Brain metastases from colorectal cancer: characteristics and management

Unusual brain metastasis from colon cancer

Background

Brain metastases due to colorectal cancer correspond to 3-5% of all brain metastases. The prognostic factors are based on age, functional status, and single metastasis. Its management is multidisciplinary, with poor prognosis despite the management.

Case Description

A case of a 64-year-old male presented with symptoms of headache, disorientation, and nausea. The enhanced magnetic resonance image showed a mass in the right frontal horn of the lateral ventricle, contrast enhancing, with irregular borders, but defined, without restriction in diffusion-weighted images, associated with obstructive hydrocephalus. The investigations in search of a primary neoplasm were negative. A ventricular endoscopic approach was performed, with total resection of the lesion. Four months later, he developed a bowel obstruction with surgical management to control the primary, followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy, with a current survival longer than 1 year.

Conclusion

Brain metastases due to colorectal cancer are rare, and usually, when diagnosed, there are already pulmonary and hepatic metastases. Multidisciplinary management is recommended, where surgical management can be included in selected cases with controlled systemic disease, good functional condition, and single metastasis.

TGFβ signalling pathway impacts brain metastases profiles in locally advanced colorectal cancer

RATIONALE

Colorectal Cancer (CRC) represents the third most common type of cancer in Germany and the second most common cancer-related cause of death worldwide. Distant metastases are still the main limit for patient survival. While liver metastases as well as peritoneal carcinomatosis can often either be resected or treated with systemic therapy, little options remain for brain metastases. Additionally, a number of studies has already investigated hepatic, peritoneal, pulmonary as well as continuing distant metastases in colorectal cancer. Yet, with respect to tumor biology and brain metastases, little is known so far.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two cohorts, M0 without distant spread and BRA with brain metastases were build. RNA was isolated from paraffin embedded specimen. Gene expression was performed by an RNA NanoString-Analysis using the nCounter® PanCancer Progression Panel by NanoString-Technologies (Hamburg, Germany). Results were analysed by principal component analysis, gene expression and pathway analysis using commonly available databases such as KEGG as benchmark for comparison.

RESULTS

We were able to determine a gene signature that provides a sophisticated group separation between M0 and BRA using principal component analysis. All genes with strong loading characteristics on principal component 1 were cross-referenced with the subsequently performed accurate gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). The GSEA revealed a clear dysregulation of the TGFβ pathway in compared cohorts M0 and BRA. Interestingly, the targeted pathways analysis of the identified genes confirmed that in fact almost all strong loading genes of PC1 play a role in the TGFβ pathway.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest the TGFβ pathway as a crucial player in the development of brain metastases in primary CRC. In some types of colorectal cancer, downregulation of the TGFβ pathway might hinder primary colorectal cancer to metastasize to the nervous system. While the paradoxical functioning of the TGFβ pathway is still not fully understood, these shed light on yet another clinical implication of this complex pathway.

Clinical, Radiologic, and Surgical Features of Brain Metastases in Colorectal Cancer. A Strong Correlation Between Surgical Patterns and Outcome

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BMs) from colorectal cancer (CRC) are a small percentage of metastatic patients and surgery is considered the best choice to improve survival. While most research has focused on the risk of CRC spreading to the brain, no studies have examined the characteristics of BMs in relation to surgery and outcome. In this study, we evaluate the clinical and radiologic features of BMs from CRC patients who underwent surgery and analyze their outcomes.

METHODS

The study is a retrospective observational analysis that included a cohort of 31 patients affected by CRC surgically-treated for their related BMs. For all patients, clinical and surgical data (number, site, side, tumor and edema volume, and morphology) were recorded.

RESULTS

Analysis found that synchronous diagnosis and lesion morphology, particularly cystic versus solid, had the most significant impact on survival (6 vs. 22 months, P = 0.04). To compare BMs with cystic morphology to those with solid morphology, a multivariate analysis was conducted. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of age, sex, clinical onset, or performance status. The analysis revealed no significant differences in localization with regard to site, tumor and edema volume, biology, or complications rate.

