Liver resection in octogenarians: are the outcomes worth the risk?

Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in octogenarians: a single-center analysis

The rapidly aging population in industrialized countries comes with an increased incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC) which presents new challenges for oncological treatments especially in elderly patients. Thus, the question arises to what extent the benefit of surgical resections, as the only curative treatment option, outweighs possible perioperative risks in patients ≥ 80 years of age (octogenarians). We therefore retrospectively analyzed 311 patients who underwent resection for iCC at Hannover Medical School between January 1996 and December 2022. In total, there were 11 patients older than 80 years in our collective. Despite similar tumor size, octogenarians underwent comparatively less extensive surgery (54.5% major resections in octogenarians vs. 82.7% in all other patients; p = 0.033) with comparable rates of lymphadenectomy and tumor-free resection margins. Furthermore, we did not observe increased major postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa complications: 27.3% vs. 34.3% in all other patients; p = 0.754) or mortality (estimated 1-year OS of 70.7% vs. 72.5% in all other patients, p = 0.099). The length of intensive care unit (ICU) or intermediate care unit (IMC) stay was significantly longer in octogenarians, however, with a comparable length in total hospital stay. The estimated overall survival (OS) did also not differ significantly, although a trend towards reduced long-term survival was observed (14.5 months vs. 28.03 months in all other patients; p = 0.099). In conclusion, primary resection is a justifiable and safe therapeutic option even in octogenarians but requires an even more thorough preoperative patient selection.

Perioperative outcome, long-term mortality and time trends in elderly patients undergoing low-, intermediate- or major non-cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Decision-making whether older patients benefit from surgery can be a difficult task. This report investigates characteristics and outcomes of a large cohort of inpatients, aged 80 years and over, undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

METHODS

This observational study was performed at a tertiary university medical centre in the Netherlands. Patients of 80 years or older undergoing elective or urgent surgery from January 2004 to June 2017 were included. Outcomes were length of stay, discharge destination, 30-day and long-term mortality. Patients were divided into low-, intermediate and high-risk surgery subgroups. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to evaluate the association of risk factors and outcomes. Secondary outcomes were time trends, assessed with Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test.

RESULTS

Data of 8251 patients, undergoing 19,027 surgical interventions were collected from the patients' medical record. 7032 primary procedures were suitable for analyses. Median LOS was 3 days in the low-risk group, compared to six in the intermediate- and ten in the high-risk group. Median LOS of the total cohort decreased from 5.8 days (IQR 1.9-14.5) in 2004-2007 to 4.6 days (IQR 1.9-9.0) in 2016-2017. Three quarters of patients were discharged to their home. Postoperative 30-day mortality in the low-risk group was 2.3%. In the overall population 30-day mortality was high and constant during the study period (6.7%, ranging from 4.2 to 8.4%).

CONCLUSION

Patients should not be withheld surgery solely based on their age. However, even for low-risk surgery, the mortality rate of more than 2% is substantial. Deciding whether older patients benefit from surgery should be based on the understanding of individual risks, patients' wishes and a patient-centred plan.

The effect of age on the opportunity to receive cancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

Older adults with cancer may not receive the same opportunities for treatment as younger patients. In this retrospective population-based cohort study, we explored whether age was an independent predictor of receiving specialist consultation and treatment.

METHODS

Patients age 45-99 were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry having a primary solid tumor diagnosed between 01/Jan/2010 and 31/Dec/2019. We used logistic regression adjusted sociodemographic and clinical characteristics to compare the likelihood of consultation or receipt of treatment using linear splines at critical ages of 65, 80, and 90 years.

RESULTS

A total 168,232 (42%), 165,205 (41%), 57,360 (14%), and 7810 (2%) patients were diagnosed age 45-64, 65-79, 80-89, and 90-99, respectively. The likelihood of surgical consultation decreased as patients reached 65 years [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.86 (0.84-0.89)], which decreased further among octogenarians [aOR 0.63 (0.59-0.67)]. Similar results were observed for consultation with a medical oncologist and radiation oncologist. Receipt of surgery also decreased with age. Three-month post-operative mortality was higher among older patients [aRR 1.38 (1.26-1.50) per 10 years, p < 0.0001], an effect that remained similar as patients reached age 65 + years of age (p = 0.09 for change). For stage I patients, 3-month post-operative survival was high across all age groups, ranging from 99.8% in 45-64 year-olds, 99.4% in 65-79 year-olds, and 98.1% among octogenarians and nonagenarians (lung, colorectal, breast, cervical cancer patients).

