1
|
Zamaray B, Veld JV, Brohet R, Consten EC, Tanis PJ, van Westreenen HL. Timing of restoration of bowel continuity after decompressing stoma, in left-sided obstructive colon cancer: a nationwide retrospective cohort. Int J Surg 2024; 110:864-872. [PMID: 37916947 PMCID: PMC10871576 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the increasing use of decompressing stoma as a bridge to surgery for left-sided obstructive colon cancer (LSOCC), the timing of restoration of bowel continuity (ROBC) is a subject of debate. There is a lack of data on immediate ROBC during elective resection as an alternative for a 3-stage procedure. This study analysed if immediate ROBC during tumour resection is safe and of any benefit for patients who underwent decompressing stoma for LSOCC. METHODS In a Dutch nationwide collaborative research project, 3153 patients who underwent resection for LSOCC in 75 hospitals (2009-2016) were identified. Extensive data on disease and procedural characteristics, and outcomes was collected by local collaborators. For this analysis, 332 patients who underwent decompressing stoma followed by curative resection were selected. Immediate ROBC during tumour resection was compared to two no immediate ROBC groups, (1) tumour resection with primary anastomosis (PA) with leaving the decompressing stoma in situ, and (2) tumour resection without PA. RESULTS Immediate ROBC was performed in 113 patients (34.0%) and no immediate ROBC in 219 patients [168 with PA (50.6%) and 51 patients without PA (15.4%)]. No differences at baseline between the groups were found for age, ASA score, cT, and cM. Major surgical complications (8.8% immediate ROBC vs. 4.8% PA with decompressing stoma and 7.8% no PA; P =0.37) and mortality (2.7% vs. 2.4% and 0%, respectively; P =0.52) were similar. Immediate ROBC resulted in a shorter time with a stoma (mean 41 vs. 240 and 314 days, respectively; P <0.001), and fewer permanent stomas (7% vs. 21% and 80%, respectively; P <0.001) as compared to PA with a decompressing stoma or no PA. CONCLUSION After a decompressing stoma for LSOCC, immediate ROBC during elective resection appears safe, reduces the total time with a stoma and the risk of a permanent stoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby Zamaray
- Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Zwolle
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam
| | - Joyce V. Veld
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam
| | | | - Esther C.J. Consten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen
- Department of Surgery, Meander hospital, Amersfoort
| | - Pieter J. Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Steen CJ, Wei MYK, Vadakkenchery Varghese E, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Sansom W, Balakrishnan V, An V, Chandra R. Quality of life amongst patients with diverting umbilical stomas in rectal surgery: a single centre prospective randomized controlled pilot study. ANZ J Surg 2024; 94:187-192. [PMID: 37749845 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The umbilical stoma (umbistoma) has been proposed as a viable alternative site for a temporary defunctioning stoma. Suggested advantages of the umbistoma include decreased number of surgical incisions required, improved cosmesis and ease of reversal surgery. This study aimed to assess the patient experience of umbilical loop ileostomies in rectal surgery, with the primary outcome being patient reported quality of life (QoL). METHODS A total of 20 patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery were randomly allocated to have a defunctioning ileostomy at a conventional site (right iliac fossa) or at the umbilicus. Patient-reported QoL was assessed at 6 weeks using the Stoma-QoL questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were number of stomas reversed, length of time awaiting stoma reversal surgery, duration of operative time for stoma reversal, length of hospital stay following stoma reversal and rate of parastomal or post reversal incisional hernias. RESULTS Patients who had an umbilical stoma scored significantly lower on the Stoma-QoL questionnaire compared to the conventional group, particularly on questions regarding feelings of tiredness, body insecurity and anxiety. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in relation to secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION There may be potential disadvantages to the umbilical stoma with negative impacts on body image and subsequent increased social anxiety. Patient selection and adequate counselling will be important when considering an umbilical stoma. Further larger scale prospective studies are required to further validate the feasibility and longer-term safety of umbilical stomas in both clinical outcomes as well as patient QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Steen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Cabrini Research, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew Y K Wei
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi
- Cabrini Research, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wendy Sansom
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vikram Balakrishnan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vinna An
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Raaj Chandra