CONCLUSIONS

BMs derived from CRC have a significantly different prognosis depending on whether they present as a solid or cystic pattern. Although solid pattern is more common, cystic BMs in this tumor type are less frequent and are associated with a poorer prognosis, regardless of molecular expression, location, size, and adjuvant treatment.

A case of dMMR/MSI-H/TMB-H colon cancer with brain metastasis treated with PD-1 monoclonal antibody

A 70-year-old man had radical surgery for colon cancer one year before the symptoms of memory loss and decreasing cognitive function. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging revealed a brain mass, which was surgically resected and confirmed to be metastatic intestinal adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry of the primary tumor and brain metastasis showed mismatch repair deficiency. The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. However, the brain metastasis relapsed one month after the last chemotherapy. Genetic testing on the resected colon tumor samples confirmed microsatellite instability-high with a high tumor mutation burden by 77.7 muts/Mb. The patient was subsequently treated with programmed death-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab (keytruda). The brain metastatic lesions were completely shrunk, and a complete clinical response was achieved.

Deciphering Brain Metastasis Stem Cell Properties From Colorectal Cancer Highlights Specific Stemness Signature and Shared Molecular Features

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Brain metastases (BMs) from colorectal cancer (CRC) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with chemoresistance and short overall survival. Migrating cancer stem cells with the ability to initiate BM have been described in breast and lung cancers. In this study, we describe the identification and characterization of cancer stem cells in BM from CRC.

METHODS

Four brain metastasis stem cell lines from patients with colorectal cancer (BM-SC-CRC1 to BM-SC-CRC4) were obtained by mechanical dissociation of patient's tumors and selection of cancer stem cells by appropriate culture conditions. BM-SC-CRCs were characterized in vitro by clonogenic and limiting-dilution assays, as well as immunofluorescence and Western blot analyses. In ovo, a chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model and in vivo, xenograft experiments using BALB/c-nude mice were realized. Finally, a whole exome and RNA sequencing analyses were performed.

RESULTS

BM-SC-CRC formed metaspheres and contained tumor-initiating cells with self-renewal properties. They expressed stem cell surface markers (CD44v6, CD44, and EpCAM) in serum-free medium and CRC markers (CK19, CK20 and CDX-2) in fetal bovine serum-enriched medium. The CAM model demonstrated their invasive and migratory capabilities. Moreover, mice intracranial xenotransplantation of BM-SC-CRCs adequately recapitulated the original patient BM phenotype. Finally, transcriptomic and genomic approaches showed a significant enrichment of invasiveness and specific stemness signatures and highlighted KMT2C as a potential candidate gene to potentially identify high-risk CRC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This original study represents the first step in CRC BM initiation and progression comprehension, and further investigation could open the way to new therapeutics avenues to improve patient prognosis.

Risk Factors on the Incidence and Prognostic Effects of Colorectal Cancer With Brain Metastasis: A SEER-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) with brain metastases (BM) is uncommon and often diagnosed at a late stage. The aims of this study were to identify the clinical factors that can influence the incidence of CRC patients with BM (CRCBM) and to investigate the impact of clinical factors and therapies on the outcomes of CRCBM.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2018, patients with CRCBM were enrolled under the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were used to identify risk factors and prognostic factors of BM. Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test were used to evaluate overall survival (OS) and tumor-specific survival (CSS) of CRCBM patients.

