Outpatient vs inpatient total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial

Minimally invasive outpatient hysterectomy for a benign indication: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Outpatient surgery in gynaecology may offer advantages including cost reduction, patient convenience and hospital bed optimisation without compromising patient safety and satisfaction. With the continual rise in health costs since 2000, outpatient surgery could be a line of action to improve financial resource utilisation and a solution for continuing to treat patients during crises such as the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review provides an overview of the literature on minimally invasive outpatient hysterectomy for benign indications.

METHOD

A focused systematic review of the medical literature between 2018 and 2022 on outpatient gynaecological surgery for a benign indication was conducted using the PubMed and Google Scholar search engines. We then narrowed our selection to articles that referred to hysterectomy. Successful same-day discharge (SDD) was defined as the patient's return home on the day of the procedure without an overnight stay.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles that focused on minimally invasive surgery were included in this review. Most of the studies (n = 11) were conducted in the United States. Outpatient surgery had a mean success rate of 60 % and a mean readmission rate of 3 %. The main reasons for SDD failure were patient choice, failed voiding, the need for pain management, nausea or vomiting, or both and the late timing of surgery. SDD was not associated with more complications and readmissions compared with inpatient care. The three main attribute predictors of SDD were young age, early timing of surgery and short total operative time. Patient satisfaction with SDD was high in absolute terms and relative to satisfaction with hospitalisation.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive outpatient hysterectomy for a benign indication is feasible and safe but is associated with a notable risk of failure. To increase the success rate of outpatient management, patients must be well selected and surgery pathways must be planned in advance. The implementation of enhanced recovery protocols may help promote outpatient hysterectomy for a benign indication.

Inpatient Versus Outpatient Surgery: A Comparison of Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity in Elective Operations

BACKGROUND

Operations performed outpatient offer several benefits. The prevalence of outpatient operations is growing. Consequently, the proportion of patients with multiple comorbidities undergoing outpatient surgery is increasing. We compared 30-day mortality and overall morbidity between outpatient and inpatient elective operations.

METHODS

Using the 2005-2018 ACS-NSQIP database, we evaluated trends in percent of hospital outpatient operations performed over time, and the percent of operations done outpatient versus inpatient by CPT code. Patient characteristics were compared for outpatient versus inpatient operations. We compared unadjusted and risk-adjusted 30-day mortality and morbidity for inpatient and outpatient operations.

RESULTS

A total of 6,494,298 patients were included. The proportion of outpatient operations increased over time, from 37.8% in 2005 to 48.2% in 2018. We analyzed the 50 most frequent operations performed outpatient versus inpatient 25-75% of the time (n = 1,743,097). Patients having outpatient operations were younger (51.6 vs 54.6 years), female (70.3% vs 67.3%), had fewer comorbidities, and lower ASA class (I-II, 69.3% vs. 59.9%). On both unadjusted and risk-adjusted analysis, 30-day mortality and overall morbidity were less likely in outpatient versus inpatient operations.

CONCLUSION

In this large multi-specialty analysis, we found that patients undergoing outpatient surgery had lower risk of 30-day morbidity and mortality than those undergoing the same inpatient operation. Patients having outpatient surgery were generally healthier, suggesting careful patient selection occurred even with increasing outpatient operation frequency. Patients and providers can feel reassured that outpatient operations are a safe, reasonable option for selected patients.

[Feasibility and security of laparoscopic (± robotic) total hysterectomy in outpatient surgery: A French multicenter retrospective study]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and safety of total hysterectomy by laparoscopic approach (± robot assisted) in ambulatory.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

French three-center retrospective study including 165 patients who had laparoscopic (± robot assisted) total hysterectomy scheduled as outpatients from January 2016 to December 2020. Clinical and perioperative data were collected. Factors associated with outpatient failure and rehospitalization were evaluated.

RESULTS

The outpatient success rate was 92.7%. Factors associated with outpatient failure were incision time>13:00, large volume of blood loss, intraoperative complications with Oslo score≥2, uterine weight≥250g, indication for benign pathology, and robot-assisted approach. Among patients managed as outpatients, 7.2% were rehospitalized at a mean of 10 days from surgery. The factors associated with rehospitalization were the use of an effective antiaggregant or anticoagulant treatment and the use of intraoperative adhesiolysis. Four patients (2.6%) underwent revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive hysterectomy can be performed as an outpatient procedure even in cases of malignant pathology. Age and body mass index are not associated with an increased risk of failure or re-hospitalization within one month.

[Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy in France: A monocentric randomized trial]

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the feasibility of outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy using the assessment of post-operative quality of life.

