Assessing the short- and long-term outcomes after resection of benign insulinoma

Diagnosis and management of benign secreting pancreatic insulinoma: What's new? 4 case report

Introduction and importance: Even though insulinoma is the most frequent neuroendocrine tumor, it represents only 2% of pancreatic 2% of all pancreatic neoplasms. Diagnosis is relatively simple, and surgery after accurate determination of the tumors location within the pancreas is the cornerstone of its treatment. Case presentation: We herein report 4 patients undergoing various surgeries for benign secreting insulinomas, after extensive radiological and endoscopic exploration. Clinical discussion: Diagnosis is relatively simple relying on clinical and biological criteria, it must be followed by an extensive and accurate preoperative determination of the tumors localization. The laparoscopic tumoral enucleation is the treatment of choice for small isolated tumors, but open surgery still has its indications. Conclusion: Pancreatic insulinoma is a rare neuroendocrine tumor that can be life-threatening due to hypoglycemic manifestations. The diagnosis is based on clinical and biological criteria. echo endoscopy and to a lesser extent radiological exploration can precisely determine the tumors location. Laparoscopic surgical enucleation of the tumor remains the preferred curative treatment.

Diagnostic performance of noninvasive imaging modalities for localization of insulinoma: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Insulinoma is the most common functional neuroendocrine tumor found only in the pancreas. The early detection of insulinoma is of importance. Studies comparing the performance of noninvasive modalities were limited by sample size and heterogeneity between studies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PET/CT, SPECT/CT, CT and MRI for the localization of insulinoma, and to provide evidence for clinical practice.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang Data and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched from inception to May 31, 2021. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive Likelihood Ratio (+LR) and negative Likelihood Ratio (-LR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and concordance rate were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies including 708 patients of insulinoma reached the inclusion criteria. PET/CT imaging demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.54-0.92) and a pooled specificity of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.20-0.99). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of SPECT/CT were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.46-0.93) and 0.45 (95% CI: 0.22-0.70). CT showed an overall sensitivity of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.35-0.72) and specificity of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.54-0.88). The pooled sensitivity and specificity for MRI were 0.54 (95% CI: 0.31-0.75) and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.39-0.84), respectively. The concordance rates of PET, SPECT, CT, and MRI were 78% (95% CI: 66-90%), 74% (95% CI: 52-97%), 56% (95% CI: 41-72%), and 53% (95% CI: 33-73%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Results of this study indicate that PET/CT demonstrated superior performance than SPECT/CT, CT and MRI for the localization of insulinoma. GLP-1R based PET/CT manifested better diagnostic performance in comparison with SSTR based PET/CT imaging modality.

Carcinoid Syndrome and Hyperinsulinemic Hypoglycemia Associated with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Critical Review on Clinical and Pharmacological Management

The carcinoid syndrome (CS) and hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (HH) represent two of the most common clinical syndromes associated with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The former is mainly related to the serotonin secretion by a small bowel NEN, whereas the latter depends on an insulin hypersecretion by a pancreatic insulinoma. Both syndromes/conditions can affect prognosis and quality of life of patients with NENs. They are often diagnosed late when patients become strongly symptomatic. Therefore, their early detection and management are a critical step in the clinical management of NEN patients. A dedicated and experienced multidisciplinary team with appropriate therapeutic strategies is needed and should be encouraged to optimize clinical outcomes. This review aims to critically analyze clinical features, evidence and treatment options of CS and HH and therefore to improve their management.

Insulinoma in pregnancy (a case presentation and systematic review of the literature)

Insulinomas are rare, benign and functional tumors that coincidentally may become overt during pregnancy or in the post-partum period. As the general symptoms of a pregnancy might cover the clinical presentation, diagnosing remains challenging. We present one additional case of a post-partum insulinoma, combined with a systematic review of the literature to sum up relevant details in diagnosis and treatment. A systematic request of Pubmed/Medline was conducted using the following terms: "insulinoma AND pregnancy" and "insulinoma" for a second request of ClinicalTrials.gov. All publications concerning pregnant or post-partum women with insulinoma were included. Thirty-six cases could be identified for analysis. Each publication was reviewed for demographic, diagnostic and therapeutic data. The most frequent clinical signs were unconsciousness and neurological symptoms. 64.9% were diagnosed during early pregnancy and 35.1% post-partum. 91.9% underwent surgery with a third resected during pregnancy without severe influence on fetal or maternal outcome. Three patients died of metastatic disease or misdiagnosing, two of them miscarried. Insulinoma in pregnancy is rare but should be considered in case of unclear hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. Surgery can be performed during the second trimester or post-partum with promising outcome.

