Long-term evaluation of painful symptoms and fertility after surgery for large rectovaginal endometriosis nodule: a retrospective study

Pilot study MOVENDOP protocol - impact on quality of life following postoperative osteopathic abdominal mobilizations in patients operated for endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Surgery remains the gold standard for management of endometriosis, offering significant improvement in patient pelvic pain and quality of life (QoL). Postoperative tissue adhesions can however diminish these benefits, limiting the long-term effectiveness of the intervention. Despite the development of strategies and devices to reduce adhesion formation, their efficacy remains inconclusive.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to propose and evaluate a novel approach involving early visceral mobilization and training of patients in abdominal self-mobilization as a means to improve QoL following surgery.

METHODS

This pilot study is a prospective, randomized, phase II superiority trial. Patients undergoing surgery for infiltrating endometriosis will be randomized, with a 2:1 ratio, into two groups. The intervention group (n = 42) will receive six sessions of osteopathic visceral mobilization with training in abdominal self-mobilization techniques, one preoperative, and five postoperative during the first month post-surgery. The control group (n = 21) will receive no osteopathic visceral mobilizations but will be offered an osteopathic session after one year. The primary endpoint is a minimum increase of 20 points (on a 100-point scale) in the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) global score, at one year. Secondary endpoints include assessment of gastrointestinal quality of life (GIQLI), sexual function (FSFI), urinary symptoms (ICIQ-FLUTS), pain catastrophizing (PCS), as well as scar examination, pelvic pain, abdominal flexibility, use of medical and non-medical care, analgesic and hormonal treatments, pregnancy rate, physical activity, sedentary lifestyle and patient compliance. Statistical analyses will be based on a one-sided α=0.05 and β=0.15, assuming a standard deviation of 25 points in the EHP-30 global score. A total of 42 participants in the intervention group and 21 in the control group are required.

DISCUSSION

This trial aims to demonstrate that early and repeated osteopathic sessions following surgery for endometriosis may significantly improve patient QoL.

Gastrointestinal function outcomes following radical and conservative colorectal surgery for deep endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Patients who have undergone colorectal surgery for symptomatic deep endometriosis may still encounter persistent or worsening digestive complaints. The aim of the present work was to analyze gastrointestinal function outcomes after radical and conservative colorectal surgery to further elucidate the effect of surgery on postoperative bowel function.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Clinical Trials.gov and the Cochrane Database databases were searched from January 1, 2010 until April 1, 2024. The quality of included studies was assessed by the Downs and Black quality checklist. Studies including patients with colorectal endometriosis who either underwent segmental resection (SR) or conservative approaches and reported data on bowel function were included.

RESULTS

From the initial pool of 55 studies, 14 reported patient reported outcome measures eligible to be pooled in the meta-analysis. Conservative surgery was less associated with constipation and increased number of daily stool (>3/day) when compared to SR (p = 0.02 and p = 0,0004, respectively). No difference was found in the occurrence of gas and stool incontinence (p = 0.72), postsurgical defecation pain (p = 0.44) and time to defer defecation (≤ 15 min; p = 0.64). Patients in the conservative surgery group reported higher postoperative Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) when compared to SR (p = 0.01). However, when comparing changes between pre- and postsurgical patient reported outcome measures within the respective groups, rather than evaluating postsurgical outcomes alone, none of the intervention groups showed significant changes between pre- and postsurgical GIQLI, Knowles Eccersley Scott Symptom Score(KESS) and Wexner scores (p = 0.28, p = 0.94 and p = 0.78, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Segmental resection seems to be associated with higher rates of post-operative constipation and lower GIQLI scores when compared to conservative surgery. However, when comparing the change of gastrointestinal function symptoms reflected by changes of gastrointestinal function parameters from pre- to postoperative rather than focusing on purely postoperative parameters alone, no significant difference of these parameters was observed between surgical techniques.

