Temporal trends in obstetric anal sphincter injury from the first vaginal delivery in Austria, Canada, Norway, and Sweden

Global Prevalence of Fecal Incontinence in Community-Dwelling Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Fecal incontinence (FI) can considerably impair quality of life. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to determine the global prevalence and geographic distribution of FI and to characterize its relationship with sex and age.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to identify population-based surveys of the prevalence of FI.

RESULTS

Of the 5175 articles identified, the final analysis included 80 studies; the median response rate was 66% (interquartile range [IQR], 54%-74%). Among 548,316 individuals, the pooled global prevalence of FI was 8.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.8%-9.2%); by Rome criteria, it was 5.4% (95% CI, 3.1%-7.7%). FI prevalence was greater for persons aged 60 years and older (9.3%; 95% CI, 6.6%-12.0%) compared with younger persons (4.9%; 95% CI, 2.9%-6.9%) (odds ratio [OR], 1.75; 95% CI, 1.39-2.20), and it was more prevalent among women (9.1%; 95% CI, 7.6%-10.6%) than men (7.4%; 95% CI, 6.0%-8.8%]) (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.28). The prevalence was highest in Australia and Oceania, followed by North America, Asia, and Europe, but prevalence could not be estimated in Africa and the Middle East. The risk of bias was low, moderate, and high for 19 (24%), 46 (57%), and 15 (19%) studies, respectively. Exclusion of studies with high risk of bias did not affect the prevalence of FI or heterogeneity. In the meta-regression, the high study heterogeneity (I2 = 99.61%) was partly explained by age.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 1 in 12 adults worldwide have FI. The prevalence is greater among women and older people.

Differences in rates of severe perineal trauma between midwife-led and obstetrician-led care in the Netherlands: A nationwide cohort study

Objective

To investigate trends and rates of severe perineal trauma (SPT), also known as obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), between midwife-led and obstetrician-led care in the Netherlands, and factors associated with SPT.

Methods

This nationwide cohort study included registry data from 2000 to 2019 (n = 2,169,950) of spontaneous vaginal births of term, live, cephalic, single infants, without a (previous) caesarean section or assisted vaginal birth.First, trends of SPT and episiotomy were shown. Second, differences in SPT rates between midwife- and obstetrician-led care were assessed. Third, associations of care factors with SPT were examined. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine which factors were important in the associations. All outcomes were stratified for parity.

Results

Over time, the SPT incidence increased mainly in midwife-led care and episiotomy rates decreased. Compared to midwife-led care, SPT rates were lower in obstetrician-led care among primiparous women (aOR 0.78; 99 % CI 0.74-0.81) and comparable among multiparous women (aOR 1.04; 99 % CI 0.99-1.10). Among women without epidural analgesia, these differences were smaller for primiparous women (aOR 0.88; 99 % CI 0.84-0.92), but the SPT rate was higher in obstetrician-led care among multiparous women (aOR 1.09; 99 % CI 1.03-1.15). Among women without shoulder dystocia, induction, augmentation, and pain medication, SPT rates were comparable among primiparous women, but higher among multiparous women in obstetrician-led care. In midwife-led care, SPT occurred more often among hospital versus home births. In obstetrician-led care, lower SPT incidences were found among births with epidural analgesia and for multiparous women with induction or augmentation.

Conclusions

Iinduction, augmentation, and epidural analgesia in obstetrician-led care may be an explanatory factor for the higher incidence of SPT among primiparous women in midwife-led care. More research is needed to explain differences in SPT rates and to understand how SPT can be prevented, while maintaining a high intact perineum rate.

Women's experiences of anal incontinence following vaginal birth: A qualitative study of missed opportunities in routine care contacts

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore experiences of women with anal incontinence following a childbirth injury, and to identify areas of missed opportunities within care they received.

DESIGN

This is a qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews.

SETTING

Participants were recruited via five hospitals in the UK, and via social media adverts and communication from charity organisations.

PARTICIPANTS

Women who have experienced anal incontinence following a childbirth injury, either within 7 years of sustaining the injury, or if they identified new, or worsening symptoms of AI at the time of menopause.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Main outcomes are experiences of women with anal incontinence following childbirth injury, and missed opportunities within the care they received.

RESULTS

The following main themes were identified: opportunities for diagnosis missed, missed opportunities for information sharing and continuity and timeliness of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Anal Incontinence following a childbirth injury has a profound impact on women. Lack of information and awareness both amongst women and healthcare professionals contributes to delays in accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

More than time: travel time to the delivery ward and maternal outcomes - onset of labour, postpartum haemorrhage and obstetric anal sphincter injury

BACKGROUND

Closing delivery units increases travel time for some women. Whether increased travel time is associated with maternal outcomes is important for understanding the consequences of such closures. Previous studies are limited in measuring travel time and restricted to the outcome of caesarean section.

METHODS

Our population-based cohort includes data from the Swedish Pregnancy Register for women giving birth between 2014 and 2017 (N = 364,630). We estimated travel time from home to the delivery ward using coordinate pairs of actual addresses. The association between travel time and onset of labour was modelled using multinomial logistic regression, and logistic regression was used for the outcomes postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS).

FINDINGS

Over three-quarters of women had ≤30 min travel time (median 13.9 min). Women who travelled ≥60 min arrived to care sooner and laboured there longer. Women with further to travel had increased adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of having an elective caesarean section (31-59 min aOR 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.16; ≥60 min aOR 1.25; 95% CI 1.16-1.36) than spontaneous onset of labour. Women (at full term with spontaneous onset) living ≥60 min away had reduced odds of having a PPH (aOR 0.84; 95% CI 0.76-0.94) or OASIS (aOR 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.94).