CONCLUSION

Older patients were less likely to have specialist consultations. More comprehensive data collection on clinical factors and referral patterns is needed to improve care for elderly cancer patients.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of 90-day and 30-day mortality after liver resection in the elderly

BACKGROUND

With the aging population worldwide, the number of elderly patients presenting for liver resection because of liver malignancies is increasing. Data on the perioperative mortality in this population are limited and contradictory. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the mortality of elderly patients after hepatectomy.

METHODS

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, we searched 3 databases to identify studies that investigated 30-day and 90-day mortality after hepatectomy for patients ≥65 years of age. We categorized the patients by age into 4 groups (≥65, ≥70, ≥75, and ≥80 years), which were analyzed separately for mortality. All analyses were conducted with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 28.

RESULTS

Using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, we identified 441 articles. After study selection and quality assessment, we included 66 studies consisting of 29,998 patients in the final meta-analysis. The pooled estimates for 30-day and 90-day mortality in the ≥65, ≥70, ≥75, and ≥80 age groups years were 1.3% (95% confidence interval 0.59%-2.06%), 2.8% (95% confidence interval 1.80%-3.69%), 3.0% (95% confidence interval 1.68%-4.30%), and 1.7% (95% confidence interval 1.22%-2.20%) and 2.7% (95% confidence interval 1.45%-3.87%), 2.8% (95% confidence interval 1.49%-4.02%), 5.1% (95% confidence interval 2.76%-7.42%), and 2.4% (95% confidence interval 0.60%-4.16%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis summarizes the 30-day and 90-day mortality rates after liver resection in the elderly patients. Liver resection in this population selected for surgery appears to be relatively safe. Advanced age alone may not be a sufficient exclusion criterion for surgery. These age-specific mortality data can be used to educate patients at the time of preoperative counseling.

Oncological liver resection in elderly - A retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Due to demographic changes and higher life expectancy especially in industrial nations, the number of liver resections in patients ≥70 years is rising. It is known that older age is associated with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality after surgery under general anesthesia. The aim of this analysis is to compare the postoperative outcome after liver resections for malignancies in patients aged below and above 70 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospectively collected electronic database of 1034 liver resections between 01/2013 and 12/2019 was retrospectively analyzed. Comparative analysis of patients <70 and ≥ 70 years receiving liver resections for malignancies included 889 operations in 703 patients. Analysis of postoperative outcome and uni- and multivariate analyses of associated risk factors were performed.

RESULTS

Median age of the whole cohort was 65 years (range 18-87 years). N = 582 liver resections (65.7%) were performed in patients <70 years with 42.8% major hepatectomies and n = 307 (34.3%) liver resections in patients ≥70 years with 50.5% major hepatectomies (p = 0.034). Relevant postoperative morbidity of the whole cohort was 27.9%. The 30-day mortality was 3.9% and re-operation rate 14.8%. Patients ≥70 years had significantly higher postoperative morbidity and mortality rates than patients <70 years. Major resections, longer operating time, need of intraoperative transfusions of blood products as well as biliodigestive anastomosis (BDA) and inferior vena cava (IVC) resection were independent risk factors for worse postoperative outcome.

CONCLUSION

Liver resections in patients ≥70 years are associated with a worse postoperative course after. Parenchyma sparing resections should be preferred in those patients.

Alveolar Echinococcosis-A Challenging Task for the Hepatobiliary Surgeon

(1) Background: Alveolar echinococcosis (AE) is an ultimately fatal disease, whose only curative treatment is surgery. Due to its late presentation extended liver resections are often necessary. The true benefit of extensive surgery has yet to be established; (2) Methods: We present a single center experience of 33 cases of Echinococcus multilocularis that have been treated at a high-volume hepatobiliary surgery center between 2004 and 2021. (3) Results: Of the 33 patients 24 patients underwent major liver resection (73%). In addition to the liver resection patients frequently underwent complex extrahepatic procedures such as lymphadenectomy (n = 21, 61%), vascular resections and reconstructions (n = 9, 27%) or resections and reconstruction of the extrahepatic bile duct (n = 11, 33%). Seven patients suffered from ≥ grade III complications (21%). Complete resection was achieved in 17 patients. Fourteen patients had R1 resections and two had macroscopic parasitic remnant (R2). Progressive disease was reported in three patients (The two R2 patients and one R1 resected patient). At a median follow-up of 54 months no mortality has occurred in our cohort; (4) Conclusions: Liver resection remains the gold standard for AE. Even in extensive disease the combination of complex resection and perioperative benzimidazoles can achieve favorable long-term outcomes.