Comparative pregnancy rate after colorectal resection versus other surgical procedures for deep infiltrating rectal endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The debate around colorectal surgery for endometriosis has been ongoing, but to date no meta-analysis has investigated the impact of the different surgical approaches on the pregnancy rate. The aim of this meta-analysis study was to determine in women with deep infiltrating rectal endometriosis, how does colorectal resection surgery compare to other surgical techniques (e.g., rectal shaving, disc excision) in terms of pregnancy rates. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library and Clinical Trials for relevant studies published from inception to December 2024. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all English language full-text articles addressing colorectal resection compared with other management of deep infiltrating rectal endometriosis and presenting pregnancy outcomes. We included a study when it (i) provided data on surgical management (shaving, disc excision, and/or colorectal resection) and (ii) detailed the pregnancy outcomes in each subgroup. Four authors independently performed the initial search to evaluate the eligibility criteria. Four authors extracted the data and a fifth author checked this extraction. Of the 113 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, we included 13 in the meta-analysis. These studies represented a total of 3,248 patients. Pregnancy information was available for 2,131 patients: 1073 colorectal resection, 502 shaving, 172 disc excisions, and 384 other practices (expectant management). Colorectal resection was associated with a lower pregnancy rate compared with the other techniques (N = 2,131, odds ratio [OR] = 0.64 [95% confidence interval 0.52-0.79], p < 0.001, I2 = 35%). There were similar results when comparing colorectal resection with rectal shaving (N = 952, OR = 0.51 [95% confidence interval 0.36-0.73], p < 0.001, I2 = 0%), but not when comparing colorectal resection with disc excision (N = 432, OR = 0.65 [95% confidence interval 0.37-1.13], p = 0.13). Conclusions Rectal resection for endometriosis is associated with a lower pregnancy rate compared with other type of surgery, such as shaving. Trial registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42024512328.

Voiding dysfunction after surgery for colorectal deep infiltrating endometriosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

To define the risk factors of post-operative voiding dysfunction according to the type of surgical procedure performed. A systematic review through PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was performed. The Medical Subject Headings terms aimed for English articles about colorectal endometriosis surgery and voiding dysfunction published until December 26, 2022 were used. The primary outcome was the occurrence of post-operative voiding dysfunction. Secondary outcome was the presence of a persistent voiding dysfunction at 1 month. MeSH terms included ''deep endometriosis'', ''surgery'', or ''voiding dysfunction''. Two reviewers (AM, PE) assessed the quality of each article independently. A Study Quality Assessment Tool was used to provide rating of the quality of the included studies. 22 studies were included in the final analysis. Rectal shaving was associated with less voiding dysfunction than segmental resection (OR 0.33; 95%CI [0.20: 0.54]; I2 = 0%; p < 10-3). No difference was found between rectal shaving and discoid excision (OR 0.44; 95%CI [0.07: 2.84]; I2 = 55%; p = 0.39), nor between discoid excision and segmental resection (OR 0.44; 95%CI [0.18: 1.09]; I2 = 49%; p = 0.08). Conservative surgery (i.e., shaving and discoid) was associated with less voiding dysfunction than radical surgery (i.e., segmental resection) (OR 0.37; 95%CI [0.25: 0.55]; I2 = 0%; p < 10-3). Regarding persistent voiding dysfunction, rectal shaving and discoid excision were less associated with voiding dysfunction than segmental resection (respectively, OR 0.30; 95%CI [0.14: 0.66]; I2 = 0%; p = 0.003 and OR 0.13; 95%CI [0.03: 0.57]; I2 = 0%; p = 0.007). Conservative bowel procedures are associated with lower rates of persistent post-operative voiding dysfunction and should be considered first when possible.Trial registration: Our meta-analysis was registered under the PROSPERO number: CRD42023395356.

A quality-of-life meta-analysis comparing pre- and postoperative symptoms in women undergoing colorectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis

AIM

Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) may involve the rectum or colon and is associated with pain, gastrointestinal dysfunction and reduced quality of life (QoL). While hormonal treatment may be effective, surgical intervention including colorectal resection can be required. Colorectal resection can result in functional changes and complications, which can also impair QoL. The aim of this study is to examine all available comparative pre- and postoperative data on QoL and symptom outcomes following colorectal resection for DIE.

METHOD

An electronic database search was conducted for studies reporting pre- and postoperative QoL and symptom outcomes following colorectal resection for DIE. The study was registered with PROSPERO and followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Data were combined using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies including 1142 patients were included. Colorectal resection was associated with improved outcomes for all items in the SF-36 QoL questionnaire as well as symptom outcomes including dysmenorrhoea, chronic pelvic pain and deep dyspareunia. Importantly, the gastrointestinal QoL index was significantly improved (mean difference 24.50, 95% CI 15.93-33.08, p < 0.0001) as was dyschezia (mean difference -4.1, 95% CI -4.77 to -3.42, p < 0.0001). There was no change in low anterior resection syndrome scores (mean difference -5.28, 95% CI -11.65 to 1.10, p = 0.1046).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a significant postoperative improvement in patient-reported QoL, pain symptoms and gastrointestinal function following colorectal resection for endometriosis.

