Term breech deliveries in the Netherlands: did the increased cesarean rate affect neonatal outcome? A population-based cohort study

Does overweight and obesity have an impact on delivery mode and peripartum outcome in breech presentation? A FRABAT cohort study

PURPOSE

Obesity is a worldwide and growing issue affecting women in childbearing age, complicating surgical procedures as well as pregnancy. Through a reduction of not necessarily required cesarean deliveries-for instance in pregnancies with breech presentation-obesity mediated and surgery-associated morbidity might be contained. Date on the impact of maternal BMI in vaginally attempted breech delivery is not existing. To give insight into whether an elevated BMI leads to an increased perinatal morbidity in vaginally intended deliveries out of breech presentation, we analyzed delivery outcome of laboring women with a singleton baby in breech presentation with overweight and obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) in comparison to women with a BMI of below 25 kg/m2.

METHODS

Based on data from January 2004 to December 2020, a cohort study was performed on 1641 women presenting with breech presentation at term (> 37 weeks). The influence of maternal BMI on perinatal outcome was analyzed with Chi2 testing for group differences and logistic regression analysis. Patients with a hyperglycemic metabolism were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

Fetal morbidity was not different when patients with a BMI of ≥ 25 kg/m2 (PREMODA morbidity score 2.16%) were compared to patients with a BMI of below 25 kg/m2 (1.97%, p = 0.821). Cesarean delivery rates were significantly higher in overweight and obese women with 43.9% compared to 29.3% (p < 0.0001). BMI and cesarean delivery were significantly associated in a logistic regression analysis (Chi2 coefficient 18.05, p < 0.0001). In successful vaginal deliveries out of breech presentation, maternal perineal injury rates (vaginal birth in normal-BMI women 48.4%; vaginal birth in overweight and obese women: 44.2%; p = 0.273) and rates of manually assisted delivery (vaginal birth in normal-BMI women: 44.4%; vaginal birth in obese and overweight women: 44.2%; p = 0.958) were not different between BMI groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity and overweight are not associated with peripartum maternal or newborn morbidity in vaginally attempted breech delivery, if the patient cohort is thoroughly selected and vaginal breech delivery is in an upright maternal position. Reduction of cesarean delivery rates, especially in overweight and obese women might, have an important positive impact on maternal and newborn morbidity.

Mechanics of vaginal breech birth: Factors influencing obstetric maneuver rate, duration of active second stage of labor, and neonatal outcome

BACKGROUND

We investigated possible parameters that could predict the need for obstetric maneuvers, the duration of the active second stage of labor (i.e., the duration of active pushing), and short-term neonatal outcome in vaginal breech births.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 268 successful singleton vaginal breech births in women without previous vaginal births from January 2015 to August 2022. Multivariable regression was used to investigate associations between maternal and fetal characteristics (including antepartum magnetic resonance (MR) pelvimetry) with obstetric maneuvers, the duration of active second stage of labor, pH values, and admission to the neonatal unit. Models for the prediction of obstetric maneuvers were built and internally validated.

RESULTS

Obstetric maneuvers were performed in a total of 130 women (48.5%). A total of 32 neonates (11.9%) had to be admitted to the neonatal unit. The intertuberous distance (ITD) (p < 0.001), epidural analgesia (p < 0.001), and birthweight (p = 0.026) were associated with the duration of active second stage of labor. ITD (p = 0.028) and birthweight (p = 0.011) were also independently associated with admission to the neonatal unit, while pH values below 7.10 dropped significantly (p = 0.0034) if ITD was ≥13 cm. Furthermore, ITD (p < 0.001) and biparietal diameter (p = 0.002) were independent predictors for obstetric maneuvers.

CONCLUSIONS

ITD is independently associated with the duration of active second stage of labor. Thus, it can predict suboptimal birth mechanics in the last stage of birth, which may lead to the need for obstetric maneuvers, lower arterial pH values, and admission to the neonatal unit. Consequently, MR pelvimetry gives additional information for practitioners and birthing people preferring a vaginal breech birth.

Novel Three-Dimensional Body Scan Anthropometry versus MR-Pelvimetry for Vaginal Breech Delivery Assessment

In this prospective, monocentric study, we investigated the potency of a novel three-dimensional (3D) body scanner for external pelvic assessment in birth planning for intended vaginal breech delivery. Between April 2021 and June 2022, 73 singleton pregnancies with intended vaginal birth from breech presentation (>36.0 weeks of gestation) were measured using a pelvimeter by Martin, a three-dimensional body scanner, and MR-pelvimetry. Measures were related to vaginal birth and intrapartum cesarean section. A total of 26 outer pelvic dimensions and 7 inner pelvic measurements were determined. The rate of successful vaginal breech delivery was 56.9%. The AUC (area under the curve) of the obstetric conjugate (OC) measured by MRI for predicting the primary outcome was 0.62 (OR 0.63; p = 0.22), adjusted for neonatal birth weight 0.66 (OR 0.60; p = 0.19). Of the 22 measured 3D body scanner values, the ratio of waist girth to maternal height showed the best prediction (AUC = 0.71; OR 1.27; p = 0.015). The best predictive pelvimeter value was the distantia spinarum with an AUC of 0.65 (OR = 0.80). The 3D body scanner technique is at least equal to predict successful vaginal breech delivery compared to MRI diagnostics. Further large-scale, prospective studies are needed to verify these results.

Do specific maternal sensations experienced in late pregnancy correlate to a breech presenting baby? Evaluation of a simple maternal questionnaire

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effectiveness of a structured questionnaire completed at 36 weeks gestation in predicting breech presentation.

DESIGN

Questionnaire-based study.

SETTING

Tertiary NHS Foundation Trust.

PARTICIPANTS

Women attending for a universally offered 36-week fetal growth scan.

INTERVENTION

Completion of a previously designed maternal questionnaire detailing sensation of fetal movements during the past week, immediately before a routine growth scan.

RESULTS

Between September 01, 2018 and September 30, 2019, 2341 questionnaires were handed out and 2053 were returned. Analysis was performed in 1938 (94.4%) completed questionnaires. Recorded presentation was breech in 109 (5.6%), transverse/oblique in 15 (0.8%), and cephalic in 1814 (93.6%). Women "thinking their baby was breech" had a high positive likelihood ratio, at 11.8 (95% CI 7.4-19.1), but poor sensitivity (27.3%). "Feeling kicks low down or near the bladder" was sensitive for non-cephalic presentation (76.3%) but with poor specificity (48.9%). The questions "kicks low" ("no") (P = 0.013, aOR 2.18 [1.18-4.04]) and 'thinks cephalic ("no")' (P = 0.001, aOR 0.12 (0.04-0.43) were independent risk factors for a non-cephalic presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

The questions posed in this questionnaire could aid the detection of breech presentation, but do not perform better than published data on palpation. Missing a breech presentation near term through palpation alone is well reported. Combining the concept of palpation to exclude breech presentation and these questions may help focus a clinician and improve both palpation skills and breech detection. As a minimum, a woman who believes her baby is breech should be taken seriously.

Neonatal admission rate after vaginal breech delivery

OBJECTIVES

The safest mode of delivery for fetuses in breech presentations is still an ongoing debate. The aim of this study was to analyze neonatal admission rates after vaginal breech delivery and compare it to other modes of delivery in order to counsel pregnant women with breech presentation adequately.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of all deliveries with singleton pregnancies in breech presentation > 36.0 weeks of gestation between 01/2018-12/2019. Short-term neonatal morbidity data was collected for vaginal delivery and primary as well as secondary cesarean sections from breech presentations.

RESULTS

A total of n=41/482 (8.5%) neonates had to be admitted to NICU: vaginal breech delivery n=18/153 (11.8%), primary cesarean section n=9/101 (8.9%, OR 0.73; CI 0.32-1.70; p=0.47), secondary cesarean section n=10/76 (13.2%, OR 1.14; CI 0.50-2.60, p=0.76) and vaginal vertex delivery n=4/152 (2.6%, OR 0.20; CI 0.06-0.51; p=0.005). There was no significant difference in transfer to NICU between all breech position delivery modes. Despite significantly lower pH and 5' APGAR values after vaginal delivery, neonates delivered by primary cesarean section and NICU admission had to be treated there significantly longer (mean 80.9 vs. 174.0 h). No significant difference in terms of ventilation parameters and infections were found between the vaginal delivery, primary and secondary cesarean section from breech presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaginal breech delivery does not result in a higher neonatal admission rate in comparison to primary and secondary section. In contrast, there is a shorter NICU duration in case of neonatal admission after vaginal delivery.