METHODS

A prospective randomized single-center trial was performed in France between 2013 and 2016. A total of 42 patients needed laparoscopic hysterectomy was included. Postoperative quality of life was assessed using the standardized Euroquol questionnaire. Patients filled the score before the operation and then on the 3rd and 30th postoperative day. Secondary outcomes were assessment of postoperative pain, overall quality of life, analgesic use, and anxiety. The patients were randomized into two groups, group A with a conventional hospital stay of 2 to 3 days and group B with a short stay and a discharge the day after the intervention.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were randomized to group A as well as group B. We did not find any significant differences between the two groups in our study either on our primary outcome or in the seconds ones. On day 3, the average of Euroquol score was 0.68 for group A against 0.50 for group B (P=0.05). Likewise, the scores for postoperative pain were similar with 70.6 in group A and 61.8 in group B (P=0.21). The trend was the same for quality of life score or anxiety.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows the possibility and the safety of outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Factors Associated with Same Day Discharge after Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with same day discharge (SDD) after laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Total of 800 patients having minimally invasive surgery in the division of gynecologic oncology during a 20-month period.

INTERVENTION

Minimally invasive surgery cases were reviewed for determinants of SDD to identify factors that could improve the SDD rate.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

During the study period, 800 minimally invasive procedures were performed with a 43.0% SDD rate. Patients who had SDD were younger (52.3 years vs 58.0 years; p <.001), had a lower body mass index (31.1 kg/m² vs 33.7 kg/m²; p <.001), were less likely to have a malignancy (28.2% vs 55.5%; p <.001), had a lower estimated blood loss (36 vs 72 mL; p <.001), and were more likely to have received an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol (49.8% vs 39.3%; p <.003). Total surgical time was shorter in women with SDD (156 minutes vs 208 minutes) as was total narcotic use in morphine equivalents (MEq) (milligram intravenous MEq, 23.1 mg MEq vs 28.8 mg MEq). SDD was also associated with earlier start time (p <.001). Laparoscopic cases were most likely to have SDD (51.4%) as compared with robotic assisted surgery (16.1%) or minilaparotomy (10.5%). There was a wide range of SDD among surgeons ranging from 19.8% to 56.2% (p <.001). In a multivariate analysis, the factors predicting SDD in order of predictive factors were surgical time (p <.001), recovery time (p <.001), start time (p <.001), surgeon (p <.001), age (p <.001), estimated blood loss (p <.001), and type of surgery (p = .005).

CONCLUSION

Multiple factors affect SDD. Modifiable factors for SDD include the start time, surgeon preference, and patient expectations for SDD. Given these data, centers should prioritize surgical order by which patients are more likely to go home, and surgeons should analyze their own data with respect to achieving higher SDD rates.

Outpatient Hysterectomy versus Inpatient Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to investigate whether outpatient hysterectomy (OH) has benefits when compared with inpatient hysterectomy (IH) regarding postoperative complications, readmissions, operative outcomes, cost, and patient quality of life.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search for studies comparing OH with IH was conducted through PubMed, SAGE, and Scopus from January 2010 to March 2020, without limitations regarding language and study design.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Studies reporting on the differences between same-day discharge and overnight stay after hysterectomy were included. The study outcomes were overall complication rate, type of complication, readmission after discharge, surgery duration, estimated blood loss, payer savings, hospital savings, and health-related quality of life (HrQoL). Median and range are used to describe non-normal data, while mean ± SD and confidence interval are used to descibe data with normal distribution. A meta-analysis with sensitivity analysis and subgroup analyses was performed.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Eight studies published between 2011 and 2019 with 104,466 patients who underwent hysterectomy were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. All included studies except 1 were found to have a high risk of bias. OH in comparison with IH had a lower overall complication rate (odds ratio [OR] 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.82) and lower rates of wound infection (OR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.84), urinary tract infection (OR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.78), need for transfusion (OR 0.36; 95% CI, 0.22-0.59), sepsis (OR 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.64), uncontrolled pain (OR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.95), and bleeding requiring medical attention (OR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.94). In addition, patients who underwent OH had a lower readmission rate (OR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.87), surgery duration (standardized mean difference -0.35; 95% CI, -0.61 to -0.08), and estimated blood loss (standardized mean difference -0.63; 95% CI, -0.93 to -0.33) than those who underwent IH. A qualitative analysis found that OH had a poorer patient HrQoL and a lower cost for the hospital as well as the payer.

CONCLUSION

OHs present fewer complications and have a lower readmission rate and estimated blood loss as well as a shorter surgery duration than IHs. OHs also have a cost benefit in comparison with IHs. But patients seem to have a worse HrQoL in the first postoperative week after OH. The high risk of bias of the included studies indicates that well-designed clinical trials and standardization of surgical complication reporting are essential to better address this issue.

Trends in Hysterectomy Incidence Rates During 2000-2015 in Denmark: Shifting from Abdominal to Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

Background

Hysterectomy (removal of the uterus) is a common surgical procedure in gynecology. Although minimally invasive surgical procedures have been introduced, hysterectomy is still associated with risk of short- and long-term complications. Given that hysterectomized women are no longer at risk of either hysterectomy or being diagnosed with endometrial or cervical cancer, it is important to describe trends in hysterectomy rates.

Objective

To describe trends in hysterectomy incidence rates overall and stratified by age, indication, and procedure.