Endometriosis and Adenomyosis: Modern Concepts of Their Clinical Outcomes, Treatment, and Management

Endometriosis and adenomyosis are complex gynecological conditions characterized by diverse clinical presentations, including superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SPE), ovarian endometrioma (OMA), and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). The hallmark features of these pathologies involve the manifestation of pain symptoms and infertility, and approximately 30% of patients are asymptomatic. Despite ongoing research, definitive treatments for these conditions remain elusive, and clinical management primarily revolves around medical or surgical interventions. Recent advancements in our understanding of the efficacy of various treatment modalities, including medical therapy and surgical interventions, have provided clinicians with valuable insights into pain relief and fertility preservation. This review aims to provide an updated overview of the latest literature on clinical outcomes, treatment options, and management strategies for different types of endometriosis. By synthesizing the newest available data, this review seeks to inform clinicians and guide decision making based on factors such as patients' symptom severity, childbearing desire, and overall health.

Endometriosis: Age at diagnosis and the severity of the disease

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is often described as a progressive disease beginning with menarche and menstrual bleeding. However, this is controversial, as the origin of the disease remains unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between the severity of endometriosis and age at initial diagnosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective multicenter cohort study included 964 patients, newly and histologically diagnosed with endometriosis during laparoscopic treatment. The main outcome measures were diagnostic lesions with staging according to rAFS (revised American Fertility Society) scores, intensity of pain based on VAS (Visual Analog Scale) scores and quality of life from SF-36 questionnaire results. Age was treated as a categorical variable. Univariate and multivariable analyses (linear and multinomial ordinal) were conducted taking into account two by two multiple comparisons. The results were expressed with effect sizes and 95 % confidence intervals.

MAIN FINDINGS

No significant association between age and rAFS stage was found (p = 0.053). The percentage of patients with a deep nodule ≥ 2 cm was respectively 20 %, 25 %, 21 %, 18 % and 9 % for patients aged ≤ 25, 26-30, 31-35, 36-40 and >40 years respectively (p = 0.005). For dysmenorrhea, 64 %, 61 %, 54 %, 51 % and 32 % of patients aged ≤25, 26-30, 31-35, 36-40 and >40 years respectively reported a VAS score of ≥7 (p ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Prospective data obtained in patients newly diagnosed with endometriosis, revealed that the rAFS score is not related to patient age, and that the percentage of patients with a nodule ≥ 2 cm and severe dysmenorrhea did not increase with age. These percentages were significantly lower in patients aged > 40.

Surgical treatment of deep endometriosis: Impact on spontaneous conception

Deep endometriosis (DE) is the most severe form of endometriosis and is commonly associated with infertility. Surgical treatment of DE appears to increase chances of spontaneous conception in appropriately selected patients wishing to conceive. Identifying, however, the exact impact of DE, and its surgical removal, on natural conception is highly challenging. The surgical approach should be favoured in symptomatic patients with pregnancy intention. Limited data from infertile patients suggest that outcomes may not differ from patients without known infertility. Complex DE surgery carries a risk of serious complications, therefore, it should be performed in centers of expertise. Such complications may, however, not have a significant negative impact on fertility outcomes, according to limited available data. Data on obstetric outcomes of spontaneous conceptions after DE surgery are too scarce. In asymptomatic, infertile patients the debate between primary surgery or Artifial Reproductive Technology is ongoing, until randomized studies report their results.

In the thicket of fears, doubts, and murky facts: some reflections on treatment modalities for endometriosis-associated pain

Endometriosis-associated pain can be managed by either surgery or hormonal therapy. The final decision as to which treatment modality to take is based on efficacy and possible complications of different treatment modalities, risk of recurrence, and the patient's wishes and preferences. But in the thicket of fears, doubts, and murky facts, the choice may ultimately be the trade-off between irrational fears and ignorance versus scientific evidence. We elaborate some pros and cons of the two treatment modalities and highlight some notable downsides of hormonal therapy, in particular the possible yet unquantified risk of long-term hormonal therapy for malignant transformation, perhaps with the only exception of combined oral contraceptives. Thus, when discussing with patients, we advocate the approach of discussing the advantages and disadvantages of all treatment options in detail, accounting for the known pros and cons with a full understanding of the predictive irrationality of human beings. For endometriosis-associated pain, surgery is definitely not a failure of medicine but, rather, a viable option, especially given the recently surfaced undercurrent of wariness and dissatisfaction with the current hormonal drugs among patients with endometriosis. Above all, there is a pressing need to fill the knowledge gap of perioperative interventions intended to reduce the risk of recurrence and to fulfill the demand for the development of safe and efficacious non-hormonal therapeutics.