Optimal time intervals for vaginal breech births: a case-control study

Background

Breech births are associated with a high rate of hypoxic injury, in part due to cord occlusion during emergence. Maximum time intervals and guidelines oriented toward earlier intervention have been proposed in a Physiological Breech Birth Algorithm. We wished to further test and refine the Algorithm for use in a clinical trial.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective case-control study in a London teaching hospital, including 15 cases and 30 controls, during the period of April 2012 to April 2020. Our sample size was powered to test the hypothesis that exceeding recommended time limits is associated with neonatal admission or death. Data collected from intrapartum care records was analysed using SPSS v26 statistical software. Variables were intervals between the stages of labour and various stages of emergence (presenting part, buttocks, pelvis, arms, head). The chi-square test and odds ratios were used to determine association between exposure to the variables of interest and composite outcome. Multiple logistic regression was used to test the predictive value of delays defined as non-adherence the Algorithm.

Results

Logistic regression modelling using the Algorithm time frames had an 86.8% accuracy, a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 92.3% for predicting the primary outcome. Delays between umbilicus and head >3 minutes (OR: 9.508 [95% CI: 1.390-65.046] p=0.022) and from buttocks on the perineum to head >7 minutes (OR: 6.682 [95% CI: 0.940-41.990] p=0.058) showed the most effect. Lengths of time until the first intervention were consistently longer among the cases. Delay in intervention was more common among cases than head or arm entrapment.

Conclusion

Emergence taking longer than the limits recommended in the Physiological Breech Birth algorithm may be predictive of adverse outcomes. Some of this delay is potentially avoidable. Improved recognition of the boundaries of normality in vaginal breech births may help improve outcomes.

Maternal and fetal risks of planned vaginal breech delivery vs planned caesarean section for term breech birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Breech presentation delivery approach is a controversial issue in obstetrics. How to cope with breech delivery (vaginal or C-section) has been discussed to find the safest in terms of morbidity. The aim of this study was to assess the risks of foetal and maternal mortality and perinatal morbidity associated with vaginal delivery against elective caesarean in breech presentations, as reported in observational studies.

Methods

Studies assessing perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with breech presentations births. Cochrane, Medline, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cuiden databases were consulted. This protocol was registered in PROSPERO CRD42020197598. Selection criteria were: years between 2010 and 2020, in English language, and full-term gestation (37-42 weeks). The methodological quality of the eligible articles was assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analyses were performed to study each parameter related to neonatal mortality and maternal morbidity.

Results

The meta-analysis included 94 285 births with breech presentation. The relative risk of perinatal mortality was 5.48 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.61-11.51) times higher in the vaginal delivery group, 4.12 (95% CI = 2.46-6.89) for birth trauma and 3.33 (95% CI = 1.95-5.67) for Apgar results. Maternal morbidity showed a relative risk 0.30 (95% CI = 0.13-0.67) times higher in the planned caesarean group.

Conclusions

An increment in the risk of perinatal mortality, birth trauma, and Apgar lower than 7 was identified in planned vaginal delivery. However, the risk of severe maternal morbidity because of complications of a planned caesarean was slightly higher.

Combined Assessment of the Obstetrical Conjugate and Fetal Birth Weight Predicts Birth Mode Outcome in Vaginally Intended Breech Deliveries of Primiparous Women-A Frabat Study

(1) Background: Guidelines on vaginal breech delivery require birth weight restrictions and neglect the impact of pelvic measurements despite contradicting evidence. There is a great need for more evidence on delivery outcome predicting factors for patients counselling. (2) Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study on 748 primiparous women intending vaginal breech birth and analyzed combined influence of fetal birth weight (BW) and the obstetric conjugate (conjugate vera obstetrica, CVO) on delivery outcome. (3) Results: We generated a BW/CVO ratio and devided our study cohort at median (257.8 g/cm) into a low ratio group (LR, with low birth weight and wide obstetric conjugate) and a high ratio group (HR, high birth weight and narrow obstetric conjugate). Cesarean section (CS) rate was significantly higher in HR (50.3%) as compared to LR (28.3%, p < 0.0001). Fetal morbidity was not different. In vaginally completed deliveries duration of birth was significantly longer in vHR (557 min) as in vLR (414 min, p < 0.001). Manual assistance to deliver the arms (‘Louwen maneuver’) positively correlated with birth weight (r2 = 0.215; p = 0.005) and the BW/CVO ratio (r2 = 0.0147; p = 0.02). (4) Conclusions: A high fetal birth weight combined with a tiny CVO predicts higher cesarean section probability, longer birth duration and the necessity to perform arm delivery assistance. Birth weight and pelvic measurements should be topics of great importance in patients counselling.

Term breech presentation-Intended cesarean section versus intended vaginal delivery-A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Three per cent of all infants are born in breech presentation, still the preferred way to deliver them remains controversial. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the safety for the mother and child depending on intended mode of delivery when the baby is in breech position at term.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The population (P) was pregnant women with a child in breech presentation, from gestational week 34⁺⁰ . The intervention (I) was the intention to deliver by cesarean section, the comparison (C) was the intention to deliver vaginally. Outcomes (O) were perinatal mortality, perinatal morbidity, maternal mortality, maternal morbidity, conversion of delivery mode, and the mother's experience. Systematic literature searches were performed. We included randomized trials, cohort studies with more than 500 women/group and case series for more than 15 000 women published between 1990 and October 2021, written in English or the Nordic languages. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach and data were pooled in meta-analyses. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020209546.

RESULTS

Thirty-two articles were included (with 530 604 women). The certainty of evidence was moderate or low because the study designs were mostly retrospective cohort studies. The only randomized trial showed reduced risk of perinatal mortality for planned cesarean section, risk ratio (RR) 0.27 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.97, 2078 women, low certainty of evidence), stillbirths excluded. A meta-analysis of cohort studies resulted in a similar estimate, RR 0.36 (95% CI 0.25-0.51, 21 studies, 388 714 women, low certainty of evidence). We also found reduced risk for outcomes representing perinatal morbidity 0-28 days: 5-min Apgar score less than 7 in one randomized controlled trial: RR 0.27 (95% CI 0.12-0.58, 2033 women, moderate certainty of evidence), and in a meta-analysis: RR 0.1 (95% CI 0.14-0.26, 18 studies, 217 024 women, moderate certainty of evidence); APGAR score less than 4 at 5 min: RR 0.39 (95% CI 0.19-0.81, five studies, 44 498 women, low certainty of evidence); and pH less than 7.0: RR 0.23 (95% CI 0.12-0.43, four studies, 13 440 women, low certainty of evidence). Outcomes for the mother were similar in the groups except for reduced risk for experience of urinary incontinence in the group of planned cesarean section: RR 0.62 (95% CI 0.41-0.93, one study, 1940 women, low certainty of evidence). The conversion rate from planned vaginal delivery to emergency cesarean section ranged from 16% to 51% (median 41.8%, 10 studies, 50 763 women, moderate certainty of evidence).

CONCLUSIONS

Intended cesarean section may reduce the risk of perinatal mortality and perinatal as well as some maternal morbidity compared with intended vaginal delivery. It is uncertain whether there is any difference in maternal mortality. The conversion rate from intended vaginal delivery to emergency cesarean section is high.

Delivery mode and severe maternal and neonatal morbidity among singleton term breech births: A population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the association between delivery mode and severe maternal and neonatal morbidity in singleton term breech births.

STUDY DESIGN

This nationwide population-based cohort study includes 41 319 singleton term and post-term breech births (37 + 0-42 + 6 gestational weeks) in Sweden from 1998 to 2016. Data was retrieved from the Swedish Medical Birth Register. The primary outcomes were two separate composite outcomes, maternal and neonatal severe morbidity. Secondary outcomes were separate severe maternal and neonatal morbidity outcomes. Hospitalization and out-patient visits during childhood were also analyzed in ages 0-5 years. Logistic regression was used to estimate unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of severe maternal and neonatal morbidity in women with vaginal breech birth or intrapartum cesarean section. Women with a prelabor breech cesarean section was used as the reference group.