The functioning side of the pancreas: a review on insulinomas

PURPOSE

Insulinomas are a rare type of neuroendocrine tumors, originating in the pancreas, difficult to diagnose and to treat. Due to its rarity, insulinomas are a not well-known pathological entity; thus, the diagnostic process is frequently a medical challenge with many possible differential diagnoses. The diagnostic process varies between non-invasive procedures, such as the fasting test or imaging techniques, and invasive ones. Insulinomas are rarely malignant, but the glycemic imbalance correlated with this tumor can frequently alter the quality of life of the patients and the consequent hypoglycemia can be extremely dangerous. Moreover, insulinomas can be associated with different genetic syndromes, such as Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia 1, accompanied by other specific symptoms. There are many different treatment strategies, depending on the need to control symptoms or control diseases progression, the only curative one being surgery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We reviewed the evidences present in the literature on insulinomas and reported its main clinical characteristics and management strategies.

CONCLUSION

The aim of this review of the literature is to present the current knowledge on insulinomas, exploring the main clinical characteristics, the diagnostic tools, and the therapeutic strategies.

The role of microwave ablation in management of functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Background

Surgical resection is considered to be the only potentially curative option for patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). High risk rates of perioperative complications make minimally invasive ablative techniques a novel perspective and alternative treatment option for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This study aims to present the first experience of using a microwave ablation in management of pNETs.

Methods

Sechenov University has an experience of treating more than 400 patients with hormone-producing tumors of the pancreas, 7 of which were treated by microwave ablation (MWA).

Results

In all patients that underwent MWA, a regression of hormonal symptomatic was achieved. Two patients required readmission a month later for draining of pseudocyst and abscess.

Conclusions

The exact role of microwave ablation in the treatment of non-metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors has not been defined yet. There is a lack of large prospective randomized studies and the reason for this is that local tumor destruction is indicated in selected cases only, thus making it difficult to analyze a large group of patients and assess long-term results of the treatment. However, microwave ablation allows to take a better control of symptoms in patients with hormone overproduction and in those with high risk of postoperative complications.

Open and minimally invasive pancreatic neoplasms enucleation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic enucleation (pEN) as parenchyma-sparing procedure for small pancreatic neoplasms is quickly becoming the most common surgical option in such setting. Nowadays, pEN is frequently carried out through a minimally invasive approach either laparoscopic or robotic. Its impact on overall perioperative complications and pancreatic fistula (POPF) is still under evaluation. The scope of our systematic review is to assess pEN's perioperative outcomes and to evaluate the effect of the minimally invasive techniques over POPF and other surgical complications.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search (time-frame January 1999-September 2018), considering exclusively those studies which included at least 5 cases of either open or minimally invasive pEN. Data regarding postoperative outcome and POPF were extracted and analyzed. We defined postoperative morbidities by the Clavien-Dindo classification while POPF according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definition.

RESULTS

Sixty-three studies met the criteria selected, accounting for a study population of 2485 patients. 27.7% had a minimally invasive pEN. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 46.1% with 11.9% rated as severe (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3). Mortality rate was 0.69%. The minimally invasive approach to pEN led to a statistically significant reduction of both the overall POPF rate (28.7% vs. 45.9%, p < 0.001), and clinically significant B-C POPF (p < 0.027). The postoperative overall morbidity rate was clearly in favor of the minimally invasive approach (27.6% vs. 55.2%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our review confirms that pEN is a safe and feasible technique for the treatment of small benign or low-grade pancreatic neoplasms and it can be implemented with an acceptable morbidity rate along with low mortality. The minimally invasive approach is gaining widespread acceptance due to its supposed non-inferiority compared with the traditional open approach. In our review, it showed to be even better in terms of POPF incidence rate and short-term postoperative outcome. Still, such data need to be corroborated by randomized clinical trials.

Is endoscopic ultrasonography more sensitive than magnetic resonance imaging in detecting and localizing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors?

To compare endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in terms of their sensitivities to localize pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) preoperatively. Systematic analysis of the literature; sensitivity of EUS and MRI in insulinomas and pancreaticoduodenal NETs in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) in series of at least 20 subjects referring to tumors confirmed by surgery and histopathology. Other imaging methods reported were also assessed. Eighteen publications on insulinomas (782 cases) could be analyzed, no study in MEN1 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and compared EUS to MRI. Data quality was moderate: all publications referred to case series. Mean correct detection / localization rates (sensitivity) were calculated: EUS 80%, MRI 66%, computed tomography 63%, angiography 52%, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy 42%, ultrasonography 23%; arterial calcium stimulation with hepatic venous sampling regionalized correctly in 80%. EUS seems to be more sensitive than MRI in localizing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. If a specialized endosonographist is available, EUS is the preferable imaging procedure. Otherwise, MRI is a suitable alternative.

Minimally invasive versus open pancreatic enucleation. Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical outcomes

Parenchymal sparing procedures are gaining interest in pancreatic surgery and recent studies have reported that minimally invasive pancreatic enucleation may be associated with enhanced outcomes when compared with traditional surgery. By meta-analyzing the available data from the literature, minimally invasive surgery is not at higher risk of pancreatic fistula and offers a number of advantages over conventional surgery for pancreatic enucleation.