'Sandwich' technique in the treatment of large and complex incisional hernias

The Impact of Botulinum Toxin A Application on Reducing the Necessity for "Component Separation Techniques" in Giant Incisional Hernias: A Dual-Center, Polish-Ukrainian, Retrospective Cohort Study

<b>Introduction:</b> Incisional hernias are prevalent complications, with significant recurrence rates and associated surgical wound complications. Giant hernias, classified by the European Hernia Society (EHS) as exceeding 10 cm (width dimension), pose a challenge due to the "loss of domain" effect. Component separation techniques (CST), including anterior component separation (ACS) and transversus abdominis release (TAR), are established interventions but have drawbacks related to the irreversible alteration of abdominal wall anatomy and associated risks. An alternative approach involves the preoperative application of Botulinum Toxin A (BTA) to reduce lateral abdominal muscle tension, facilitating hernial defect closure.<b>Aim:</b> The aim was to assess the impact of BTA on reducing the necessity for CST, the occurrence of surgical site complications,and the need for further interventions.<b>Materials and methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study was conducted across two reference centers specializing in hernia treatment in Poland and Ukraine. The study compared outcomes between patients undergoing elective abdominal wall reconstruction surgery for giant hernias, specifically looking at the requirement for CST following preoperative BTA application. Patients were divided into two groups - those who received BTA injections 3-4 weeks prior to surgery (BOTOX group) and those who did not (NON-BOTOX group).<b>Results:</b> The study found that in the BOTOX group, a significantly lower proportion of patients required CST compared to the NON-BOTOX group (46 <i>vs</i> 84%, P-value = 0.000124). Additionally, the BOTOX group experienced fewer postoperative complications, suggesting a beneficial effect of BTA in simplifying surgical procedures and enhancing patient outcomes.<b>Conclusions:</b> The findings support the use of preoperative BTA injections as a valuable adjunct in the management of giant abdominal hernias. This approach not only facilitates fascial closure without the need for extensive CST but also potentially reduces perioperative trauma and postoperative complications. Preoperative BTA injections significantly reduce the need for CST in giant incisional abdominal hernia repairs, offering a less invasive and more effective approach to fascial closure. The most important role of BTA is "downstaging" the hernia before surgery. This study highlights the importance of considering BTA injections in preoperative protocols, advocating for broader acceptance and reimbursement to improve surgical outcomes and patient care in hernia surgery.

Preventing incisional ventral hernias: important for patients but ignored by surgical specialities? A critical review

PURPOSE

Incisional ventral hernias (IHs) are a common complication across all surgical specialities requiring access to the abdomen, pelvis, and retroperitoneum. This public health issue continues to be widely ignored, resulting in appreciable morbidity and expenses. In this critical review, the issue is explored by an interdisciplinary group.

METHODS

A group of European surgeons encompassing representatives from abdominal wall, vascular, urological, gynecological, colorectal and hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgery have reviewed the occurrence of His in these disciplines.

RESULTS

Incisional hernias are a major public health issue with appreciable morbidity and cost implications. General surgeons are commonly called upon to repair IHs following an initial operation by others. Measures that may collectively reduce the frequency of IH across specialities include better planning and preparation (e.g. a fit patient, no time pressure, an experienced operator). A minimally invasive technique should be employed where appropriate. Our main recommendations in midline incisions include using the 'small bites' suture technique with a ≥ 4:1 suture-to-wound length, and adding prophylactic mesh augmentation in patients more likely to suffer herniation. For off-midline incisions, more research of this problem is essential.

CONCLUSION

Meticulous closure of the incision is significant for every patient. Raising awareness of the His is necessary in all surgical disciplines that work withing the abdomen or retroperitoneum. Across all specialties, surgeons should aim for a < 10% IH rate.

