Objective measures of adenomyosis on MRI and their diagnostic accuracy-a systematic review & meta-analysis

Efficacy of focused ultrasound ablation surgery in patients with adenomyosis and coexisting pelvic adhesions

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS) in treating patients with adenomyosis and coexisting pelvic adhesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 396 patients diagnosed with adenomyosis and who underwent FUAS between January 2014 and December 2022 were enrolled. Pelvic adhesions were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the patients were categorized into either adhesive group or non-adhesive group. The aim was to investigate the comparative efficacy between the two groups.

RESULTS

Among the 396 patients, pelvic adhesions were detected in 123 (31.06%) women. Compared to the non-adhesive group, patients in the adhesive group exhibited a higher preoperative dysmenorrhea score (7 vs. 6, p  < 0.001), a lower short-term clinical success rate (74.80% vs. 84.62%, p = 0.025), and a higher long-term cumulative recurrence rate (log-rank p = 0.009). The adhesive group exhibited a high incidence of anal discomfort during the procedure compared to the non-adhesive group (18.70% vs. 7.69%, p = 0.002). Additionally, patients with severe adhesion demonstrated a lower ratio of non-perfused volume ratio (NPVR) (38.81% vs. 46.58%, p = 0.009). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis revealed that pelvic adhesion independently increased the risk of dysmenorrhea (OR = 4.730, 95%CI: 2.026-11.044, p < 0.001), while severe pelvic adhesion was identified as an independent risk factor for NPVR (OR = 2.226, 95%CI: 1.181-4.196, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

The preoperative assessment of pelvic adhesions plays a crucial role in predicting intraoperative adverse events of FUAS in patients with adenomyosis, as well as determining both short-term and long-term efficacy, thereby providing valuable guidance for the development of comprehensive treatment.

Accuracy of endomyometrial biopsy in diagnosis of adenomyosis: A prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopic endomyometrial biopsy using Spirotome,complemented by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), for diagnosis of adenomyosis in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.

METHODS

A prospective observational study (n = 60) was conducted at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital. Patients underwent TVUS, MRI, and office hysteroscopy-guided biopsy using the Spirotome before hysterectomy. Biopsy results were compared with final pathology.

RESULTS

Biopsy sensitivity (86.36%), specificity (90%), and overall accuracy (87.5%) were recorded. TVUS demonstrated high sensitivity (100%) but low positive predictive value (66.66%). MRI showed sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 75%.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the diagnostic efficacy of hysteroscopic endomyometrial biopsy using a Spirotome, complemented by TVUS and MRI, in adenomyosis diagnosis. A sequential diagnostic approach enhances detection rates, improving patient outcomes. Integrating office hysteroscopy-guided biopsy into diagnostic protocols will provide accurate diagnoses and targeted treatments.

Effect of pelvic adhesions on reproductive outcomes following high-intensity focused ultrasound in patients with adenomyosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of pelvic adhesions on reproductive outcomes following high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in patients with adenomyosis.

METHODS

A total of 396 patients with adenomyosis underwent HIFU, including 148 patients with fertility requirements. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was employed to evaluate pelvic adhesions. Reproductive outcomes were evaluated subsequent to the HIFU procedure for adenomyosis, with an assessment of the effect of pelvic adhesions on reproductive outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients (79.83%), with an average age of 35.34 ± 4.66 years, were followed up for a median period of 92 months (48-122 months). Successful pregnancy was achieved in 35 individuals (29.66%), including 28 cases of natural conception and 7 cases of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. MRI indicated signs of pelvic adhesions in 71 patients (60.17%). Pregnant women had lower numeric rating scale (6 vs. 7, P = 0.008), uterine volume (160.74 vs. 207.57 cm3, P = 0.013), and a lower proportion of pelvic adhesions (40.00% vs. 68.67%, P = 0.004) compared with non-pregnant women. The successful pregnancy rates were 16.28%, 25.00%, and 44.68% in the severe adhesive group, mild adhesive group, and non-adhesive group, respectively. Severe pelvic adhesion was identified as an independent risk factor for achieving pregnancy following HIFU (odds ratio 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.10-0.76, P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe pelvic adhesion is a hindrance to achieving pregnancy following HIFU in patients with adenomyosis. Assessing pelvic adhesions is crucial for the fertility of women as it provides valuable guidance for clinical decision making.