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chau TCY, Nguyen H, Robertson IK, Harvey X, Tan B, Tan M, Yang CM. Factors affecting timing of loop ileostomy closure: a regional centre's experience with 106 patients. ANZ J Surg 2024; 94:193-198. [PMID: 37876156 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The burden of defunctioning ileostomy is significant with up to two thirds of patients reporting stoma-related morbidity. While timely reversal is safe and cost-effective, the time to reversal in regional Australian hospitals is not well described in professional publications. We aim to assess the current timeliness of ileostomy closure and identify possible reasons for delaying closure. METHODS A retrospective analysis of loop ileostomies created and reversed in Launceston General Hospital for both rectal cancer surgery and other benign indications was undertaken. Patients with loop ileostomy created between 2010 and 2020 were included. Clinical data of timing of events, complications, readmission and stoma follow-up were recorded; and analysed using multivariate regression analyses to identify clinically relevant risk factors for delayed closure. RESULTS A total of 123 patients underwent loop-ileostomy formation during the study period, of which 106 patients (86.2%) were reversed. Median time to closure was 8.5 months (IQR 5.2-12.4) for patients with rectal cancers, compared to 5.2 months (IQR 3.6-9.3) for patients who did not have rectal cancer, with a difference of 3.4 months (95% CI 0.9, 5.9; P = 0.008). Adjuvant chemotherapy and unexpected readmission to hospital were associated with delayed reversal (P = 0.0081 and P = 0.0005, respectively). CONCLUSION Stoma reversal is often scheduled 3-6 months after creation. More than two-thirds of patients experienced delays due to changing clinical concerns and non-clinical factors, such as unexpected delays at each stage of surgical planning. Early placement on the waiting list and better-coordinated follow-ups may expedite reversal surgery and reduce associated morbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tedman Cheuk-Yiu Chau
- Department of General Surgery, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Hung Nguyen
- Department of General Surgery, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Iain K Robertson
- School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Xavier Harvey
- Department of General Surgery, St John of God Bunbury Hospital, Bunbury, Australia
| | - Brendan Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Mitchell Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Caroline M Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dahlstrand U, Gustafsson P, Näsvall P, Johansson J, Gunnarsson U, Lindforss U. Costs Related to Diverting Ileostomy After Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Population-Based Healthcare Cost Analysis Based on Nationwide Registers. INQUIRY : A JOURNAL OF MEDICAL CARE ORGANIZATION, PROVISION AND FINANCING 2023; 60:469580231212126. [PMID: 38105185 PMCID: PMC10729635 DOI: 10.1177/00469580231212126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Low anterior resection for rectal cancer often includes a diverting loop-ileostomy to avoid the severe consequences of anastomotic leakage. Reversal of the stoma is often delayed, which can incur health-care costs on different levels. The aim is to, on population basis, determine stoma-related costs, and to investigate habitual and socioeconomic factors associated to the level of cost. Multi-register design with data from the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry, the National Prescribed Drug Register, Statistics Sweden and cost-administrative data from the National Board of Health and Welfare. Data was gathered for 3564 patients with rectal cancer surgery 2007 to 2013, for 3 years following the surgery. Factors influencing the cost of inpatient care and stoma-related consumables were assessed with linear regression analyses. All monthly costs were higher for females (consumables P < .001 and in-patient care P = .031). Post-secondary education (P = .003) and younger age (P = .020) was associated with a higher cost for consumables while suffering a surgical complication was associated with increased cost for inpatient care (P < .001). Patients who had their stoma longer had lower monthly costs (consumables P < .001 and in-patient care P < .001). Female gender, longer duration of stoma, young age, and higher education are associated with higher costs for the care of a diverting stoma after rectal cancer surgery. This study does not allow for analyses of causality but the results together with deepened analyses of underlying reasons form a proper basis for decisions in health care planning and allocation of resources. These findings may have implications on the debate of equal care for all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ursula Dahlstrand
- Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Enköping Hospital, Enköping, Sweden
| | - Pontus Gustafsson
- Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Visby Hospital, Visby, Sweden
| | | | - Jeaneth Johansson
- Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden
- Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden
| | | | - Ulrik Lindforss
- Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|