Prognostic significance of perineural invasion in stage IIA colon cancer

Perineural invasion in colorectal cancer: mechanisms of action and clinical relevance

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the significance of the nervous system in the tumor microenvironment has gained increasing attention. The bidirectional communication between nerves and cancer cells plays a critical role in tumor initiation and progression. Perineural invasion (PNI) occurs when tumor cells invade the nerve sheath and/or encircle more than 33% of the nerve circumference. PNI is a common feature in various malignancies and is associated with tumor invasion, metastasis, cancer-related pain, and unfavorable clinical outcomes. The colon and rectum are highly innervated organs, and accumulating studies support PNI as a histopathologic feature of colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, it is essential to investigate the role of nerves in CRC and comprehend the mechanisms of PNI to impede tumor progression and improve patient survival.

CONCLUSION

This review elucidates the clinical significance of PNI, summarizes the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms, introduces various experimental models suitable for studying PNI, and discusses the therapeutic potential of targeting this phenomenon. By delving into the intricate interactions between nerves and tumor cells, we hope this review can provide valuable insights for the future development of CRC treatments.

Multiple High-Risk Features for Stage II Colon Carcinoma Portends Worse Survival Than Stage III Disease

BACKGROUND

High-risk features in stage II colon cancer worsen survival and serve as an impetus for adjuvant chemotherapy. Limited data exist on the effect of multiple high-risk features on survival.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to compare the survival of 0, 1, or multiple high-risk features in stage II to stage III colon cancer.

DESIGN

Patients with stage II and III colon cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 were identified using the Survival, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients with stage II colon cancer were then classified according to the presence of 0, 1, or 2 or more of the following high-risk features: pathologic T4, perineural invasion, fewer than 12 lymph nodes assessed, or poor histologic differentiation. Overall survival and cause-specific survival were calculated. Each group was then stratified on the basis of whether chemotherapy was given.

SETTINGS

This study used the Survival, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2016).

PATIENTS

Patients who had stage II or III colon cancer were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures were 5-year overall survival and cause-specific survival.

RESULTS

A total of 65,831 patients were studied. Of these, 18,056 patients with stage II cancer had 0 high-risk features, 9426 had 1 high-risk feature, and 3503 had 2 or more high-risk features. There were 34,842 patients diagnosed with stage III disease. The 5-year overall survival and cause-specific survival for patients with stage II cancer with 2 or more high-risk features (49.2%, 59.5%) were lower than those without high-risk features (74.9%, 90.7%), with 1 high-risk feature (67.1%, 82.4%), or stage III disease (59.1%, 68.1%; p < 0.05). Although chemotherapy is associated with improved cause-specific survival in stage III disease, it is associated with worse cause-specific survival in patients with stage II disease.

LIMITATIONS

This study being a retrospective database analysis is the main limitation. Also, lymphovascular invasion, margin status, and clinical obstruction or perforation were absent from the dataset.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple high-risk features in stage II colon cancer predict worse survival than lymph node metastasis. Chemotherapy is associated with adverse cause-specific survival in patients with stage II disease. Further study into this group should focus on the type and duration of adjuvant therapy and biological features of these tumors. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B929 .

MLTIPLES CARACTERSTICAS DE ALTO RIESGO PARA EL CARCINOMA DE COLON EN ESTADIO II PRESAGIAN PEOR SUPERVIVENCIA QUE LA ENFERMEDAD EN ESTADIO III