RESULTS

No difference between vaginal delivery and prelabor cesarean section was seen regarding maternal morbidity. Intrapartum cesarean section was associated with elevated odds for maternal morbidity (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10-1.47) compared with prelabor cesarean section. A similar result was observed for vaginal delivery and intrapartum cesarean section combined (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.11-1.50). Vaginal delivery was associated with higher odds for composite neonatal morbidity (aOR 1.85, CI 1.54-2.21) and most separate outcomes, as well as increased number of hospital nights and out-patient visits during first year of life, compared with prelabor cesarean section.

CONCLUSIONS

Prelabor cesarean section in breech births improved short-term neonatal health without increasing risks for severe maternal short-term complications.

Association Between Mode of Delivery of the Breech Fetus and Hospitalizations Due to Inflammatory Bowel Disease During Childhood

BACKGROUND AND GOALS

While evidence suggests short-term benefits in neonatal morbidity and mortality from cesarean delivery of the fetus in breech presentation, the long-term implications for the offspring are less clear. To assess the implications of the mode of delivery on offspring's health, we have evaluated the long-term gastrointestinal (GI) morbidity of offspring with a breech presentation delivered in either way.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A population-based retrospective cohort study including singleton deliveries in breech presentation occurring between 1991 and 2014 at a tertiary referral hospital. Incidence of hospitalizations of the offspring up to the age of 18 years involving GI morbidity was compared between those delivered via cesarean section or vaginally. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve compared cumulative GI morbidity. A Weibull parametric survival model controlled for confounders while accounting for repeated occurrence of mothers and dependence among siblings.

RESULTS

Overall, 86.9% (n=6376) of the 7337 fetuses in breech presentation, were delivered abdominally. Hospitalizations involving GI morbidity were higher in offspring delivered by cesarean section, specifically due to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Kaplan-Meier survival curve revealed the higher cumulative incidence of total GI morbidity and IBD specifically in the cesarean delivery group (P<0.001 and P=0.004, respectively). Using a Weibull parametric while controlling for relevant confounders, cesarean delivery emerged as an independent risk factor for long-term IBD-related morbidity of the offspring delivered in breech presentation (adjusted hazard ratio=3.18, 95% confidence interval: 1.47-6.87, P=0.003).

CONCLUSION

Cesarean delivery is associated with higher rates of hospitalizations due to IBD and total GI morbidity during childhood in term singleton in breech presentation.

Women’s experiences of breech birth decision making: An integrated review

INTRODUCTION

Currently, caesarean section is the primary mode of birth for a breech presenting fetus, leading to a deskilling of clinicians and limitation of birth choices for women. The aim of this review is to present a synthesized summary of existing literature related to women’s experiences of breech birth mode decision-making.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted in April 2021, utilizing five databases to identify and obtain peer-reviewed articles meeting the predetermined selection criteria.

RESULTS

Four major categories were synthesized from the integrated review: 1) Women who desire a vaginal birth may experience a range of negative emotions such as feelings of disempowerment, loss, uncertainty and a sense of isolation; 2) Women who experience a breech presentation at term experience significant pressures to conform to expectations of medical professionals and their families due to perceptions of risk related to breech birth; 3) Breech birth decision-making in a limiting system; and 4) Overall satisfaction with the decision to plan a vaginal breech birth.

CONCLUSION

Women with a breech presenting fetus at term experience a complex range of emotions and internal and external pressures due to perceptions of risk around breech birth. Midwives were seen as helpful throughout the breech experience. The reduced caesarean section rate for breech, observed in studies exploring specialized care pathways or dedicated services, could reduce the incidence of Severe Acute Maternal Morbidity.

Success rate of external cephalic version in relation to the woman's body mass index and other factors-a population-based cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of women's body mass index (BMI) on the probability of a successful external cephalic version (ECV).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective population-based observational study including all women that underwent an ECV in the southeast region of Sweden from January 2014 to December 2019. Data were collected from electronic medical records, Obstetrix, Cerner. The women were divided into BMI categories according to the World Health Organization classification. Women with a BMI below 25 kg/m² formed the reference group. Crude and adjusted odds ratios for unsuccessful ECV in each BMI group were calculated using binary logistic regression. Furthermore, the association between maternal characteristics and clinical and ultrasound variables at the time of the ECV and unsuccessful ECV was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 2331 women were included. The overall success rate of ECV was 53.4%. Women with a BMI below 25 kg/m² had a success rate of 51.3% whereas obese women had a success rate of 58.6%. The risk of an unsuccessful ECV among obese women (BMI ≥30 kg/m² ) had an OR of 0.74 (95% CI 0.59-0.94) compared with women with a BMI below 25 kg/m² . After adjusting for suitable confounding factors, the association was no longer significant. Higher maternal age, multiparity, higher gestational age, posterior placenta position, polyhydramnios and higher estimated weight of the fetus at the ECV significantly decreased the risk of an unsuccessful ECV.

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal obesity does not seem to negatively influence the success rate of ECV. This is a finding that may encourage both caregivers and obese pregnant women to consider an ECV and so avoid a planned cesarean section for breech presentation in this group.

Breech progression angle: new feasible and reliable transperineal ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal breech descent in birth canal

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and reliability of transperineal ultrasound in the assessment of fetal breech descent in the birth canal, by measuring the breech progression angle (BPA).

METHODS

Women with a singleton pregnancy with the fetus in breech presentation between 34 and 41 weeks' gestation were recruited. Transperineal ultrasound images were acquired in the midsagittal view for each woman, twice by one operator and once by another. Each operator measured the BPA after anonymization of the transperineal ultrasound images. BPA was defined as the angle between a line running along the long axis of the pubic symphysis and another line extending from the most inferior portion of the pubic symphysis tangentially to the lowest recognizable fetal part in the maternal pelvis. Each operator was blinded to all other measurements performed for each woman. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BPA measurement was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). To investigate the presence of any bias, intra- and interobserver agreement was also analyzed using Bland-Altman analysis. Student's t-test and Levene's W₀ test were used to investigate whether a number of different clinical factors had an effect on systematic differences and homogeneity, respectively, between BPA measurements.

RESULTS

Overall, 44 women were included in the analysis. BPA was measured successfully by both operators on all images. Both intra- and interobserver agreement analyses showed excellent reproducibility in BPA measurement, with ICCs of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.93) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71-0.90), respectively. The mean difference between measurements was 0.4° (95% CI, -1.4 to 2.2°) for intraobserver repeatability and -0.4° (95% CI, -2.6 to 1.8°) for interobserver repeatability. The upper limits of agreement were 12.0° (95% CI, 8.9-15.1°) and 13.6° (95% CI, 9.9-17.3°) for intra- and interobserver repeatability, respectively. The lower limits of agreement were -11.2° (95% CI, -14.3 to -8.1°) and -14.4° (95% CI, -18.2 to -10.7°) for intra- and interobserver repeatability, respectively. No systematic difference between BPA measurements was found on either intra- or interobserver agreement analysis. None of the clinical factors examined (maternal body mass index, maternal age, gestational age at the ultrasound scan and parity) showed a statistically significant effect on intra- or interobserver reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

BPA represents a new feasible and highly reproducible measurement for the evaluation of fetal breech descent in the birth canal. Future studies assessing its usefulness in the prediction of successful external cephalic version and breech vaginal delivery are needed. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Morbidity associated with planned cesarean deliveries performed before the scheduled date: A cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Women with planned cesareans can require delivery before the scheduled date. However, data describing the morbidity associated with planned cesarean deliveries performed before the originally scheduled date is lacking. The objective of this study was to compare the morbidity associated with planned cesarean delivery performed before compared with on the scheduled date.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective single-center cohort study included all 3595 women with singleton pregnancies and cesarean deliveries after 36⁺⁶ weeks. All cases were reviewed individually to identify the initial intended mode of delivery, determined before 37 weeks. We excluded the 2145 (59.7%) unplanned cesareans initially planned as vaginal deliveries. Finally, the analysis included 1450 women with planned cesareans: 1232 (85.0%) performed as scheduled, and 218 (15.0%) before that date. The composite outcomes of maternal morbidity was one or more of the morbidity measures, including surgical complications, postpartum hemorrhage, infection and thrombo-embolism. Neonatal morbidity measures included 5 min Apgar score < 7, arterial cord blood pH < 7.00, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

RESULTS

Reasons for performing planned cesarean delivery before the scheduled date were as follows: onset of labor (n = 109; 50.0%), rupture of membranes (n = 85; 39.0%), preeclampsia (n = 9; 4.1%), scar pain in women with a previous cesarean (n = 6; 2.8%), unexplained vaginal bleeding (n = 5; 2.3%), and nonreassuring fetal heart rate (n = 4; 1.8%). Mean gestational age for planned cesarean deliveries before the scheduled date was 38.7 weeks ± 0.8 versus 39.2 weeks ± 0.7 for those performed when scheduled (P < 0.0001). The maternal morbidity composite outcome rate was significantly higher among planned cesareans performed early compared with those on the scheduled date: 18.3% vs 9.7%, respectively, P = 0.0002. It was still higher in the multivariable analysis: aOR 2.17, 95% CI 1.46-3.21, P = 0.0001. The neonatal composite outcome did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In planned cesarean deliveries, maternal morbidity is higher for cesareans performed before rather than on the scheduled date. Studies without accurate intent-to-treat analyses underestimate the morbidity associated with planned cesareans. Accordingly, medical records must make it possible to distinguish planned cesarean deliveries performed before the scheduled date from those performed as planned.