Retromuscular mesh and hernial sac technique in the reconstruction of 139 cases of large median incisional hernias: one institution's experience

PURPOSE

Incisional hernia is the most common complication of laparotomy. Postoperative parietal defects tend to relapse, even after the most optimal surgical methods. The aim of this study was to present the effectiveness of an adapted retromuscular technique with prolene mesh and a hernial sac, in patients with large incisional median hernias. The reported results were obtained by our team after more than 15 years of experience.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 139 consecutive cases of large median incisional hernias operated on using a retromuscular mesh and hernial sac technique. The cross-sectional diameter of incisional hernias was larger than 10 cm, being classified in the W3 group, according to the European Hernia Society classification.

RESULTS

The study included 83 females (59.71%) and 56 males (40.29%) with a median age of 62.4 ± 16.6 years and an average body mass index of 32.4 ± 7.6 kg. The hernia was supraumbilically located in 54 cases, subumbilically in 61 cases, and supra- and subumbilically in 24 cases. Postoperative complications were recorded in eight cases (5.75%): one case with a hematoma in the right abdominal muscle sheath; five cases with supra-aponeurotic seromas; two cases with skin necrosis and one with a mesh infection. Recurrence occurred in seven cases (5.03%): four cases in the first 2 years postoperatively and three cases in the third year after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The retromuscular technique with prolene mesh and a hernial sac is an effective method of restoring the integrity of the abdominal wall in large median incisional hernias with low rates of morbidity and recurrence.

Treatment of Large Incisional Hernias in Sandwich Technique - A Review of the Literature

Introduction

In a systematic review of the surgical treatment of large incisional hernia sublay repair, the sandwich technique and aponeuroplasty with intraperitoneal mesh displayed the best results. In this systematic review only the sandwich technique, which used the hernia sac as an extension of the posterior and anterior rectus sheath and placement of a non-absorbable mesh in the sublay position, was included. Other modifications of the sandwich technique are published in the literature and were also analyzed in this literature review.

Methods

A systematic search of the available literature was performed in November 2017 using Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library using the terms “sandwich technique”, “double prosthetic repair”, “double mesh intraperitoneal repair”, and “component separation technique with double mesh”. This review is based on 24 relevant publications. Unfortunately, the evidence of the available studies is not very high since only prospective and retrospective case series have been published. There are no comparative studies at all. Therefore, the findings of the published case series must be viewed in a critical light.

Results

The published studies report a remarkably low recurrence rate of 0-13% with a follow-up of 1–7 years. One limitation that must be mentioned here is that in around half of the studies the method of follow-up was not specified and in the remaining cases this was based on clinical examination by the surgical team. This puts into perspective the reported results, which appear to be too favorable given the complex nature of the hernias involved.

The major disadvantage of the sandwich technique is a very high rate of wound complications of up to 68%, mainly induced by creation of large skin and subcutaneous cellular tissue flaps.

Conclusion

It is difficult to evaluate the significance of the various modifications of the “sandwich technique” based on the available literature since it includes only case series and no comparative studies. The techniques used are associated with very high wound complication rates but with only relatively low recurrence rates despite the complexity of the cases involved. This must be verified in studies with a well-designed methodology.

Bioprinting of osteochondral tissues: A perspective on current gaps and future trends

Osteochondral tissue regeneration has remained a critical challenge in orthopaedic surgery, especially due to complications of arthritic degeneration arising out of mechanical dislocations of joints. The common gold standard of autografting has several limitations in presenting tissue engineering strategies to solve the unmet clinical need. However, due to the complexity of joint anatomy, and tissue heterogeneity at the interface, the conventional tissue engineering strategies have certain limitations. The advent of bioprinting has now provided new opportunities for osteochondral tissue engineering. Bioprinting can uniquely mimic the heterogeneous cellular composition and anisotropic extra-cellular matrix (ECM) organization, while allowing for targeted gene delivery to achieve heterotypic differentiation. In this perspective, we discuss the current advances made towards bioprinting of composite osteochondral tissues and present an account of challenges-in terms of tissue integration, long-term survival, and mechanical strength at the time of implantation-required to be addressed for effective clinical translation of bioprinted tissues. Finally, we highlight some of the future trends related to osteochondral bioprinting with the hope of in-clinical translation.