RESULTS

A total of 195 (0.34%) CRC patients initially diagnosed with BM were included for analysis. The positive level of CEA, pN2a-b, and additional organ metastases were positively associated with developing BM from the CRC cohort (p < 0.05). The median OS and CSS of the BM patients were both 4.0 months, while the corresponding survival time in CRC patients without BM was 14.0 and 16.0 months, respectively (HR = 2.621, 95% CI = 2.061-3.333 for CSS; HR = 2.556, 95% CI = 2.026-3.225 for OS; log rank p < 0.001, each). Only systematic treatment was independently associated with better survival (p < 0.05, each).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the overall prognosis of CRCBM patients was extremely poor, the positive level of CEA, pN2a-b, and distant metastases could be bad risk factors for the incidence of CRCBM. In addition, only systematic treatment was found to be a negative prognostic factor for CRCBM patients. These related factors can provide more valuable reference for clinical individualized treatments.

New Artificial Intelligence Score and Immune Infiltrates as Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Cancer With Brain Metastases

Incidence of brain metastases has increased in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) as their survival has improved. CD3 T-cells and, lately, DGMate (DiGital tuMor pArameTErs) score, have been identified as prognostic factors in locally advanced CRC. Until now, there is no data concerning the prognostic value of these markers in patients with CRC-derived brain metastases. All consecutive patients with CRC-derived brain metastases diagnosed between 2000 and 2017 were retrospectively included. Staining for CD3, CD8, PD-1, PD-L1 and DGMate analyses were performed using tissue micro-array from primary tumors and, if available, brain metastases. All in all, 83 patients were included with 80 primary tumor samples and 37 brain metastases samples available. CD3 and CD8 T-cell infiltration was higher in primary tumors compared to brain metastases. We observed a significant higher DGMate score in rectal tumors compared to colon tumors (p=0.03). We also noted a trend of higher CD3 T-cell infiltration in primary tumors when brain metastases were both supra and subtentorial compared to brain metastases that were only subtentorial or supratentorial (p=0.36 and p=0.03, respectively). No correlation was found between CD3 or CD8 infiltration or DGMate score in primary tumors or brain metastases and overall survival (OS) in the overall population. In patients with rectal tumors, a high DGMate score in brain metastases was associated with longer OS (13.4 ± 6.1 months versus 6.1 ± 1.4 months, p=0.02). High CD3 T-cell infiltration in brain metastases was associated with lower OS in patients with supratentorial brain metastases (9.8 ± 3.3 months versus 16.7 ± 5.9 months, p=0.03). PD-L1 overexpression was rare, both in primary tumors and brain metastases, but PD-L1 positive primary tumors were associated with worse OS (p=0.01). In contrast to breast and lung cancer derived brain metastases, CD3 and CD8 infiltration and DGMate score are not major prognostic factors in patients with CRC-derived brain metastases.

Factors Prognostic for Brain Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Center Experience in China

Purpose

This study aimed to analyze clinicopathological, survival, prognostic factors, as well as the timing of brain metastases (BM) in colorectal cancer (CRC) using data from a Chinese center.

Patients and Methods

Data of 65 consecutive CRC patients with BM were collected from a single institution in China. The time from primary tumor surgery to the occurrence of BM was calculated. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate cumulative survival of patients. Factors associated with prognosis of overall survival (OS) were explored using Cox's proportional hazard regression models.

Results

The median time interval from CRC surgery to the diagnosis of BM was 24 months. After diagnosis of BM, median OS values for patients were 11 months. Extracranial metastases occurred in 45 cases (69.2%) when BM was diagnosed, and 58.5% of these patients with lung metastases Time of BMs (P=0.018), presence of extracranial metastases (P=0.033), treatment (P=0.003), CA199 (P=0.034), CA125 (P<0.001), CA242 (P=0.018), and CA211 (P=0.012) were associated with OS of patients through univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis using a Cox regression model showed that only treatment was an independent predictor for OS (conservative treatment; HR=1.861, 95% CI=1.077-3.441; P=0.048).

Conclusion

Surgical treatment of metastatic lesions may be an alternative choice for CRC patients with BM. Identifying the timing of brain metastases can help to detect this disease early, leading to a better survival outcome.

