Adults: A Rare Presentation of Bilateral Cryptorchidism Presenting as Pelvic Pain in an Adult Patient

This case report presents a rare case of adult cryptorchidism, found incidentally in a 25-year-old gentleman who initially presented with abdominal and suprapubic pain and was successfully treated with staged orchidopexy. To our knowledge, to date, our case is the first published instance of bilateral cryptorchidism in an adult presenting with nonspecific suprapubic pain. Cryptorchidism is the most common genital abnormality in newborn boys, and due to its association with an increased risk of infertility and malignancy, current management involves surgical correction with orchidopexy by 12 to 18 months of life. Adult presentation of cryptorchidism is very unusual due to early intervention; therefore, bilateral cryptorchidism is even more rare. As a result, current guidelines do not address proper management for adult cryptorchidism. Therefore, after performing a thorough review of the literature on contemporary guidelines for cryptorchidism management, we aim to highlight our approach to management in this rare case of adult bilateral cryptorchidism. We suggest bilateral orchiectomy as the safest option, if the patient is amendable, or bilateral orchiopexy with long-term follow-up for testicular cancer. Although the American Urological Association guidelines recommend orchiectomy for postpubertal cryptorchid children, currently, no explicit guidelines exist for the preferred method of managing adult cryptorchidism. Due to the increased risk of infertility and testicular cancer with cryptorchidism, orchiectomy instead of orchiopexy may be the preferred surgical approach in some instances. Still, in the case of bilateral cryptorchidism, orchiectomy may not always be the most viable solution, making orchiopexy with long-term follow-up for testicular cancer the best option, such as in our case.

Stepwise mini-incision microdissection testicular sperm extraction in NOA patients with a history of cryptorchidism: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Although the orchiopexy is recommended for cryptorchidism to preserve male fertility, non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) may occur in adulthood. Fortunately, a great many of azoospermic men may obtain sperm by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). Due to the potential injuries caused by testicular diagnostic biopsy and vascular damage at the time of orchidopexy, minimal invasiveness is particularly important during mTESE, aims to reduce the surgical damage and avoids secondary testicular failure. This comparative study aims to investigate the efficacy of stepwise mini-incision mTESE technique by comparison with standard mTESE in the treatment of NOA patients with a history of cryptorchidism.

RESULTS

A total of 73 mTESE procedures were divided into two groups: Group 1 included 37 cases performed by stepwise mini-incision mTESE, while Group 2 included 36 cases with standard mTESE. The overall sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in the two groups was 68.5% (50/73), with no significant difference in SRR between Group 1 (78.4%, 29/37) and Group 2 (58.3%, 21/36) (P = 0.1). In addition, 46.0% of the patients (17/37) obtained sperm in the first mini-incision step in Group 1, which was also equal to an overall SRR in Group 2 (58.3%, 21/36) (P = 0.3). The operation time in Group 1 (72.6 ± 33.9 min) was significantly shorter than that in Group 2 (90.4 ± 36.4 min) (P = 0.04). Patients with an orchidopexy age no more than 10 years old had a higher SRR (79.5%, 31/39) than others (55.9%, 19/34) (P = 0.03). There were no postoperative complications including wound infection, scrotal hematoma, persistent pain, and testicular atrophy during a follow-up period of at least 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our study suggests that the stepwise mini-incision mTESE could be a promising approach for sperm retrieval in NOA men with a history of cryptorchidism. While the technique may potentially reduce operation time and surgical invasiveness, further research is needed to validate these findings on a larger scale. The results also suggest that age at orchidopexy may affect SRR and have important implications for the management of cryptorchidism.

The undescended testis in children and adolescents. Part 1: pathophysiology, classification, and fertility- and cancer-related controversies

Undescended testis (UDT) is defined as failure of a testis to descend into the scrotum. It is one of the most common reasons for consultation in pediatric surgery and urology with an incidence of 3% in live-born male infants. Decades ago, classical studies established that the failure of a testis to descend alters the development of its germ cells increasing the risk of infertility and testicular cancer in adulthood. More recent publications have rebutted some of the myths and raised controversies regarding the management of these patients, which, far from being limited to surgical treatment, should include pathophysiological and prognostic aspects for a comprehensive approach to the condition. Therefore, here we present an updated review divided into two parts: the first assessing the pathophysiological aspects and risks of these patients focused on fertility and cancer, and the second addressing the different treatment options for UDT.