Development of a core outcome set for effectiveness studies of breech birth at term (Breech-COS): A systematic review on variations in outcome reporting

Women pregnant with a breech-presenting fetus at term are at an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Although the most common intervention is planned delivery by caesarean section, this is not always possible or desirable. Comparing alternative interventions is difficult due to heterogeneity in reported outcomes and their measurements. Additionally, the evidence, particularly for women in labour with a breech-presenting fetus, is very low quality, with several outcomes viewed as critical and important to decision-making not reported at all. There is a need to develop a core outcome set of minimum outcomes in all studies evaluating the effectiveness of interventions to improve outcomes associated with term breech birth (Breech-COS). Our objectives were to (1) identify outcomes currently reported in effectiveness studies of breech birth at term using a systematic review of the literature; (2) assess the methodological quality of outcome reporting in the included studies; and (3) engage with members of an established Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) group about the results, to help frame our understanding from the perspective of service users. We searched three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) for all effectiveness studies associated with vaginal breech birth published in English between 2000 and 2020. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted the data. Outcomes were categorised into neonatal, maternal, features of labour, and long-term maternal and hierarchy of outcome classification (primary, secondary, part of composite, or undesignated). Frequency of reporting was calculated for each. An adapted methodological assessment was done for each study investigating whether primary and secondary objectives were clearly stated and defined. The results of the systematic review were then discussed with a PPI group to consider importance and relevance to service users. A total of 211 outcomes were extracted from 108 included studies, comprising of short (43) and long-term (39) neonatal, short (54) and long-term (39) maternal and features of labour (36) outcomes. The most frequently reported outcome in each category was: APGAR score at 5 min, developmental vulnerability/neurological morbidity, maternal mortality, urinary incontinence, and actual mode of birth respectively. Long-term outcomes were infrequently reported in the included studies, with outcomes for future pregnancies not reported at all, although these were each deemed important by service users. There was a lack of consensus in definition and measurement of outcomes, with only 36% of the included studies having clearly stated primary and secondary objectives. The observed heterogeneity in reported outcomes, lack of consensus in definition and measurement, as well as desire expressed by service users to have robust risk statistics for outcomes important to them highlights the need to develop a core outcome set for evaluating effectiveness studies of breech birth at term. A Breech-COS will enable useful synthesis of evidence and contribute to supported decision-making for women pregnant with a breech-presenting fetus at term.

Development of a Breech-Specific Integrated Care Pathway for Pregnant Women: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND

The development of an integrated care pathway with multidisciplinary input to standardize and streamline care for pregnant women experiencing breech presentation at 36 or more weeks of gestation poses several challenges because of the divisive and contentious nature of the phenomenon. Although many clinicians are interested in obtaining the skills required to safely support women desiring a vaginal breech birth, the primary trend in most health care facilities is to recommend a cesarean section.

OBJECTIVE

This paper aims to discuss the mixed methods approach used in a doctoral study conducted to generate new knowledge regarding women's experiences of breech birth in Western Australia and professional recommendations regarding the care of women experiencing breech presentation close to or at term. This study was designed to inform the development of an integrated care pathway for women experiencing a breech presentation. This mixed methods approach situated within the pragmatic paradigm was determined to be the optimal way for incorporating multidisciplinary recommendations with current clinical practice guidelines and consumer feedback.

METHODS

A mixed methods study utilizing semistructured interviews, an electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) study, and clinical practice guideline appraisal was conducted to generate new data. The interviews were designed to provide insights and understanding of the experiences of women in Western Australia who are diagnosed with a breech presentation. The e-Delphi study explored childbirth professionals' knowledge, opinions, and recommendations for the care of women experiencing breech presentation close to or at term. The clinical practice guideline appraisal will examine the current national and professional breech management and care guidelines. This study has the potential to highlight areas in practice that may need improvement and enable clinicians to better support women through what can be a difficult time.

RESULTS

Data collection for this study began in November 2018 and concluded in March 2020. Data analysis is currently taking place, and the results will be disseminated through publication when the analysis is complete.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study will guide the development of an integrated care pathway for women experiencing a breech presentation close to or at term, with the hope of moving toward standardized breech care for women in Western Australia. This study protocol has the potential to be used as a research framework for future studies of a similar nature.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/23514.

Induction of labor in breech presentations - a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

There is limited evidence on the safety and outcome of induction of breech labor. In this study, we aimed to compare the outcomes of spontaneous and induced breech deliveries and to describe variations in induction rates.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study comprising 1054 singleton live fetuses in breech presentation at Trondheim University Hospital from 2012 to 2019. The main outcome was intrapartum cesarean section, and secondary outcomes were postpartum hemorrhage, anal sphincter ruptures, Apgar scores, pH in the umbilical artery, and metabolic acidosis. All data were obtained from the hospital birth journal.

RESULTS

Induction of labor was performed in 127/606 (21.0%) women with planned vaginal birth. The frequency of intrapartum cesarean section was 48.0% for induced labor vs 45.7% for spontaneous labor (P = .64). We found no differences in the frequency of postpartum hemorrhage or anal sphincter ruptures between induced and spontaneous births. The median pH in the umbilical artery was significantly lower in neonates with induced labor compared with neonates with spontaneous labor (7.22 vs 7.25; P = .02). The frequency of pH <7.05 was 7.0% for induced labor vs 2.9% (P = .05) for spontaneous labor, but the frequency of pH <7.0 was not significantly different: 2.6% vs 0.8% (P = .14), respectively. Three neonates with planned vaginal birth had metabolic acidosis: two with spontaneous labors and one with induced labor. Three fetuses with planned vaginal birth died during labor: two with spontaneous onset of labor and one with induced labor. All three were extremely preterm: two were delivered in week 23 and one in week 25. We did not observe any significant trend in induction rates in either parous or nulliparous women.

CONCLUSIONS

The induction rates were stable during the study period. We did not observe any significant difference in intrapartum cesarean section rates, in the frequency of pH <7.0 in the umbilical artery, or in the frequency of metabolic acidosis when comparing induced and spontaneous breech deliveries.

The impact of a routine late third trimester growth scan on the incidence, diagnosis, and management of breech presentation in Oxfordshire, UK: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Breech presentation at term contributes significantly to cesarean section (CS) rates worldwide. External cephalic version (ECV) is a safe procedure that reduces term breech presentation and associated CS. A principal barrier to ECV is failure to diagnose breech presentation. Failure to diagnose breech presentation also leads to emergency CS or unplanned vaginal breech birth. Recent evidence suggests that undiagnosed breech might be eliminated using a third trimester scan. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of introducing a routine 36-week scan on the incidence of breech presentation and of undiagnosed breech presentation.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We carried out a population-based cohort study of pregnant women in a single unit covering Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. All women delivering between 37+0 and 42+6 weeks gestational age, with a singleton, nonanomalous fetus over a 4-year period (01 October 2014 to 30 September 2018) were included. The mean maternal age was 31 years, mean BMI 26, 44% were nulliparous, and 21% were of non-white ethnicity. Comparisons between the 2 years before and after introduction of routine 36-week scan were made for 2 primary outcomes of (1) the incidence of breech presentation and (2) undiagnosed breech presentation. Secondary outcomes related to ECV, mode of birth, and perinatal outcomes. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. A total of 27,825 pregnancies were analysed (14,444 before and 13,381 after). A scan after 35+0 weeks was performed in 5,578 (38.6%) before, and 13,251 (99.0%) after (p < 0.001). The incidence of breech presentation at birth did not change significantly (2.6% and 2.7%) (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.89, 1.18; p = 0.76). The rate of undiagnosed breech before labour reduced, from 22.3% to 4.7% (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.12, 0.36; p < 0.001). Vaginal breech birth rates fell from 10.3% to 5.3% (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.30, 0.87; p = 0.01); nonsignificant increases in elective CS rates and decreases in emergency CS rates for breech babies were seen. Neonatal outcomes were not significantly altered. Study limitations include insufficient numbers to detect serious adverse outcomes, that we cannot exclude secular changes over time which may have influenced our results, and that these findings are most applicable where a comprehensive ECV service exists.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, a universal 36-week scan policy was associated with a reduction in the incidence but not elimination of undiagnosed term breech presentation. There was no reduction in the incidence of breech presentation at birth, despite a comprehensive ECV service.