Liver resection for octogenarians in a French center: prolonged hepatic pedicle occlusion and male sex increase major complications

PURPOSE

The prolonged life expectancy and increase in aging of the population have led surgeons to propose hepatectomy in the elderly population. In this study, we evaluate the surgical outcome of octogenarians in a single French center.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2020, 78 patients over 80 years old were retrospectively analyzed. The risk factors of major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade IIIa) and patient performance after surgery by using textbook outcome (TO) (no surgical complications, no prolonged hospital stay (≤ 15 days), no readmission ≤90 days after discharge, and no mortality ≤90 days after surgery) were studied.

RESULTS

The main surgical indication was for malignancy (96%), including mainly colorectal liver metastases (n = 41; 53%) and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 22; 28%), and major hepatectomy was performed in 28 patients (36%). There were 6 (8%) postoperative mortalities. The most frequent complications were pulmonary (n = 22; 32%), followed by renal insufficiency (n = 22; 28%) and delirium (n = 16; 21%). Major complications occurred in 19 (24%) patients. On multivariate analysis, the main risk factors for major complications were the median vascular clamping time (0 vs 35; P = 0.04) and male sex (P = 0.046). TO was ultimately achieved in 30 patients (38%), and there was no prognostic factor for achievement of TO.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatectomy in octogenarians is associated with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Meanwhile, prolonged hepatic pedicle clamping should be avoided especially if hepatectomy is planned in a male patient.

Impact of Ageing on Hepatic Malignancy Resection: Is Age Really a Risk Factor for Mortality?

BACKGROUND

With an ageing population, it is paramount for surgeons to comprehend the implications of age on surgical outcomes. This study aims to identify the effects of age on perioperative outcomes post-hepatectomy.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2017, 357 hepatectomies were performed in our centre for malignancy. Data recorded include demographic, histopathology and perioperative outcomes. Patients were divided into three age groups (Group 1 < 65 years, Group 2 65-74 years, Group 3 ≥ 75 years).

RESULTS

With increasing age, there was a trend towards patient having: ASA ≥ 3 (from 32.1% to 60.9%, p < 0.0001), clear margins (from 80.4% to 88.3%, p = 0.2256), days of hospitalisation (from 9.5 ± 6.9 to 12 ± 8.0, p = 0.0003), days of ICU admission (from 2.3 ± 2.8 to 2.8 ± 12.9, p = 0.0790) and morbidity (from 39% to 58.5%, p = 0.0073). Cardiovascular complications and postoperative delirium increase with age. There was no significant difference in mortality across the three groups. Univariate and bivariate binary logistic regressions found no association between mortality and age. When adjusted for age, 30- and 90-day mortality was significantly associated with Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3, length of hospital and cardiac complications. Additionally, 90-day mortality was significantly associated with ASA score ≥3, mass of liver resected, length of ICU stay and hepatobiliary, pulmonary and genitourinary complications.

CONCLUSION

Increased age is associated with increased post-hepatectomy complications, prolonged hospital stay and ICU admission. However, age itself is not a contraindication for hepatectomy and is not associated with increased mortality. Good histopathology outcomes and low mortality rates are achievable with careful patient selection and appropriate perioperative management.

Peer review of mortality after hepatectomy in Australia

BACKGROUND

The data within the Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality (ANZASM) provides a unique opportunity to consider the contributing factors to perioperative deaths as determined by peer review. Consideration of the factors contributing to mortality after hepatectomy can provide greater insight into how deaths can be prevented. The objective of this study was to determine the reasons for patient deaths post-hepatectomy in Australia.

METHODS

ANZASM data from 1 January 2010 to 30 Jun 2017 was reviewed and all deaths following hepatectomy were selected for analysis. Assessors determinations of whether management could have been improved were reviewed, and then classified into groups of significant clinical events using thematic analysis with a data driven approach.

RESULTS

The study included 88 deaths reported to ANZASM after hepatectomy. The assessors questioned the decision to operate in 23/88 (25%) patients with a further nine (10%) patients insufficiently investigated prior to resection. ANZASM assessors determined that there was a delay in recognising a significant complication in 16/88 (18%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Multi-disciplinary decision making is strongly recommended when deciding which patients to treat with hepatic resection. Optimal care post-hepatectomy includes early recognition of complications and enactment of an adequate rescue plan.

Short-term autonomy and survival after hepatectomy in the elderly

AIM

To study morbi-mortality, survival after hepatectomy in elderly patients, and influence on their short-term autonomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study conducted between 2002 and 2017 comparing patients less than 65 years old (controls) to those more than 65 years old (cases) from a prospective database, with retrospective collection of geriatric data. Cases were divided into three sub-groups (65-70 years, 70-80 years and>80 years).

