Early delivery or expectant management for late preterm preeclampsia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of C-Type Natriuretic Peptide for Preeclampsia

BACKGROUND

Preeclampsia is a serious condition of pregnancy, complicated by aberrant maternal vascular dysfunction. CNP (C-type natriuretic peptide) contributes to vascular homeostasis, acting through NPR-B (natriuretic peptide receptor-B) and NPR-C (natriuretic peptide receptor-C). CNP mitigates vascular dysfunction of arteries in nonpregnant cohorts; this study investigates whether CNP can dilate maternal arteries in ex vivo preeclampsia models.

METHODS

Human omental arteries were dissected from fat biopsies collected during cesarean section. CNP, NPR-B, and NPR-C mRNA expression was assessed in arteries collected from pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia (n=6) and normotensive controls (n=11). Using wire myography, we investigated the effects of CNP on dilation of arteries from normotensive pregnancies. Arteries were preconstricted with either serum from patients with preeclampsia (n=6) or recombinant ET-1 (endothelin-1; vasoconstrictor elevated in preeclampsia; n=6) to model vasoconstriction associated with preeclampsia. Preconstricted arteries were treated with recombinant CNP (0.001-100 µmol/L) or vehicle and vascular relaxation assessed. In further studies, arteries were preincubated with NPR-B (5 µmol/L) and NPR-C (10 µmol/L) antagonists before serum-induced constriction (n=4-5) to explore mechanistic signaling.

RESULTS

CNP, NPR-B, and NPR-C mRNAs were not differentially expressed in omental arteries from preeclamptic pregnancies. CNP potently stimulated maternal artery vasorelaxation in our model of preeclampsia (using preeclamptic serum). Its vasodilatory actions were driven through the activation of NPR-B predominantly; antagonism of this receptor alone dampened CNP vasorelaxation. Interestingly, CNP did not reduce ET-1-driven omental artery constriction.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, these data suggest that enhancing CNP signaling through NPR-B offers a potential therapeutic strategy to reduce systemic vascular constriction in preeclampsia.

Practical guide for the management of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and eclampsia, are a worldwide health problem. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy affect more than 10% of pregnancies and are associated with increased mortality and morbidity for both mother and fetus. Although patients' outcomes and family's experience will always be the primary concern regarding hypertensive complications during pregnancy, the economic aspect of this disease is also worth noting. Compared with normotensive pregnancies, those related with hypertension resulted in an excess increase in hospitalization and healthcare cost. Hence, the focus of this review is to analyze hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and to present practical tips with clear instructions for the clinical management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. This overview offers a detailed approach from the diagnosis to treatment and follow-up of a pregnant women with hypertension, evidence based, to support these instructions.

Planned delivery or expectant management in preeclampsia: an individual participant data meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Pregnancy hypertension is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. Between 34⁺⁰ and 36⁺⁶ weeks gestation, it is uncertain whether planned delivery could reduce maternal complications without serious neonatal consequences. In this individual participant data meta-analysis, we aimed to compare planned delivery to expectant management, focusing specifically on women with preeclampsia.

DATA SOURCES

We performed an electronic database search using a prespecified search strategy, including trials published between January 1, 2000 and December 18, 2021. We sought individual participant-level data from all eligible trials.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included women with singleton or multifetal pregnancies with preeclampsia from 34 weeks gestation onward.

METHODS

The primary maternal outcome was a composite of maternal mortality or morbidity. The primary perinatal outcome was a composite of perinatal mortality or morbidity. We analyzed all the available data for each prespecified outcome on an intention-to-treat basis. For primary individual patient data analyses, we used a 1-stage fixed effects model.

RESULTS

We included 1790 participants from 6 trials in our analysis. Planned delivery from 34 weeks gestation onward significantly reduced the risk of maternal morbidity (2.6% vs 4.4%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.98) compared with expectant management. The primary composite perinatal outcome was increased by planned delivery (20.9% vs 17.1%; adjusted risk ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.47), driven by short-term neonatal respiratory morbidity. However, infants in the expectant management group were more likely to be born small for gestational age (7.8% vs 10.6%; risk ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.99).

CONCLUSION

Planned early delivery in women with late preterm preeclampsia provides clear maternal benefits and may reduce the risk of the infant being born small for gestational age, with a possible increase in short-term neonatal respiratory morbidity. The potential benefits and risks of prolonging a pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia should be discussed with women as part of a shared decision-making process.

Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, November 2021

An extensive review of new resources to support the provision of evidence-based care for women and infants. The current column includes a discussion of autonomy and respect in maternity care and commentaries on reviews focused on whether to induce women who present with mild preeclampsia in the late preterm period and the extent to which urinary incontinence symptoms prevent women from participating in exercise. It also includes a brief update about the USPSTF guidelines on screening for gestational diabetes.