External cephalic version: Predictors of success and influence on caesarean rates

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the success rate of external cephalic version, predictive factors for success of this maneuver and to examine how it affects mode of delivery, pregnancy and neonatal outcome rates.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study performed in a tertiary care university hospital between January 2002 and June 2018. A total of 324 ECVs were performed in 321 pregnancies. Maternal and ultrasound data, procedure-related factors, birth characteristics and neonatal data were collected. Absolute and relative frequencies were used for descriptive analysis and the chi-square test for comparative analysis. Odds ratios with 95 % confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

The overall success rate of the procedure was 33,3%. Multiparity, transverse lie, unengaged breech presentation, low body mass index, soft uterus and palpable fetal head were independent risk factors for success. No statistically significant association was found with other variables. Routine use of ECV allowed a reduction in cesarean delivery rates for breech presentation, with no increase in maternal or neonatal morbidity. Operative delivery rates after successful ECV were similar to those of the general population.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Despite a relatively low overall success rate, routine use of ECV can result in reduced cesarean delivery rates with similar perinatal outcomes. Conveyed information on the success rate of ECV can be adapted to individual patient characteristics.

Management of Breech Presentation: A Comparison of Four National Evidence-Based Guidelines

OBJECTIVE

The management of breech presentation may improve perinatal outcomes. The aim of this study was to synthesize and compare published evidence of four national guidelines on breech presentation.

STUDY DESIGN

A descriptive review of four recently published national guidelines on breech presentation and external cephalic version (ECV) was conducted: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guideline on "External Cephalic Version and Reducing the Incidence of Term Breech Presentation" and "Management of Breech Presentation", American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guideline on "External Cephalic Version" and "Mode of Term Singleton Breech Delivery," Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada guideline on "Vaginal Delivery of Breech Presentation" and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guideline on "Management of breech presentation at term."

RESULTS

Regarding ECV, there is no recommendation by the SOGC, whereas all other national guidelines recommend this technique. Regarding breech vaginal delivery, there are limited recommendations by the ACOG, whereas all other guidelines provide similar recommendations. The RANZCOG makes no special recommendations on the intrapartum period.

CONCLUSION

The differences among national guidelines point out the need for the adoption of an international consensus on the management of breech presentation.

Revisiting the management of term breech presentation: a proposal for overcoming some of the controversies

Background

The debate surrounding the management of term breech presentation has excessively focused on the mode of delivery. Indeed, a steady decline in the rate of vaginal breech delivery has been observed over the last three decades, and the soundness of the vaginal route was seriously challenged at the beginning of the 2000s. However, associations between adverse perinatal outcomes and antenatal risk factors have been observed in foetuses that remain in the breech presentation in late gestation, confirming older data and raising the question of the role of these antenatal risk factors in adverse perinatal outcomes. Thus, aspects beyond the mode of delivery must be considered regarding the awareness and adequate management of such situations in term breech pregnancies.

Main body

In the context of the most recent meta-analysis and with the publication of large-scale epidemiologic studies from medical birth registries in countries that have not abruptly altered their criteria for individual decision-making regarding the breech delivery mode, the currently available data provide essential clues to understanding the underlying maternal-foetal conditions beyond the delivery mode that play a role in perinatal outcomes, such as foetal growth restriction and gestational diabetes mellitus. In view of such data, an accurate evaluation of these underlying conditions is necessary in cases of persistent term breech presentation. Timely breech detection, estimated foetal weight/growth curves and foetal/maternal well-being should be considered along with these possible antenatal risk factors; a thorough analysis of foetal presentation and an evaluation of the possible benefit of external cephalic version and pelvic adequacy in each specific situation of persistent breech presentation should be performed.

Conclusion

The adequate management of term breech pregnancies requires screening and the efficient identification of breech presentation at 36 weeks of gestation, followed by thorough evaluations of foetal weight, growth and mobility, while obstetric history, antenatal gestational disorders and pelvis size/conformation are considered. The management plan, including external cephalic version and follow-up based on the maternal/foetal condition and potentially associated disorders, should be organized on a case-by-case basis by a skilled team after the woman is informed and helped to make a reasoned decision regarding delivery route.

Maternal and neonatal outcome after vaginal breech delivery of nulliparous versus multiparous women of singletons at term-A prospective evaluation of the Frankfurt breech at term cohort (FRABAT)

INTRODUCTION

The best way to deliver a term breech infant is still a much discussed topic among obstetricians. The question whether nulliparity should be considered an exclusion criterion for an intended vaginal breech delivery is not fully answered.

OBJECTIVE

We compared maternal and neonatal outcome of intended vaginal breech deliveries of nulliparous versus multiparous women at term.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a prospective case-control study between January 2004 and December 2016. 1046 women expecting singletons at term with favorable pelvic measurements were enrolled in the study.

RESULTS

Neonatal morbidity and mortality was not significantly different in deliveries of nulliparous (n = 647) versus multiparous (n = 399) women. Nulliparous women had a significantly higher rate of a cesarean section during labor than multiparous women. Maternal birth-injury rates and the use of epidural anesthesia were significantly higher comparing vaginal births of nulliparous (n = 384) versus multiparous (n = 331) women.

CONCLUSION

Nulliparity seems not be an exclusion criterion for intended vaginal breech birth at term. It is still important to inform the women of an increased risk of a cesarean section during labor. A clinical management built on this evidence might reduce negative implications for future pregnancies.

Vaginal breech delivery of pregnancy before and after the estimated due date-A prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

3-4% of pregnant women present with a fetal breech position at term. National societies regard vaginal breech delivery as a safe option, but only for a specific and thoroughly counseled group of patients. To avoid adverse outcome, many practitioners recommend elective cesarean section once their patients go past the estimated due date. Since encompassing evidence is missing, the evaluation on this common clinical practice is needed.

OBJECTIVE

This study compares the short-term maternal and fetal outcome in intended vaginally breech deliveries before the estimated due date (until 40 0/7 weeks of gestation) to the outcome of deliveries carried out past the estimated due date (later than 40 0/7 weeks of gestation).

METHODS

This prospective cohort study includes 827 women who presented for an intended vaginal breech delivery of a singleton at our perinatal center between January 2010 and December 2016.

RESULTS

447 patients (54%) delivered before or at their estimated due date, 380 (46%) of pregnancies continued after the estimated due date. Comparing both groups, no significant difference in maternal and neonatal short-term mortality and morbidity was found. The rate of caesarian sections was increased in the group of patients, who delivered later than 40 1/7 weeks of gestation. Here, the likelihood for delivery maneuvers was also increased.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence, that an elective cesarean section for breech presentations at term is not obligatory when the estimated due date has passed in singleton pregnancy.

[Comparison of antepartum management of breech versus cephalic presentation]

OBJECTIVES

Delivery mode of term breech presentation is still being discussed. The aim of this study was to compare the labor management of a breech presentation to a vertex presentation during a vaginal delivery attempt.