Different segmental resection techniques and postoperative complications in patients with colorectal endometriosis: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to analyze the available literature by conducting a systematic review to assess the possible effects of nerve-sparing segmental resection and conventional bowel resection on postoperative complications for the treatment of colorectal endometriosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Pubmed, Clinical Trials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched from 1997 to 2021 in order to perform a systematic review. Studies including patients undergoing segmental resection for colorectal endometriosis including adequate follow-up, data on postoperative complications and postoperative sequelae were enrolled in this review. Selected articles were evaluated and divided in two groups: Nerve-sparing resection (NSR), and conventional segmental resection not otherwise specified (SRNOS). Within the NSRs, studies mentioning preservation of the rectal artery supply (artery and nerve-sparing SR - ANSR) and not reporting preservation of the artery supply (NSR not otherwise specified - NSRNOS) were further analyzed.

PROSPERO ID

CRD42021250974.

RESULTS

A total of 7549 patients from 63 studies were included in the data analysis. Forty-three of these publications did not mention the preservation or the removal of the hypogastric nerve plexus, or main rectal artery supply and were summarized as SRNOS. The remaining 22 studies were listed under the NSR group. The mean size of the resected deep endometriosis lesions and patients' body mass index were comparable between SRNOS and NSR. A mean of 3.6% (0-16.6) and 2.3% (0-10.5%) of rectovaginal fistula development was reported in patients who underwent SRNOS and NSR, respectively. Anastomotic leakage rates varied from 0% to 8.6% (mean 1.7 ± 2%) in SRNOS compared with 0% to 8% (mean 1.7 ± 2%) in patients undergoing NSR. Urinary retention (4.5% and 4.9%) and long-term bladder catheterization (4.9% and 5.6%) were frequently reported in SRNOS and NSR. There was insufficient information about pain or the recurrence rates for women undergoing SRNOS and NSR.

CONCLUSIONS

Current data describe the outcomes of different segmental resection techniques. However, the data are inhomogeneous and not sufficient to reach a conclusion regarding a possible advantage of one technique over the other.

Conservative Management of Rectovaginal Deep Endometriosis: Shaving Should Be Considered as the Primary Surgical Approach in a High Majority of Cases

Deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum remains a challenging situation to manage, and it is even more important when ureters and pelvic nerves are also infiltrated. Removal of deep rectovaginal endometriosis is mandatory in case of symptoms strongly impairing quality of life, alteration of digestive, urinary, sexual and reproductive functions, or in case of growing. Extensive preoperative imaging is required to choose the right technique between laparoscopic shaving, disc excision, or rectal resection. When performed by skilled surgeons and well-trained teams, a very high majority of cases of deep endometriosis nodule (>95%) is feasible by the shaving technique, and this is associated with lower complication rates regarding rectal resection. In most cases, removing a part of the rectum is questionable according to the risk of complications, and the rectum should be preserved as far as possible. Shaving and rectal resection are comparable in terms of recurrence rates. As shaving is manageable whatever the size of the lesions, surgeons should consider rectal shaving as first-line surgery to remove rectal deep endometriosis. Rectal stenosis of more than 80% of the lumen, multiple bowel deep endometriosis nodules, and stenotic sigmoid colon lesions should be considered as indication for rectal resection, but this represents a minority of cases.

Spontaneous pregnancy rate following surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis in infertile women: The impact of the learning curve

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the surgical learning curve impact the spontaneous pregnancy rate in infertile patients undergoing removal of deep infiltrating endometriosis MATERIAL AND METHODS: Single center retrospective study including the first 50 consecutive infertile women suffering from deep infiltrating endometriosis and referred to a single surgeon. All patients underwent laparoscopic removal of deep endometriosis lesions. The study population was stratified in two subgroups, namely the early group (including the first 25 cases) and the late group (comprising the 25 subsequent cases). Pregnancy and live birth rates, surgical morbidity and clinical recurrence rate were compared between study groups.

