Systematic review of the impact of sacral neuromodulation on clinical symptoms and gastrointestinal physiology

Faecal incontinence is associated with an impaired rectosigmoid brake and improved by sacral neuromodulation

BACKGROUND

The rectosigmoid brake, characterised by retrograde cyclic motor patterns on high-resolution colonic manometry, has been postulated as a contributor to the maintenance of bowel continence. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an effective therapy for faecal incontinence, but its mechanism of action is unclear. This study aims to investigate the colonic motility patterns in the distal colon of patients with faecal incontinence, and how these are modulated by SNM.

METHODS

A high-resolution fibreoptic colonic manometry catheter, containing 36 sensors spaced at 1-cm intervals, was positioned in patients with faecal incontinence undergoing stage 1 SNM. One hour of pre- and post meal recordings were obtained followed by pre- and post meal recordings with suprasensory SNM. A 700-kcal meal was given. Data were analysed to identify propagating contractions.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with faecal incontinence were analysed. Patients had an abnormal meal response (fewer retrograde propagating contractions compared to controls; p = 0.027) and failed to show a post meal increase in propagating contractions (mean 17 ± 6/h premeal vs. 22 ± 9/h post meal, p = 0.438). Compared to baseline, SNM significantly increased the number of retrograde propagating contractions in the distal colon (8 ± 3/h premeal vs. 14 ± 3/h premeal with SNM, p = 0.028). Consuming a meal did not further increase the number of propagating contractions beyond the baseline upregulating effect of SNM.

CONCLUSION

The rectosigmoid brake was suppressed in this cohort of patients with faecal incontinence. SNM may exert a therapeutic effect by modulating this rectosigmoid brake.

Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of Faecal Incontinence-A UEG/ESCP/ESNM/ESPCG collaboration

INTRODUCTION

The goal of this project was to create an up-to-date joint European clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of faecal incontinence (FI), using the best available evidence. These guidelines are intended to help guide all medical professionals treating adult patients with FI (e.g., general practitioners, surgeons, gastroenterologists, other healthcare workers) and any patients who are interested in information regarding the diagnosis and management of FI.

METHODS

These guidelines have been created in cooperation with members from the United European Gastroenterology (UEG), European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP), European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) and the European Society for Primary Care Gastroenterology (ESPCG). These members made up the guideline development group (GDG). Additionally, a patient advisory board (PAB) was created to reflect and comment on the draft guidelines from a patient perspective. Relevant review questions were established by the GDG along with a set of outcomes most important for decision making. A systematic literature search was performed using these review questions and outcomes as a framework. For each predefined review question, the study or studies with the highest level of study design were included. If evidence of a higher-level study design was available, no lower level of evidence was sought or included. Data from the studies were extracted by two reviewers for each predefined important outcome within each review question. Where possible, forest plots were created. After summarising the results for each review question, a systematic quality assessment using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) approach was performed. For each review question, we assessed the quality of evidence for every predetermined important outcome. After evidence review and quality assessment were completed, recommendations could be formulated. The wording used for each recommendation was dependent on the level of quality of evidence. Lower levels of evidence resulted in weaker recommendations and higher levels of evidence resulted in stronger recommendations. Recommendations were discussed within the GDG to reach consensus.

RESULTS

These guidelines contain 45 recommendations on the classification, diagnosis and management of FI in adult patients.

CONCLUSION

These multidisciplinary European guidelines provide an up-to-date comprehensive evidence-based framework with recommendations on the diagnosis and management of adult patients who suffer from FI.

Outcomes of treatment of faecal incontinence with sacral nerve stimulation - a Finnish multicentre study

AIM

The aim of this multicentre study is to report the results of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) treatment for faecal incontinence (FI) in Finland and determine factors that could influence SNS treatment outcomes.

METHOD

This is a national multicentre study, involving all patients tested for SNS implantation in Finland from 1999 to 2017. Data were collected retrospectively from electronic patient archives and analysed for possible effects on treatment outcome.

RESULTS

Of the 432 patients with FI tested for SNS, 365 were women. Three hundred and thirteen (72.5%) of the tested patients advanced to permanent implantation of a stimulator. A successful final treatment outcome, with subjective alleviation of FI, was reported by 59.3% of the patients at the end of follow-up (mean 2.4 years, range 8 days to 13.3 years). Patients with obstetric sphincter injury and idiopathic FI had more permanent stimulator implantations than patients with iatrogenic injury (P = 0.012). Male patients had significantly worse test phase outcomes than female patients (P < 0.001). Age did not influence treatment outcome (P = 0.446) CONCLUSION: Subjective final success of SNS treatment for FI was achieved in 59.3% of patients at a mean of 2.4 years. Gender and the aetiology of FI influenced the test phase and final treatment outcome of SNS treatment.