METHODS

It was a single-center, comparative, descriptive retrospective study from 2014 to 2017. We studied fetal heart rate (FHR) during labor and expulsion, duration of the different stage of labor, mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes for breech and vertex presentations.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-nine patients were included whom 106 (44%) breech presentation. The use of oxytocin was more common in breech group (63,2% versus 48,1%, P=0.020). Average dilatation rate was slower for breech presentation than for vertex presentation (1.9cm/h vs. 2.8cm/h; P=0.005). There was more FHR with high risk of acidosis in the breech presentations (37.2% vs 19.1%, P=0.001) and Melchior's FHR classification were comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The per-partum management of a fetus in breech presentation differs from a fetus in cephalic presentation. It must be known and anticipated for an optimal management in the delivery room.

Trial of vaginal breech delivery in carefully selected women is worth considering-Fruit for thought!

There remains uncertainty about the optimal route of delivering carefully selected breech babies at term. This review argues strongly that vaginal mode of delivery should be considered in selected cases rather than offering an elective caesarean section for every patient.

First Twin in Breech Presentation and Neonatal Mortality and Morbidity According to Planned Mode of Delivery

OBJECTIVE

To compare neonatal mortality and morbidity of first twins according to the planned mode of delivery when the first twin is in breech presentation, in a country where planned vaginal delivery is an option.

METHODS

This is a planned secondary analysis of the JUMODA (JUmeaux MODe d'Accouchement) cohort, a national prospective population-based study of twin deliveries conducted in 176 French hospitals. We analyzed pregnancies with first twins in breech presentation and applied the inclusion criteria of the Twin Birth Study (except the criterion for first-twin presentation): both fetuses alive, with a birth weight between 1,500 g and 4,000 g, at or after 32 0/7 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was a composite of neonatal mortality and morbidity. We used multivariate Poisson regression models to control for potential confounders and propensity score analyses, that is, matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting to control for indication bias.

RESULTS

Among the 1,467 women with a breech-presenting first twin included in this analysis, 1,169 (79.7%) had planned cesarean and 298 (20.3%) planned vaginal births, of whom 185 (62.1%) delivered both twins vaginally. The neonatal mortality and severe morbidity rate for first twins was 1.7% (5/298) in the planned vaginal and 1.9% (22/1,169) in the planned cesarean delivery groups (crude relative risk [RR] 0.90, 95% CI 0.34-2.34). Planned vaginal delivery was not associated with higher neonatal mortality and morbidity than planned cesarean delivery, regardless of the statistical method used: adjusted RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.27-1.86; RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.20-1.83 after matching for propensity score; RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.23-1.74 with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Analyses of neonatal mortality and morbidity of second twins yielded similar results.

CONCLUSION

Although our sample size precluded a robust assessment for small differences in outcomes between planned cesarean and planned vaginal delivery in twin pregnancies in which the first twin was in breech presentation, in our cohort planned vaginal delivery was not associated with higher neonatal mortality and morbidity for either twin.

Breech deliveries in OLVG, the Netherlands: A retrospective cohort study of seven years

BACKGROUND

The clinical dilemma on the preferred mode of delivery for breech position still exists. Elective caesarean delivery (CD) could be safer for neonates, whereas vaginal breech delivery (VBD) remains a safe option when conducted by an experienced person. Besides successful VBD is beneficial for mothers and subsequent pregnancies.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate breech deliveries on mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

A single center, retrospective, cohort study was performed of women who delivered a singleton fetus in breech position from 32 weeks' gestation onwards from January 2011 to December 2017. Primary outcome measure was mode of delivery defined as an elective CD and planned VBD. Secondary outcome measures were neonatal and maternal outcome. For neonatal outcome, we used neonatal mortality and a composite measure neonatal morbidity. Maternal outcome included maternal mortality and maternal morbidity divided in severe and non-severe complications. We subcategorized for preterm (32 weeks to 37 weeks of gestation) and term pregnancies (from 37 weeks of gestation onwards).

RESULTS

1.774 women delivered a child in breech position, 73 % opted for an elective CD. Of the 484 women that had a planned VBD (preterm 38 % (n = 59), term 26 % (n = 425)) 71 % were successful. Neonatal mortality occurred twice in the VBD cohort. Preterm neonatal morbidity occurred in the elective CD and VBD cohort equally (both 66 %), at term significantly more in the VBD cohort (12 % v 4%, OR 3.2, 95 % CI 2.1-4.8). For the total cohort, severe maternal postpartum complications occurred more often in the elective CD compared to successful VBD (2% v 0.3 %, OR 6.0, 95 % CI 0.80-44.3).

CONCLUSION

A high rate of successful VBD after opting for a planned VBD was found in our center. Nevertheless, compromised neonatal outcome at term was more frequent in the planned VBD group compared to the elective CD group. Severe maternal postpartum complications were more frequent in the elective CD group compared to the VBD group. Future research should focus alternations in the management of breech presentation.

The influence of the fetal leg position on the outcome in vaginally intended deliveries out of breech presentation at term - A FRABAT prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Vaginal delivery out of a breech presentation in pregnancies at term are being re-implemented into clinical practice. Still, recommendations regarding exclusion criteria leading to caesarean sections are based on expert opinions, not on evidence-based guidelines. The difference in perinatal outcome and course of delivery in births with babies in frank breech position and babies in incomplete or complete breech presentation never has been investigated in a large patient cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To compare perinatal outcome of vaginally intended breech deliveries between births out of frank breech position and incomplete/complete breech presentation.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SAMPLE

884 women at term with a singleton in frank breech presentation (FB) and 284 women with incomplete or complete breech presentation (CB) intending vaginal birth between January 2004 and December 2018.

METHODS

Maternal and fetal outcome was compared between groups using Pearson's Chi Square test. Birth duration parameters were analysed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were no differences in cesarean section rates (FB: 25.1%, CB 22.2%, p = 0.317). Short-term fetal morbidity did not differ between groups (FB: 2.5%, CB: 2.8%, p = 0.761). In vaginal deliveries the necessity to perform manual assistance was significantly more frequent in deliveries of infants in CB (FB: 39.9%, CB: 51.6%, p = 0.0013). Cord loops (FB: 10.1%, CB: 18.0%, p = 0.0004) and cesarean sections necessary because of cord prolapses (FB: 1.4%, CB 8.1%, p = 0.005) were significantly more often in deliveries with babies in CB.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence, that perinatal morbidity is not associated with the fetal leg posture in vaginally intended breech deliveries. The higher risk for the need of manual assistance during vaginal birth in deliveries of babies out of complete or incomplete breech presentation suggests that obstetrical departments re-implementing the vaginal breech in their repertoire might start with births of babies out of frank breech presentation.

[Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Benefits and Risks for the Neonate and Child of Planned Vaginal Delivery versus Elective Cesarean Section]

OBJECTIVE

To provide guidelines regarding the benefits and risks for the neonate and the child of planning vaginal delivery versus planning elective cesarean section in case of term breech presentation.

METHODS

MedLine and Cochrane Library databases search and review of the main foreign guidelines.

RESULTS

In case of term breech presentation, planned vaginal delivery might be associated with an increased composite risk of perinatal mortality or occurrence of a combined outcome of serious neonatal morbidity in comparison to elective cesarean section (LE2). In case of planned vaginal delivery of term breech presentation, the risk of perinatal mortality is around 1‰ (LE3). It is potentially less but still exists in case of elective cesarean section (LE2). Risks of neonatal trauma - especially fracture of clavicle and breech hematoma -, Apgar score lower than 7 at 5minutes, and need for neonatal intubation and ventilation, are increased in case of planned vaginal delivery (LE2) and are around 1% (LE3). However, no difference has been demonstrated between planned vaginal and planned cesarean delivery regarding neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years (LE2), cognitive and psychomotor outcomes between 5 and 8 years (LE3), and adult intellectual performances (LE4).

CONCLUSIONS

In case of term breech presentation, risks of severe complications for neonate and child are low in case of planned vaginal delivery or elective cesarean section. Short-term benefit/risk balance for the neonate might favor elective cesarean section but long-term morbidity seems to be similar whatever the delivery route (Professional consensus).

[Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Epidemiology, Risk Factors and Complications]

OBJECTIVES

To study the frequency, the risk factors and the mode of delivery of breech presentation. To analyze the perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with breech presentation in comparison to cephalic presentation from all mode of delivery.

METHODS

MedLine and Cochrane Library databases search in French and English and review of the main foreign guidelines between 1980 and 2019.

