Testosterone replacement in prostate cancer survivors with testosterone deficiency: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Clinical Trial Protocol: Impact of Testosterone Replacement Therapy on Functional and Oncological Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy (ENFORCE Study)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Testosterone deficiency (TD) affects 18-38% of men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for localised prostate cancer and may impair postoperative sexual rehabilitation. Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) may improve sexual function and is assumed to be oncologically safe following RP, though evidence is based on nonrandomised, retrospective studies. The ENFORCE study evaluates the effects of TRT on sexual function recovery and on biochemical recurrence (BCR) following RP in men with TD.

CLINICAL TRIAL DESIGN AND TIME FRAME

The ENFORCE study is a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial being conducted at ten Dutch centres. Eligible patients with TD (total testosterone <8 nmol/l, or total testosterone 8-12 nmol/l with free testosterone <225 pmol/l) and minimal preserved erectile function (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite 26 [EPIC-26] sexual domain ≥40) undergoing RP are randomised to receive TRT or placebo from 6-12 wk after RP until 1 yr after RP.

ENDPOINTS

The primary endpoint is sexual function at 12 mo (EPIC-26 sexual domain). The secondary endpoints include sexual function at 6 and 24 mo, and quality of life, and hormonal and urinary function at 12 and 24 mo, assessed by the EPIC-26 and Aging Males' Symptoms questionnaires. BCR is evaluated at 12, 24, and 60 mo.

DATA SOURCES AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Outcomes include patient-reported outcomes and laboratory results. Linear regression will assess the effect of TRT on sexual function, adjusting for baseline variability.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

Strengths include the randomised design and long-term follow-up. Limitations include potential recruitment challenges due to specific inclusion criteria, limited to men with TD and minimal preserved sexual function.

FUNDING

This work was supported by KWF Dutch Cancer Society, Besins Healthcare, and Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital Research Fund.

ETHICS AND TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee Oost-Nederland (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04833426).

PATIENT SUMMARY

For men with low testosterone undergoing surgery for prostate cancer (radical prostatectomy), testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) may improve recovery of sexual function and general well-being. The ENFORCE trial investigates whether TRT indeed improves sexual recovery after prostate cancer surgery and whether it can be administered safely. Although TRT is generally believed to be safe, this is based on small or potentially biased studies, and has never been investigated in a large clinical trial. Some concerns remain that TRT increases the risk of prostate cancer recurrence. The results of this trial may provide answers about the benefits and safety of TRT after prostate cancer surgery.

Management of vasomotor symptoms in cancer patients

Many cancer treatments can lead to reduced levels of sex hormones, which in turn may cause vasomotor symptoms (VMS) such as hot flashes. These symptoms are associated with impaired quality of life, as well as suboptimal tolerability of and adherence to cancer treatment. Hormone therapy, performed by increasing estradiol or testosterone levels, is the gold standard for treatment of VMS. However, this approach is generally contraindicated in patients with hormone-sensitive cancers. Nonhormone agents with low to moderate efficacy in controlling VMS are available, but their use may be limited by side effects and tolerability. In this narrative review, the approach to VMS in cancer patients will be discussed. The evidence for various treatment options, including novel agents such as fezolinetant that target the hypothalamic thermoregulatory pathway, will be evaluated. Finally, special considerations in different patient populations based on cancer types (eg, breast, prostate) and age groups (eg, older adults) will be explored.

Testosterone therapy for functional hypogonadism in middle-aged and elderly males: current evidence and future perspectives

Population aging is a global phenomenon driving research focus toward preventing and managing age-related disorders. Functional hypogonadism (FH) has been defined as the combination of low testosterone levels, typically serum total testosterone below 300-350 ng/dL, together with manifestations of hypogonadism, in the absence of an intrinsic pathology of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular (HPT) axis. It is usually seen in middle-aged or elderly males as a product of aging and multimorbidity. This age-related decline in testosterone levels has been associated with numerous adverse outcomes. Testosterone therapy (TTh) is the mainstay of treatment for organic hypogonadism with an identifiable intrinsic pathology of the HPT axis. Current guidelines generally make weak recommendations for TTh in patients with FH, mostly in the presence of sexual dysfunction. Concerns about long-term safety have historically limited TTh use in middle-aged and elderly males with FH. However, recent randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated safe long-term outcomes regarding prostatic and cardiovascular health, together with decreases in all-cause mortality and improvements in various domains, including sexual function, body composition, physical strength, bone density, and hematopoiesis. Furthermore, there are numerous insightful studies suggesting additional benefits of TTh, for instance in cardio-renal-metabolic conditions. Specifically, future trials should investigate the role of TTh in improving symptoms and prognosis in various clinical contexts, including sarcopenia, frailty, dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, fracture risk, heart failure, stable angina, chronic kidney disease, mood disorders, and cognitive dysfunction.