Effect of Ovarian Endometriotic Cyst on the Efficacy of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Adenomyosis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of ovarian endometriotic cysts on the efficacy of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in patients with adenomyosis.

METHODS

Based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, patients were categorized into three groups according to the presence and type of adnexal cyst signal: group A (with endometriotic cyst signal), group B (with simple cyst signal), and group C (without cyst signal). The non-perfused volume ratio (NPVR), postoperative dysmenorrhea scores, and long-term recurrence of HIFU were compared among groups.

RESULTS

A total of 396 patients were enrolled, comprising group A (77 cases), group B (134 cases), and group C (185 cases), and the NPVR were 41.83, 44.99, and 50.79%, respectively (P = .021). The postoperative dysmenorrhea scores were 3 (2, 5), 2 (1, 4), and 2 (1, 4) (P = .012), while the pregnancy rates were 20.00%, 27.27%, and 43.59%, respectively (P = .072). Cumulative recurrence rates for patients with endometriotic cysts at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 years were 45.60, 56.10, 57.90, 61.90, and 67.30%, respectively (log-rank P < .001). Endometriotic cysts were significantly associated with higher dysmenorrhea scores and represented an independent risk factor for postoperative pregnancy (OR = 0.338, 95% CI: 0.129-0.886, P = .027) and long-term recurrence (HR = 1.865, 95% CI: 1.275-2.728, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The signal of endometriotic cyst on MRI exhibits a negative correlation with the efficacy of HIFU in patients with adenomyosis. Preoperative MRI assessment of adnexal cyst signal in patients facilitates the development of a more tailored and comprehensive treatment plan for individuals suffering from adenomyosis.

Risk factors for uterine adenomyosis diagnosed by MRI in women of reproductive age

Background

Adenomyosis is a condition characterized by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma within the myometrium. It can manifest as either focal or diffuse. While histopathological examination of the uterus following hysterectomy remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis, non-invasive imaging techniques, particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are crucial for diagnosis. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and associated pathologies in women with MRI-confirmed adenomyosis.

Methods

In this case-control study, 50 women of reproductive age with MRI-confirmed adenomyosis were recruited as the case group, and fifty other women who underwent pelvic MRI due to various indications that were not diagnosed as adenomyosis were included as the control group. Pelvic MRI with and without intravenous contrast was done for all patients. Factors such as age, smoking, number of pregnancies, history of uterine surgery, endometriosis, ovarian cyst, and coexisting leiomyoma were searched and recorded in both groups, and their relationship with uterine adenomyosis was statistically analyzed. The software used was IBM-SPSS v.26. A Significance level of less than 5% was considered.

Results

No significant difference was found in terms of age (P = 0.891), smoking (P = 0.999), coexisting leiomyoma (P = 0.687), and ovarian cysts (P = 1.00) between case and control groups. The prevalence of endometriosis (P < 0.0001), history of uterine surgery (P = 0.002), and number of pregnancies (P = 0.012) were significantly higher in the case group.

Conclusion

The study findings suggest significant associations between endometriosis, number of pregnancies, and history of uterine surgery with adenomyosis. Therefore, managing these risk factors appropriately can substantially reduce the occurrence of adenomyosis.

Diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding based on the FIGO classification: A systematic review and expert opinions

AIM

To present evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis abnormal uterine bleeding.

METHODS

A literature search for the diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding was systematically conducted in PubMed from its inception to May 2024 to identify meta-analyses, reviews, randomized controlled trials, and clinical trials, followed by an additional systematic search using keywords. Based on this evidence, an expert panel developed background, clinical, and future research questions.

RESULTS

Based on a systematic search and the collected evidence, we developed five background questions, three clinical questions, and one future research question, with recommendations and/or statements. Evidence and recommendations are provided for clinical questions. Additionally, we developed a flowchart for diagnosis showing the steps of the examinations to be performed.

CONCLUSION

The flowchart and nine recommendations/statements specify an efficient diagnostic procedure to differentiate abnormal causative diseases of uterine bleeding optimized for actual Japanese situations.