RESULTS

Three modes of breech presentation exist according to fetal lower limbs position: frank in 2/3 of cases, complete in 1/3 of cases or, more rarely, incomplete (LE3). About 5% of women gave birth in breech presentation in France (LE3). As the frequency of breech presentation decreases with increasing gestational age, this incidence is lower after 37 WG and represents only 3% of term deliveries (LE3). Congenital uterine malformation (LE3) and fibroma (LE3), prematurity (LE3), oligoamnios (LE3), some fetal congenital malformations (LE3) and low birthweight for gestational age (LE3) are the main risk factors with breech presentation. In France, one-third of women with a term fetus in breech presentation attempt a vaginal delivery (LE3), which is successful in 70% of cases (LE3). Neonatal outcome is not associated with type of breech presentation (frank or complete) in case of vaginal delivery attempt after 37 WG (LE3). Overall, perinatal morbidity and mortality after 37 WG of breech presentation appear to be greater than in cephalic presentation from all mode of delivery (LE3). The risk of traumatic injury in breech delivery is estimated under 1% (LE3). The most common injuries are collarbone fractures, hematomas or contusions, and brachial plexus injury (LE3). Breech presentation is associated with an increased risk of hip dysplasia (LE3) and cesarean delivery does not seem to be a protective factor (LE3). Breech presentation does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of cerebral palsy compared to cephalic presentation after exclusion of fetuses with congenital malformations (LE3).

CONCLUSION

Worldwide, mode of delivery of breech presentation has undergone profound changes since the publication of the TBT (Term Breech Trial). There are intrinsic factors associated with breech presentation, which should not be overlooked when interpreting the increased perinatal morbidity and mortality observed in case of breech presentation.

Comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity between elective and emergency caesarean section in singleton-term breech presentation

The objective of the study was to compare maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes between elective caesarean section (ElCS) and emergency caesarean section (EmCS) for singleton-term breech presentation. This study included women with singleton breech presentation who underwent ElCS or EmCS at term during 2007-2015 at Siriraj Hospital (Thailand). Complete data were collected for 2178 pregnant women. Of those, 1322 (60.7%) women underwent EmCS, and 856 (39.3%) delivered by ElCS. Maternal and perinatal morbidity were compared. There was no maternal or perinatal death in either group. Maternal morbidity was comparable between groups, except for longer hospital stay in the EmCS group (p = .047). One-minute Apgar score was significantly lower in the EmCS group (p = .040). There was no significant difference in 5-min Apgar score between groups. No significant difference was observed for serious maternal and neonatal morbidity between women who underwent ElCS versus those who underwent EmCS for singleton-term breech presentation.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Emergency caesarean section (EmCS) is generally known to be associated with a higher risk of maternal and neonatal complications than elective caesarean section (ElCS).What do the results of this study add? In singleton-term breech presentation, EmCS in tertiary care setting was not associated with an increase in serious maternal and neonatal morbidity compared with EICS. Cord prolapse as an indication for emergency caesarean section was significantly associated with adverse outcomes while advanced cervical dilation ≥7 cm or low foetal station ≥+1 did not have an impact on maternal and neonatal complications.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Mean gestational age in both the ElCS and EmCS groups was approximately 38 weeks and 5 d; there were no neonatal cases with respiratory distress syndrome. Our findings suggest further prospective study in planned caesarean section scheduled for 38-39 weeks in patients with term breech presentation. The results of such a study could yield lower rates of both EmCS and potential adverse outcomes.

Introduction of a dedicated team increases the success rate of external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of a dedicated team on the success rate of external cephalic version and mode of delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective cohort study included 673 women with a singleton fetus in breech presentation who underwent external cephalic version between January 2013 and December 2017 at Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands. In January 2014, a dedicated team consisting of six gynaecologists and six midwives was introduced at the study clinic. The success rate of external cephalic version and mode of delivery were analysed. In addition, predictors for success were examined by logistic regression analysis. Successful external cephalic version was defined as fetal cephalic presentation immediately following the procedure.

RESULTS

Following the introduction of a dedicated team in 2014, the success rate of external cephalic version increased from 39.8% in 2013 to 69.5% in 2017 (p < 0.001), with the greatest increase in nulliparous women (from 23.5% to 58.5%, p = 0.002). Over the 5-year study period, the vaginal delivery rate after external cephalic version increased from 43% in 2013 to 71% in 2017 (p < 0.05). The rate of caesarean section after external cephalic version decreased from 55% to 27% (p < 0.05). Anterior placenta [odds ratio (OR) 0.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48‒0.97] and complete breech (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.07‒0.90) were significantly associated with a lower success rate.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that introduction of a dedicated team led to a significant increase in the success rate of external cephalic version, and a significant decrease in the rate of caesarean section for women presenting with breech in pregnancy.

[Per-partum risk factors of neonatal acidemia in planned vaginal delivery for fetuses in breech presentation]

OBJECTIVES

Delivery mode of term breech presentation is debated because of higher rate of neonatal acidosis (pH<7.15) in planned vaginal delivery than in planned caesarean section. The objective was to evaluate per-partum risk factors of neonatal acidosis in vaginal delivery for podalic fetuses.

METHODS

It was a single-centre, case-control retrospective study that included planned vaginal delivery in singleton term breech presentation between 2012 and 2016. The "case" group defined by neonatal pH≤7.10 and the "control" group defined by neonatal pH≥7.20 were matched. The maternal, labor, and neonatal characteristics were noted.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-two patients were included: each of 44 patients in "case" group, has been matched according to breech type (legs position) to 2 patients in the "control" group, so 88. In multivariate analysis, significant risk factors identified were oxytocin use [ORa=5.663 (95% CI=1.844-17.397)], "high risk" fetal heart rate (FHR) abnormalities according to FIGO classification [ORa=10.997 (95% CI=1.864-64.866)] and FHR abnormalities during expulsion, Melchior 2 [ORa=8.088 (95% CI=1.192-54.875)] and Melchior 4 [ORa=12.705 (95% CI=1.157-139.541)].

CONCLUSIONS

These risk factors of neonatal acidemia have to be known to improve the labor management in case of breech planned vaginal delivery.

External cephalic version at term: a cohort study of 18 years' experience

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the outcome of referrals for external cephalic version (ECV).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data.

SETTING

Major university hospital, UK.

SAMPLE

Women with non-cephalic presentation at term and no prior caesarean, referred to a specialist clinic.

METHODS

Details of referrals, ECV attempts, and perinatal outcomes were prospectively collected and analysed. Multivariate binary logistic regression models were created to determine independent predictors of ECV success, reversion, and spontaneous version.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

External cephalic version success rates, predictors of success and cephalic presentation at birth, and perinatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Three thousand eight had confirmed breech presentation; 2614 women underwent ECV. Ineligibility for ECV occurred in 117 breech presentations (3.9%), and 297 eligible women (10.2%) declined it. ECV was successful in 1280 (49.0%, 95% CI 47.0-50.9%) (40% in nulliparous women; 64% in others); 1234 (97.3%) were cephalic at birth. Spontaneous version after failure occurred in 4.3% and was more common in multiparas (aOR 2.47, 95% CI 1.43-4.26) and those with a posterior fetal back (aOR 6.09, 95% CI 1.90-19.53). Reversion after successful ECV occurred in 2.2%. In women with a successful ECV whose fetus remained cephalic at birth, 85.7% delivered vaginally. The corrected perinatal mortality of the ECV cohort was 0.12%.

CONCLUSION

External cephalic version has a low complication rate and is effective for most breech presentations, enabling vaginal birth and avoiding caesarean section.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

External cephalic version can safely be performed with most breech presentations.

Breech birth at home: outcomes of 60 breech and 109 cephalic planned home and birth center births

Background

Research on outcomes of out-of-hospital breech birth is scarce. This study evaluates the outcomes of singleton term breech and cephalic births in a home or birth center setting.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational cohort study of 60 breech and 109 cephalic planned out-of-hospital term singleton births during a 6 year period with a single obstetrician. Outcomes measured included mode of delivery; birth weights; 1 & 5-min Apgar scores; ante-, intra-, and post-partum transports; perineal integrity; and other maternal and neonatal morbidity.