Prostate Risk and Monitoring During Testosterone Replacement Therapy

ABSTRACT

Men with hypogonadism have reduced risk of prostate cancer mortality; whether testosterone treatment increases the risk of prostate safety events in men with hypogonadism remains controversial. Several studies including 4 larger randomized trials-the Testosterone Trials, TEstosterone and Atherosclerosis Progression in Aging Men (TEAAM) trial, Testosterone for Diabetes Mellitus trial, and Testosterone Replacement therapy for Assessment of long-term Vascular Events and efficacy ResponSE in hypogonadal men (TRAVERSE) trial-treated men with testosterone or placebo for 1 year or longer and reported prospectively ascertained prostate safety data. The TRAVERSE Trial, because of its large size, longer duration, and adjudication of prostate events, has provided comprehensive data on the risk of adverse prostate events during testosterone replacement therapy (TRT). Among men with hypogonadism, carefully screened to exclude those at high risk of prostate cancer, the incidences of high-grade or any prostate cancer, acute urinary retention, surgical procedure for benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostate biopsy, or new pharmacologic therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms were low and did not differ between the testosterone and placebo groups. Testosterone did not worsen lower urinary tract symptoms. TRT was associated with a greater increase in prostate-specific antigen than placebo in the first year of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Testosterone treatment of men with hypogonadism, screened to exclude those at high risk of prostate cancer, is associated with low risk of adverse prostate events. Baseline evaluation of prostate cancer risk and a standardized monitoring plan can minimize the risk of unnecessary prostate biopsy while enabling the detection of high-grade prostate cancers in men receiving TRT.

Testosterone recovery after androgen deprivation therapy in localised prostate cancer: Long-term data from two randomised trials

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To determine the rate and time of testosterone (T) recovery in patients (pts) with localised prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy plus 0-, 6-, 18- or 36-month of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 1230 pts with prostate cancer randomised into two phase III trials, serum T was measured at baseline, then regularly. T recovery rate was compared between normal vs. abnormal baseline T and with ADT duration with Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A multivariable logistic regression model to predict the probability of recovering normal T was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 87.4 % (167/191), 75.9 % (293/386), 54.8 % (181/330) and 43.2 % (80/185) of pts, recovered normal T on the 0-, 6-, 18- or 36-month schedule, respectively (p < 0.001). In patients recovering normal T, the median time to T recovery increased with ADT duration ranging from 0.31, 1.64, 3.06 to 5.0 years for the 0-, 6-, 18- or 36-month schedules, respectively (p < 0.001) and was significantly faster for those with a normal T at baseline (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, older age and longer ADT duration are associated with a lower T recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Testosterone recovery rate after ADT depends on several factors including hormonal duration, normal baseline T, age and medical comorbidities. A longer ADT duration is the most important variable affecting T recovery. The data from this report might be a valuable tool to help physicians and patients in evaluating risks and benefits of ADT.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Focus on Cognitive Function and Mood

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in men in the United States. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is currently the primary treatment for metastatic prostate cancer, and some studies have shown that the use of anti-androgen drugs is related to a reduction in cognitive function, mood changes, diminished quality of life, dementia, and possibly Alzheimer's disease. ADT has potential physiological effects such as a reduction in white matter integrity and a negative impact on hypothalamic functions due to the lowering of testosterone levels or the blockade of downstream androgen receptor signaling by first- and second-generation anti-androgen drugs. A comparative analysis of prostate cancer patients undergoing ADT and Alzheimer patients identified over 30 shared genes, illustrating common ground for the mechanistic underpinning of the symptomatology. The purpose of this review was to investigate the effects of ADT on cognitive function, mood, and quality of life, as well as to analyze the relationship between ADT and Alzheimer's disease. The evaluation of prostate cancer patient cognitive ability via neurocognitive testing is described. Future studies should further explore the connection among cognitive deficits, mood disturbances, and the physiological changes that occur when hormonal balance is altered.