RESULTS

Overall, spontaneous pregnancy rate (40 % in the early group versus 56 % in the late group, p = 0.25), live birth rate (40 % versus 44 %, p = 0.77) and clinical recurrence rate (16 % versus 4%, p = 0.16) did not significantly differ between the study groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that ASRM stage, EFI score, and body mass index were the only significant prognostic factors of postoperative spontaneous fertility.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection of deep infiltrating endometriosis in infertile women is associated with high spontaneous pregnancy and live birth rates. The surgeon's learning curve does not impact postoperative fertility outcomes.

Surgical Outcomes after Colorectal Surgery for Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of type of surgery for colorectal endometriosis-rectal shaving or discoid resection or segmental colorectal resection-on complications and surgical outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a systematic review of all English- and French-language full-text articles addressing the surgical management of colorectal endometriosis, and compared the postoperative complications according to surgical technique by meta-analysis. The PubMed, Clinical Trials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies published before March 27, 2020. The search strategy used the following Medical Subject Headings terms: ("bowel endometriosis" or "colorectal endometriosis") AND ("surgery for endometriosis" or "conservative management" or "radical management" or "colorectal resection" or "shaving" or "full thickness resection" or "disc excision") AND ("treatment", "outcomes", "long term results" and "complications").

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Two authors conducted the literature search and independently screened abstracts for inclusion, with resolution of any difference by 3 other authors. Studies were included if data on surgical management (shaving, disc excision, and/or segmental resection) were provided and if postoperative outcomes were detailed with at least the number of complications. The risk of bias was assessed according to the Cochrane recommendations.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Of the 168 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 60 were included in the qualitative synthesis. Seventeen of these were included in the meta-analysis on rectovaginal fistula, 10 on anastomotic leakage, 5 on anastomotic stenosis, and 9 on voiding dysfunction <30 days. The mean complication rate according to shaving, disc excision, and segmental resection were 2.2%, 9.7%, and 9.9%, respectively. Rectal shaving was less associated with rectovaginal fistula than disc excision (odds ratio [OR] = 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.36; p <.001; I² = 33%) and segmental colorectal resection (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15-0.44; p <.001; I² = 0%). No difference was found in the occurrence of rectovaginal fistula between disc excision and segmental colorectal resection (OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.70-1.63; p = .76; I² = 0%). Rectal shaving was less associated with leakage than disc excision (OR = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.06-0.73; p = .01; I² = 86%). No difference was found in the occurrence of leakage between rectal shaving and segmental colorectal resection (OR = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.10-1.01; p = .05; I² = 71%) or between disc excision and segmental colorectal resection (OR = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.30-1.58; p = .38; I² = 0%). Disc excision was less associated with anastomotic stenosis than segmental resection (OR = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05-0.48; p = .001; I² = 59%). Disc excision was associated with more voiding dysfunction <30 days than rectal shaving (OR = 12.9; 95% CI, 1.40-119.34; p = .02; I² = 0%). No difference was found in the occurrence of voiding dysfunction <30 days between segmental resection and rectal shaving (OR = 3.05; 95% CI, 0.55-16.87; p = .20; I² = 0%) or between segmental colorectal and discoid resections (OR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.54-1.85; p = .99; I² = 71%).

CONCLUSION

Colorectal surgery for endometriosis exposes patients to a risk of severe complications such as rectovaginal fistula, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, and voiding dysfunction. Rectal shaving seems to be less associated with postoperative complications than disc excision and segmental colorectal resection. However, this technique is not suitable for all patients with large bowel infiltration. Compared with segmental colorectal resection, disc excision has several advantages, including shorter operating time, shorter hospital stay, and lower risk of postoperative bowel stenosis.

Long-Term Evolution of Quality of Life and Symptoms Following Surgical Treatment for Endometriosis: Different Trajectories for Which Patients?

Many studies have shown a global efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for patients with endometriosis in reducing painful symptoms and improving quality of life (QoL) in the short and long-term. The aim of this study was to analyze the different trajectories of long-term evolution in QoL and symptoms following surgical treatment for endometriosis, and to identify corresponding patient profiles. This prospective and multicenter cohort study concerned 962 patients who underwent laparoscopic treatment for endometriosis. QoL was evaluated using the Short Form (SF)-36 questionnaire and intensity of pain was reported using a visual analog scale prior to surgery and at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months after surgery. Distinctive trajectories of pain and QoL evolution were identified using group-based trajectory modeling, an approach which gathers individuals into meaningful subgroups with statistically similar trajectories. Pelvic symptom trajectories (models of the evolution of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and chronic pelvic pain intensity over years) correspond to (1) patients with no pain or pain no longer after surgery, (2) patients with the biggest improvement in pain and (3) patients with continued severe pain after surgery. Our study reveals clear trajectories for the progression of symptoms and QoL after surgery that correspond to clusters of patients. This information may serve to complete information obtained from epidemiological methods currently used in selecting patients eligible for surgery.