Bilateral congenital cryptorchidism and unilateral Leydig cell tumor in an adult presenting with gynecomastia and primary infertility: A case report

Introduction and importance

The neoplasms of the testis are sporadic tumors among men. Furthermore, the rarest subset of these is neoplasms belonging to the stromal tumors of the sex cord. Leydig cell tumors are the most common form among the testicular stromal tumors. In our case, the underlying risk factor associated with the development of Leydig cell tumors was cryptorchidism. While mostly unilateral, cases of bilateral cryptorchidism may be present and have been rarely reported.

Case presentation

We report a 36-year-old gentleman who presented to us with the inability to carry off intercourse without difficulty attaining erection on stimulation for the past two years. He had a history of left undescended testis since birth, for which he underwent left orchidopexy 20 years ago. An ultrasound of the pelvis showed an oval hypoechoic-shaped heterogeneous mass in the right mid-inguinal canal. Relevant blood investigations showed a deranged hormonal profile. He then underwent an uneventful right radical orchiectomy, histopathology of which was consistent with Leydig cell tumor.

Clinical discussion

LCT with a history of bilateral cryptorchidism has rarely been reported. This case highlights its clinical presentation, management, and further follow-up in such patients.

Conclusion

Bilateral congenital cryptorchidism may be associated with Leydig cell tumor years later in life hence long-term follow-up is required for these patients. The clinical presentation of these tumors may vary among individuals. Any change in physical appearance, hormonal assay, and imaging studies should promptly be followed for possible surgical resection and close monitoring.

•

Bilateral congenital cryptorchidism may be associated with LCT, years later in life.

•

The clinical presentation of these tumors may vary among individuals.

•

Such patients need periodic monitoring of hormonal profiles and imaging studies.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Male Sexual and Reproductive Health: 2021 Update on Male Infertility

CONTEXT

The European Association of Urology (EAU) has updated its guidelines on sexual and reproductive health for 2021.

OBJECTIVE

To present a summary of the 2021 version of the EAU guidelines on sexual and reproductive health, including advances and areas of controversy in male infertility.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The panel performed a comprehensive literature review of novel data up to January 2021. The guidelines were updated and a strength rating for each recommendation was included that was based either on a systematic review of the literature or consensus opinion from the expert panel, where applicable.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The male partner in infertile couples should undergo a comprehensive urological assessment to identify and treat any modifiable risk factors causing fertility impairment. Infertile men are at a higher risk of harbouring and developing other diseases including malignancy and cardiovascular disease and should be screened for potential modifiable risk factors, such as hypogonadism. Sperm DNA fragmentation testing has emerged as a novel biomarker that can identify infertile men and provide information on the outcomes from assisted reproductive techniques. The role of hormone stimulation therapy in hypergonadotropic hypogonadal or eugonadal patients is controversial and is not recommended outside of clinical trials. Furthermore, there is insufficient evidence to support the widespread use of other empirical treatments and surgical interventions in clinical practice (such as antioxidants and surgical sperm retrieval in men without azoospermia). There is low-quality evidence to support the routine use of testicular fine-needle mapping as an alternative diagnostic and predictive tool before testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA), and either conventional or microdissection TESE remains the surgical modality of choice for men with NOA.

CONCLUSIONS

All infertile men should undergo a comprehensive urological assessment to identify and treat any modifiable risk factors. Increasing data indicate that infertile men are at higher risk of cardiovascular mortality and of developing cancers and should be screened and counselled accordingly. There is low-quality evidence supporting the use of empirical treatments and interventions currently used in clinical practice; the efficacy of these therapies needs to be validated in large-scale randomised controlled trials.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Approximately 50% of infertility will be due to problems with the male partner. Therefore, all infertile men should be assessed by a specialist with the expertise to not only help optimise their fertility but also because they are at higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease and cancer long term and therefore require appropriate counselling and management. There are many treatments and interventions for male infertility that have not been validated in high-quality studies and caution should be applied to their use in routine clinical practice.