ANTECEDENTES:Las características de alto riesgo en el cáncer de colon en estadio II empeoran la supervivencia y sirven como impulso para la quimioterapia adyuvante. Existen datos limitados sobre el efecto de múltiples características de alto riesgo en la supervivencia.OBJETIVO:Comparar la supervivencia de cero, una o múltiples características de alto riesgo en el cáncer de colon en estadio II con la enfermedad en estadio III.DISEÑO:Los pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio II y III diagnosticados entre 2010 y 2016 se identificaron mediante la base de datos de supervivencia, epidemiología y resultados finales. Luego, los pacientes en etapa II se clasificaron según la presencia de cero, 1 o 2+ de las siguientes características de alto riesgo: T4 patológico, invasión perineural, menos de 12 ganglios linfáticos evaluados (< 12 ganglios linfáticos) o mala diferenciación histológica. Se calculó la supervivencia observada y específica de la causa. Luego, cada grupo se estratificó en función de si se administró quimioterapia.ESCENARIO:Este estudio utilizó la base de datos de supervivencia, epidemiología y resultados finales, 2010-2016.PACIENTES:Los pacientes tenían cáncer de colon en estadio II o III.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La medida principal fue la supervivencia observada a 5 años y la supervivencia por causa específica.RESULTADOS:Se estudiaron un total de 65,831 pacientes. 18,056 pacientes estaban en estadio II sin características de alto riesgo, 9.426 con 1 característica de alto riesgo y 3.503 con 2+ características de alto riesgo. Hubo 34.842 pacientes a los que se les diagnosticó enfermedad en estadio III. La supervivencia observada a los 5 años y la supervivencia específica de la causa para los pacientes con cáncer en estadio II con 2+ características de alto riesgo (49.2 %, 59.5 %) fueron más bajas, en comparación con aquellos sin características de alto riesgo (74.9 %, 90.7 %), con 1 característica de alto riesgo (67.1 %, 82.4 %) o enfermedad en estadio III (59.1 %, 68.1 %) (p < 0.05). Si bien la quimioterapia se asocia con una mejor supervivencia por causa específica en la enfermedad en estadio III, se asocia con una peor supervivencia por causa específica en pacientes con enfermedad en estadio II.LIMITACIONES:Este es un análisis de base de datos retrospectivo. La invasión linfovascular, el estado de los márgenes y la obstrucción o perforación clínicas estaban ausentes en la base de datos.CONCLUSIONES:Múltiples características de alto riesgo en el cáncer de colon en estadio II predicen una peor supervivencia que la metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos. La quimioterapia se asocia con una supervivencia específica de causa adversa en pacientes con enfermedad en estadio II. El estudio adicional de este grupo deberá centrarse en el tipo y la duración de la terapia adyuvante y las características biológicas de estos tumores. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B929 . (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco ).

How I treat stage II colon cancer patients

Stage II colon cancer (CC) is probably one of the best prognosis gastrointestinal tumors seen in our consultations, but often takes a lot of time for physicians to determine appropriate treatment because of the limited benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in these patients, together with the limited evidence in this situation. How to choose the best treatment for each individual patient is thus dependent on molecular (microsatellite instability/microsatellite stability status) and clinico-pathological features relevant enough to classify these tumors into low-, intermediate- and high-risk stage II disease and to choose an appropriate attitude for each of these subgroups. In practice, the first step in treatment decision making must be to assess the patient's status and comorbidities to see if the patient is eligible for an adjuvant treatment. Then, as fluoropyrimidines (FPs) are the corner stone of CC adjuvant treatment, screening for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency is mandatory in western countries. Finally, depending on the patient's characteristics and tumor risk stage, the strategy may be surveillance, adjuvant FP alone or oxaliplatin-based adjuvant CT. In the near future, new tools such as Immunoscore® (HalioDx; Luminy Biotech Enterprises, Marseille Cedex, France) and circulating tumor DNA may help to identify more precisely patients with minimal residual disease for more personalized adjuvant treatment approaches.

•

Stage II CC is a heterogeneous disease with a complex management due to the limited data and benefit of adjuvant CT.

•

Risk stratification through prognostic parameters is crucial to aid clinicians in determining the appropriate therapy.

•

Lymph node sampling <12 and pT4 are currently recognized as the major prognostic features associated with worse survival.

•

Adjuvant CT should be considered by incorporating prognostic features and balanced against patient's age and comorbidities.

Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers in the Era of Personalized Medicine

The 5-year survival probability for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer has not drastically changed over the last several years, nor has the backbone chemotherapy in first-line disease. Nevertheless, newer targeted therapies and immunotherapies have been approved primarily in the refractory setting, which appears to benefit a small proportion of patients. Until recently, rat sarcoma (RAS) mutations remained the only genomic biomarker to assist with therapy selection in metastatic colorectal cancer. Next generation sequencing has unveiled many more potentially powerful predictive genomic markers of therapy response. Importantly, there are also clinical and physiologic predictive or prognostic biomarkers, such as tumor sidedness. Variations in germline pharmacogenomic biomarkers have demonstrated usefulness in determining response or risk of toxicity, which can be critical in defining dose intensity. This review outlines such biomarkers and summarizes their clinical implications on the treatment of colorectal cancer. It is critical that clinicians understand which biomarkers are clinically validated for use in practice and how to act on such test results.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II Colon Cancer: A Clinical Dilemma

The decision to treat a patient with stage II colon cancer with adjuvant chemotherapy can be challenging. Although the benefit of treatment is clear in most patients with stage III disease, the decision to provide chemotherapy after surgical resection in stage II disease must be made on an individual basis. Several trials have demonstrated the small but absolute benefits of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer for disease-free survival and overall survival. In an attempt to better understand the role of chemotherapy, several studies were performed that identified high-risk characteristics that can be used prognostically and predictively to aid in the clinical decision making process. ASCO, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and the European Society of Medical Oncology have published guidelines describing these high-risk characteristics. Since then, several other molecular markers have emerged that may offer more information on a given patient's risk for recurrence. The decision to treat a patient with stage II colon cancer must be made on an individual basis, considering the risks and benefits of treatment. In this short review, we will present the available evidence and offer possible directions for future study.

Chemokine-Derived Peptides: Novel Antimicrobial and Antineoplasic Agents

Chemokines are a burgeoning family of chemotactic cytokines displaying a broad array of functions such as regulation of homeostatic leukocyte traffic and development, as well as activating the innate immune system. Their role in controlling early and late inflammatory stages is now well recognized. An improper balance either in chemokine synthesis or chemokine receptor expression contributes to various pathological disorders making chemokines and their receptors a useful therapeutic target. Research in this area is progressing rapidly, and development of novel agents based on chemokine/chemokine receptors antagonist functions are emerging as attractive alternative drugs. Some of these novel agents include generation of chemokine-derived peptides (CDP) with potential agonist and antagonist effects on inflammation, cancer and against bacterial infections. CDP have been generated mainly from N- and C-terminus chemokine sequences with subsequent modifications such as truncations or elongations. In this review, we present a glimpse of the different pharmacological actions reported for CDP and our current understanding regarding the potential use of CDP alone or as part of the novel therapies proposed in the treatment of microbial infections and cancer.

Prognostic value of perineural invasion in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of perineural invasion (PNI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) does not reach a consensus.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search for relevant reports published up to October 2014 was performed using the electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) was used to estimate the prognostic effects.

RESULT

Thirty-eight studies comprising 12,661 CRC patients were analyzed. Our results showed that PNI is significantly associated with poor prognosis in OS (overall survival) (HR = 2.07, 95 % CI = 1.87-2.29, P < 0.01) and DFS (disease-free survival) (HR = 2.23, 95 % CI = 1.79-2.78, P < 0.01). There was no significant prognostic difference in DFS between stage II CRC patients with PNI(+) and stage III patients (HR = 1.67, 95 % CI = 0.53-5.25, P = 0.38). Further subgroup analysis revealed that the significance of the association between PNI and worse prognosis in CRC patients is not affected by many factors, including geographic setting, PNI positive rate, treatment, TNM stage, tumor site, and quality of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis indicates that PNI is a poor prognostic factor in CRC patients. The postoperative survival of stage II CRC patients with PNI(+) is probably more similar to that of stage III patients. Currently available adjuvant therapy should be considered in stage II CRC patients with PNI(+).