Voiding Dysfunction after Colorectal Surgery for Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Surgical management of deep endometriosis is associated with a high incidence of lower urinary tract dysfunction. The aim of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the rates of voiding dysfunction according to colorectal shaving, discoid excision, and segmental resection for deep endometriosis.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a systematic review using bibliographic citations from PubMed, Clinical Trials.gov, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Medical Subject Headings terms for colorectal endometriosis and voiding dysfunction were combined and restricted to the French and English languages. The final search was performed on August 28, 2019. The outcome measured was the occurrence of postoperative voiding dysfunction.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Study Quality Assessment Tools were used to assess the quality of included studies. Studies rated as good and fair were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of each included study, discrepancies were discussed; if consensus was not reached, a third reviewer was consulted.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS

Out of 201 relevant published reports, 51 studies were ultimately reviewed systematically and 13 were included in the meta-analysis. Rectal shaving was statistically less associated with postoperative voiding dysfunction than segmental colorectal resection (Odds ratio [OR] 0.34; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.18-0.63; I² = 0%; p <.001) or discoid excision (OR 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09-0.51; I² = 0%; p  <.001). No significant difference was noted when comparing discoid excision and segmental colorectal resection (OR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.32-1.69; I² = 29%; p = .47). Similarly, rectal shaving was associated with a lower risk of self-catheterization >1 month than segmental colorectal resection (OR 0.3; 95% CI, 0.14-0.66; I² = 0%; p = .003). This outcome was no longer significant when comparing discoid excision and segmental colorectal resection (OR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.4-1.31; I² = 63%; p = .28).

CONCLUSION

Colorectal surgery for endometriosis has a significant impact on urinary function regardless of the technique. However, rectal shaving causes less postoperative voiding dysfunction than discoid excision or segmental resection.

Deep endometriosis: The place of laparoscopic shaving

Deep endometriosis (DE) is considered to be one of the most challenging conditions to manage, especially when it invades surrounding organs like the rectum. Surgical excision of deep rectovaginal endometriosis is required when lesions are symptomatic, impairing bowel, urinary, sexual, and reproductive functions, or if they evolve. Preoperative radiological examination should be extensive to determine the appropriate surgery: laparoscopic shaving, disc excision, or rectal resection. We demonstrated that in the hands of experienced surgeons, rectal shaving is possible for DE in more than 95% of cases, with low complication rates compared to rectal resection. Shaving and bowel resection are associated with comparable recurrence rates. As shaving is indicated whatever the size of deep lesions, surgeons should first consider rectal shaving to remove DE. Bowel resection should only be performed in case of major rectal stenosis (>80%), multiple and/or posterior rectal lesions and stenotic sigmoid colon lesions.

Working group of ESGE, ESHRE, and WES, Keckstein J, Becker CM, Canis M, Feki A, Grimbizis GF, Hummelshoj L, Nisolle M, Roman H, Saridogan E, Tanos V, Tomassetti C, Ulrich UA, Vermeulen N, De Wilde RL. Recommendations for the surgical treatment of endometriosis. Part 2: deep endometriosis

STUDY QUESTION

How should surgery for endometriosis be performed?

SUMMARY ANSWER

This document provides recommendations covering technical aspects of different methods of surgery for deep endometriosis in women of reproductive age.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Endometriosis is highly prevalent and often associated with severe symptoms. Yet compared to equally prevalent conditions, it is poorly understood and a challenge to manage. Previously published guidelines have provided recommendations for (surgical) treatment of deep endometriosis, based on the best available evidence, but without technical information and details on how to best perform such treatment in order to be effective and safe.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

A working group of the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), ESHRE and the World Endometriosis Society (WES) collaborated on writing recommendations on the practical aspects of surgery for treatment of deep endometriosis.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