Evaluation of junctional zone differential and ratio as possible markers of clinical efficacy in uterine artery embolisation of adenomyosis

BACKGROUND

Uterine artery embolisation is a recommended method of adenomyosis treatment with good clinical results. Changes in uterine volume and maximal junctional zone thickness (JZmax) after embolisation are thoroughly analyzed in the literature. In contrast changes in other suggested morphological diagnostic markers of adenomyosis (junctional zone differential / JZdiff-and junctional zone ratio / JZratio) are rarely evaluated. This single-centre retrospective study aimed to analyse the changes in morphological parameters used for the MR imaging diagnosis of adenomyosis (including JZdiff and JZratio) after UAE. Clinical effectiveness and safety were also analysed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent UAE for pure adenomyosis from Jan 2008 to Dec 2021 were evaluated. Adenomyosis was diagnosed based on JZmax, JZdiff, and JZratio measured on MR imaging. To assess clinical efficacy, the numerical-analog-quality-of-life (QoL) score was routinely obtained from patients at our centre. MRI morphological data were analysed. Statistical analysis was conducted using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, uni- and multivariate regression models, Pearson product-moment correlation, and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

RESULTS

From our database of 801 patients who underwent UAE between Jan 2008 to Dec 2021, preprocedural MR images were available in 577 cases and, 15 patients had pure adenomyosis (15/577, 2.6%). Uterine volume, JZmax, and JZdiff decreased significantly after UAE; QoL score increased significantly. A significant correlation was found between QoL change vs. JZmax and JZdiff change. Permanent amenorrhoea and elective hysterectomy 5 years after UAE were both 7.1%.

CONCLUSION

Change of JZdiff after UAE in adenomyosis is a potential marker of clinical success. UAE is a clinically safe and effective treatment for adenomyosis.

Quantitative ultrasound measurement of uterine contractility in adenomyotic vs. normal uteri: a multicenter prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate uterine contractility in patients with adenomyosis compared with healthy controls using a quantitative two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) speckle tracking method.

DESIGN

A multicenter prospective observational study took place in three European centers between 2014 and 2023.

SETTING

One university teaching hospital, 1 teaching hospital and 1 specialised clinic.

PATIENTS

A total of 46 women with a sonographic or magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of adenomyosis were included. 106 healthy controls without uterine pathologies were included.

INTERVENTION

Four-minute TVUS recordings were performed and four uterine contractility features were extracted using a speckle tracking algorithm.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

The extracted features were contraction frequency (contractions/min), amplitude, velocity (mm/s), and coordination. Women with adenomyosis were compared with healthy controls according to the phase of the menstrual cycle.

RESULTS

Throughout the different phases of the menstrual cycle, trends of increased amplitude, decreased frequency and velocity, and reduced contraction coordination were seen in patients with adenomyosis compared with healthy controls. These were statistically significant in the late follicular phase, with a higher amplitude (0.087 ± 0.042 vs. 0.050 ± 0.018), lower frequency and velocity (1.49 ± 0.22 vs. 1.68 ± 0.25 contractions/min, and 0.65 ± 0.18 vs. 0.88 ± 0.29 mm/s, respectively), and reduced contraction coordination (0.34 ± 0.08 vs. 0.26 ± 0.17), in the late luteal phase, with higher amplitude (0.050 ± 0.022 vs. 0.035 ± 0.013), lower velocity (0.51 ± 0.11 vs. 0.65 ± 0.13 mm/s), and reduced contraction coordination (0.027 ± 0.06 vs. 0.18 ± 0.07), and in the midfollicular phase, with decreased frequency (1.48 ± 0.21 vs. 1.69 ± 0.16 contractions/min) in patients with adenomyosis compared with healthy controls. During menses, a higher pain score was significantly associated with lower frequency and velocity and higher contraction amplitude. Results remained significant after correcting for age, parity, and body mass index.

CONCLUSION

Uterine contractility differs in patients with adenomyosis compared with healthy controls throughout the phases of the menstrual cycle. This suggests an etiologic mechanism for the infertility and dysmenorrhea seen in patients with adenomyosis. Moreover, it presents new potential therapeutic targets and diagnostic markers.

[Classification of Uterine Adenomyosis: A Pictorial Essay]

MRI is a crucial tool for diagnosing adenomyosis and identifying its related pathologies. To accurately diagnose adenomyosis, it is necessary to recognize both the typical MRI findings and atypical features of the condition. Recently, a standardized classification system has been developed to facilitate precise presurgical diagnosis of adenomyosis and to determine the appropriate treatment method. Differentiating between various subtypes based on MRI-based classification and identifying different MRI phenotypes can aid in categorizing patients with adenomyosis into specific treatment groups and monitoring their response to therapy.