RESULTS

Four hundred and eighty-two patients were included. There was no age difference in number of major hepatectomies (P=0.5506), length of stay (P=0.3215), mortality at 90 days (P=0.3915), and surgical complications (P=0.1467). There were more Grade 1 Clavien medical complications among the patients aged over 65 years (P=0.1737). There was no difference in overall survival (P=0.460) or disease-free survival (P=0.108) according to age after adjustment for type of disease and hepatectomy. One-third of patients had geriatric complications. The "home discharge" rate decreased significantly with age from 92% to 68% (P=0.0001). Early loss of autonomy after hospitalization increased with age, 16% between 65 and 70 years, 23% between 70 and 80 years and 36% after 80 years (P=0.10). We identified four independent predictors of loss of autonomy: age>70 years, cholangiocarcinoma, length of stay>10 days, and metachronous colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients had the same management as young patients, with no difference in surgery or survival, but with an increase in early loss of autonomy.

Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients - is it reasonable?

Background

Intrahepatic cholangiocarinoma (ICC) has a rising incidence in western countries. Often major or extended resections are necessary for complete tumor removal. Due to demographical trends the number of elderly patients diagnosed with ICC is rising accordingly. Aim of this study is to show whether resection of ICC in elderly patients is reasonable or not.

Methods

Between January 2008 and June 2018 all consecutive patients with ICC were collected. Analyses were focussed on the performed resection, its extent, postoperative morbidity and mortality as well as survival. Statistics were performed with Chi² test for categorical data and for survival analyses the Kaplan Meier model with log rank test was used.

Results

In total 210 patients underwent surgical exploration with 150 resections (71.4%). Patients were divided in 70-years cut-off groups (> 70 vs < 70 years of age) as well as a young (age 30–50, n = 23), middle-age (50–70, n = 76) and old (> 70, n = 51) group, whose results are presented here. Resectability (p = 0.709), extent of surgery (p = 0.765), morbidity (p = 0.420) and mortality (p = 0.965) was comparable between the different age groups. Neither visceral (p = 0.991) nor vascular (p = 0.614) extension differed significantly, likewise tumor recurrence (p = 0.300) or the localisation of recurrence (p = 0.722). In comparison of patients > or < 70 years of age, recurrence-free survival (RFS) was significantly better for the younger group (p = 0.047). For overall survival (OS) a benefit could be shown, but without reaching significance (p = 0.072). In subgroup analysis the middle-age group had significant better OS (p = 0.020) and RFS (p = 0.038) compared to the old group. Additionally, a better OS (p = 0.076) and RFS (p = 0.179) was shown in comparison with the young group as well, but without reaching significance. The young compared to the old group had analogous OS (p = 0.931) and RFS (p = 0.845).

Conclusion

Resection of ICC in elderly patients is not associated with an increased perioperative risk. Even extended resections can be performed in elderly patients without obvious disadvantages. Middle-age patients have a clear benefit for OS and RFS, while young and old patients have a comparable and worse long-term outcome.

Stereotactic Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Tumors in Octogenarians

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and overall clinical outcome of patients over the age of 80 undergoing stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) and to compare the results to a younger population with propensity score matching.

Materials and Methods: Between 2006 and 2018 36 patients aged between 80 and 90 years underwent 46 SRFA sessions of 70 primary and secondary liver tumors. For comparison of treatment safety and efficacy 36 younger patients were selected with propensity score matching by the R package “MatchIt” in this retrospective, single-center study.

Results: 68/70 tumors were successfully ablated at first ablation session (97% primary technical efficacy rate). Local tumor recurrence developed in 5 of 70 nodules (7.1%). The complication rate above Clavien-Dindo Grade III was 6.5% (3 of 46). The overall survival (OS) rates at 1-, 3-, and 5- years from the date of the first SRFA were 84.6, 50.5, and 37.9% for HCC patients and 87.5%, 52.5% at 1-, and 3-years for CRC patients. The disease-free survival (DFS) for HCC patients after SRFA was 79.1, 35.6, and 23.7%, at 1-, 3-, and 5- years, and 75%, 22.5% at 1-, and 3-years for CRC patients. There were no significant differences in terms of technical efficacy, local recurrences, major complications, OS and DFS compared to the control group.

Conclusion: SRFA in octogenarians is a safe, feasible and useful option in the management of primary or metastatic liver tumors with no significant difference in outcomes compared to a younger control group.