The Biomechanical Burden of Orthopaedic Procedures and Musculoskeletal Injuries Sustained by Orthopaedic Surgeons: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Orthopaedic surgeons are at high risk for experiencing work-related musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries and chronic pain due to repetitive large magnitude forces, altered posture from lead vests, and prolonged irregular body positions. We sought to synthesize available evidence regarding (1) the biomechanics of orthopaedic surgery and (2) MSK injuries sustained by orthopaedic surgeons with subsequent treatment and consequences.

METHODS

To conduct this systematic review, we queried 4 databases (PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science) for original research studies presenting on the biomechanics of orthopaedic surgery or MSK injuries sustained by orthopaedic surgeons. Studies were excluded if they were not original research (i.e., reviews) or reported on non-MSK injuries and injuries in patients or nonorthopaedic specialists. The literature search yielded 3,202 publications, 34 of which were included in the final analysis.

RESULTS

Eight studies reported on the biomechanics of orthopaedic surgery. Surgeons spent an average 41.6% of operating time slouched. Head and whole spine angles were closest to natural standing position when using a microscope for visualization and with higher surgical field heights. Use of lead aprons resulted in a shifted weight distribution on the forefoot, gain in thoracic kyphosis, and increase in lateral deviation from postural loading. Twenty-six studies reported on MSK symptoms and injuries experienced by orthopaedic surgeons, with an overall prevalence from 44% to 97%. The most common body regions involved were lower back (15.2%-89.5%), hip/thigh (5.0%-86.6%), neck (2.4%-74%), hand/wrist (10.5%-54%), shoulder (7.1%-48.5%), elbow (3.1%-28.3%), knee/lower leg (7.9%-27.4%), and foot/ankle (7%-25.7%). Of surgeons with any reported MSK symptom or injury, 27% to 65.7% required nonoperative treatment, 3.2% to 34.3% surgery, and 4.5% to 31% time off work. Up to 59.3% of surgeons reported that their injuries would negatively influence their ability to perform surgical procedures in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

The orthopaedic surgeon population experiences a high prevalence of MSK symptoms and injuries, likely secondary to the biomechanical burdens of tasks required of them during strenuous operations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Survey of Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Orthopaedic Surgeon: Identifying Injuries, Exacerbating Workplace Factors, and Treatment Patterns in the Orthopaedic Community

Introduction:

As demand for orthopaedic care increases, the orthopaedic community must preserve access to skilled physicians. Workplace hazards and related injuries or conditions contribute to musculoskeletal (MSK) stress on orthopaedic surgeons, which can lead to undesirable medical leaves of absence or early retirement. The purpose of this study was to identify and characterize work-related and non–work-related MSK conditions that affect orthopaedic surgeons and differential injury patterns among male and female surgeons. This study hypothesized that MSK conditions would be exacerbated by work, correlate with age, and show gender-based disparities. Identifying MSK conditions and associated workplace hazards may ultimately help guide preventive or protective efforts.

Methods:

Following IRB and society approvals, a modified 15-question physical discomfort survey was emailed to a randomized selection of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) members and all Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society members. Data were deidentified and merged by AAOS; analyses were performed by the authors.

Results:

Most surgeons reported at least one MSK condition (86%; 95% male versus 82% female, P = 0.317), with an average of two conditions per surgeon. Low back pain (56%) and neck pain (42%) were the two most common conditions reported. Male surgeons were more likely to report medial epicondylitis (P = 0.040), lateral epicondylitis (P ≤ 0.001), low back pain (P = 0.001), and lumbar radiculopathy (P = 0.001); however, male respondents were significantly older than female respondents (57 versus 43 years, P ≤ 0.0001), and some conditions were age-correlated. Most respondents reported at least one work-attributed MSK condition (64%; 68% male versus 62% female, P = 0.806). Caseload was not associated with an increased number of work-related MSK conditions; yet, 60% of surgeons reported that work worsened symptoms. Surgical treatment was sought most often for lumbar radiculopathy (6%) and carpal tunnel syndrome (6%). Sixty-nine leaves of absence were reported; most less than 1 month (55%). Exacerbating workplace factors included positioning (patient/surgeon), instruments, and personal protective equipment.

Discussion:

Work-related MSK conditions are common among orthopaedic surgeons. Greater awareness of potential workplace-related hazards and conditions is needed to address and mitigate negative MSK health effects on orthopaedic surgeons.

Quantifying Lumbar Movement Patterns of Allied Health Professionals in an Australian Health Care Facility

Health professionals responsible for return to work plans have little data about allied health movement to guide recommendations following lower back injury. This study aimed to quantify the lumbar movement patterns of allied health professionals within a health care facility throughout a normal workday. An observational case study was undertaken at a public health care facility with 122 allied health professionals. The lumbar movements were recorded with the ViMove together with pain scale measurement. The mean (SD) recording time for allied health was 7.7 (0.7) hours. A mean (SD) 3 (1.4) hours total were spent in standing, 3.8 (1.7) hours in sitting, and 0.8 (0.4) hours in locomotion. Forty-nine flexions were recorded on average per session, most identified as short term (<30 s) within low range (0°-20°). Lumbar movement patterns differed among professions. Thirty-seven (31%) participants reported a history of lower back injury, and 57 (47%) reported low back pain at the end of their workday. This study provides an insight into allied health professionals' back movement in a hospital or community-based health care setting. These data may inform those who make return to work recommendations or provide rehabilitation services for allied health professionals working with a lower back injury.

Sitting Posture During Occupational Driving Causes Low Back Pain; Evidence-Based Position or Dogma? A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

In this review, we determine if there is evidence to demonstrate a relationship between occupational driving posture and low back pain.

BACKGROUND

The burden of low back pain is increasing. An understanding of this relationship is required to enable the development of recommendations for clinicians and policy-makers for the driving industry.

METHOD

Five databases were searched up to March 12, 2018. Study quality was assessed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies, followed by a GRADE analysis to consider the evidence as a whole. A narrative, critical synthesis was completed that considered the methods by which driving posture and low back pain were measured and analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 653 articles identified, with seven eligible for review. Four articles identified an association between occupational driving posture and low back pain, yet this was based on the use of measurement tools lacking validity. Although a relationship may exist, the specific driving postures associated with low back pain and the strength of this relationship have not been confirmed.

CONCLUSION

Future research needs to employ validated and reliable, real-time qualitative methods for measuring occupational driving posture to advance our understanding of this relationship.

APPLICATION

Clinical and policy recommendations regarding driving posture and low back pain should be used with caution, as they are guided by evidence incorporating bias. Future studies are required to confirm the specific postures assumed while occupational driving and their relationship with low back pain, before recommendations can be made.