MRI-Based Radiomics as a Promising Noninvasive Diagnostic Technique for Adenomyosis

Background: MRI diagnostics are important for adenomyosis, especially in cases with inconclusive ultrasound. This study assessed the potential of MRI-based radiomics as a novel tool for differentiating between uteri with and without adenomyosis. Methods: This retrospective proof-of-principle single-center study included nine patients with and six patients without adenomyosis. All patients had preoperative T2w MR images and histological findings served as the reference standard. The uterus of each patient was segmented in 3D using dedicated software, and 884 radiomics features were extracted. After dimension reduction and feature selection, the diagnostic yield of individual and combined features implemented in the machine learning models were assessed by means of receiver operating characteristics analyses. Results: Eleven relevant radiomics features were identified. The diagnostic performance of individual features in differentiating adenomyosis from the control group was high, with areas under the curve (AUCs) ranging from 0.78 to 0.98. The performance of ML models incorporating several features was excellent, with AUC scores of 1 and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.4. Conclusions: The set of radiomics features derived from routine T2w MRI enabled accurate differentiation of uteri with adenomyosis. Radiomics could enhance diagnosis and furthermore serve as an imaging biomarker to aid in personalizing therapies and monitoring treatment responses.

Are Adenomyosis and Endometriosis Phenotypes of the Same Disease Process?

In recent literature reviews, we concluded that the possibility that endometrial molecular aberrations are the sole or a necessary determinant of endometriosis and the Tissue Injury and Repair (TIAR) theory are yet to be convincingly proven. Here, we critically examine the theory that adenomyosis and endometriosis represent different phenotypes of a single disease. A common etiopathology for adenomyosis and endometriosis has been suggested because both conditions entail the presence of endometrial tissue at locations other than the lining of the uterus. There are wide differences in reported disease incidence and prevalence and, consequently, in estimates of the coexistence of both conditions. There are some similarities but also differences in their clinical features and predisposing factors. Each condition has a range of subtypes. These differences alone pose the question of whether subtypes of endometriosis and adenomyosis have different etiopathologies, and, in turn, this raises the question of whether they all share a common etiology. It is debatable whether the recognized differences between the eutopic endometrium in adenomyosis and endometriosis compared to those in unaffected women are the cause or the effect of the disease. The finding of common mutations, particularly of KRAS, lend support to the notion of shared predisposing factors, but this alone is insufficient evidence of causation.

Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Reproductive Age Women: Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management

Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is defined by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics as bleeding from the uterine corpus that is abnormal in regularity, volume, frequency, or duration and occurs in the absence of pregnancy. AUB is a common condition that affects about a third of women in their lifetime. Abnormal bleeding in duration, quantity, or timing consists of 2 categories, predictable cyclical heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) and irregular non-cyclical intermenstrual bleeding (IMB). The most common causes of HMB include fibroids and adenomyosis and IMB is commonly caused by ovulatory dysfunction such as in polycystic ovaries, endometrial polyp, or an IUD. A pelvic ultrasound is the initial and often only imaging modality needed in the imaging evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding and can accurately identify the common causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive age group.

The ADENO study: ADenomyosis and its Effect on Neonatal and Obstetric outcomes: a retrospective population-based study

BACKGROUND

Adenomyosis is a benign gynecologic condition arising from the uterine junctional zone. Recent studies suggest a relationship between adenomyosis and adverse obstetrical outcomes, but evidence remains conflicting. There is no large-scale study investigating obstetrical outcomes in women with adenomyosis using the gold standard of histopathologic diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in women with histopathologic adenomyosis and that of the general (Dutch) population.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective population-based study used 2 Dutch national databases (Perined, the perinatal registry, and the nationwide pathology databank [Pathologisch Anatomisch Landelijk Geautomiseerd Archief], from 1995 to 2018) to compare obstetrical outcomes in women before histopathologic adenomyosis diagnosis to the general Dutch population without registered histopathologic adenomyosis. The adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) were calculated for adverse obstetrical outcomes. The outcomes were adjusted for maternal age, parity, ethnicity, year of registered birth, induction of labor, hypertensive disorders in previous pregnancies, multiple gestation, and low socioeconomic status.