Brain metastases from primary colorectal cancer: is radiosurgery an effective treatment approach? Results of a multicenter study of the radiation and clinical oncology Italian association (AIRO)

OBJECTIVES

The prognosis of brain metastatic colorectal cancer patients (BMCRC) is poor. Several local treatments have been used, but the optimal treatment choice remains an unresolved issue. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of a large series of BMCRC patients treated in several Italian centers using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

METHODS

185 BMCRC patients for a total of 262 lesions treated were evaluated. Treatments included surgery followed by post-operative SRS to the resection cavity, and SRS, either single-fraction, then hypofractionated SRS (HSRS). Outcomes was measured in terms of local control (LC), toxicities, brain distant failure (BDF), and overall survival (OS). Prognostic factors influencing survival were assed too.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 33 months (range 3-183 months). Surgery plus SRS have been performed in 28 (10.7%) cases, SRS in 141 (53.8%), and HSRS in 93 (35.5%). 77 (41.6%) patients received systemic therapy. The main total dose and fractionation used were 24 Gy in single fraction or 24 Gy in three daily fractions. Local recurrence occurred in 32 (17.3%) patients. Median, 6 months,1-year-LC were 86 months (95%CI 36-86), 87.2% ± 2.8, 77.8% ± 4.1. Median,6 months,1-year-BDF were 23 months (95%CI 9-44), 66.4% ± 3.9, 55.3% ± 4.5. Median,6 months,1-year-OS were 7 months (95% CI 6-9), 52.7% ± 3.6, 33% ± 3.5. No severe neurological toxicity occurred. Stage at diagnosis, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), presence and number of extracranial metastases, and disease-specific-graded-prognostic-assessment (DS-GPA) score were observed as conditioning survival.

CONCLUSION

SRS/HSRS have proven to be an effective local treatment for BMCRC. A careful evaluation of prognostic factors as well as a multidisciplinary evaluation is a valid aid to manage the optimal therapeutic strategy for CTC patients with BMs.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The prognosis of BMCRC is poor. Several local treatments was used, but optimal treatment choice remains undefined. Radiosurgery has proven to be an effective local treatment for BMCRC. A careful evaluation of prognostic factors and a multidisciplinary evaluation needed.

Metastasis directed treatment of brain metastases from colorectal cancer - a Danish population-based cohort study

Background: Brain metastases (BMs) are an uncommon presentation of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with reported incidence of about 2-4%. Today, there is an increased awareness towards a metastasis directed treatment approach with either surgical resection, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) or both. We examined patient characteristics and survival for patients treated with a localized modality for BM from CRC in a nationwide population-based study.Methods: A registry-based cohort study of all patients with a resected primary colorectal cancer and localized treatment of BM during 2000-2013. We computed descriptive statistics and analysed overall survival by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression.Results: A total of 38131 patients had surgery for a primary CRC and 235 patients were recorded with a metastasis directed treatment for BM, comprising resection alone (n = 158), SRT alone (n = 51) and combined resection and SRT (n = 26). Rectal primary tumor (48.9% vs. 36.2%, p < .001) and lung metastasectomy (11.9 vs 2.8%, p < .001) were more frequent in the BM group. The median survival of patients receiving localized treatment for BM was 9.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.2-10.8). The 1- and 5-year overall survival were 41.7% (95% CI 35-48%) and 11.2% (95% CI 6.9-16.3%). In multivariate analysis, nodal stage was associated with increased mortality with a hazard ratio of 1.63 (95% CI 1.07-2.60, p = .03) for N2 stage with reference to N0.Conclusion: We report a median overall survival of 9.6 months for patients receiving localized treatment for BM from CRC. Lung metastases and rectal primary tumor are more common in the population treated for BM.