INTERPRETATION

Longer travel time increased the odds of elective caesarean section. Women with furthest to travel arrived sooner and spent more time in care; although they had a lower risk of PPH or OASIS, they also tended to be younger, have a higher body mass index and were Nordic born.

Obstetric rectal buttonhole tear and a successful three-layer repair: A case report

An obstetric rectal buttonhole tear (ORBT) is a rare obstetric complication with only 21 cases reported in the literature. The choice of two- or three-layer repair of ORBT is controversial. In this case, the author describes (with high-quality images) an ORBT repaired in three layers in order to provide clinical lessons to healthcare professionals involved in obstetrical care. The patient was a 26-year-old pregnant woman with a previous vertex delivery and 4 previous first-trimester miscarriages. In the index pregnancy, she had a spontaneous vertex vaginal birth of a 3095 g male baby at 39 weeks of gestation. During childbirth, she sustained an ORBT and a third-degree perineal tear involving <50% of the external anal sphincter. The ORBT was repaired in three layers using continuous 2-0 Vicryl to the rectal mucosa, and interrupted polydioxanone (PDS) 3-0 to the adjoining vagino-rectal fascia. Subsequently, the external anal sphincter was repaired end-to-end with interrupted PDS 3-0. Thereafter, the vagina was repaired with continuous Vicryl 2-0. The wound healed with no complications over the 12 weeks of postnatal clinic visits. A three-layer repair is arguably preferable given that closure of the fascia between the rectal and vaginal mucosae (vagino-rectal fascia) may improve the tensile strength at the injury site. However, a two-layer repair may be undertaken in rare cases where the vagino-rectal fascia is not identifiable.

Effectiveness of episiotomy to prevent OASIS in nulliparous women at term

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between episiotomy and severe obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) in nulliparous women at term according to the use of an instrument for delivery with control confounding by indication.

METHODS

This was an observational retrospective cohort study including 12 346 women from 2004 to 2020. All nulliparous women with a cephalic singleton pregnancy were included. The primary outcome was the occurrence of OASIS. Association between episiotomy and OASIS was assessed by multivariate logistic regression with adjustment for confounding factors and stratification on the use of an instrument at delivery. Propensity score matching was used to account for indication bias.

RESULTS

Among 12 346 women included, 7803 (63.2%) had an episiotomy and 4543 (36.8%) did not have an episiotomy; the rate of OASIS was similar in both groups (0.7%). After stratification on use of instrument, an association between episiotomy and OASIS was shown in the case of instrumental delivery (odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.80) but not if the delivery was spontaneous (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.29-1.98). The result was similar after matching on propensity score (in the case of operative vaginal delivery: OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.10-0.75).

CONCLUSION

Episiotomy seems to be a protective factor for OASIS in nulliparous woman at term only in the case of operative vaginal delivery.

Increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in women undergoing vaginal delivery after caesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is increased focus on obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and there are several well-established risk factors such as birthweight, instrumental delivery and median episiotomy. Some studies have found increased risk of OASI in women delivering vaginally after a previous caesarean section (VBAC).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether there is increased prevalence of OASI in VBAC compared with primiparous women.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Literature search using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All studies with data on both primiparous women and women undergoing VBAC were included. All included studies were evaluated using the "SIGN - methodology checklist" to verify if the quality was acceptable.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

This systematic review included 23 articles conducted in 11 countries over 19 years. Included studies were analysed using RevMan version 5.4.

MAIN RESULTS

We found increased prevalence of OASI in the VBAC group; 8.18% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.07-8.29) compared with 6.59% (95% CI 6.56-6.62) in primiparous women. Correspondingly, the meta-analysis revealed increased prevalence for OASI in the VBAC group (odds ratio 1.27, 95% CI 1.10-1.47). We found a high level of heterogeneity (I²  = 98%).

CONCLUSION

Women undergoing VBAC had a higher prevalence of OASI compared with primiparous women.

Mediolateral/lateral episiotomy with operative vaginal delivery and the risk reduction of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction and hypothesis

OASI complicates approximately 6% of vaginal deliveries. This risk is increased with operative vaginal deliveries (OVDs), particularly forceps. However, there is conflicting evidence supporting the use of mediolateral/lateral episiotomy (MLE/LE) with OVD. The aim of this study was to assess whether MLE/LE affects the incidence of OASI in OVD.

Methods

Electronic searches were performed in OVID Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Randomised and non-randomised observational studies investigating the risk of OASI in OVD with/without MLE/LE were eligible for inclusion. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated using Revman 5.3. Risk of bias of was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 and ROBINS-I tool. The quality of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

Results

A total of 703,977 patients from 31 studies were pooled for meta-analysis. MLE/LE significantly reduced the rate of OASI in OVD (OR 0.60 [95% CI 0.42–0.84]). On sub-group analysis, MLE/LE significantly reduced the rate in nulliparous ventouse (OR 0.51 [95% CI 0.42–0.84]) and forceps deliveries (OR 0.32 [95% CI 0.29–0.61]). In multiparous women, although the incidence of OASI was lower when a ventouse or forceps delivery was performed with an MLE/LE, this was not statistically significant. Heterogeneity remained significant across all studies (I² > 50). The quality of all evidence was downgraded to “very low” because of the critical risk of bias across many studies.

Conclusions

MLE/LE may reduce the incidence of OASI in OVDs, particularly in nulliparous ventouse or forceps deliveries. This information will be useful in aiding clinical decision-making and counselling in the antenatal period and during labour.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00192-022-05145-1.