RESULTS

The pregnancy outcomes of 7925 women with histopathologic adenomyosis were compared with that of 4,615,803 women without registered adenomyosis. When adjusted for confounders, women with adenomyosis had adjusted odds ratios of 1.37 (95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.50) for hypertensive disorders, 1.37 (95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.51) for preeclampsia, 1.15 (95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.25) for small-for-gestational-age infants, 1.54 (95% confidence interval, 1.41-1.68) for emergency cesarean delivery, 1.24 (95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.37) for failure to progress, 1.29 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.48) for placental retention, and 1.23 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.38) for postpartum hemorrhage. No increased risk of HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count) syndrome, placental abruption, or operative vaginal delivery or need for oxytocin stimulation was found.

CONCLUSION

Women with a histopathologic diagnosis of adenomyosis showed an increased prevalence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and small-for-gestational-age infants, failure to progress in labor, and placental retention compared with the general population in previous pregnancies. This suggests that uterine (contractile) function in labor and during pregnancy is impaired in women with adenomyosis.

Inter-Rater Agreement for Diagnosing Adenomyosis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transvaginal Ultrasonography

Our aim was to compare the inter-rater agreement about transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with regard to diagnosing adenomyosis and for assessing various predefined imaging features of adenomyosis, in the same set of women. The study cohort included 51 women, prospectively, consecutively recruited based on a clinical suspicion of adenomyosis. MRIs and TVS videoclips and 3D volumes were retrospectively assessed by four experienced radiologists and five experienced sonographers, respectively. Each rater subjectively evaluated the presence or absence of adenomyosis, as well as imaging features suggestive of adenomyosis. Fleiss kappa (κ) was used to reflect inter-rater agreement for categorical data, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to reflect the reliability of quantitative data. Agreement between raters for diagnosing adenomyosis was higher for TVS than for MRI (κ = 0.42 vs. 0.28). MRI had a higher inter-rater agreement in assessing wall asymmetry, irregular junctional zone (JZ), and the presence of myometrial cysts, while TVU had a better agreement for assessing globular shape. MRI showed a moderate to good reliability for measuring the JZ (ICC = 0.57-0.82). For TVS, the JZ was unmeasurable in >50% of cases, and the remaining cases had low reliability (ICC = -0.31-0.08). We found that inter-rater agreement for diagnosing adenomyosis was higher for TVS than for MRI, despite the fact that MRI showed a higher inter-rater agreement in most specific features. Measurements of JZ in the coronal plane with 3D TVS were unreliable and thus unlikely to be useful for diagnosing adenomyosis.

Directive clinique no 437 : Diagnostic et prise en charge de l'adénomyose

OBJECTIF

Décrire les pratiques actuelles fondées sur des données probantes pour le diagnostic et la prise en charge de l'adénomyose.

POPULATION CIBLE

Toutes les patientes en âge de procréer qui ont un utérus.

OPTIONS

Les options diagnostiques sont l'échographie endovaginale et l'imagerie par résonance magnétique. Les options thérapeutiques doivent être adaptées aux symptômes (saignements menstruels abondants, douleur et/ou infertilité) et comprendre des options médicamenteuses (anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens, acide tranexamique, contraceptifs oraux combinés, système intra-utérin à libération de lévonorgestrel, diénogest, autres progestatifs, analogues de la gonadotrophine), des options interventionnelles (embolisation de l'artère utérine) et des options chirurgicales (ablation de l'endomètre, excision de l'adénomyose, hystérectomie). RéSULTATS: Les critères de jugement sont la réduction des saignements menstruels abondants, l'atténuation de la douleur pelvienne (dysménorrhée, dyspareunie, douleur pelvienne chronique) et l'amélioration du devenir reproductif (fertilité, avortement spontané, issues de grossesse défavorables). BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: Par la présentation des méthodes de diagnostic et des options de prise en charge, cette directive sera bénéfique pour les patientes qui expriment des plaintes de nature gynécologique potentiellement causées par l'adénomyose, en particulier celles qui souhaitent préserver leur fertilité. La directive sera également utile aux praticiens qui pourront améliorer leurs connaissances sur les différentes options. DONNéES PROBANTES: Des recherches ont été effectuées dans les bases de données MEDLINE Reviews, MEDLINE ALL, Cochrane, PubMed et Embase. La recherche initiale a été réalisée en 2021 et mise à jour avec les articles pertinents en 2022. Les termes de recherche utilisés sont les suivants : adenomyosis, adenomyoses, endometritis (utilisés ou indexés sous adenomyosis avant 2012), (endometrium AND myometrium) uterine adenomyosis/es, symptom/s/matic adenomyosis ET [diagnosis, symptoms, treatment, guideline, outcome, management, imaging, sonography, pathogenesis, fertility, infertility, therapy, histology, ultrasound, review, meta-analysis, evaluation]. Les articles retenus sont des essais cliniques randomisés, des méta-analyses, des revues systématiques, des études observationnelles et des études de cas. Des articles dans toutes les langues ont été répertoriés et examinés. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (Tableau A1 pour les définitions et Tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Obstétriciens-gynécologues, radiologistes, médecins de famille, urgentologues, sages-femmes, infirmières autorisées, infirmières praticiennes, étudiants en médecine, résidents et moniteurs cliniques (fellows). RéSUMé POUR TWITTER: L'adénomyose est fréquemment observée chez les femmes en âge de procréer. Il existe des options de diagnostic et de prise en charge qui préservent la fertilité. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.