Vision Loss from Metastatic Colon Cancer to the Planum Sphenoidale and Optic Nerves

An 80-year-old man was seen in urgent neuro-ophthalmology consultation for bilateral vision loss. He had a past medical history of hypertension and metastatic stage IV colorectal adenocarcinoma. Four months prior to presentation, he developed gradual onset, painless blurred vision in his right eye. He underwent cataract surgery in that eye, but his vision continued to decline to the point of no light perception. He developed new onset, painless, blurred vision in his left eye 3 weeks prior to presentation and woke up with no light perception in his left eye one day prior to presentation.

Treatment modalities and relative survival in patients with brain metastasis from colorectal cancer

Standard treatment options for brain metastases (BM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) are controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of multidisciplinary treatment modalities and provide optimal therapeutic strategies for selected patients with different clinical characteristics. All eligible patients diagnosed with BM from CRC during the past two decades (1997-2016) were identified in our center. Clinical characteristics, treatment modalities and relative survival were retrospectively analyzed. Median overall survival after the identification of BM was 6 months. The 1- and 2- year survival rates were 29.40% and 5.70%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the number of BMs, Karnofsky performance score and the treatment modalities were found to be independent prognostic factors (the p-value was 0.006, 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, multidisciplinary treatment is supported to be the optimal treatment for patients with BM from CRC. For patients with single brain metastases and KPS > 70, neurosurgery combined with chemotherapy could provide an additional survival benefit. For patients with multiple brain metastases or KPS ≤ 70, radiotherapy plus chemotherapy may be appropriate.

Micro/nanomachines: what is needed for them to become a real force in cancer therapy?

Conventional drug delivery systems face several issues in medical applications, such as cyto/genotoxicity and off-targeting. These issues are particularly significant for cancer therapeutics because many of the currently used systems are toxic in their free form. Self-propelled autonomous micro/nanomachines offer promising alternative drug delivery systems based on high cargo loading, fast autonomous movement, precise targeting and the on-demand release of therapeutics in vivo. With this unique set of properties, it is not surprising that they are receiving considerable research attention. However, much less is reported about the drawbacks that hinder their systemic in vivo application. In this review, a biomedical perspective is used to assess micro/nanomotor-based anticancer drug delivery systems reported to date. Advantages along with present issues are highlighted and recommendations which need to be considered to develop an effective biocompatible micro/nanomotor-based delivery system for cancer therapy are discussed.

Brain metastases in colorectal cancer: prognostic factors and survival analysis

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) brain metastases (BM) are an uncommon and late event. We aim to investigate the impact of clinical factors, treatment modalities and RAS/BRAF status on the outcomes of CRC patients with BM.

PATIENTS

We retrospectively analysed CRC patients who developed BM in our centre between January 1997 and June 2017. Clinical factors, treatment modalities, RAS/BRAF status and survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were recorded; 82% had left-sided (LS) CRC and 71% had lung metastases. Median time to BM diagnosis was 36 months (m) and 93% of patients received local treatment of BM (43% whole brain radiotherapy, 50% surgery). Right-sided (RS) CRC showed shorter time to BM, not previously described (9.3 vs 46.6 m for RS and LS CRC, respectively; HR = 4.7, p = 0.006). Median overall survival (mOS) from BM treatment was 9.5 m, better in patients who underwent surgery than those treated with radiotherapy alone (12.1 vs 4.6 m, respectively; HR = 0.3, p = 0.019) and in those without progressive metastatic extracranial disease (7.2 vs 20.9 m, for progressive and non-progressive, respectively; HR = 0.3, p = 0.056). Patients with two or more metastatic extracranial locations showed worse prognosis (5.9 vs 16.3 m, for > 2 vs 0-1, respectively; HR = 3.7, p = 0.015). RAS/BRAF status did not showed prognostic value.

CONCLUSIONS

Time to BM diagnosis is shorter in RS CRC. The presence of two or more metastatic extracranial locations and progressive metastatic extracranial disease at the time of BM diagnosis could be bad prognosis factors for CRC BM patients.