Methods

Nationwide population-based cohort study using Danish national registries, 2000–2015, was conducted. We calculated the overall hysterectomy-corrected and age-standardized incidence rates of hysterectomy among women ≥20 years old. Incidence rates were stratified by age group, indication, and surgical procedure. We performed trend analyses using Joinpoint regression, thereby estimating the average annual percentage change (AAPC).

Results

A total of 98,484 women had a hysterectomy during the study period, corresponding to an overall age-standardized, hysterectomy-corrected hysterectomy incidence rate (SIR) of 351.1 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI 348.9;353.3). SIR of hysterectomy declined over time (AAPC −1.4; 95% CI −1.9;-1.0), which was driven by a decline in rates of benign hysterectomy (AAPC −2.1; 95% CI −2.7;-1.6). Irrespective of indication, rates of abdominal hysterectomy declined substantially during the study period and were surpassed by rates of minimally invasive procedures (ie, laparoscopy and robot-assisted laparoscopy) in 2013.

Conclusion

Hysterectomy-corrected incidence rates of benign hysterectomy declined over time. Irrespective of indication, we observed a shift in surgical procedure over time, from abdominal hysterectomy to minimally invasive surgical procedures.

High-risk surgical procedures and semi-emergent surgical procedures for ambulatory surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review evaluates more complex surgical procedures to see whether they might be suitable for ambulatory surgery. Operations that have shown an increasing daycase rate in England include thyroidectomy, joint arthroplasty, spinal surgery and hysterectomy, and these procedures are evaluated. Similarly, there have been recent developments in the management of nonelective ambulatory surgery with more timely throughput and home discharge for suitable patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Caveats on patient selection with the development of focussed educational programmes about the proposed operation have assisted with the development of shorter discharge times. Strict antiemetic guidelines, multimodal analgesic protocols and postoperative multidisciplinary follow-up are core components of the pathway for effective ambulatory management. Communication after discharge should include phone calls from the Ambulatory Unit and easy access to the medical staff who conducted their operation.

SUMMARY

There should be no reason why more complex surgical operations could not be included in a day surgery armamentarium. Similarly, the evidence for more effective use of timely emergency care with shortened length of stay is increasing.

Feasibility and safety of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing from 1.5 kg to 11.000 kg

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility and safety of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for uteri ≥ 1.5 kg.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated all elective TLHs (with or without adnexectomy) performed for fibromatous uteri between August 2009 and August 2019 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sirai Hospital, Carbonia, and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Businco Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Brotzu, Cagliari. Patients with large myomatous uteri (uterine weight ≥ 1.5 kg on pathology reports) were included in the analysis. We examined all procedures and collected data about intra- and post-operative short-term and long-term complications, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, and time to achieve well-being.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients were included. The median weight was 2,000 g (range 1,500-11,000 g), estimated blood loss was 100 mL (range 10-700 mL), operating time was 135 min (range 60-300 min), and hospital stay was 2 days (range 2-5 days). Conversion to laparotomy occurred in 4 patients (5.1%) with uterine weight ranging from 3 to 5.5 kg, due to severe adherence syndrome or inadequate visualization. As for intraoperative complications, 1 patient (who had the largest removed uterus weighing 11,000 g) experienced an intraoperative ureteral injury (grade III). No major postoperative complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the largest case series of TLH for fibromatous uteri > 1.5 kg and includes some of the largest uteri reported to date in the literature (weighing 5,320, 5,720, and 11,000 g, respectively). The study reaffirms the feasibility and safety of a minimally invasive hysterectomy even in the case of abnormally large uteri.

AMeTHYST (AMbulatory HYsterectomy surgery). Feasibility of minimally invasive outpatient hysterectomy, a preliminary study

OBJECTIVES

Hysterectomy, one of the most frequent surgical procedures in women, is commonly performed by a minimally-invasive approach (laparoscopic or vaginal) as recommended by the French guidelines. The French authorities aim to have 66 % of all procedures performed as same-day surgery in 2020. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and identify factors associated with success or failure of same-day surgery for minimally-invasive hysterectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a prospective double-center observational study at the Caen and Amiens University Hospitals between September 2017 and May 2018 including hospitalized patients managed for a laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy. Patients were younger than 70 and have no major medical problems. The patients were placed into a "fit" or "unfit" group according to their Post Anaesthetic Discharge Scoring System (PADSS) score 6 h post-surgery. All the patients were asked to complete an assessment questionnaire during their hospitalization.

RESULTS

Of the 50 included patients, half were placed in the "fit" group. A history of laparotomy was significantly predictive of failure of same-day discharge (p = 0.003) but not uterine size or Body Mass Index (BMI). The main barriers for discharge were pain (p<0.001) and postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV) (p<0.001). Four patients, all in the "unfit" group, had Clavien-Dindo grade 1 postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Same-day minimally invasive hysterectomy is a feasible and safe procedure. Factors associated with same-day hysterectomy failure were laparotomy, pain and postoperative nausea/vomiting.