Guideline No. 437: Diagnosis and Management of Adenomyosis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the current evidence-based diagnosis and management of adenomyosis.

TARGET POPULATION

All patients with a uterus of reproductive age.

OPTIONS

Diagnostic options include transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Treatment options should be tailored to symptoms (heavy menstrual bleeding, pain, and/or infertility) and include medical options (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, tranexamic acid, combined oral contraceptives, levonorgestrel intrauterine system, dienogest, other progestins, gonadotropin-releasing analogues), interventional options (uterine artery embolization), and surgical options (endometrial ablation, excision of adenomyosis, hysterectomy).

OUTCOMES

Outcomes of interest include reduction in heavy menstrual bleeding, reduction in pelvic pain (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain), and improvement in reproductive outcomes (fertility, miscarriage, adverse pregnancy outcomes).

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

This guideline will benefit patients with gynaecological complaints that may be caused by adenomyosis, especially those patients who wish to preserve their fertility, by presenting diagnostic methods and management options. It will also benefit practitioners by improving their knowledge of various options.

EVIDENCE

Databases searched were MEDLINE Reviews, MEDLINE ALL, Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE. The initial search was completed in 2021 and updated with relevant articles in 2022. Search terms included adenomyosis, adenomyoses, endometritis (used/indexed as adenomyosis before 2012), (endometrium AND myometrium) uterine adenomyosis/es, symptom/s/matic adenomyosis] AND [diagnosis, symptoms, treatment, guideline, outcome, management, imaging, sonography, pathogenesis, fertility, infertility, therapy, histology, ultrasound, review, meta-analysis, evaluation]. Articles included randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, observational studies, and case reports. Articles in all languages were searched and reviewed.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Table A1 for definitions and Table A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Obstetrician-gynaecologists, radiologists, family physicians, emergency physicians, midwives, registered nurses, nurse practitioners, medical students, residents, and fellows.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Adenomyosis is common in reproductive-aged women. There are diagnostic and management options that preserve fertility available.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis and/or endometriosis

A narrative review of endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis and/or endometriosis revealed that this parameter is difficult to assess in natural conception because both disorders alter natural fertility. Recent data emanating from assisted reproductive technology have allowed the study of endometrial receptivity in women affected by adenomyosis and endometriosis. This has upended our views on the effects of these 2 disorders on embryo implantation. Today, the very existence of altered receptivity in assisted reproductive technology is questioned. In this context, we now know that frozen euploid blastocyst transfers in estradiol and progesterone cycles have unaltered outcomes in both adenomyosis and endometriosis.

MRI of Adenomyosis: Where Are We Today?

Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review is to (i) summarize the current literature regarding the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing adenomyosis, (ii) examine how to integrate MRI phenotypes with clinical symptomatology and histological findings, (iii) review recent advances including proposed MRI classifications, (iv) discuss challenges and pitfalls of diagnosing adenomyosis, and (v) outline the future role of MRI in promoting a better understanding of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment options for patients with uterine adenomyosis. Recent Findings: Recent advances and the widespread use of MRI have provided new insights into adenomyosis and the range of imaging phenotypes encountered in this disorder. Summary: Direct and indirect MRI features allow for accurate non-invasive diagnosis of adenomyosis. Adenomyosis is a complex and poorly understood disorder with variable MRI phenotypes that may be correlated with different pathogeneses, clinical presentations, and patient outcomes. MRI is useful for the assessment of the extent of findings, to evaluate for concomitant gynecological conditions, and potentially can help with the selection and implementation of therapeutic options. Nevertheless, important gaps in knowledge remain. This is in part due to the lack of standardized criteria for reporting resulting in heterogeneous and conflicting data in the literature. Thus, there is an urgent need for a unified MRI reporting system incorporating standardized terminology for diagnosing adenomyosis and defining the various phenotypes.