Results

50 breech and 102 cephalic presentations were still in the obstetrician’s care at the onset of labor; of those, 10 breech and 11 cephalic mothers required transport during labor. 76% of breech and 92.2% of cephalic births were planned to occur at home, with the remainder at a freestanding birth center. When compared to the cephalic group, the breech group had a higher rate of antepartum and in-labor transfer of care and cesarean section. Among completed out-of-hospital births, the breech group had a significantly higher rate of 1-min Apgar scores < 7 but no significant difference at 5 min. Rates of vaginal birth for both groups were high, with 84% of breech and 97.1% of cephalic mothers giving birth vaginally in this series. Compared to primiparas, multiparas in both groups had less perineal trauma and higher rates of out-of-hospital birth, vaginal birth, and spontaneous vaginal birth. No breech infant or mother required postpartum hospital transport, while one cephalic infant and one cephalic mother required postpartum transport. Of the babies born out-of-hospital, there was one short-term and one longer-term birth injury among the breech group and one short-term brachial plexus injury in the cephalic group.

Conclusions

A home or birth center setting leads to high rates of vaginal birth and good maternal outcomes for both breech and cephalic term singleton presentations. Out-of-hospital vaginal breech birth under specific protocol guidelines and with a skilled provider may be a reasonable choice for women wishing to avoid a cesarean section—especially when there is no option of a hospital breech birth. However, this study is underpowered to calculate uncommon adverse neonatal outcomes.

Maternal and neonatal outcome after vaginal breech delivery at term of children weighing more or less than 3.8 kg: A FRABAT prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The clinical management of breech presentations at term is still a controversially discussed issue among clinicians. Clear predictive criteria for planned vaginal breech deliveries are desperately needed to prevent adverse fetal and maternal outcomes and to reduce elective cesarean section rates. The green-top guideline considers an estimated birth weight of 3.8 kg or more an indication to plan a cesarean section despite the lack of respective evidence.

OBJECTIVE

To compare maternal and neonatal outcome of vaginal intended breech deliveries of births with children with a birth weight of 2.5 kg- 3.79 kg and children with a birth weight of 3.8 kg and more.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SAMPLE

All vaginal intended deliveries out of a breech position of newborns weighing between 2.5 kg and 4.5 kg at the Obstetrics department at Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt from January 2004 until December 2016.

METHODS

Neonatal and maternal outcome of a light weight group (LWG) (< 3.8 kg) was compared to and a high weight group (HWG) (≥ 3.8 kg) using Pearson's Chi Square test and Fishers exact test. A logistic regression analysis was performed to detect an association between cesarean section rates, fetal outcome and the birth weight.

RESULTS

No difference in neonatal morbidity was detected between the HWG (1.8%, n = 166) and the LWG (2.6%, n = 888). Cesarean section rate was significantly higher in the HWG with 45.2% in comparison to 28.8% in the LWG with an odds ratio of 1.57 (95% CI 1.29-1.91, p<0.0001). In vaginal deliveries, a high birth weight was not associated with an increased risk of maternal birth injuries (LWG in vaginal deliveries: 74.3%, HWG in vaginal deliveries: 73.6%; p = 0.887; OR = 1.9 (95% CI 0.9-1.1)).

CONCLUSION

A fetal weight above 3.79 kg does not predict increased maternal or infant morbidity after delivery from breech presentation at term. Neither the literature nor our analyses document evidence for threshold of estimated birth weight that is associated with maternal and/or infant morbidity. However, patients should be informed about an increased likelihood of cesarean sections during labor when attempting vaginal birth from breech position at term in order to reach an informed shared decision concerning the birth strategy. Further investigations in multi center settings are needed to advance international guidelines on vaginal breech deliveries in the context of estimated birth weight and its impact on perinatal outcome.

Delivery of the second twin: influence of presentation on neonatal outcome, a case controlled study

Background

Spontaneous vaginal twin delivery after 32nd week of gestation is safe when first twin presenting cephalic. Aim of this study is to identify obstetric factors influencing the condition of second twin and to verify whether non-cephalic presentation and vaginal breech delivery of the second twin is safe.

Methods

This is a retrospective case controlled cohort study of 717 uncomplicated twin deliveries ≥32 + 0 weeks of gestation from 2005 to 2014 in two tertiary perinatal centers. Obstetric parameters were evaluated in three groups with descriptive, univariate logistic regression analysis for perinatal outcome of second twins.

Results

The three groups included twins delivered by elective cesarean section ECS (n = 277, 38.6%), by unplanned cesarean section UPC (n = 233, 32.5%) and vaginally (n = 207, 28.9%). Serious adverse fetal outcome is rare and we found no differences between the groups. Second twins after ECS had significant better umbilical artery UA pH (p < 0.001) and better Apgar compared to UPC (p = 0.002). Variables for a fetal population “at risk” for adverse neonatal outcome after vaginal delivery (UA pH < 7.20, Apgar 5´ < 9) were associated with higher gestational age (p = 0.001), longer twin-twin interval (p = 0.05) and vacuum extraction of twin A (p = 0.04). Non-cephalic presentation of second twins was not associated (UA pH < 7.20 OR 1.97, CI 95% 0.93–4.22, p = 0.07, Apgar 5´ < 9 OR 1.63, CI 95% 0.70–3.77, p = 0.25, Transfer to neonatal intermediate care unit p = 0.48). Twenty-one second twins (2,9%) were delivered by cesarean section following vaginal delivery of the first twin. Even though non-cephalic presentation was overrepresented in this subgroup, outcome variables were not significantly different compared to cephalic presentation.

Conclusions

Even though elective cesarean means reduced stress for second twins this seems not to be clinically relevant. Non-cephalic presentation of the second twin does not significantly influence the perinatal outcome of the second twin but might be a risk factor for vaginal-cesarean birth.

Media Representations of Breech Birth: A Prospective Analysis of Web-Based News Reports

INTRODUCTION

Recent research has demonstrated that the media presentation of childbirth is highly medicalized, often portraying birth as risky and dramatic. Media representation of breech presentation and birth is unexplored in this context. This study aimed to explore the content and tone of news media reports relating to breech presentation and breech birth.

METHODS

Google alerts were created using the terms breech and breech birth in online English-language news sites over a 3-year period from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2015. Alerts were received daily and filed for analysis, and data were analyzed to generate themes.

RESULTS

A total of 138 web-based news reports were gathered from 9 countries. Five themes that arose from the data included the problem of breech presentation, the high drama of vaginal breech birth, the safe option of cesarean birth versus dangers of vaginal breech birth, the defiant mother versus the saintly mother, and vaginal breech birth and medical misadventure.

DISCUSSION

Media reports in this study predominantly demonstrated negative views toward breech presentation and vaginal breech birth. Cesarean birth was portrayed as the safe option for breech birth, while vaginal breech birth was associated with poor outcomes. Media presentations may impact decision making about mode of birth for pregnant women with a breech fetus. Health care providers can play an important role in balancing the media depiction of planned vaginal breech birth by providing nonjudgmental, evidence-based information to such women to facilitate informed decision making for birth.

Can the Rate of C-sections Performed in a Level I Perinatal Center Be Reduced? - An Analysis of the University Gynecology Clinic Rostock, 2008 - 2014

INTRODUCTION

In Germany the rate of deliveries by cesarean section is continually increasing. Many different reasons have been put forward to explain this trend. The aim of this study was to examine how the C-section rate developed at the University Gynecology Clinic Rostock, one of the biggest maternity hospitals and level I perinatal centers in Germany, based on various maternal and neonatal parameters. The aim was also to identify potential risk factors for C-sections.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Various obstetric parameters were obtained from the birth cohort (2008 to 2014; n = 20 091) of the University Gynecology Clinic Rostock. The data was used to calculate parameter-specific C-section rates. Potential risk factors for C-section were identified by regression analysis.

RESULTS

The C-section rate dropped from 26.24% to 23.57%. The rate of repeat C-sections also declined. The mean age of the pregnant women increased. Nevertheless, the frequency of cesarean sections in pregnant women aged more than 35 years declined. Rates of being overweight or obese preconception increased. C-section rates increased as BMI values preconception increased. There was a perceptible trend towards attempting the vaginal delivery of children in breech presentation and of twins. The frequency of depressed neonates after vaginal delivery and after C-section decreased. Rates for mild and advanced acidosis increased after both C-sections and vaginal deliveries. Previous C-section, older maternal age, overweight and obesity prior to conception, breech presentation and multiple pregnancies all increased the risk of cesarean sections.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that reducing the rates of C-sections without a deterioration in neonatal outcomes can be achieved even in a large maternity hospital that cares for many high-risk pregnancies.