Emergency surgery versus elective surgery after reduction for patients with incarcerated groin hernias

Mesh repair versus non-mesh repair for incarcerated and strangulated groin hernia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mesh repair in incarcerated or strangulated groin hernia is controversial, especially when bowel resection is required. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis comparing mesh and non-mesh repair in patients undergoing emergency groin hernia repair.

METHODS

We performed a literature search of databases to identify studies comparing mesh and primary suture repair of patients with incarcerated or strangulated inguinal or femoral hernias who underwent emergency surgery. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by pooled analysis and meta-analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics.

RESULTS

1095 studies were screened and 101 were thoroughly reviewed. Twenty observational studies and four randomized controlled trials comprising 12,402 patients were included. We found that mesh-based repair had reduced recurrence (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.19, 0.67; P = 0.001; I2 = 35%), length of hospital stay (OR - 1.02; 95% CI - 1.87, - 0.17; P = 0.02; I2 = 94%) and operative time (OR - 9.21; 95% CI - 16.82, - 1.61; P = 0.02; I2 = 95%) without increasing surgical site infection, mortality or postoperative complications such as seroma, chronic, ileus or urinary retention. In the subgroup analysis of patients that underwent bowel resection, we found that mesh repair was associated with an increased risk of surgical site infection (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.04, 2.91; P = 0.04; I2 = 9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Mesh repair for incarcerated and strangulated groin hernias reduces recurrence without an increase in postoperative complications and should be considered in clean cases. However, in the setting of bowel resection, mesh repair might increase the incidence of surgical site infection.

Emergency thoracic surgery patients have worse risk-adjusted outcomes than non-emergency patients

BACKGROUND

Outcomes for patients undergoing emergency thoracic operations have not been well described. This study was designed to compare postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing emergency versus nonemergency thoracic operations.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2005-2018). We identified patients who underwent emergency thoracic operations using current procedural technology codes. Patients were then sorted into 1 of 4 cohorts: lung and chest wall, hiatal hernia, esophagus, and pericardium. Emergency versus nonemergency outcomes were compared. Univariate logistic regression was performed with "emergency status" as the independent variable and 30-day postoperative outcomes as the dependent variables. Multiple logistic regression models were performed to control for preoperative factors.

RESULTS

Of 90,398 thoracic operations analyzed, 4,044 (4.5%) were emergency. Common emergency operations were pericardial window (n = 580, 10.2%), laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (n = 366, 8.9%), thoracoscopic partial lung decortication (n = 334, 8.1%), thoracoscopic wedge resection (n = 301, 7.3%), thoracoscopic total lung decortication (n = 256, 6.2%), and open repair of hiatal hernia without mesh (n = 254, 6.2%). In all 4 cohorts, 30-day postoperative complications occurred more frequently after emergency surgery. After controlling for patient characteristics, 8 complications were more frequent after emergency lung and chest wall surgery, 5 complications were more frequent after emergency hiatal hernia surgery, and 3 complications were more frequent after emergency pericardium surgery. Risk-adjusted complications were not different after emergency esophageal surgery.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing emergency thoracic operations have worse risk-adjusted outcomes than those undergoing nonemergency thoracic operations. Subset analysis is needed to determine what factors contribute to increased adverse outcomes in specific patient populations.

Current opinions in inguinal hernia emergencies: A comprehensive review of related evidences

INTRODUCTION:

Groins hernia emergencies are evaluated under two definitions: incarceration that is defined as a hernia in which its content becomes irreducible at the passage in the abdominal wall and strangulation that compromises the blood supply to the omentum and/or intestines within the hernia sac. The purpose of this paper was to determine the latest knowledge about groin hernia emergencies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

PubMed and Google Scholar searches were done by using combinations of “inguinal hernia” and “emergency”, and “groin hernia” and “emergency” keywords at first. More detailed searches were performed to enrich the “Surgical treatment” part of the paper by using “emergency hernia” and “mesh”, “emergency hernia,” and “laparoscopic versus open” keywords afterward.

RESULTS:

Approximately 5%–10% of all inguinal repairs are performed in emergency settings. Both lateral and medial inguinal hernias can get incarcerated or strangulated, whereas the risk for femoral hernias is higher. Manual reduction of incarcerated inguinal hernias is successful in approximately 60% of the cases. The prediction of bowel ischemia due to strangulation may be possible with some blood tests and imaging studies like ultrasound and computed tomography. It has been shown that the longer the duration of incarceration the higher the risk of bowel ischemia. Bowel resection which is more frequently necessary in patients with advanced age, female gender, and femoral hernia, is associated with an increased risk of perioperative mortality. Some surgeons still use tissue-suture repairs in an emergency setting; however, mesh repairs have been shown to be safe unless there is an overt contamination.

CONCLUSION:

Early treatment of complicated groin hernias is the key to favorable outcomes. The need for bowel resection and advanced age are the most prominent factors for morbidity and mortality. Mesh repairs are safe in most cases. Minimally invasive approaches promise good results in experienced centers.

Does preoperative enhanced CT predict requirement of intestinal resection in the patients with incarcerated myopectineal hernias containing small bowel?

PURPOSE

Bowel wall enhancement on CT imaging is considered one of the useful features for the prediction of the presence of irreversible ischemic change in patients with small bowel obstruction. However, the applicability of CT imaging in patients with incarcerated hernias has not been investigated in detail. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the feasibility of preoperative CT findings for the prediction of the presence of irreversible ischemic change in patients with incarcerated hernias containing small bowel.

METHODS

Included in this study were 76 patients who underwent surgery for preoperatively diagnosed incarcerated hernias containing small bowel (27 inguinal hernias, 37 femoral hernias and 12 obturator hernias) at our hospital between January 2011 and June 2020. The preoperative clinicoradiological features were compared between the groups, and predictors for intestinal resection were evaluated.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients required intestinal resection (Resection group), and the other 57 patients did not require intestinal resection (Nonresection group). Multivariate analyses revealed that age ≥ 80 years (p = 0.018, odds ratio = 6.604) and the absence of bowel wall enhancement (p = 0.032, odds ratio = 51.200) were independent predictors for intestinal resection. In resected specimens, all patients with an absence of bowel wall enhancement on preoperative enhanced CT had ischemic changes extending beyond the muscularis propria.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative enhancement CT yields useful information for the prediction of the presence of irreversible ischemic change in patients with incarcerated hernias containing small bowel.