Adenomyosis and fertility: does adenomyosis impact fertility and does treatment improve outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adenomyosis has recently been associated with infertility. Relief of bleeding and pain has been demonstrated with medical and surgical therapy. Less is known about reproductive outcomes after treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Imaging findings during infertility evaluation can be suggestive of adenomyosis without pathologic evaluation. Among women with infertility undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (ART), adenomyosis is associated with lower live birth rates and clinical pregnancy rates. Treatment with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) modulators prior to frozen embryo transfer may increase the live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate among women with adenomyosis. Pregnancy has been documented following image-guided adenomyosis ablation; however, the reproductive impact is not well established. Pregnancy following excisional procedures appears to be well tolerated, although may carry a higher risk of uterine rupture compared with pregnancy following myomectomy. It is not clear if ablative therapy or resection increases pregnancy rates.

SUMMARY

Adenomyosis is associated with lower embryo implantation rates and ongoing pregnancy rates. Adenomyotic changes in the uterus can be seen by ultrasound and MRI. GnRH modulators may be useful for women with adenomyosis undergoing ART. Additional prospective data is warranted to determine the optimal medical or surgical therapy for women with adenomyosis desiring conception.Video abstract Supplementary digital content, http://links.lww.com/COOG/A78.

MRI and Adenomyosis: What Can Radiologists Evaluate?

Uterine adenomyosis is a common benign condition defined by the presence of heterotopic endometrial glands and stroma within the myometrium. Adenomyosis is often related to infertility and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. Modern imaging techniques allow the non-invasive diagnosis of adenomyosis and, in this framework, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has assumed a central role due to its high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of adenomyosis. Currently, there is still a lack of international consensus on adenomyosis diagnostic criteria and classification, despite the fact that an agreed reporting system would promote treatment outcomes and research. This review aims to emphasize the important contribution of MRI to the diagnosis of adenomyosis and to highlight how, thanks to the great tissue differentiation provided by MRI, it is possible to identify the main direct (cystic component) and indirect (junctional zone features) signs of adenomyosis and to distinguish its various subtypes according to different MRI-based classifications. We also explored the main MRI criteria to identify the most common pitfalls and differential diagnoses of adenomyosis, whose features should be considered to avoid misdiagnosis.

Diagnostic accuracy of clinically reported adenomyosis on pelvic ultrasound and MRI compared to surgical pathology

BACKGROUND

Adenomyosis is a common gynecologic pathology that relies on diagnostic imaging to guide treatment. Accuracy of both pelvic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) when specifically evaluating for the presence of adenomyosis is high. However, the accuracy of reported rates in clinical practice is less well understood.

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the accuracy in reporting of adenomyosis on pelvic ultrasound and MRI compared to histopathology in common clinical practice.

BASIC PROCEDURES

An institutional database was searched for women with a pelvic ultrasound and a pelvic MRI with a subsequent hysterectomy. Findings were extracted from radiology and pathology reports, and the documented presence or absence of adenomyosis was recorded for each modality. Blinded radiologists viewed each imaging pair to directly evaluate for adenomyosis.

MAIN FINDINGS

Compared to prior published data, imaging had lower accuracy in clinical practice when adenomyosis was not specifically evaluated for. For the finding of adenomyosis, pelvic ultrasound had a sensitivity of 10.9%, a specificity of 98.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 77.8%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 66.7%, an accuracy of 67.2%, and a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 7. Pelvic MRI had a sensitivity of 29.7%, specificity of 85.3%, PPV of 52.8%, NPV of 68.8%, an accuracy of 65.6%, and DOR of 2.5. Overall accuracy of MRI improved when adenomyosis was directly evaluated for (82.4% vs 65.6%).

PRINCIPLE CONCLUSIONS

Without direct communication to evaluate for adenomyosis, pelvic ultrasound and MRI may underestimate or misreport adenomyosis. Providers should be aware of these discrepancies when relying on radiology reports to guide treatment and potential interventions when diagnosing and managing adenomyosis.