Cognitive change after DBS in refractory epilepsy: A randomized-controlled trial

Advancing thalamic neuromodulation in epilepsy: Bridging adult data to pediatric care

Thalamic neuromodulation has emerged as a treatment option for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) with widespread and/or undefined epileptogenic networks. While deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) depth electrodes offer means for electrical stimulation of the thalamus in adult patients with DRE, the application of thalamic neuromodulation in pediatric epilepsy remains limited. To address this gap, the Neuromodulation Expert Collaborative was established within the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) Epilepsy Surgery Special Interest Group. In this expert review, existing evidence and recommendations for thalamic neuromodulation modalities using DBS and RNS are summarized, with a focus on the anterior (ANT), centromedian(CMN), and pulvinar nuclei of the thalamus. To-date, only DBS of the ANT is FDA approved for treatment of DRE in adult patients based on the results of the pivotal SANTE (Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of Thalamus for Epilepsy) study. Evidence for other thalamic neurmodulation indications and targets is less abundant. Despite the lack of evidence, positive responses to thalamic stimulation in adults with DRE have led to its off-label use in pediatric patients. Although caution is warranted due to differences between pediatric and adult epilepsy, the efficacy and safety of pediatric neuromodulation appear comparable to that in adults. Indeed, CMN stimulation is increasingly accepted for generalized and diffuse onset epilepsies, with recent completion of one randomized trial. There is also growing interest in using pulvinar stimulation for temporal plus and posterior quadrant epilepsies with one ongoing clinical trial in Europe. The future of thalamic neuromodulation holds promise for revolutionizing the treatment landscape of childhood epilepsy. Ongoing research, technological advancements, and collaborative efforts are poised to refine and improve thalamic neuromodulation strategies, ultimately enhancing the quality of life for children with DRE.

Cognition-Enhancement Effect of Median Nerve Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Cognitive Impairment: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

People with cognitive impairment often face quality-of-life problems and require ongoing support, which has profound consequences for caregivers and society. Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques, such as median nerve electrical stimulation (MNS), have shown promising potentials in improving cognitive ability in patients with cognitive impairment. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the positive effect and safety of MNS in cognitive impairment.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with cognitive impairment from the hospital record management system of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from April 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022, were enrolled. Data on patients' basic characteristics, treatment records, and examination results such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), activities of daily living (ADL), and P300 event-related potentials before and after treatment were collected.

RESULTS

Overall, 146 patients with cognitive impairment were enrolled, including 71 patients who underwent conventional therapy (standard treatment group) and 75 patients who underwent conventional therapy and MNS operation (active MNS group). Before treatment, there were no differences between the standard treatment and active MNS groups in terms of age, sex, etiology, duration of symptoms before therapy, hospital stay, whether they had undergone surgery, MMSE score, ADL score, and amplitude and latency of the P300 event-related potentials (P > 0.05). After treatment, we observed significant improvements in the MMSE score, ADL score, amplitude of P300, and decreased latency of P300 event-related potentials in both groups compared with before treatment (P < 0.05). In addition, we observed that the active MNS group showed higher MMSE and ADL scores, higher amplitude of P300 event-related potentials, and lower latency of P300 event-related potentials than the standard treatment group after treatment (P < 0.05). Furthermore, no side effects were associated with MNS operation.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary data provide early evidence that MNS may be a positive effect and safe method for promoting the recovery of cognitive ability in patients with cognitive impairment.

Towards network-guided neuromodulation for epilepsy

Epilepsy is well-recognized as a disorder of brain networks. There is a growing body of research to identify critical nodes within dynamic epileptic networks with the aim to target therapies that halt the onset and propagation of seizures. In parallel, intracranial neuromodulation, including deep brain stimulation and responsive neurostimulation, are well-established and expanding as therapies to reduce seizures in adults with focal-onset epilepsy; and there is emerging evidence for their efficacy in children and generalized-onset seizure disorders. The convergence of these advancing fields is driving an era of 'network-guided neuromodulation' for epilepsy. In this review, we distil the current literature on network mechanisms underlying neurostimulation for epilepsy. We discuss the modulation of key 'propagation points' in the epileptogenic network, focusing primarily on thalamic nuclei targeted in current clinical practice. These include (i) the anterior nucleus of thalamus, now a clinically approved and targeted site for open loop stimulation, and increasingly targeted for responsive neurostimulation; and (ii) the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus, a target for both deep brain stimulation and responsive neurostimulation in generalized-onset epilepsies. We discuss briefly the networks associated with other emerging neuromodulation targets, such as the pulvinar of the thalamus, piriform cortex, septal area, subthalamic nucleus, cerebellum and others. We report synergistic findings garnered from multiple modalities of investigation that have revealed structural and functional networks associated with these propagation points - including scalp and invasive EEG, and diffusion and functional MRI. We also report on intracranial recordings from implanted devices which provide us data on the dynamic networks we are aiming to modulate. Finally, we review the continuing evolution of network-guided neuromodulation for epilepsy to accelerate progress towards two translational goals: (i) to use pre-surgical network analyses to determine patient candidacy for neurostimulation for epilepsy by providing network biomarkers that predict efficacy; and (ii) to deliver precise, personalized and effective antiepileptic stimulation to prevent and arrest seizure propagation through mapping and modulation of each patients' individual epileptogenic networks.

ANT-DBS in epilepsy shows no effect on selected neuropsychiatric tests

Objectives

Deep brain stimulation of the anterior thalamic nucleus (ANT‐DBS) is an established option in treatment‐resistant epilepsy and obtained FDA approval in 2018. Increased psychiatric comorbidity is well known in epilepsy. The main objective of this study was to investigate possible neuropsychiatric treatment‐related changes in patients receiving ANT‐DBS.

Materials and Methods

Bilateral ANT electrodes were implanted in 18 adult patients with refractory epilepsy in a randomized, double‐blinded study. Immediately after implantation, patients were randomized to stimulation ON (n = 8) or OFF (n = 10) for the first 6 months (blinded phase). During the next six months (open phase), both groups received active stimulation. Neuropsychiatric assessment was conducted before implantation (T1), at the end of the blinded period (T2), and 1 year after implantation (T3).

Results

Comparing preoperative status (T1) and 12 months (T3), postoperative outcome in all patients did not show significant differences between the two groups for any of the applied tests. Groupwise comparisons across the two first time points (the blinded period, representing the randomized controlled trial) showed no significant differences between the two groups in any of the neuropsychiatric parameters studied. Comparing test results after 6 months of stimulation in both groups (sum of ON group T1 to T2 and OFF group T2 to T3) did not show significant changes for any of the psychiatric assessments.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that ANT‐DBS has limited effect concerning psychiatric issues. Subjective side effects were, however, reported in individual patients.