This document focused on surgery for deep endometriosis and is complementary to a previous document in this series focusing on endometrioma surgery.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The document presents general recommendations for surgery for deep endometriosis, starting from preoperative assessments and first steps of surgery. Different approaches for surgical treatment are discussed and are respective of location and extent of disease; uterosacral ligaments and rectovaginal septum with or without involvement of the rectum, urinary tract or extrapelvic endometriosis. In addition, recommendations are provided on the treatment of frozen pelvis and on hysterectomy as a treatment for deep endometriosis.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

Owing to the limited evidence available, recommendations are mostly based on clinical expertise. Where available, references of relevant studies were added.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

These recommendations complement previous guidelines on management of endometriosis and the recommendations for surgical treatment of ovarian endometrioma.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

The meetings of the working group were funded by ESGE, ESHRE and WES. Dr Roman reports personal fees from ETHICON, PLASMASURGICAL, OLYMPUS and NORDIC PHARMA, outside the submitted work; Dr Becker reports grants from Bayer AG, Volition Rx, MDNA Life Sciences and Roche Diagnostics Inc. and other relationships or activities from AbbVie Inc., and Myriad Inc, during the conduct of the study; Dr Tomassetti reports non-financial support from ESHRE, during the conduct of the study; and non-financial support and other were from Lumenis, Gedeon-Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Merck SA, outside the submitted work. The other authors had nothing to disclose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

na.

Identification of Predictive Factors in Endometriosis for Improvement in Patient Quality of Life

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate predictive factors for change in quality of life (QOL) between pre- and postoperative periods in patients with endometriosis.

DESIGN

A prospective and multicenter cohort study.

SETTING

Five districts including a tertiary referral center and private and general public hospitals.

PATIENTS

Nine hundred eighty-one patients aged 15 to 50 years underwent laparoscopic treatment (preferred approach) for endometriosis between January 2004 and December 2012.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic treatment for endometriosis. All revised American Fertility Society stages were included.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

QOL was evaluated using the 36-Item Short Form Survey questionnaire. Factors influencing changes for each 36-Item Shorty Form Survey domain score between t0 (before surgery) and 1 year after surgery were predicted on the basis of univariate and multivariable analyses. The effect size (ES) method was used to measure changes in QOL. Univariate analysis revealed that 47% of stage IV endometriosis patients presented an improvement in the postoperative Physical Component Summary (PCS) score (ES ≥ 0.8) versus 26%, 31.3%, and 27.5% of patients with stage I, II, and III, respectively (p <.001). Forty-four percent and 38% of patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) presented an improvement in postoperative PCS and Mental Component Summary scores (ES>0.8) versus 23% and 24% of patients without CPP, respectively (p <.001). Multivariable analysis (ES > 0.8 vs ES < 0) revealed that women with CPP were more likely to experience greater improvement in postoperative PCS and Mental Component Summary scores than women without CPP (relative risk [RR] = 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-4.4; p <.001 and RR = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.8; p <.01, respectively). Accordingly, fertile patients were more likely to show higher rates of improvement in the postoperative PCS score than infertile patients (RR = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1; p <.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients presenting with severe endometriosis and who experience higher levels of pain are more likely to show improvement in QOL after surgery. CPP is the most significant independent predictive factor for changes in QOL scores.

Are symptoms after a colorectal segmental resection in deep endometriosis really improved? The point of view of women before and after surgery

INTRODUCTION

Bowel endometriosis can cause debilitating symptoms. Surgical colorectal resection is often required for symptomatic relief. Aim of our study was to evaluate quality of life over a one-year follow-up period in patients submitted to a colorectal resection for the treatment of deep endometriosis. Change in intestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms, and reproductive outcome were also evaluated.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted on a cohort of 20 women affected by intestinal endometriosis and submitted to a laparoscopic colorectal resection. The subjects completed a questionnaire about quality of life (SF-36), and they scored in a 100-point rank questionnaire gynecological, urinary and gastrointestinal symptoms, pre-operatively and one- year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Significant improvements were observed in all domains of the SF-36 throughout the study period. Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and not menstrual pelvic pain showed a significant decrease 1 year after surgery. There was also a decrease in abdominal pain, rectal bleeding and constipation but not of nausea, abdominal pain, defecation pain, tenesmus, diarrhea, mucorrhea. Also some urinary symptoms did not improve.

CONCLUSIONS

The radical surgical approach has a positive impact on quality of life, although it does not improve all the symptoms complained before surgery. Clear pre-surgical counseling and careful patient selection is suggested.