Electrical neuromodulation in the management of lower urinary tract dysfunction: evidence, experience and future prospects

Lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) is common and causes a spectrum of morbidity and decreased quality of life (QoL) for patients. LUTD can range from urinary retention to urge incontinence, and includes a variety of syndromes, with the most common and widely recognized being overactive bladder (OAB). The classic treatments of LUTD and OAB comprise different strategies including behavioral therapies, medications and minimally invasive or invasive surgical procedures. Generally, once patients have tried behavioral modifications and oral medical therapy, and have not experienced adequate relief of their symptoms, the next step is to consider minimally invasive therapies. In the last two decades since FDA approval, sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has become an accepted intervention, with increasing use and evidence of effectiveness for LUTD, specifically OAB and non-obstructive urinary retention. SNS has shown both objective and subjective improvement in voiding symptoms in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) when compared to sham or standard medical therapy. The main limitations for more extensive use include relatively high cost, implantation of a device and possibly reoperation secondary to adverse events (AE). Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a less invasive, less direct and less expensive method for neuromodulation, which has also shown effectiveness in several randomized and non-randomized trials, including comparable improvement rates to anticholinergics in OAB management. However, the efficacy of PTNS is only maintained for a short period after the stimulation is delivered. This technique has a much lower rate of AE compared to SNS, but with the inconvenience of weekly visits for stimulation, although implantable devices are on the horizon. In this article we review the mechanism of action, indications, effectiveness and complications related to SNS and PTNS therapy for LUTD.

Outcomes of Sacral Neuromodulation in a Privately Insured Population

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we analyzed claims data from the Ingenix data base to analyze outcomes of sacral neuromodulation with respect to both provider and patient factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used the Ingenix (I3) data base to determine demographic, diagnosis, and procedure success information for years 2002-2007 for privately insured patients. Demographic information was obtained, as were the diagnoses given and procedures performed, based on ICD-9 diagnosis codes and Current Procedural Terminology procedure codes. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify specific predictors of success, as measured by progression to implantation of a pulse generator.

RESULTS

Overall success, as defined by battery placement, was 49.1%. Fifty-one percent of staged procedures were followed by battery placement compared with 24.1% of percutaneous cases (p < 0.0001). Among the patient variables analyzed, women were more likely than men to progress to battery placement. After Stage I testing, patients treated by urologists were overall more likely than gynecologists to proceed to battery placement (I3: 54% vs. 47%, p < 0.0001). Unlike previous findings in other claims-based data sets, we did not observe a provider-volume relationship in the i3 data set.

CONCLUSIONS

Success of sacral neuromodulation, as defined by proceeding to battery placement, was much better after formal staged procedures, which leads us to question the utility of percutaneous techniques. Outcomes were also better among female patients and among those treated by a urologist. Specialty differences will likely diminish over time as more gynecologists adopt sacral neuromodulation.

Adverse events of sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence reported to the federal drug administration

AIM: To investigate the nature and severity of AE related to sacral neurostimulation (SNS).

METHODS: Based on Pubmed and Embase searches, we identified published trials and case series of SNS for fecal incontinence (FI) and extracted data on adverse events, requiring an active intervention. Those problems were operationally defined as infection, device removal explant or need for lead and/or generator replacement. In addition, we analyzed the Manufacturer and User Device Experience registry of the Federal Drug Administration for the months of August - October of 2015. Events were included if the report specifically mentioned gastrointestinal (GI), bowel and FI as indication and if the narrative did not focus on bladder symptoms. The classification, reporter, the date of the recorded complaint, time between initial implant and report, the type of AE, steps taken and outcome were extracted from the report. In cases of device removal or replacement, we looked for confirmatory comments by healthcare providers or the manufacturer.

RESULTS: Published studies reported adverse events and reoperation rates for 1954 patients, followed for 27 (1-117) mo. Reoperation rates were 18.6% (14.2-23.9) with device explants accounting for 10.0% (7.8-12.7) of secondary surgeries; rates of device replacement or explant or pocket site and electrode revisions increased with longer follow up. During the period examined, the FDA received 1684 reports of AE related to SNS with FI or GI listed as indication. A total of 652 reports met the inclusion criteria, with 52.7% specifically listing FI. Lack or loss of benefit (48.9%), pain or dysesthesia (27.8%) and complication at the generator implantation site (8.7%) were most commonly listed. Complaints led to secondary surgeries in 29.7% of the AE. Reoperations were performed to explant (38.2%) or replace (46.5%) the device or a lead, or revise the generator pocket (14.6%). Conservative management changes mostly involved changes in stimulation parameters (44.5%), which successfully addressed concerns in 35.2% of cases that included information about treatment results.

CONCLUSION: With reoperation rates around 20%, physicians need to fully disclose the high likelihood of complications and secondary interventions and exhaust non-invasive treatments, including transcutaneous stimulation paradigms.